summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu/tree.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-01-06rcu/nocb: Always init segcblist on CPU upFrederic Weisbecker
How the rdp->cblist enabled state is treated at CPU-hotplug time depends on whether or not that ->cblist is offloaded. 1) Not offloaded: The ->cblist is disabled when the CPU goes down. All its callbacks are migrated and none can to enqueued until after some later CPU-hotplug operation brings the CPU back up. 2) Offloaded: The ->cblist is not disabled on CPU down because the CB/GP kthreads must finish invoking the remaining callbacks. There is thus no need to re-enable it on CPU up. Since the ->cblist offloaded state is set in stone at boot, it cannot change between CPU down and CPU up. So 1) and 2) are symmetrical. However, given runtime toggling of the offloaded state, there are two additional asymmetrical scenarios: 3) The ->cblist is not offloaded when the CPU goes down. The ->cblist is later toggled to offloaded and then the CPU comes back up. 4) The ->cblist is offloaded when the CPU goes down. The ->cblist is later toggled to no longer be offloaded and then the CPU comes back up. Scenario 4) is currently handled correctly. The ->cblist remains enabled on CPU down and gets re-initialized on CPU up. The toggling operation will wait until ->cblist is empty, so ->cblist will remain empty until CPU-up time. The scenario 3) would run into trouble though, as the rdp is disabled on CPU down and not re-initialized/re-enabled on CPU up. Except that in this case, ->cblist is guaranteed to be empty because all its callbacks were migrated away at CPU-down time. And the CPU-up code already initializes and enables any empty ->cblist structures in order to handle the possibility of early-boot invocations of call_rcu() in the case where such invocations don't occur. So all that need be done is to adjust the locking. Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Inspired-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-06rcu/nocb: Provide basic callback offloading state machine bitsFrederic Weisbecker
Offloading and de-offloading RCU callback processes must be done carefully. There must never be a time at which callback processing is disabled because the task driving the offloading or de-offloading might be preempted or otherwise stalled at that point in time, which would result in OOM due to calbacks piling up indefinitely. This implies that there will be times during which a given CPU's callbacks might be concurrently invoked by both that CPU's RCU_SOFTIRQ handler (or, equivalently, that CPU's rcuc kthread) and by that CPU's rcuo kthread. This situation could fatally confuse both rcu_barrier() and the CPU-hotplug offlining process, so these must be excluded during any concurrent-callback-invocation period. In addition, during times of concurrent callback invocation, changes to ->cblist must be protected both as needed for RCU_SOFTIRQ and as needed for the rcuo kthread. This commit therefore defines and documents the states for a state machine that coordinates offloading and deoffloading. Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Inspired-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-06rcu/segcblist: Add debug checks for segment lengthsJoel Fernandes (Google)
This commit adds debug checks near the end of rcu_do_batch() that emit warnings if an empty rcu_segcblist structure has non-zero segment counts, or, conversely, if a non-empty structure has all-zero segment counts. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> [ paulmck: Fix queue/segment-length checks. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-06rcu/trace: Add tracing for how segcb list changesJoel Fernandes (Google)
This commit adds tracing to track how the segcb list changes before/after acceleration, during queuing and during dequeuing. This tracing helped discover an optimization that avoided needless GP requests when no callbacks were accelerated. The tracing overhead is minimal as each segment's length is now stored in the respective segment. Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-06rcu/tree: segcblist: Remove redundant smp_mb()sJoel Fernandes (Google)
The full memory barriers in rcu_segcblist_enqueue() and in rcu_do_batch() are not needed because rcu_segcblist_add_len(), and thus also rcu_segcblist_inc_len(), already includes a memory barrier *before* and *after* the length of the list is updated. This commit therefore removes these redundant smp_mb() invocations. Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-04rcu: Add lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() to rcu_sched_clock_irq() and calleesPaul E. McKenney
This commit adds a number of lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() calls to rcu_sched_clock_irq() and a number of the functions that it calls. The point of this is to help track down a situation where lockdep appears to be insisting that interrupts are enabled within these functions, which should only ever be invoked from the scheduling-clock interrupt handler. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201111133813.GA81547@elver.google.com/ Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-04rcu: Unconditionally use rcuc threads on PREEMPT_RTScott Wood
