summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/fair.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-09-03sched: Rework pick_next_task()Peter Zijlstra
The current rule is that: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) And many classes implement it directly as such. Change things around to make pick_next_task() optional while also changing the definition to: pick_next_task(prev) := pick_task() + put_prev_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) The reason is that sched_ext would like to have a 'final' call that knows the next task. By placing put_prev_task() right next to set_next_task() (as it already is for sched_core) this becomes trivial. As a bonus, this is a nice cleanup on its own. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.051225657@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Clean up DL server vs core schedPeter Zijlstra
Abide by the simple rule: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) This allows us to trivially get rid of server_pick_next() and things collapse nicely. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224015.837303391@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Fixup set_next_task() implementationsPeter Zijlstra
The rule is that: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) Turns out, there's still a few things in pick_next_task() that are missing from that combination. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224015.724111109@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched/fair: Properly deactivate sched_delayed task upon class changeValentin Schneider
__sched_setscheduler() goes through an enqueue/dequeue cycle like so: flags := DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK; prev_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags); new_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, flags); when prev_class := fair_sched_class, this is followed by: dequeue_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK | DEQUEUE_SLEEP); the idea being that since the task has switched classes, we need to drop the sched_delayed logic and have that task be deactivated per its previous dequeue_task(..., DEQUEUE_SLEEP). Unfortunately, this leaves the task on_rq. This is missing the tail end of dequeue_entities() that issues __block_task(), which __sched_setscheduler() won't have done due to not using DEQUEUE_DELAYED - not that it should, as it is pretty much a fair_sched_class specific thing. Make switched_from_fair() properly deactivate sched_delayed tasks upon class changes via __block_task(), as if a dequeue_task(..., DEQUEUE_DELAYED) had been issued. Fixes: 2e0199df252a ("sched/fair: Prepare exit/cleanup paths for delayed_dequeue") Reported-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240829135353.1524260-1-vschneid@redhat.com
2024-09-01mm: create promo_wmark_pages and clean up open-coded sitesKaiyang Zhao
Patch series "mm: print the promo watermark in zoneinfo", v2. This patch (of 2): Define promo_wmark_pages and convert current call sites of wmark_pages with fixed WMARK_PROMO to using it instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240801232548.36604-1-kaiyang2@cs.cmu.edu Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240801232548.36604-2-kaiyang2@cs.cmu.edu Signed-off-by: Kaiyang Zhao <kaiyang2@cs.cmu.edu> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-09-01memory tiering: introduce folio_use_access_time() checkZi Yan
If memory tiering mode is on and a folio is not in the top tier memory, folio's cpupid field is repurposed to store page access time. Instead of an open coded check, use a function to encapsulate the check. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240724130115.793641-3-ziy@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-08-20Merge branch 'tip/sched/core' into for-6.12Tejun Heo
To receive 863ccdbb918a ("sched: Allow sched_class::dequeue_task() to fail") which makes sched_class.dequeue_task() return bool instead of void. This leads to compile breakage and will be fixed by a follow-up patch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-08-20softirq: Remove unused 'action' parameter from action callbackCaleb Sander Mateos
When soft interrupt actions are called, they are passed a pointer to the struct softirq action which contains the action's function pointer. This pointer isn't useful, as the action callback already knows what function it is. And since each callback handles a specific soft interrupt, the callback also knows which soft interrupt number is running. No soft interrupt action callback actually uses this parameter, so remove it from the function pointer signature. This clarifies that soft interrupt actions are global routines and makes it slightly cheaper to call them. Signed-off-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240815171549.3260003-1-csander@purestorage.com
2024-08-17sched/eevdf: Propagate min_slice up the cgroup hierarchyPeter Zijlstra
In the absence of an explicit cgroup slice configureation, make mixed slice length work with cgroups by propagating the min_slice up the hierarchy. This ensures the cgroup entity gets timely service to service its entities that have this timing constraint set on them. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.948188417@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/eevdf: Use sched_attr::sched_runtime to set request/slice suggestionPeter Zijlstra
