summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/deadline.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-07-17sched/deadline: Fix dl_server runtime calculation formulakuyo chang
[ Upstream commit fc975cfb36393db1db517fbbe366e550bcdcff14 ] In our testing with 6.12 based kernel on a big.LITTLE system, we were seeing instances of RT tasks being blocked from running on the LITTLE cpus for multiple seconds of time, apparently by the dl_server. This far exceeds the default configured 50ms per second runtime. This is due to the fair dl_server runtime calculation being scaled for frequency & capacity of the cpu. Consider the following case under a Big.LITTLE architecture: Assume the runtime is: 50,000,000 ns, and Frequency/capacity scale-invariance defined as below: Frequency scale-invariance: 100 Capacity scale-invariance: 50 First by Frequency scale-invariance, the runtime is scaled to 50,000,000 * 100 >> 10 = 4,882,812 Then by capacity scale-invariance, it is further scaled to 4,882,812 * 50 >> 10 = 238,418. So it will scaled to 238,418 ns. This smaller "accounted runtime" value is what ends up being subtracted against the fair-server's runtime for the current period. Thus after 50ms of real time, we've only accounted ~238us against the fair servers runtime. This 209:1 ratio in this example means that on the smaller cpu the fair server is allowed to continue running, blocking RT tasks, for over 10 seconds before it exhausts its supposed 50ms of runtime. And on other hardware configurations it can be even worse. For the fair deadline_server, to prevent realtime tasks from being unexpectedly delayed, we really do want to use fixed time, and not scaled time for smaller capacity/frequency cpus. So remove the scaling from the fair server's accounting to fix this. Fixes: a110a81c52a9 ("sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Suggested-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: kuyo chang <kuyo.chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Tested-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250702021440.2594736-1-kuyo.chang@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-04-10sched/deadline: Use online cpus for validating runtimeShrikanth Hegde
[ Upstream commit 14672f059d83f591afb2ee1fff56858efe055e5a ] The ftrace selftest reported a failure because writing -1 to sched_rt_runtime_us returns -EBUSY. This happens when the possible CPUs are different from active CPUs. Active CPUs are part of one root domain, while remaining CPUs are part of def_root_domain. Since active cpumask is being used, this results in cpus=0 when a non active CPUs is used in the loop. Fix it by looping over the online CPUs instead for validating the bandwidth calculations. Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250306052954.452005-2-sshegde@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-12-27sched/dlserver: Fix dlserver double enqueueVineeth Pillai (Google)
[ Upstream commit b53127db1dbf7f1047cf35c10922d801dcd40324 ] dlserver can get dequeued during a dlserver pick_task due to the delayed deueue feature and this can lead to issues with dlserver logic as it still thinks that dlserver is on the runqueue. The dlserver throttling and replenish logic gets confused and can lead to double enqueue of dlserver. Double enqueue of dlserver could happend due to couple of reasons: Case 1 ------ Delayed dequeue feature[1] can cause dlserver being stopped during a pick initiated by dlserver: __pick_next_task pick_task_dl -> server_pick_task pick_task_fair pick_next_entity (if (sched_delayed)) dequeue_entities dl_server_stop server_pick_task goes ahead with update_curr_dl_se without knowing that dlserver is dequeued and this confuses the logic and may lead to unintended enqueue while the server is stopped. Case 2 ------ A race condition between a task dequeue on one cpu and same task's enqueue on this cpu by a remote cpu while the lock is released causing dlserver double enqueue. One cpu would be in the schedule() and releasing RQ-lock: current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE(); schedule(); deactivate_task() dl_stop_server(); pick_next_task() pick_next_task_fair() sched_balance_newidle() rq_unlock(this_rq) at which point another CPU can take our RQ-lock and do: try_to_wake_up() ttwu_queue() rq_lock() ... activate_task() dl_server_start() --> first enqueue wakeup_preempt() := check_preempt_wakeup_fair() update_curr() update_curr_task() if (current->dl_server) dl_server_update() enqueue_dl_entity() --> second enqueue This bug was not apparent as the enqueue in dl_server_start doesn't usually happen because of the defer logic. But as a side effect of the first case(dequeue during dlserver pick), dl_throttled and dl_yield will be set and this causes the time accounting of dlserver to messup and then leading to a enqueue in dl_server_start. Have an explicit flag representing the status of dlserver to avoid the confusion. This is set in dl_server_start and reset in dlserver_stop. Fixes: 63ba8422f876 ("sched/deadline: Introduce deadline servers") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@codethink.co.uk> # ROCK 5B Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241213032244.877029-1-vineeth@bitbyteword.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-12-19sched/deadline: Fix replenish_dl_new_period dl_server conditionJuri Lelli