PREEMPT_RT systems have long used the rcutree.use_softirq kernel boot parameter to avoid use of RCU_SOFTIRQ handlers, which can disrupt real-time applications by invoking callbacks during return from interrupts that arrived while executing time-critical code. This kernel boot parameter instead runs RCU core processing in an 'rcuc' kthread, thus allowing the scheduler to do its job of avoiding disrupting time-critical code. This commit therefore disables the rcutree.use_softirq kernel boot parameter on PREEMPT_RT systems, thus forcing such systems to do RCU core processing in 'rcuc' kthreads. This approach has long been in use by users of the -rt patchset, and there have been no complaints. There is therefore no way for the system administrator to override this choice, at least without modifying and rebuilding the kernel. Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@redhat.com> [bigeasy: Reword commit message] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> [ paulmck: Update kernel-parameters.txt accordingly. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-04rcu: Record kvfree_call_rcu() call stack for KASANZqiang
This commit adds a call to kasan_record_aux_stack() in kvfree_call_rcu() in order to record the call stack of the code that caused the object to be freed. Please note that this function does not update the allocated/freed state, which is important because RCU readers might still be referencing this object. Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2021-01-04rcu/tree: Make rcu_do_batch count how many callbacks were executedJoel Fernandes (Google)
The rcu_do_batch() function extracts the ready-to-invoke callbacks from the rcu_segcblist located in the ->cblist field of the current CPU's rcu_data structure. These callbacks are first moved to a local (unsegmented) rcu_cblist. The rcu_do_batch() function then uses this rcu_cblist's ->len field to count how many CBs it has invoked, but it does so by counting that field down from zero. Finally, this function negates the value in this ->len field (resulting in a positive number) and subtracts the result from the ->len field of the current CPU's ->cblist field. Except that it is sometimes necessary for rcu_do_batch() to stop invoking callbacks mid-stream, despite there being more ready to invoke, for example, if a high-priority task wakes up. In this case the remaining not-yet-invoked callbacks are requeued back onto the CPU's ->cblist, but remain in the ready-to-invoke segment of that list. As above, the negative of the local rcu_cblist's ->len field is still subtracted from the ->len field of the current CPU's ->cblist field. The design of counting down from 0 is confusing and error-prone, plus use of a positive count will make it easier to provide a uniform and consistent API to deal with the per-segment counts that are added later in this series. For example, rcu_segcblist_extract_done_cbs() can unconditionally populate the resulting unsegmented list's ->len field during extraction. This commit therefore explicitly counts how many callbacks were executed in rcu_do_batch() itself, counting up from zero, and then uses that to update the per-CPU segcb list's ->len field, without relying on the downcounting of rcl->len from zero. Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-12-14Merge tag 'sched-core-2020-12-14' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Thomas Gleixner: - migrate_disable/enable() support which originates from the RT tree and is now a prerequisite for the new preemptible kmap_local() API which aims to replace kmap_atomic(). - A fair amount of topology and NUMA related improvements - Improvements for the frequency invariant calculations - Enhanced robustness for the global CPU priority tracking and decision making - The usual small fixes and enhancements all over the place * tag 'sched-core-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (61 commits) sched/fair: Trivial correction of the newidle_balance() comment sched/fair: Clear SMT siblings after determining the core is not idle sched: Fix kernel-doc markup x86: Print ratio freq_max/freq_base used in frequency invariance calculations x86, sched: Use midpoint of max_boost and max_P for frequency invariance on AMD EPYC x86, sched: Calculate frequency invariance for AMD systems irq_work: Optimize irq_work_single() smp: Cleanup smp_call_function*() irq_work: Cleanup sched: Limit the amount of NUMA imbalance that can exist at fork time sched/numa: Allow a floating imbalance between NUMA nodes sched: Avoid unnecessary calculation of load imbalance at clone time sched/numa: Rename nr_running and break out the magic number sched: Make migrate_disable/enable() independent of RT sched/topology: Condition EAS enablement on FIE support arm64: Rebuild sched domains on invariance status changes sched/topology,schedutil: Wrap sched domains rebuild sched/uclamp: Allow to reset a task uclamp constraint value sched/core: Fix typos in comments Documentation: scheduler: fix information on arch SD flags, sched_domain and sched_debug ...