Allow applications to directly set a suggested request/slice length using sched_attr::sched_runtime. The implementation clamps the value to: 0.1[ms] <= slice <= 100[ms] which is 1/10 the size of HZ=1000 and 10 times the size of HZ=100. Applications should strive to use their periodic runtime at a high confidence interval (95%+) as the target slice. Using a smaller slice will introduce undue preemptions, while using a larger value will increase latency. For all the following examples assume a scheduling quantum of 8, and for consistency all examples have W=4: {A,B,C,D}(w=1,r=8): ABCD... +---+---+---+--- t=0, V=1.5 t=1, V=3.5 A |------< A |------< B |------< B |------< C |------< C |------< D |------< D |------< ---+*------+-------+--- ---+--*----+-------+--- t=2, V=5.5 t=3, V=7.5 A |------< A |------< B |------< B |------< C |------< C |------< D |------< D |------< ---+----*--+-------+--- ---+------*+-------+--- Note: 4 identical tasks in FIFO order ~~~ {A,B}(w=1,r=16) C(w=2,r=16) AACCBBCC... +---+---+---+--- t=0, V=1.25 t=2, V=5.25 A |--------------< A |--------------< B |--------------< B |--------------< C |------< C |------< ---+*------+-------+--- ---+----*--+-------+--- t=4, V=8.25 t=6, V=12.25 A |--------------< A |--------------< B |--------------< B |--------------< C |------< C |------< ---+-------*-------+--- ---+-------+---*---+--- Note: 1 heavy task -- because q=8, double r such that the deadline of the w=2 task doesn't go below q. Note: observe the full schedule becomes: W*max(r_i/w_i) = 4*2q = 8q in length. Note: the period of the heavy task is half the full period at: W*(r_i/w_i) = 4*(2q/2) = 4q ~~~ {A,C,D}(w=1,r=16) B(w=1,r=8): BAACCBDD... +---+---+---+--- t=0, V=1.5 t=1, V=3.5 A |--------------< A |---------------< B |------< B |------< C |--------------< C |--------------< D |--------------< D |--------------< ---+*------+-------+--- ---+--*----+-------+--- t=3, V=7.5 t=5, V=11.5 A |---------------< A |---------------< B |------< B |------< C |--------------< C |--------------< D |--------------< D |--------------< ---+------*+-------+--- ---+-------+--*----+--- t=6, V=13.5 A |---------------< B |------< C |--------------< D |--------------< ---+-------+----*--+--- Note: 1 short task -- again double r so that the deadline of the short task won't be below q. Made B short because its not the leftmost task, but is eligible with the 0,1,2,3 spread. Note: like with the heavy task, the period of the short task observes: W*(r_i/w_i) = 4*(1q/1) = 4q ~~~ A(w=1,r=16) B(w=1,r=8) C(w=2,r=16) BCCAABCC... +---+---+---+--- t=0, V=1.25 t=1, V=3.25 A |--------------< A |--------------< B |------< B |------< C |------< C |------< ---+*------+-------+--- ---+--*----+-------+--- t=3, V=7.25 t=5, V=11.25 A |--------------< A |--------------< B |------< B |------< C |------< C |------< ---+------*+-------+--- ---+-------+--*----+--- t=6, V=13.25 A |--------------< B |------< C |------< ---+-------+----*--+--- Note: 1 heavy and 1 short task -- combine them all. Note: both the short and heavy task end up with a period of 4q ~~~ A(w=1,r=16) B(w=2,r=16) C(w=1,r=8) BBCAABBC... +---+---+---+--- t=0, V=1 t=2, V=5 A |--------------< A |--------------< B |------< B |------< C |------< C |------< ---+*------+-------+--- ---+----*--+-------+--- t=3, V=7 t=5, V=11 A |--------------< A |--------------< B |------< B |------< C |------< C |------< ---+------*+-------+--- ---+-------+--*----+--- t=7, V=15 A |--------------< B |------< C |------< ---+-------+------*+--- Note: as before but permuted ~~~ From all this it can be deduced that, for the steady state: - the total period (P) of a schedule is: W*max(r_i/w_i) - the average period of a task is: W*(r_i/w_i) - each task obtains the fair share: w_i/W of each full period P Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.842834421@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/eevdf: Allow shorter slices to wakeup-preemptPeter Zijlstra
Part of the reason to have shorter slices is to improve responsiveness. Allow shorter slices to preempt longer slices on wakeup. Task | Runtime ms | Switches | Avg delay ms | Max delay ms | Sum delay ms | 100ms massive_intr 500us cyclictest NO_PREEMPT_SHORT 1 massive_intr:(5) | 846018.956 ms | 779188 | avg: 0.273 ms | max: 58.337 ms | sum:212545.245 ms | 2 massive_intr:(5) | 853450.693 ms | 792269 | avg: 0.275 ms | max: 71.193 ms | sum:218263.588 ms | 3 massive_intr:(5) | 843888.920 ms | 771456 | avg: 0.277 ms | max: 92.405 ms | sum:213353.221 ms | 1 chromium-browse:(8) | 53015.889 ms | 131766 | avg: 0.463 ms | max: 36.341 ms | sum:60959.230 ms | 2 chromium-browse:(8) | 53864.088 ms | 136962 | avg: 0.480 ms | max: 27.091 ms | sum:65687.681 ms | 3 chromium-browse:(9) | 53637.904 ms | 132637 | avg: 0.481 ms | max: 24.756 ms | sum:63781.673 ms | 1 cyclictest:(5) | 12615.604 ms | 639689 | avg: 0.471 ms | max: 32.272 ms | sum:301351.094 ms | 2 cyclictest:(5) | 12511.583 ms | 642578 | avg: 0.448 ms | max: 44.243 ms | sum:287632.830 ms | 3 cyclictest:(5) | 12545.867 ms | 635953 | avg: 0.475 ms | max: 25.530 ms | sum:302374.658 