commit 22368fe1f9bbf39db2b5b52859589883273e80ce upstream. The condition in replenish_dl_new_period() that checks if a reservation (dl_server) is deferred and is not handling a starvation case is obviously wrong. Fix it. Fixes: a110a81c52a9 ("sched/deadline: Deferrable dl server") Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241127063740.8278-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-12-14sched/deadline: Fix warning in migrate_enable for boosted tasksWander Lairson Costa
[ Upstream commit 0664e2c311b9fa43b33e3e81429cd0c2d7f9c638 ] When running the following command: while true; do stress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30s --minimize --quiet done a warning is eventually triggered: WARNING: CPU: 43 PID: 2848 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:794 setup_new_dl_entity+0x13e/0x180 ... Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4/0x2df ? enqueue_dl_entity+0x631/0x6e0 ? setup_new_dl_entity+0x13e/0x180 ? __warn+0x7e/0xd0 ? report_bug+0x11a/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3c/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 enqueue_dl_entity+0x631/0x6e0 enqueue_task_dl+0x7d/0x120 __do_set_cpus_allowed+0xe3/0x280 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x140/0x1d0 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x54/0xa0 migrate_enable+0x7e/0x150 rt_spin_unlock+0x1c/0x90 group_send_sig_info+0xf7/0x1a0 ? kill_pid_info+0x1f/0x1d0 kill_pid_info+0x78/0x1d0 kill_proc_info+0x5b/0x110 __x64_sys_kill+0x93/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7f0dab31f92b This warning occurs because set_cpus_allowed dequeues and enqueues tasks with the ENQUEUE_RESTORE flag set. If the task is boosted, the warning is triggered. A boosted task already had its parameters set by rt_mutex_setprio, and a new call to setup_new_dl_entity is unnecessary, hence the WARN_ON call. Check if we are requeueing a boosted task and avoid calling setup_new_dl_entity if that's the case. Fixes: 295d6d5e3736 ("sched/deadline: Fix switching to -deadline") Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240724142253.27145-2-wander@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-10-11sched/deadline: Use hrtick_enabled_dl() before start_hrtick_dl()Phil Auld
The deadline server code moved one of the start_hrtick_dl() calls but dropped the dl specific hrtick_enabled check. This causes hrticks to get armed even when sched_feat(HRTICK_DL) is false. Fix it. Fixes: 63ba8422f876 ("sched/deadline: Introduce deadline servers") Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241004123729.460668-1-pauld@redhat.com
2024-09-03sched: Add put_prev_task(.next)Peter Zijlstra
In order to tell the previous sched_class what the next task is, add put_prev_task(.next). Notable SCX will use this to: 1) determine the next task will leave the SCX sched class and push the current task to another CPU if possible. 2) statistics on how often and which other classes preempt it Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.367421076@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Rework dl_serverPeter Zijlstra
When a task is selected through a dl_server, it will have p->dl_server set, such that it can account runtime to the dl_server, see update_curr_task(). Currently p->dl_server is set in pick*task() whenever it goes through the dl_server, clearing it is a bit of a mess though. The trivial solution is clearing it on the final put (now that we have this location). However, this gives a problem when: p = pick_task(rq); if (p) put_prev_set_next_task(rq, prev, next); picks the same task but through a different path, notably when it goes from picking through the dl_server to a direct pick or vice-versa. In that case we cannot readily determine wether we should clear or preserve p->dl_server. An additional complication is pick_*task() setting p->dl_server for a remote pick, it might still need to update runtime before it schedules the core_pick. Close all these holes and remove all the random clearing of p->dl_server by: - having pick_*task() manage rq->dl_server - having the final put_prev_task() clear p->dl_server - having the first set_next_task() set p->dl_server = rq->dl_server - complicate the core_sched code to save/restore rq->dl_server where appropriate. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.259853414@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Rework pick_next_task()Peter Zijlstra
The current rule is that: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) And many classes implement it directly as such. Change things around to make pick_next_task() optional while also changing the definition to: pick_next_task(prev) := pick_task() + put_prev_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) The reason is that sched_ext would like to have a 'final' call that knows the next task. By placing put_prev_task() right next to set_next_task() (as it already is for sched_core) this becomes trivial. As a bonus, this is a nice cleanup on its own. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224016.051225657@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Clean up DL server vs core schedPeter Zijlstra