2020-12-14Merge tag 'core-rcu-2020-12-14' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull RCU updates from Thomas Gleixner: "RCU, LKMM and KCSAN updates collected by Paul McKenney. RCU: - Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPI pileups and idle-CPU IPIs - Lockdep-RCU updates reducing the need for __maybe_unused - Tasks-RCU updates - Miscellaneous fixes - Documentation updates - Torture-test updates KCSAN: - updates for selftests, avoiding setting watchpoints on NULL pointers - fix to watchpoint encoding LKMM: - updates for documentation along with some updates to example-code litmus tests" * tag 'core-rcu-2020-12-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (72 commits) srcu: Take early exit on memory-allocation failure rcu/tree: Defer kvfree_rcu() allocation to a clean context rcu: Do not report strict GPs for outgoing CPUs rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header comment rcu: Prevent lockdep-RCU splats on lock acquisition/release rcu/tree: nocb: Avoid raising softirq for offloaded ready-to-execute CBs rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursion rcu/tree: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions const rcu/tree: Add a warning if CPU being onlined did not report QS already rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config rcu: Fix single-CPU check in rcu_blocking_is_gp() rcu: Implement rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() config dependent list.h: Update comment to explicitly note circular lists rcu: Panic after fixed number of stalls x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier rcu: Allow rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from NMI tools/memory-model: Label MP tests' producers and consumers tools/memory-model: Use "buf" and "flag" for message-passing tests tools/memory-model: Add types to litmus tests tools/memory-model: Add a glossary of LKMM terms ...
2020-11-27Merge branch 'linus' into sched/core, to resolve semantic conflictIngo Molnar
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-11-24irq_work: CleanupPeter Zijlstra
Get rid of the __call_single_node union and clean up the API a little to avoid external code relying on the structure layout as much. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
2020-11-19Merge branches 'cpuinfo.2020.11.06a', 'doc.2020.11.06a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'fixes.2020.11.19b', 'lockdep.2020.11.02a', 'tasks.2020.11.06a' and 'torture.2020.11.06a' into HEAD cpuinfo.2020.11.06a: Speedups for /proc/cpuinfo. doc.2020.11.06a: Documentation updates. fixes.2020.11.19b: Miscellaneous fixes. lockdep.2020.11.02a: Lockdep-RCU updates to avoid "unused variable". tasks.2020.11.06a: Tasks-RCU updates. torture.2020.11.06a': Torture-test updates.