ms | 100ms massive_intr 500us cyclictest PREEMPT_SHORT 1 massive_intr:(5) | 839843.919 ms | 837384 | avg: 0.264 ms | max: 74.366 ms | sum:221476.885 ms | 2 massive_intr:(5) | 852449.913 ms | 845086 | avg: 0.252 ms | max: 68.162 ms | sum:212595.968 ms | 3 massive_intr:(5) | 839180.725 ms | 836883 | avg: 0.266 ms | max: 69.742 ms | sum:222812.038 ms | 1 chromium-browse:(11) | 54591.481 ms | 138388 | avg: 0.458 ms | max: 35.427 ms | sum:63401.508 ms | 2 chromium-browse:(8) | 52034.541 ms | 132276 | avg: 0.436 ms | max: 31.826 ms | sum:57732.958 ms | 3 chromium-browse:(8) | 55231.771 ms | 141892 | avg: 0.469 ms | max: 27.607 ms | sum:66538.697 ms | 1 cyclictest:(5) | 13156.391 ms | 667412 | avg: 0.373 ms | max: 38.247 ms | sum:249174.502 ms | 2 cyclictest:(5) | 12688.939 ms | 665144 | avg: 0.374 ms | max: 33.548 ms | sum:248509.392 ms | 3 cyclictest:(5) | 13475.623 ms | 669110 | avg: 0.370 ms | max: 37.819 ms | sum:247673.390 ms | As per the numbers the, this makes cyclictest (short slice) it's max-delay more consistent and consistency drops the sum-delay. The trade-off is that the massive_intr (long slice) gets more context switches and a slight increase in sum-delay. Chunxin contributed did_preempt_short() where a task that lost slice protection from PREEMPT_SHORT gets rescheduled once it becomes in-eligible. [mike: numbers] Co-Developed-by: Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@lixiang.com> Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@lixiang.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.735459544@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Avoid re-setting virtual deadline on 'migrations'Peter Zijlstra
During OSPM24 Youssef noted that migrations are re-setting the virtual deadline. Notably everything that does a dequeue-enqueue, like setting nice, changing preferred numa-node, and a myriad of other random crap, will cause this to happen. This shouldn't be. Preserve the relative virtual deadline across such dequeue/enqueue cycles. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.625119246@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/eevdf: Fixup PELT vs DELAYED_DEQUEUEPeter Zijlstra
Note that tasks that are kept on the runqueue to burn off negative lag, are not in fact runnable anymore, they'll get dequeued the moment they get picked. As such, don't count this time towards runnable. Thanks to Valentin for spotting I had this backwards initially. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.514088302@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Implement DELAY_ZEROPeter Zijlstra
'Extend' DELAY_DEQUEUE by noting that since we wanted to dequeued them at the 0-lag point, truncate lag (eg. don't let them earn positive lag). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.403750550@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeuePeter Zijlstra
Extend / fix 86bfbb7ce4f6 ("sched/fair: Add lag based placement") by noting that lag is fundamentally a temporal measure. It should not be carried around indefinitely. OTOH it should also not be instantly discarded, doing so will allow a task to game the system by purposefully (micro) sleeping at the end of its time quantum. Since lag is intimately tied to the virtual time base, a wall-time based decay is also insufficient, notably competition is required for any of this to make sense. Instead, delay the dequeue and keep the 'tasks' on the runqueue, competing until they are eligible. Strictly speaking, we only care about keeping them until the 0-lag point, but that is a difficult proposition, instead carry them around until they get picked again, and dequeue them at that point. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.226163742@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Implement ENQUEUE_DELAYEDPeter Zijlstra
Doing a wakeup on a delayed dequeue task is about as simple as it sounds -- remove the delayed mark and enjoy the fact it was actually still on the runqueue. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105029.888107381@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Prepare pick_next_task() for delayed dequeuePeter Zijlstra
Delayed dequeue's natural end is when it gets picked again. Ensure pick_next_task() knows what to do with delayed tasks. Note, this relies on the earlier patch that made pick_next_task() state invariant -- it will restart the pick on dequeue, because obviously the just dequeued task is no longer eligible. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105029.747330118@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Prepare exit/cleanup paths for delayed_dequeuePeter Zijlstra
When dequeue_task() is delayed it becomes possible to exit a task (or cgroup) that is still enqueued. Ensure things are dequeued before freeing. Thanks to Valentin for asking the obvious questions and making switched_from_fair() less weird. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105029.631948434@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Assert {set_next,put_prev}_entity() are properly balancedPeter Zijlstra
Just a little sanity test.. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105029.486423066@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Re-organize dequeue_task_fair()Peter Zijlstra