Abide by the simple rule: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) This allows us to trivially get rid of server_pick_next() and things collapse nicely. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224015.837303391@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched: Fixup set_next_task() implementationsPeter Zijlstra
The rule is that: pick_next_task() := pick_task() + set_next_task(.first = true) Turns out, there's still a few things in pick_next_task() that are missing from that combination. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813224015.724111109@infradead.org
2024-09-03sched/deadline: Fix schedstats vs deadline serversHuang Shijie
In dl_server_start(), when schedstats is enabled, the following happens: dl_server_start() dl_se->dl_server = 1; enqueue_dl_entity() update_stats_enqueue_dl() __schedstats_from_dl_se() dl_task_of() BUG_ON(dl_server(dl_se)); Since only tasks have schedstats and internal entries do not, avoid trying to update stats in this case. Fixes: 63ba8422f876 ("sched/deadline: Introduce deadline servers") Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie@os.amperecomputing.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240829031111.12142-1-shijie@os.amperecomputing.com
2024-08-17sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeuePeter Zijlstra
Extend / fix 86bfbb7ce4f6 ("sched/fair: Add lag based placement") by noting that lag is fundamentally a temporal measure. It should not be carried around indefinitely. OTOH it should also not be instantly discarded, doing so will allow a task to game the system by purposefully (micro) sleeping at the end of its time quantum. Since lag is intimately tied to the virtual time base, a wall-time based decay is also insufficient, notably competition is required for any of this to make sense. Instead, delay the dequeue and keep the 'tasks' on the runqueue, competing until they are eligible. Strictly speaking, we only care about keeping them until the 0-lag point, but that is a difficult proposition, instead carry them around until they get picked again, and dequeue them at that point. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105030.226163742@infradead.org
2024-08-17sched: Allow sched_class::dequeue_task() to failPeter Zijlstra
Change the function signature of sched_class::dequeue_task() to return a boolean, allowing future patches to 'fail' dequeue. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240727105028.864630153@infradead.org
2024-07-29sched/rt: Remove default bandwidth controlPeter Zijlstra
Now that fair_server exists, we no longer need RT bandwidth control unless RT_GROUP_SCHED. Enable fair_server with parameters equivalent to RT throttling. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: "Vineeth Pillai (Google)" <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/14d562db55df5c3c780d91940743acb166895ef7.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/core: Fix picking of tasks for core scheduling with DL serverJoel Fernandes (Google)
* Use simple CFS pick_task for DL pick_task DL server's pick_task calls CFS's pick_next_task_fair(), this is wrong because core scheduling's pick_task only calls CFS's pick_task() for evaluation / checking of the CFS task (comparing across CPUs), not for actually affirmatively picking the next task. This causes RB tree corruption issues in CFS that were found by syzbot. * Make pick_task_fair clear DL server A DL task pick might set ->dl_server, but it is possible the task will never run (say the other HT has a stop task). If the CFS task is picked in the future directly (say without DL server), ->dl_server will be set. So clear it in pick_task_fair(). This fixes the KASAN issue reported by syzbot in set_next_entity(). (DL refactoring suggestions by Vineeth Pillai). Reported-by: Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com> Signed-off-by: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vineeth Pillai <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b10489ab1f03d23e08e6097acea47442e7d6466f.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/fair: Fair server interfaceDaniel Bristot de Oliveira
Add an interface for fair server setup on debugfs. Each CPU has two files under /debug/sched/fair_server/cpu{ID}: - runtime: set runtime in ns - period: set period in ns This then leaves /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_{period,runtime}_us to set bounds on admission control. The interface also add the server to the dl bandwidth accounting. Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a9ef9fc69bcedb44bddc9bc34f2b313296052819.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/deadline: Deferrable dl serverDaniel Bristot de Oliveira