2020-11-19rcu/tree: Defer kvfree_rcu() allocation to a clean contextUladzislau Rezki (Sony)
The current memmory-allocation interface causes the following difficulties for kvfree_rcu(): a) If built with CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING, the lockdep will complain about violation of the nesting rules, as in "BUG: Invalid wait context". This Kconfig option checks for proper raw_spinlock vs. spinlock nesting, in particular, it is not legal to acquire a spinlock_t while holding a raw_spinlock_t. This is a problem because kfree_rcu() uses raw_spinlock_t whereas the "page allocator" internally deals with spinlock_t to access to its zones. The code also can be broken from higher level of view: <snip> raw_spin_lock(&some_lock); kfree_rcu(some_pointer, some_field_offset); <snip> b) If built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT, spinlock_t is converted into sleeplock. This means that invoking the page allocator from atomic contexts results in "BUG: scheduling while atomic". c) Please note that call_rcu() is already invoked from raw atomic context, so it is only reasonable to expaect that kfree_rcu() and kvfree_rcu() will also be called from atomic raw context. This commit therefore defers page allocation to a clean context using the combination of an hrtimer and a workqueue. The hrtimer stage is required in order to avoid deadlocks with the scheduler. This deferred allocation is required only when kvfree_rcu()'s per-CPU page cache is empty. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200630164543.4mdcf6zb4zfclhln@linutronix.de/ Fixes: 3042f83f19be ("rcu: Support reclaim for head-less object") Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu: Fix a typo in rcu_blocking_is_gp() header commentZhouyi Zhou
This commit fixes a typo in the rcu_blocking_is_gp() function's header comment. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu: Prevent lockdep-RCU splats on lock acquisition/releasePaul E. McKenney
The rcu_cpu_starting() and rcu_report_dead() functions transition the current CPU between online and offline state from an RCU perspective. Unfortunately, this means that the rcu_cpu_starting() function's lock acquisition and the rcu_report_dead() function's lock releases happen while the CPU is offline from an RCU perspective, which can result in lockdep-RCU splats about using RCU from an offline CPU. And this situation can also result in too-short grace periods, especially in guest OSes that are subject to vCPU preemption. This commit therefore uses sequence-count-like synchronization to forgive use of RCU while RCU thinks a CPU is offline across the full extent of the rcu_cpu_starting() and rcu_report_dead() function's lock acquisitions and releases. One approach would have been to use the actual sequence-count primitives provided by the Linux kernel. Unfortunately, the resulting code looks completely broken and wrong, and is likely to result in patches that break RCU in an attempt to address this appearance of broken wrongness. Plus there is no net savings in lines of code, given the additional explicit memory barriers required. Therefore, this sequence count is instead implemented by a new ->ofl_seq field in the rcu_node structure. If this counter's value is an odd number, RCU forgives RCU read-side critical sections on other CPUs covered by the same rcu_node structure, even if those CPUs are offline from an RCU perspective. In addition, if a given leaf rcu_node structure's ->ofl_seq counter value is an odd number, rcu_gp_init() delays starting the grace period until that counter value changes. [ paulmck: Apply Peter Zijlstra feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu/tree: nocb: Avoid raising softirq for offloaded ready-to-execute CBsJoel Fernandes (Google)
Testing showed that rcu_pending() can return 1 when offloaded callbacks are ready to execute. This invokes RCU core processing, for example, by raising RCU_SOFTIRQ, eventually resulting in a call to rcu_core(). However, rcu_core() explicitly avoids in any way manipulating offloaded callbacks, which are instead handled by the rcuog and rcuoc kthreads, which work independently of rcu_core(). One exception to this independence is that rcu_core() invokes do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(), however, rcu_pending() also checks rcu_nocb_need_deferred_wakeup() in order to correctly handle this case, invoking rcu_core() when needed. This commit therefore avoids needlessly invoking RCU core processing by checking rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs() only on non-offloaded CPUs. This reduces overhead, for example, by reducing softirq activity. This change passed 30 minute tests of TREE01 through TREE09 each. On TREE08, there is at most 150us from the time that rcu_pending() chose not to invoke RCU core processing to the time when the ready callbacks were invoked by the rcuoc kthread. This provides further evidence that there is no need to invoke rcu_core() for offloaded callbacks that are ready to invoke. Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursionPeter Zijlstra