Working towards delaying dequeue, notably also inside the hierachy, rework dequeue_task_fair() such that it can 'resume' an interrupted hierarchy walk. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.977256873@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched: Allow sched_class::dequeue_task() to failPeter Zijlstra
Change the function signature of sched_class::dequeue_task() to return a boolean, allowing future patches to 'fail' dequeue. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.864630153@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Unify pick_{,next_}_task_fair()Peter Zijlstra
Implement pick_next_task_fair() in terms of pick_task_fair() to de-duplicate the pick loop. More importantly, this makes all the pick loops use the state-invariant form, which is useful to introduce further re-try conditions in later patches. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.725062368@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Cleanup pick_task_fair()'s currPeter Zijlstra
With 4c456c9ad334 ("sched/fair: Remove unused 'curr' argument from pick_next_entity()") curr is no longer being used, so no point in clearing it. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.614707623@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/fair: Cleanup pick_task_fair() vs throttlePeter Zijlstra
Per 54d27365cae8 ("sched/fair: Prevent throttling in early pick_next_task_fair()") the reason check_cfs_rq_runtime() is under the 'if (curr)' check is to ensure the (downward) traversal does not result in an empty cfs_rq. But then the pick_task_fair() 'copy' of all this made it restart the traversal anyway, so that seems to solve the issue too. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.501679876@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched/eevdf: Remove min_vruntime_copyPeter Zijlstra
Since commit e8f331bcc270 ("sched/smp: Use lag to simplify cross-runqueue placement") the min_vruntime_copy is no longer used. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.395297941@infradead.org
2024-08-07sched/fair: Make balance_fair() test sched_fair_runnable() instead of ↵Tejun Heo
rq->nr_running balance_fair() skips newidle balancing if rq->nr_running - there are already tasks on the rq, so no need to try to pull tasks. This tests the total number of queued tasks on the CPU instead of only the fair class, but is still correct as the rq can currently only have fair class tasks while balance_fair() is running. However, with the addition of sched_ext below the fair class, this will not hold anymore and make put_prev_task_balance() skip sched_ext's balance() incorrectly as, when a CPU has only lower priority class tasks, rq->nr_running would still be positive and balance_fair() would return 1 even when fair doesn't have any tasks to run. Update balance_fair() to use sched_fair_runnable() which tests rq->cfs.nr_running which is updated by bandwidth throttling. Note that pick_next_task_fair() already uses sched_fair_runnable() in its optimized path for the same purpose. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZrFUjlCf7x3TNXB8@slm.duckdns.org
2024-08-04Merge branch 'sched/core' of ↵Tejun Heo
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip into for-6.12 Pull tip/sched/core to resolve the following four conflicts. While 2-4 are simple context conflicts, 1 is a bit subtle and easy to resolve incorrectly. 1. 2c8d046d5d51 ("sched: Add normal_policy()") vs. faa42d29419d ("sched/fair: Make SCHED_IDLE entity be preempted in strict hierarchy") The former converts direct test on p->policy to use the helper normal_policy(). The latter moves the p->policy test to a different location. Resolve by converting the test on p->plicy in the new location to use normal_policy(). 2. a7a9fc549293 ("sched_ext: Add boilerplate for extensible scheduler class") vs. a110a81c52a9 ("sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server") Both add calls to put_prev_task_idle() and set_next_task_idle(). Simple context conflict. Resolve by taking changes from both. 3. a7a9fc549293 ("sched_ext: Add boilerplate for extensible scheduler class") vs. c245910049d0 ("sched/core: Add clearing of ->dl_server in put_prev_task_balance()") The former changes for_each_class() itertion to use for_each_active_class(). The latter moves away the adjacent dl_server handling code. Simple context conflict. Resolve by taking changes from both. 4. 60c27fb59f6c ("sched_ext: Implement sched_ext_ops.cpu_online/offline()") vs. 31b164e2e4af ("sched/smt: Introduce sched_smt_present_inc/dec() helper") 2f027354122f ("sched/core: Introduce sched_set_rq_on/offline() helper") The former adds scx_rq_deactivate() call. The latter two change code around it. Simple context conflict. Resolve by taking changes from both. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2024-07-30Merge tag 'v6.11-rc1' into for-6.12Tejun Heo
Linux 6.11-rc1
2024-07-29sched/fair: Cleanup fair_serverPeter Zijlstra
The throttle interaction made my brain hurt, make it consistently about 0 transitions of h_nr_running. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2024-07-29sched/core: Fix picking of tasks for core scheduling with DL serverJoel Fernandes (Google)