Among the motivations for the DL servers is the real-time throttling mechanism. This mechanism works by throttling the rt_rq after running for a long period without leaving space for fair tasks. The base dl server avoids this problem by boosting fair tasks instead of throttling the rt_rq. The point is that it boosts without waiting for potential starvation, causing some non-intuitive cases. For example, an IRQ dispatches two tasks on an idle system, a fair and an RT. The DL server will be activated, running the fair task before the RT one. This problem can be avoided by deferring the dl server activation. By setting the defer option, the dl_server will dispatch an SCHED_DEADLINE reservation with replenished runtime, but throttled. The dl_timer will be set for the defer time at (period - runtime) ns from start time. Thus boosting the fair rq at defer time. If the fair scheduler has the opportunity to run while waiting for defer time, the dl server runtime will be consumed. If the runtime is completely consumed before the defer time, the server will be replenished while still in a throttled state. Then, the dl_timer will be reset to the new defer time If the fair server reaches the defer time without consuming its runtime, the server will start running, following CBS rules (thus without breaking SCHED_DEADLINE). Then the server will continue the running state (without deferring) until it fair tasks are able to execute as regular fair scheduler (end of the starvation). Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/dd175943c72533cd9f0b87767c6499204879cc38.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-29sched/fair: Add trivial fair serverPeter Zijlstra
Use deadline servers to service fair tasks. This patch adds a fair_server deadline entity which acts as a container for fair entities and can be used to fix starvation when higher priority (wrt fair) tasks are monopolizing CPU(s). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b6b0bcefaf25391bcf5b6ecdb9f1218de402d42e.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
2024-07-11Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up fixes and refresh ↵Ingo Molnar
the branch Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2024-07-01sched/deadline: Fix task_struct reference leakWander Lairson Costa
During the execution of the following stress test with linux-rt: stress-ng --cyclic 30 --timeout 30 --minimize --quiet kmemleak frequently reported a memory leak concerning the task_struct: unreferenced object 0xffff8881305b8000 (size 16136): comm "stress-ng", pid 614, jiffies 4294883961 (age 286.412s) object hex dump (first 32 bytes): 02 40 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .@.............. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ debug hex dump (first 16 bytes): 53 09 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 S............... backtrace: [<00000000046b6790>] dup_task_struct+0x30/0x540 [<00000000c5ca0f0b>] copy_process+0x3d9/0x50e0 [<00000000ced59777>] kernel_clone+0xb0/0x770 [<00000000a50befdc>] __do_sys_clone+0xb6/0xf0 [<000000001dbf2008>] do_syscall_64+0x5d/0xf0 [<00000000552900ff>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 The issue occurs in start_dl_timer(), which increments the task_struct reference count and sets a timer. The timer callback, dl_task_timer, is supposed to decrement the reference count upon expiration. However, if enqueue_task_dl() is called before the timer expires and cancels it, the reference count is not decremented, leading to the leak. This patch fixes the reference leak by ensuring the task_struct reference count is properly decremented when the timer is canceled. Fixes: feff2e65efd8 ("sched/deadline: Unthrottle PI boosted threads while enqueuing") Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240620125618.11419-1-wander@redhat.com
2024-05-27sched: Fix spelling in commentsIngo Molnar
Do a spell-checking pass. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2024-04-24scheduler: Remove the now superfluous sentinel elements from ctl_table arrayJoel Granados
This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which will reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time memory bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link : https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@bombadil.infradead.org/) rm sentinel element from ctl_table arrays Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
2023-11-15sched/deadline: Introduce deadline serversPeter Zijlstra
Low priority tasks (e.g., SCHED_OTHER) can suffer starvation if tasks with higher priority (e.g., SCHED_FIFO) monopolize CPU(s). RT Throttling has been introduced a while ago as a (mostly debug) countermeasure one can utilize to reserve some CPU time for low priority tasks (usually background type of work, e.g. workqueues, timers, etc.). It however has its own problems (see documentation) and the undesired effect of unconditionally throttling FIFO tasks even when no lower priority activity needs to run (there are mechanisms to fix this issue as well, but, again, with their own problems). Introduce deadline servers to service low priority tasks needs under starvation conditions. Deadline servers are built extending SCHED_DEADLINE implementation to allow 2-level scheduling (a sched_deadline entity becomes a container for lower priority scheduling entities). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4968601859d920335cf85822eb573a5f179f04b8.1699095159.git.bristot@kernel.org
2023-11-15sched/deadline: Move bandwidth accounting into {en,de}queue_dl_entityPeter Zijlstra
In preparation of introducing !task sched_dl_entity; move the bandwidth accounting into {en.de}queue_dl_entity(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a86dccbbe44e021b8771627e1dae01a69b73466d.1699095159.git.bristot@kernel.org
2023-11-15sched/deadline: Collect sched_dl_entity initializationPeter Zijlstra
Create a single function that initializes a sched_dl_entity. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/51acc695eecf0a1a2f78f9a044e11ffd9b316bcf.1699095159.git.bristot@kernel.org
