| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Replace <+... ...+> by ... when any. <+... ...+> is slow, and in some
obscure cases involving backward jumps it doesn't force the unlock to
actually come after the end of the if.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
spatch has changed its option scheme.
E.g., --no_show_diff is now --no-show-diff
This patch updates:
- scripts/coccicheck
- Semantic patches under scripts/coccinelle/
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
|
|
This patch ensures that all semantic patches in the scripts/coccinelle
directory provide the report option. Report messages that include line
numbers now have the line number preceded by "line" for easier subsequent
processing.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
|
|
Find missing unlocks. This semantic match considers the specific case
where the unlock is missing from an if branch, and there is a lock
before the if and an unlock after the if. False positives are due to
cases where the if branch represents a case where the function is
supposed to exit with the lock held, or where there is some preceding
function call that releases the lock.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Palix <npalix@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
|