* Use simple CFS pick_task for DL pick_task DL server's pick_task calls CFS's pick_next_task_fair(), this is wrong because core scheduling's pick_task only calls CFS's pick_task() for evaluation / checking of the CFS task (comparing across CPUs), not for actually affirmatively picking the next task. This causes RB tree corruption issues in CFS that were found by syzbot. * Make pick_task_fair clear DL server A DL task pick might set ->dl_server, but it is possible the task will never run (say the other HT has a stop task). If the CFS task is picked in the future directly (say without DL server), ->dl_server will be set. So clear it in pick_task_fair(). This fixes the KASAN issue reported by syzbot in set_next_entity(). (DL refactoring suggestions by Vineeth Pillai). Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b10489ab1f03d23e08e6097acea47442e7d6466f.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/deadline: Deferrable dl serverDaniel Bristot de Oliveira
Among the motivations for the DL servers is the real-time throttling mechanism. This mechanism works by throttling the rt_rq after running for a long period without leaving space for fair tasks. The base dl server avoids this problem by boosting fair tasks instead of throttling the rt_rq. The point is that it boosts without waiting for potential starvation, causing some non-intuitive cases. For example, an IRQ dispatches two tasks on an idle system, a fair and an RT. The DL server will be activated, running the fair task before the RT one. This problem can be avoided by deferring the dl server activation. By setting the defer option, the dl_server will dispatch an SCHED_DEADLINE reservation with replenished runtime, but throttled. The dl_timer will be set for the defer time at (period - runtime) ns from start time. Thus boosting the fair rq at defer time. If the fair scheduler has the opportunity to run while waiting for defer time, the dl server runtime will be consumed. If the runtime is completely consumed before the defer time, the server will be replenished while still in a throttled state. Then, the dl_timer will be reset to the new defer time If the fair server reaches the defer time without consuming its runtime, the server will start running, following CBS rules (thus without breaking SCHED_DEADLINE). Then the server will continue the running state (without deferring) until it fair tasks are able to execute as regular fair scheduler (end of the starvation). Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dd175943c72533cd9f0b87767c6499204879cc38.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/fair: Add trivial fair serverPeter Zijlstra
Use deadline servers to service fair tasks. This patch adds a fair_server deadline entity which acts as a container for fair entities and can be used to fix starvation when higher priority (wrt fair) tasks are monopolizing CPU(s). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b6b0bcefaf25391bcf5b6ecdb9f1218de402d42e.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/fair: Make SCHED_IDLE entity be preempted in strict hierarchyTianchen Ding
Consider the following cgroup: root | ------------------------ | | normal_cgroup idle_cgroup | | SCHED_IDLE task_A SCHED_NORMAL task_B According to the cgroup hierarchy, A should preempt B. But current check_preempt_wakeup_fair() treats cgroup se and task separately, so B will preempt A unexpectedly. Unify the wakeup logic by {c,p}se_is_idle only. This makes SCHED_IDLE of a task a relative policy that is effective only within its own cgroup, similar to the behavior of NICE. Also fix se_is_idle() definition when !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED. Fixes: 304000390f88 ("sched: Cgroup SCHED_IDLE support") Signed-off-by: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240626023505.1332596-1-dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com
2024-07-29sched: remove HZ_BW feature hedgePhil Auld
As a hedge against unexpected user issues commit 88c56cfeaec4 ("sched/fair: Block nohz tick_stop when cfs bandwidth in use") included a scheduler feature to disable the new functionality. It's been a few releases (v6.6) and no screams, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515133705.3632915-1-pauld@redhat.com
2024-07-29sched: Initialize the vruntime of a new task when it is first enqueuedZhang Qiao
When creating a new task, we initialize vruntime of the newly task at sched_cgroup_fork(). However, the timing of executing this action is too early and may not be accurate. Because it uses current CPU to init the vruntime, but the new task actually runs on the cpu which be assigned at wake_up_new_task(). To optimize this case, we pass ENQUEUE_INITIAL flag to activate_task() in wake_up_new_task(), in this way, when place_entity is called in enqueue_entity(), the vruntime of the new task will be initialized. In addition, place_entity() in task_fork_fair() was introduced for two reasons: 1. Previously, the __enqueue_entity() was in task_new_fair(), in order to provide vruntime for enqueueing the newly task, the vruntime assignment equation "se->vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime" was introduced by commit e9acbff6484d ("sched: introduce se->vruntime"). This is the initial state of place_entity(). 2. commit 4d78e7b656aa ("sched: new task placement for vruntime") added child_runs_first task placement feature which based on vruntime, this also requires the new task's vruntime value. After removing the child_runs_first and enqueue_entity() from task_fork_fair(), this place_entity() no longer makes sense, so remove it also. Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240627133359.1370598-1-zhangqiao22@huawei.com