Kim reported that perf-ftrace made his box unhappy. It turns out that commit: ff5c4f5cad33 ("rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstr") removed one too many notrace qualifiers, probably due to there not being a helpful comment. This commit therefore reinstates the notrace and adds a comment to avoid losing it again. [ paulmck: Apply Steven Rostedt's feedback on the comment. ] Fixes: ff5c4f5cad33 ("rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstr") Reported-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu/tree: Make struct kernel_param_ops definitions constJoe Perches
These should be const, so make it so. Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu/tree: Add a warning if CPU being onlined did not report QS alreadyJoel Fernandes (Google)
Currently, rcu_cpu_starting() checks to see if the RCU core expects a quiescent state from the incoming CPU. However, the current interaction between RCU quiescent-state reporting and CPU-hotplug operations should mean that the incoming CPU never needs to report a quiescent state. First, the outgoing CPU reports a quiescent state if needed. Second, the race where the CPU is leaving just as RCU is initializing a new grace period is handled by an explicit check for this condition. Third, the CPU's leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock serializes these checks. This means that if rcu_cpu_starting() ever feels the need to report a quiescent state, then there is a bug somewhere in the CPU hotplug code or the RCU grace-period handling code. This commit therefore adds a WARN_ON_ONCE() to bring that bug to everyone's attention. Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu: Fix single-CPU check in rcu_blocking_is_gp()Neeraj Upadhyay
Currently, for CONFIG_PREEMPTION=n kernels, rcu_blocking_is_gp() uses num_online_cpus() to determine whether there is only one CPU online. When there is only a single CPU online, the simple fact that synchronize_rcu() could be legally called implies that a full grace period has elapsed. Therefore, in the single-CPU case, synchronize_rcu() simply returns immediately. Unfortunately, num_online_cpus() is unreliable while a CPU-hotplug operation is transitioning to or from single-CPU operation because: 1. num_online_cpus() uses atomic_read(&__num_online_cpus) to locklessly sample the number of online CPUs. The hotplug locks are not held, which means that an incoming CPU can concurrently update this count. This in turn means that an RCU read-side critical section on the incoming CPU might observe updates prior to the grace period, but also that this critical section might extend beyond the end of the optimized synchronize_rcu(). This breaks RCU's fundamental guarantee. 2. In addition, num_online_cpus() does no ordering, thus providing another way that RCU's fundamental guarantee can be broken by the current code. 3. The most probable failure mode happens on outgoing CPUs. The outgoing CPU updates the count of online CPUs in the CPUHP_TEARDOWN_CPU stop-machine handler, which is fine in and of itself due to preemption being disabled at the call to num_online_cpus(). Unfortunately, after that stop-machine handler returns, the CPU takes one last trip through the scheduler (which has RCU readers) and, after the resulting context switch, one final dive into the idle loop. During this time, RCU needs to keep track of two CPUs, but num_online_cpus() will say that there is only one, which in turn means that the surviving CPU will incorrectly ignore the outgoing CPU's RCU read-side critical sections. This problem is illustrated by the following litmus test in which P0() corresponds to synchronize_rcu() and P1() corresponds to the incoming CPU. The herd7 tool confirms that the "exists" clause can be satisfied, thus demonstrating that this breakage can happen according to the Linux kernel memory model. { int x = 0; atomic_t numonline = ATOMIC_INIT(1); } P0(int *x, atomic_t *numonline) { int r0; WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1); r0 = atomic_read(numonline); if (r0 == 1) { smp_mb(); } else { synchronize_rcu(); } WRITE_ONCE(*x, 2); } P1(int *x, atomic_t *numonline) { int r0; int r1; atomic_inc(numonline); smp_mb(); rcu_read_lock(); r0 = READ_ONCE(*x); smp_rmb(); r1 = READ_ONCE(*x); rcu_read_unlock(); } locations [x;numonline;] exists (1:r0=0 /\ 1:r1=2) It is important to note that these problems arise only when the system is transitioning to or from single-CPU operation. One solution would be to hold the CPU-hotplug locks while sampling num_online_cpus(), which was