diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2023-02-22 09:52:32 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2023-02-25 11:55:05 +0100 |
commit | 12e3119a87627741bd3871c895ce198f21529eb3 (patch) | |
tree | 7458f7c766bfeb3535552b4aec9b49e513631172 | |
parent | c44e96d6c31a0937c6b82c3dc3e6500545fb1024 (diff) |
bpf: add missing header file include
commit f3dd0c53370e70c0f9b7e931bbec12916f3bb8cc upstream.
Commit 74e19ef0ff80 ("uaccess: Add speculation barrier to
copy_from_user()") built fine on x86-64 and arm64, and that's the extent
of my local build testing.
It turns out those got the <linux/nospec.h> include incidentally through
other header files (<linux/kvm_host.h> in particular), but that was not
true of other architectures, resulting in build errors
kernel/bpf/core.c: In function ‘___bpf_prog_run’:
kernel/bpf/core.c:1913:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘barrier_nospec’
so just make sure to explicitly include the proper <linux/nospec.h>
header file to make everybody see it.
Fixes: 74e19ef0ff80 ("uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user()")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index c18aed60ce40..73d4b1e32fbd 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include <linux/perf_event.h> #include <linux/extable.h> #include <linux/log2.h> +#include <linux/nospec.h> #include <asm/barrier.h> #include <asm/unaligned.h> |