2024-07-11Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up fixes and refresh ↵Ingo Molnar
the branch Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2024-07-08Merge branch 'sched/core' of ↵Tejun Heo
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip into for-6.11 d32960528702 ("sched/fair: set_load_weight() must also call reweight_task() for SCHED_IDLE tasks") applied to sched/core changes how reweight_task() is called causing conflicts with e83edbf88f18 ("sched: Add sched_class->reweight_task()"). Resolve the conflicts by taking set_load_weight() changes from d32960528702 and updating sched_class->reweight_task() to take pointer to struct load_weight instead of int prio. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj@kernel.org>
2024-07-04sched/fair: set_load_weight() must also call reweight_task() for SCHED_IDLE ↵Tejun Heo
tasks When a task's weight is being changed, set_load_weight() is called with @update_load set. As weight changes aren't trivial for the fair class, set_load_weight() calls fair.c::reweight_task() for fair class tasks. However, set_load_weight() first tests task_has_idle_policy() on entry and skips calling reweight_task() for SCHED_IDLE tasks. This is buggy as SCHED_IDLE tasks are just fair tasks with a very low weight and they would incorrectly skip load, vlag and position updates. Fix it by updating reweight_task() to take struct load_weight as idle weight can't be expressed with prio and making set_load_weight() call reweight_task() for SCHED_IDLE tasks too when @update_load is set. Fixes: 9059393e4ec1 ("sched/fair: Use reweight_entity() for set_user_nice()") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15+ Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240624102331.GI31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
2024-07-01Revert "sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task"Josh Don
This reverts commit b0defa7ae03ecf91b8bfd10ede430cff12fcbd06. b0defa7ae03ec changed the load balancing logic to ignore env.max_loop if all tasks examined to that point were pinned. The goal of the patch was to make it more likely to be able to detach a task buried in a long list of pinned tasks. However, this has the unfortunate side effect of creating an O(n) iteration in detach_tasks(), as we now must fully iterate every task on a cpu if all or most are pinned. Since this load balance code is done with rq lock held, and often in softirq context, it is very easy to trigger hard lockups. We observed such hard lockups with a user who affined O(10k) threads to a single cpu. When I discussed this with Vincent he initially suggested that we keep the limit on the number of tasks to detach, but increase the number of tasks we can search. However, after some back and forth on the mailing list, he recommended we instead revert the original patch, as it seems likely no one was actually getting hit by the original issue. Fixes: b0defa7ae03e ("sched/fair: Make sure to try to detach at least one movable task") Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620214450.316280-1-joshdon@google.com
2024-06-18sched: Add normal_policy()Tejun Heo
A new BPF extensible sched_class will need to dynamically change how a task picks its sched_class. For example, if the loaded BPF scheduler progs fail, the tasks will be forced back on CFS even if the task's policy is set to the new sched_class. To support such mapping, add normal_policy() which wraps testing for %SCHED_NORMAL. This doesn't cause any behavior changes. v2: Update the description with more details on the expected use. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com> Acked-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Acked-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
2024-06-18sched: Factor out update_other_load_avgs() from __update_blocked_others()Tejun Heo
RT, DL, thermal and irq load and utilization metrics need to be decayed and updated periodically and before consumption to keep the numbers reasonable. This is currently done from __update_blocked_others() as a part of the fair class load balance path. Let's factor it out to update_other_load_avgs(). Pure refactor. No functional changes. This will be used by the new BPF extensible scheduling class to ensure that the above metrics are properly maintained. v2: Refreshed on top of tip:sched/core. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com>
2024-06-18sched: Add sched_class->reweight_task()Tejun Heo