2023-11-15sched: Unify runtime accounting across classesPeter Zijlstra
All classes use sched_entity::exec_start to track runtime and have copies of the exact same code around to compute runtime. Collapse all that. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/54d148a144f26d9559698c4dd82d8859038a7380.1699095159.git.bristot@kernel.org
2023-10-13sched: Fix stop_one_cpu_nowait() vs hotplugPeter Zijlstra
Kuyo reported sporadic failures on a sched_setaffinity() vs CPU hotplug stress-test -- notably affine_move_task() remains stuck in wait_for_completion(), leading to a hung-task detector warning. Specifically, it was reported that stop_one_cpu_nowait(.fn = migration_cpu_stop) returns false -- this stopper is responsible for the matching complete(). The race scenario is: CPU0 CPU1 // doing _cpu_down() __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() task_rq_lock(); takedown_cpu() stop_machine_cpuslocked(take_cpu_down..) <PREEMPT: cpu_stopper_thread() MULTI_STOP_PREPARE ... __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() affine_move_task() task_rq_unlock(); <PREEMPT: cpu_stopper_thread()\> ack_state() MULTI_STOP_RUN take_cpu_down() __cpu_disable(); stop_machine_park(); stopper->enabled = false; /> /> stop_one_cpu_nowait(.fn = migration_cpu_stop); if (stopper->enabled) // false!!! That is, by doing stop_one_cpu_nowait() after dropping rq-lock, the stopper thread gets a chance to preempt and allows the cpu-down for the target CPU to complete. OTOH, since stop_one_cpu_nowait() / cpu_stop_queue_work() needs to issue a wakeup, it must not be ran under the scheduler locks. Solve this apparent contradiction by keeping preemption disabled over the unlock + queue_stopper combination: preempt_disable(); task_rq_unlock(...); if (!stop_pending) stop_one_cpu_nowait(...) preempt_enable(); This respects the lock ordering contraints while still avoiding the above race. That is, if we find the CPU is online under rq-lock, the targeted stop_one_cpu_nowait() must succeed. Apply this pattern to all similar stop_one_cpu_nowait() invocations. Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()") Reported-by: "Kuyo Chang (張建文)" <Kuyo.Chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: "Kuyo Chang (張建文)" <Kuyo.Chang@mediatek.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231010200442.GA16515@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-10-09sched/topology: Consolidate and clean up access to a CPU's max compute capacityVincent Guittot
Remove the rq::cpu_capacity_orig field and use arch_scale_cpu_capacity() instead. The scheduler uses 3 methods to get access to a CPU's max compute capacity: - arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu) which is the default way to get a CPU's capacity. - cpu_capacity_orig field which is periodically updated with arch_scale_cpu_capacity(). - capacity_orig_of(cpu) which encapsulates rq->cpu_capacity_orig. There is no real need to save the value returned by arch_scale_cpu_capacity() in struct rq. arch_scale_cpu_capacity() returns: - either a per_cpu variable. - or a const value for systems which have only one capacity. Remove rq::cpu_capacity_orig and use arch_scale_cpu_capacity() everywhere. No functional changes. Some performance tests on Arm64: - small SMP device (hikey): no noticeable changes - HMP device (RB5): hackbench shows minor improvement (1-2%) - large smp (thx2): hackbench and tbench shows minor improvement (1%) Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009103621.374412-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
2023-09-29sched/deadline: Make dl_rq->pushable_dl_tasks update drive dl_rq->overloadedValentin Schneider
dl_rq->dl_nr_migratory is increased whenever a DL entity is enqueued and it has nr_cpus_allowed > 1. Unlike the pushable_dl_tasks tree, dl_rq->dl_nr_migratory includes a dl_rq's current task. This means a dl_rq can have a migratable current, N non-migratable queued tasks, and be flagged as overloaded and have its CPU set in the dlo_mask, despite having an empty pushable_tasks tree. Make an dl_rq's overload logic be driven by {enqueue,dequeue}_pushable_dl_task(), in other words make DL RQs only be flagged as overloaded if they have at least one runnable-but-not-current migratable task. o push_dl_task() is unaffected, as it is a no-op if there are no pushable tasks. o pull_dl_task() now no longer scans runqueues whose sole migratable task is their current one, which it can't do anything about anyway. It may also now pull tasks to a DL RQ with dl_nr_running > 1 if only its current task is migratable. Since dl_rq->dl_nr_migratory becomes unused, remove it. RT had the exact same mechanism (rt_rq->rt_nr_migratory) which was dropped in favour of relying on rt_rq->pushable_tasks, see: 612f769edd06 ("sched/rt: Make rt_rq->pushable_tasks updates drive rto_mask") Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230928150251.463109-1-vschneid@redhat.com
2023-09-19sched/fair: Rename check_preempt_curr() to wakeup_preempt()Ingo Molnar