in fact the intent of the (redundant) preempt_disable() and preempt_enable() surrounding this call to num_online_cpus(). Actually blocking CPU hotplug would not only result in excessive overhead, but would also unnecessarily impede CPU-hotplug operations. This commit therefore follows long-standing RCU tradition by maintaining a separate RCU-specific set of CPU-hotplug books. This separate set of books is implemented by a new ->n_online_cpus field in the rcu_state structure that maintains RCU's count of the online CPUs. This count is incremented early in the CPU-online process, so that the critical transition away from single-CPU operation will occur when there is only a single CPU. Similarly for the critical transition to single-CPU operation, the counter is decremented late in the CPU-offline process, again while there is only a single CPU. Because there is only ever a single CPU when the ->n_online_cpus field undergoes the critical 1->2 and 2->1 transitions, full memory ordering and mutual exclusion is provided implicitly and, better yet, for free. In the case where the CPU is coming online, nothing will happen until the current CPU helps it come online. Therefore, the new CPU will see all accesses prior to the optimized grace period, which means that RCU does not need to further delay this new CPU. In the case where the CPU is going offline, the outgoing CPU is totally out of the picture before the optimized grace period starts, which means that this outgoing CPU cannot see any of the accesses following that grace period. Again, RCU needs no further interaction with the outgoing CPU. This does mean that synchronize_rcu() will unnecessarily do a few grace periods the hard way just before the second CPU comes online and just after the second-to-last CPU goes offline, but it is not worth optimizing this uncommon case. Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu: Implement rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() config dependentFrederic Weisbecker
This commit simplifies the use of the rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() API so that its callers no longer need to check the RCU_NOCB_CPU Kconfig option. Note that rcu_segcblist_is_offloaded() is defined in the header file, which means that the generated code should be just as efficient as before. Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-19rcu: Allow rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from NMIPeter Zijlstra
Eugenio managed to tickle #PF from NMI context which resulted in hitting a WARN in RCU through irqentry_enter() -> __rcu_irq_enter_check_tick(). However, this situation is perfectly sane and does not warrant an WARN. The #PF will (necessarily) be atomic and not require messing with the tick state, so early return is correct. This commit therefore removes the WARN. Fixes: aaf2bc50df1f ("rcu: Abstract out rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() from rcu_nmi_enter()") Reported-by: "Eugenio Pérez" <eupm90@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-11-13Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux Pull arm64 fixes from Will Deacon: - Spectre/Meltdown safelisting for some Qualcomm KRYO cores - Fix RCU splat when failing to online a CPU due to a feature mismatch - Fix a recently introduced sparse warning in kexec() - Fix handling of CPU erratum 1418040 for late CPUs - Ensure hot-added memory falls within linear-mapped region * tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux: arm64: cpu_errata: Apply Erratum 845719 to KRYO2XX Silver arm64: proton-pack: Add KRYO2XX silver CPUs to spectre-v2 safe-list arm64: kpti: Add KRYO2XX gold/silver CPU cores to kpti safelist arm64: Add MIDR value for KRYO2XX gold/silver CPU cores arm64/mm: Validate hotplug range before creating linear mapping arm64: smp: Tell RCU about CPUs that fail to come online arm64: psci: Avoid printing in cpu_psci_cpu_die() arm64: kexec_file: Fix sparse warning arm64: errata: Fix handling of 1418040 with late CPU onlining
2020-11-10arm64: smp: Tell RCU about CPUs that fail to come onlineWill Deacon
Commit ce3d31ad3cac ("arm64/smp: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") ensured that RCU is informed early about incoming CPUs that might end up calling into printk() before they are online. However, if such a CPU fails the early CPU feature compatibility checks in check_local_cpu_capabilities(), then it will be powered off or parked without informing RCU, leading to an endless stream of stalls: | rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: | rcu: 2-O...: (0 ticks this GP) idle=002/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=0/0 fqs=2593 | (detected by 0, t=5252 jiffies, g=9317, q=136) | Task dump for CPU 2: | task:swapper/2 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 0 ppid: 1 flags:0x00000028 | Call trace: | ret_from_fork+0x0/0x30 Ensure that the dying CPU invokes rcu_report_dead() prior to being powered off or parked. Cc: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Qian Cai <cai@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201105222242.GA8842@willie-the-truck Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201106103602.9849-3-will@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