Currently, during a task weight change, sched core directly calls reweight_task() defined in fair.c if @p is on CFS. Let's make it a proper sched_class operation instead. CFS's reweight_task() is renamed to reweight_task_fair() and now called through sched_class. While it turns a direct call into an indirect one, set_load_weight() isn't called from a hot path and this change shouldn't cause any noticeable difference. This will be used to implement reweight_task for a new BPF extensible sched_class so that it can keep its cached task weight up-to-date. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <dvernet@meta.com> Acked-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Acked-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>
2024-06-05sched/balance: Skip unnecessary updates to idle load balancer's flagsTim Chen
We observed that the overhead on trigger_load_balance(), now renamed sched_balance_trigger(), has risen with a system's core counts. For an OLTP workload running 6.8 kernel on a 2 socket x86 systems having 96 cores/socket, we saw that 0.7% cpu cycles are spent in trigger_load_balance(). On older systems with fewer cores/socket, this function's overhead was less than 0.1%. The cause of this overhead was that there are multiple cpus calling kick_ilb(flags), updating the balancing work needed to a common idle load balancer cpu. The ilb_cpu's flags field got updated unconditionally with atomic_fetch_or(). The atomic read and writes to ilb_cpu's flags causes much cache bouncing and cpu cycles overhead. This is seen in the annotated profile below. kick_ilb(): if (ilb_cpu < 0) test %r14d,%r14d ↑ js 6c flags = atomic_fetch_or(flags, nohz_flags(ilb_cpu)); mov $0x2d600,%rdi movslq %r14d,%r8 mov %rdi,%rdx add -0x7dd0c3e0(,%r8,8),%rdx arch_atomic_read(): 0.01 mov 0x64(%rdx),%esi 35.58 add $0x64,%rdx arch_atomic_fetch_or(): static __always_inline int arch_atomic_fetch_or(int i, atomic_t *v) { int val = arch_atomic_read(v); do { } while (!arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val | i)); 0.03 157: mov %r12d,%ecx arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(): return arch_try_cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new); 0.00 mov %esi,%eax arch_atomic_fetch_or(): do { } while (!arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(v, &val, val | i)); or %esi,%ecx arch_atomic_try_cmpxchg(): return arch_try_cmpxchg(&v->counter, old, new); 0.01 lock cmpxchg %ecx,(%rdx) 42.96 ↓ jne 2d2 kick_ilb(): With instrumentation, we found that 81% of the updates do not result in any change in the ilb_cpu's flags. That is, multiple cpus are asking the ilb_cpu to do the same things over and over again, before the ilb_cpu has a chance to run NOHZ load balance. Skip updates to ilb_cpu's flags if no new work needs to be done. Such updates do not change ilb_cpu's NOHZ flags. This requires an extra atomic read but it is less expensive than frequent unnecessary atomic updates that generate cache bounces. We saw that on the OLTP workload, cpu cycles from trigger_load_balance() (or sched_balance_trigger()) got reduced from 0.7% to 0.2%. Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240531205452.65781-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
2024-05-27sched: Fix spelling in commentsIngo Molnar
Do a spell-checking pass. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2024-05-19Merge tag 'sched-urgent-2024-05-18' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler fixes from Ingo Molnar: - Fix a sched_balance_newidle setting bug - Fix bug in the setting of /sys/fs/cgroup/test/cpu.max.burst - Fix variable-shadowing build warning - Extend sched-domains debug output - Fix documentation - Fix comments * tag 'sched-urgent-2024-05-18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: sched/core: Fix incorrect initialization of the 'burst' parameter in cpu_max_write() sched/fair: Remove stale FREQUENCY_UTIL comment sched/fair: Fix initial util_avg calculation docs: cgroup-v1: Clarify that domain levels are system-specific sched/debug: Dump domains' level sched/fair: Allow disabling sched_balance_newidle with sched_relax_domain_level arch/topology: Fix variable naming to avoid shadowing
2024-05-17Merge tag 'sysctl-6.10-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sysctl/sysctl Pull sysctl updates from Joel Granados: - Remove sentinel elements from ctl_table structs in kernel/* Removing sentinels in ctl_table arrays reduces the build time size and runtime memory consumed by ~64 bytes per array. Removals for net/, io_uring/, mm/, ipc/ and security/ are set to go into mainline through their respective subsystems making the next release the most likely place where the final series that removes the check for proc_name == NULL will land. This adds to removals already in arch/, drivers/ and fs/. - Adjust ctl_table definitions and references to allow constification - Remove unused ctl_table function arguments - Move non-const elements from ctl_table to ctl_table_header - Make ctl_table pointers const in ctl_table_root structure Making the static ctl_table structs const will increase safety by keeping the pointers to proc_handler functions in .rodata. Though no ctl_tables where made const in this PR, the ground work for making that possible has started with these changes sent by Thomas Weißschuh. * tag 'sysctl-6.10-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sysctl/sysctl: sysctl: drop now unnecessary out-of-bounds check sysctl: move sysctl type to ctl_table_header sysctl: drop sysctl_is_perm_empty_ctl_table sysctl: treewide: constify argument ctl_table_root::permissions(table) sysctl: treewide: drop unused argument ctl_table_root::set_ownership(table) bpf: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array delayacct: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array kprobes: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array printk: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array scheduler: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array seccomp: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array timekeeping: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array ftrace: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array umh: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array kernel misc: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table array