The name is a bit opaque - make it clear that this is about wakeup preemption. Also rename the ->check_preempt_curr() methods similarly. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2023-06-27Merge tag 'cgroup-for-6.5' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup Pull cgroup updates from Tejun Heo: - Whenever cpuset needs to rebuild sched_domain, it walked all tasks looking for DEADLINE tasks as they need to be accounted on the new domain. Walking all tasks can be expensive and there may not be any DEADLINE tasks at all. Task iteration is now omitted if there are no DEADLINE tasks - Fixes DEADLINE bandwidth misaccounting after task migration failures - When no controller is enabled, -Wstringop-overflow warning is triggered. The fix patch added an early exit which is too eager and got reverted for now. Will fix later - Everything else is minor cleanups * tag 'cgroup-for-6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup: Revert "cgroup: Avoid -Wstringop-overflow warnings" cgroup/misc: Expose misc.current on cgroup v2 root cgroup: Avoid -Wstringop-overflow warnings cgroup: remove obsolete comment on cgroup_on_dfl() cgroup: remove unused task_cgroup_path() cgroup/cpuset: remove unneeded header files cgroup: make cgroup_is_threaded() and cgroup_is_thread_root() static rdmacg: fix kernel-doc warnings in rdmacg cgroup: Replace the css_set call with cgroup_get cgroup: remove unused macro for_each_e_css() cgroup: Update out-of-date comment in cgroup_migrate() cgroup: Replace all non-returning strlcpy with strscpy cgroup/cpuset: remove unneeded header files cgroup/cpuset: Free DL BW in case can_attach() fails sched/deadline: Create DL BW alloc, free & check overflow interface cgroup/cpuset: Iterate only if DEADLINE tasks are present sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED_DEADLINE task in cpusets sched/cpuset: Bring back cpuset_mutex cgroup/cpuset: Rename functions dealing with DEADLINE accounting
2023-06-16sched/deadline: Fix bandwidth reclaim equation in GRUBVineeth Pillai
According to the GRUB[1] rule, the runtime is depreciated as: "dq = -max{u, (1 - Uinact - Uextra)} dt" (1) To guarantee that deadline tasks doesn't starve lower class tasks, we do not allocate the full bandwidth of the cpu to deadline tasks. Maximum bandwidth usable by deadline tasks is denoted by "Umax". Considering Umax, equation (1) becomes: "dq = -(max{u, (Umax - Uinact - Uextra)} / Umax) dt" (2) Current implementation has a minor bug in equation (2), which this patch fixes. The reclamation logic is verified by a sample program which creates multiple deadline threads and observing their utilization. The tests were run on an isolated cpu(isolcpus=3) on a 4 cpu system. Tests on 6.3.0 ============== RUN 1: runtime=7ms, deadline=period=10ms, RT capacity = 95% TID[693]: RECLAIM=1, (r=7ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 93.33 TID[693]: RECLAIM=1, (r=7ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 93.35 RUN 2: runtime=1ms, deadline=period=100ms, RT capacity = 95% TID[708]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 16.69 TID[708]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 16.69 RUN 3: 2 tasks Task 1: runtime=1ms, deadline=period=10ms Task 2: runtime=1ms, deadline=period=100ms TID[631]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 62.67 TID[632]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 6.37 TID[631]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 62.38 TID[632]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 6.23 As seen above, the reclamation doesn't reclaim the maximum allowed bandwidth and as the bandwidth of tasks gets smaller, the reclaimed bandwidth also comes down. Tests with this patch applied ============================= RUN 1: runtime=7ms, deadline=period=10ms, RT capacity = 95% TID[608]: RECLAIM=1, (r=7ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 95.19 TID[608]: RECLAIM=1, (r=7ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 95.16 RUN 2: runtime=1ms, deadline=period=100ms, RT capacity = 95% TID[616]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 95.27 TID[616]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 95.21 RUN 3: 2 tasks Task 1: runtime=1ms, deadline=period=10ms Task 2: runtime=1ms, deadline=period=100ms TID[620]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 86.64 TID[621]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 8.66 TID[620]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=10ms, p=10ms), Util: 86.45 TID[621]: RECLAIM=1, (r=1ms, d=100ms, p=100ms), Util: 8.73 Running tasks on all cpus allowing for migration also showed that the utilization is reclaimed to the maximum. Running 10 tasks on 3 cpus SCHED_FLAG_RECLAIM - top shows: %Cpu0 : 94.6 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 5.4 id, 0.0 wa %Cpu1 : 95.2 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 4.8 id, 0.0 wa %Cpu2 : 95.8 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 4.2 id, 0.0 wa [1]: Abeni, Luca & Lipari, Giuseppe & Parri, Andrea & Sun, Youcheng. (2015). Parallel and sequential reclaiming in multicore real-time global scheduling. Signed-off-by: Vineeth Pillai (Google) <vineeth@bitbyteword.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530135526.2385378-1-vineeth@bitbyteword.org
2023-05-30sched/deadline: remove unused dl_bandwidthMiaohe Lin
The default deadline bandwidth control structure has been removed since commit eb77cf1c151c ("sched/deadline: Remove unused def_dl_bandwidth") leading to unused init_dl_bandwidth() and struct dl_bandwidth. Remove them to clean up the code. Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230524102514.407486-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
