diff options
| author | Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> | 2013-09-23 00:52:09 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> | 2013-09-23 00:52:09 -0400 |
| commit | c61b4d41c9647a54a329aa021341c0eb032b793e (patch) | |
| tree | c4a665c232a7d37786a6f3b5e3f56d0ae11480e8 /sysdeps/s390/s390-32 | |
| parent | 58a96064d193317236b740998e134b652d3d62ad (diff) | |
BZ #15754: CVE-2013-4788
The pointer guard used for pointer mangling was not initialized for
static applications resulting in the security feature being disabled.
The pointer guard is now correctly initialized to a random value for
static applications. Existing static applications need to be
recompiled to take advantage of the fix.
The test tst-ptrguard1-static and tst-ptrguard1 add regression
coverage to ensure the pointer guards are sufficiently random
and initialized to a default value.
Diffstat (limited to 'sysdeps/s390/s390-32')
| -rw-r--r-- | sysdeps/s390/s390-32/stackguard-macros.h | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sysdeps/s390/s390-32/stackguard-macros.h b/sysdeps/s390/s390-32/stackguard-macros.h index b74c5799b3..449e8d488f 100644 --- a/sysdeps/s390/s390-32/stackguard-macros.h +++ b/sysdeps/s390/s390-32/stackguard-macros.h @@ -2,3 +2,14 @@ #define STACK_CHK_GUARD \ ({ uintptr_t x; asm ("ear %0,%%a0; l %0,0x14(%0)" : "=a" (x)); x; }) + +/* On s390/s390x there is no unique pointer guard, instead we use the + same value as the stack guard. */ +#define POINTER_CHK_GUARD \ + ({ \ + uintptr_t x; \ + asm ("ear %0,%%a0; l %0,%1(%0)" \ + : "=a" (x) \ + : "i" (offsetof (tcbhead_t, stack_guard))); \ + x; \ + }) |