2024-05-17sched/fair: Remove stale FREQUENCY_UTIL commentChristian Loehle
On 05/03/2024 15:05, Vincent Guittot wrote: I'm fine with either and that was my first thought here, too, but it did seem like the comment was mostly placed there to justify the 'unexpected' high utilization when explicitly passing FREQUENCY_UTIL and the need to clamp it then. So removing did feel slightly more natural to me anyway. So alternatively: From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 09:34:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Remove stale FREQUENCY_UTIL mention effective_cpu_util() flags were removed, so remove mentioning of the flag. commit 9c0b4bb7f6303 ("sched/cpufreq: Rework schedutil governor performance estimation") reworked effective_cpu_util() removing enum cpu_util_type. Modify the comment accordingly. Signed-off-by: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0e2833ee-0939-44e0-82a2-520a585a0153@arm.com
2024-05-17sched/fair: Fix initial util_avg calculationDawei Li
Change se->load.weight to se_weight(se) in the calculation for the initial util_avg to avoid unnecessarily inflating the util_avg by 1024 times. The reason is that se->load.weight has the unit/scale as the scaled-up load, while cfs_rg->avg.load_avg has the unit/scale as the true task weight (as mapped directly from the task's nice/priority value). With CONFIG_32BIT, the scaled-up load is equal to the true task weight. With CONFIG_64BIT, the scaled-up load is 1024 times the true task weight. Thus, the current code may inflate the util_avg by 1024 times. The follow-up capping will not allow the util_avg value to go wild. But the calculation should have the correct logic. Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <daweilics@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240315015916.21545-1-daweilics@gmail.com
2024-05-13Merge tag 'sched-core-2024-05-13' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar: - Add cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler - Rework misfit load-balancing wrt affinity restrictions - Clean up and simplify the code around ::overutilized and ::overload access. - Simplify sched_balance_newidle() - Bump SCHEDSTAT_VERSION to 16 due to a cleanup of CPU_MAX_IDLE_TYPES handling that changed the output. - Rework & clean up <asm/vtime.h> interactions wrt arch_vtime_task_switch() - Reorganize, clean up and unify most of the higher level scheduler balancing function names around the sched_balance_*() prefix - Simplify the balancing flag code (sched_balance_running) - Miscellaneous cleanups & fixes * tag 'sched-core-2024-05-13' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (50 commits) sched/pelt: Remove shift of thermal clock sched/cpufreq: Rename arch_update_thermal_pressure() => arch_update_hw_pressure() thermal/cpufreq: Remove arch_update_thermal_pressure() sched/cpufreq: Take cpufreq feedback into account cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler sched/fair: Fix update of rd->sg_overutilized sched/vtime: Do not include <asm/vtime.h> header s390/irq,nmi: Include <asm/vtime.h> header directly s390/vtime: Remove unused __ARCH_HAS_VTIME_TASK_SWITCH leftover sched/vtime: Get rid of generic vtime_task_switch() implementation sched/vtime: Remove confusing arch_vtime_task_switch() declaration sched/balancing: Simplify the sg_status bitmask and use separate ->overloaded and ->overutilized flags sched/fair: Rename set_rd_overutilized_status() to set_rd_overutilized() sched/fair: Rename SG_OVERLOAD to SG_OVERLOADED sched/fair: Rename {set|get}_rd_overload() to {set|get}_rd_overloaded() sched/fair: Rename root_domain::overload to ::overloaded sched/fair: Use helper functions to access root_domain::overload sched/fair: Check root_domain::overload value before update sched/fair: Combine EAS check with root_domain::overutilized access sched/fair: Simplify the continue_balancing logic in sched_balance_newidle() ...
2024-04-24sched/pelt: Remove shift of thermal clockVincent Guittot
The optional shift of the clock used by thermal/hw load avg has been introduced to handle case where the signal was not always a high frequency hw signal. Now that cpufreq provides a signal for firmware and SW pressure, we can remove this exception and always keep this PELT signal aligned with other signals. Mark sysctl_sched_migration_cost boot parameter as deprecated Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240326091616.3696851-6-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-08-01 19:59:03 +0000