2023-05-08sched/deadline: Create DL BW alloc, free & check overflow interfaceDietmar Eggemann
While moving a set of tasks between exclusive cpusets, cpuset_can_attach() -> task_can_attach() calls dl_cpu_busy(..., p) for DL BW overflow checking and per-task DL BW allocation on the destination root_domain for the DL tasks in this set. This approach has the issue of not freeing already allocated DL BW in the following error cases: (1) The set of tasks includes multiple DL tasks and DL BW overflow checking fails for one of the subsequent DL tasks. (2) Another controller next to the cpuset controller which is attached to the same cgroup fails in its can_attach(). To address this problem rework dl_cpu_busy(): (1) Split it into dl_bw_check_overflow() & dl_bw_alloc() and add a dedicated dl_bw_free(). (2) dl_bw_alloc() & dl_bw_free() take a `u64 dl_bw` parameter instead of a `struct task_struct *p` used in dl_cpu_busy(). This allows to allocate DL BW for a set of tasks too rather than only for a single task. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-05-08sched/cpuset: Keep track of SCHED_DEADLINE task in cpusetsJuri Lelli
Qais reported that iterating over all tasks when rebuilding root domains for finding out which ones are DEADLINE and need their bandwidth correctly restored on such root domains can be a costly operation (10+ ms delays on suspend-resume). To fix the problem keep track of the number of DEADLINE tasks belonging to each cpuset and then use this information (followup patch) to only perform the above iteration if DEADLINE tasks are actually present in the cpuset for which a corresponding root domain is being rebuilt. Reported-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230206221428.2125324-1-qyousef@layalina.io/ Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2023-04-21sched/rt: Fix bad task migration for rt tasksSchspa Shi
Commit 95158a89dd50 ("sched,rt: Use the full cpumask for balancing") allows find_lock_lowest_rq() to pick a task with migration disabled. The purpose of the commit is to push the current running task on the CPU that has the migrate_disable() task away. However, there is a race which allows a migrate_disable() task to be migrated. Consider: CPU0 CPU1 push_rt_task check is_migration_disabled(next_task) task not running and migration_disabled == 0 find_lock_lowest_rq(next_task, rq); _double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest); raw_spin_rq_unlock(this_rq); double_rq_lock(this_rq, busiest); <<wait for busiest rq>> <wakeup> task become running migrate_disable(); <context out> deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu); WARN_ON_ONCE(is_migration_disabled(p)); Fixes: 95158a89dd50 ("sched,rt: Use the full cpumask for balancing") Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Tested-by: Dwaine Gonyier <dgonyier@redhat.com>
2023-03-22sched/core: Avoid selecting the task that is throttled to run when ↵Hao Jia
core-sched enable When {rt, cfs}_rq or dl task is throttled, since cookied tasks are not dequeued from the core tree, So sched_core_find() and sched_core_next() may return throttled task, which may cause throttled task to run on the CPU. So we add checks in sched_core_find() and sched_core_next() to make sure that the return is a runnable task that is not throttled. Co-developed-by: Cruz Zhao <CruzZhao@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Cruz Zhao <CruzZhao@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230316081806.69544-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com
2023-02-11sched/deadline: Add more reschedule cases to prio_changed_dl()Valentin Schneider
I've been tracking down an issue on a ~5.17ish kernel where: CPUx CPUy <DL task p0 owns an rtmutex M> <p0 depletes its runtime, gets throttled> <rq switches to the idle task> <DL task p1 blocks on M, boost/replenish p0> <No call to resched_curr() happens here> [idle task keeps running here until *something* accidentally sets TIF_NEED_RESCHED] On that kernel, it is quite easy to trigger using rt-tests's deadline_test [1] with the test running on isolated CPUs (this reduces the chance of something unrelated setting TIF_NEED_RESCHED on the idle tasks, making the issue even more obvious as the hung task detector chimes in). I haven't been able to reproduce this using a mainline kernel, even if I revert 2972e3050e35 ("tracing: Make trace_marker{,_raw} stream-like") which gets rid of the lock involved in the above test, *but* I cannot convince myself the issue isn't there from looking at the code. Make prio_changed_dl() issue a reschedule if the current task isn't a deadline one. While at it, ensure a reschedule is emitted when a queued-but-not-current task gets boosted with an earlier deadline that current's. [1]: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/rt-tests/rt-tests.git Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230206140612.701871-1-vschneid@redhat.com
2022-10-27sched: Introduce affinity_contextWaiman Long
In order to prepare for passing through additional data through the affinity call-chains, convert the mask and flags argument into a structure. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220922180041.1768141-5-longman@redhat.com
2022-10-17sched: Introduce struct balance_callback to avoid CFI mismatchesKees Cook
Introduce distinct struct balance_callback instead of performing function pointer casting which will trip CFI. Avoids warnings as found by Clang's future -Wcast-function-type-strict option: In file included from kernel/sched/core.c:84: kernel/sched/sched.h:1755:15: warning: cast from 'void (*)(struct rq *)' to 'void (*)(struct callback_head *)' converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] head->func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))func; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ No binary differences result from this change. This patch is a cleanup based on Brad Spengler/PaX Team's modifications to sched code in their last public patch of grsecurity/PaX based on my understanding of the code. Changes or omissions from the original code are mine and don't reflect the original grsecurity/PaX code. Reported-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1724 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221008000758.2957718-1-keescook@chromium.org
2022-09-07sched: Rename task_running() to task_on_cpu()Peter Zijlstra
There is some ambiguity about task_running() in that it is unrelated to TASK_RUNNING but instead tests ->on_cpu. As such, rename the thing task_on_cpu(). Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Yxhkhn55uHZx+NGl@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2022-09-01sched/deadline: Move __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lockShang XiaoJing
As members in sched_dl_entity are independent with dl_bw, move __dl_clear_params out of dl_bw lock. Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220827020911.30641-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com
2022-09-01sched/deadline: Add replenish_dl_new_period helperShang XiaoJing
Wrap repeated code in helper function replenish_dl_new_period, which set the deadline and runtime of input dl_se based on pi_of(dl_se). Note that setup_new_dl_entity originally set the deadline and runtime base on dl_se, which should equals to pi_of(dl_se) for non-boosted task. Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220826100037.12146-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com
2022-09-01sched/deadline: Add dl_task_is_earliest_deadline helperShang XiaoJing
Wrap repeated code in helper function dl_task_is_earliest_deadline, which return true if there is no deadline task on the rq at all, or task's deadline earlier than the whole rq. Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220826083453.698-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com
2022-08-30Merge branch 'sched/warnings' into sched/core, to pick up WARN_ON_ONCE() ↵Ingo Molnar
conversion commit Merge in the BUG_ON() => WARN_ON_ONCE() conversion commit. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2022-08-27sched: Add update_current_exec_runtime helperShang XiaoJing
Wrap repeated code in helper function update_current_exec_runtime for update the exec time of the current. Signed-off-by: Shang XiaoJing <shangxiaojing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220824082856.15674-1-shangxiaojing@huawei.com
2022-08-12sched/all: Change all BUG_ON() instances in the scheduler to WARN_ON_ONCE()Ingo Molnar
There's no good reason to crash a user's system with a BUG_ON(), chances are high that they'll never even see the crash message on Xorg, and it won't make it into the syslog either. By using a WARN_ON_ONCE() we at least give the user a chance to report any bugs triggered here - instead of getting silent hangs. None of these WARN_ON_ONCE()s are supposed to trigger, ever - so we ignore cases where a NULL check is done via a BUG_ON() and we let a NULL pointer through after a WARN_ON_ONCE(). There's one exception: WARN_ON_ONCE() arguments with side-effects, such as locking - in this case we use the return value of the WARN_ON_ONCE(), such as in: - BUG_ON(!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!lock_task_sighand(p, &flags))) + return; Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YvSsKcAXISmshtHo@gmail.com
2022-08-02sched/deadline: Make dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() capacity-awareDietmar Eggemann
dl_cpuset_cpumask_can_shrink() is used to validate whether there is still enough CPU capacity for DL tasks in the reduced cpuset. Currently it still operates on `# remaining CPUs in the cpuset` (1). Change this to use the already capacity-aware DL admission control __dl_overflow() for the `cpumask can shrink` test. dl_b->bw = sched_rt_period << BW_SHIFT / sched_rt_period dl_b->bw * (1) >= currently allocated bandwidth in root_domain (rd) Replace (1) w/ `\Sum CPU capacity in rd >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT` Adapt __dl_bw_capacity() to take a cpumask instead of a CPU number argument so that `rd->span` and `cpumask of the reduced cpuset` can be used here. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220729111305.1275158-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
2022-08-02sched/core: Introduce sched_asym_cpucap_active()Dietmar Eggemann
Create an inline helper for conditional code to be only executed on asymmetric CPU capacity systems. This makes these (currently ~10 and future) conditions a lot more readable. Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220729111305.1275158-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com