2020-11-06x86/cpu: Avoid cpuinfo-induced IPIing of idle CPUsPaul E. McKenney
Currently, accessing /proc/cpuinfo sends IPIs to idle CPUs in order to learn their clock frequency. Which is a bit strange, given that waking them from idle likely significantly changes their clock frequency. This commit therefore avoids sending /proc/cpuinfo-induced IPIs to idle CPUs. [ paulmck: Also check for idle in arch_freq_prepare_all(). ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: <x86@kernel.org>
2020-10-26stop_machine, rcu: Mark functions as notraceZong Li
Some architectures assume that the stopped CPUs don't make function calls to traceable functions when they are in the stopped state. See also commit cb9d7fd51d9f ("watchdog: Mark watchdog touch functions as notrace"). Violating this assumption causes kernel crashes when switching tracer on RISC-V. Mark rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() and stop_machine_yield() notrace to prevent this. Fixes: 4ecf0a43e729 ("processor: get rid of cpu_relax_yield") Fixes: 366237e7b083 ("stop_machine: Provide RCU quiescent state in multi_cpu_stop()") Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> Tested-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201021073839.43935-1-zong.li@sifive.com
2020-10-18Merge tag 'core-rcu-2020-10-12' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull RCU changes from Ingo Molnar: - Debugging for smp_call_function() - RT raw/non-raw lock ordering fixes - Strict grace periods for KASAN - New smp_call_function() torture test - Torture-test updates - Documentation updates - Miscellaneous fixes [ This doesn't actually pull the tag - I've dropped the last merge from the RCU branch due to questions about the series. - Linus ] * tag 'core-rcu-2020-10-12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (77 commits) smp: Make symbol 'csd_bug_count' static kernel/smp: Provide CSD lock timeout diagnostics smp: Add source and destination CPUs to __call_single_data rcu: Shrink each possible cpu krcp rcu/segcblist: Prevent useless GP start if no CBs to accelerate torture: Add gdb support rcutorture: Allow pointer leaks to test diagnostic code rcutorture: Hoist OOM registry up one level refperf: Avoid null pointer dereference when buf fails to allocate rcutorture: Properly synchronize with OOM notifier rcutorture: Properly set rcu_fwds for OOM handling torture: Add kvm.sh --help and update help message rcutorture: Add CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST to TREE05 torture: Update initrd documentation rcutorture: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones locktorture: Make function torture_percpu_rwsem_init() static torture: document --allcpus argument added to the kvm.sh script rcutorture: Output number of elapsed grace periods rcutorture: Remove KCSAN stubs rcu: Remove unused "cpu" parameter from rcu_report_qs_rdp() ...
2020-10-15rcu/tree: docs: document bkvcache new members at struct kfree_rcu_cpuMauro Carvalho Chehab
Changeset 53c72b590b3a ("rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects") added new members for struct kfree_rcu_cpu, but didn't add the corresponding at the kernel-doc markup, as repoted when doing "make htmldocs": ./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3113: warning: Function parameter or member 'bkvcache' not described in 'kfree_rcu_cpu' ./kernel/rcu/tree.c:3113: warning: Function parameter or member 'nr_bkv_objs' not described in 'kfree_rcu_cpu' So, move the description for bkvcache to kernel-doc, and add a description for nr_bkv_objs. Fixes: 53c72b590b3a ("rcu/tree: cache specified number of objects") Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
2020-10-09Merge branch 'for-mingo' of ↵Ingo Molnar
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu Pull v5.10 RCU changes from Paul E. McKenney: - Debugging for smp_call_function(). - Strict grace periods for KASAN. The point of this series is to find RCU-usage bugs, so the corresponding new RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD Kconfig option depends on both DEBUG_KERNEL and RCU_EXPERT, and is further disabled by dfefault. Finally, the help text includes a goodly list of scary caveats. - New smp_call_function() torture test. - Torture-test updates. - Documentation updates. - Miscellaneous fixes. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-09-21rcu/tree: Export rcu_idle_{enter,exit} to modulesBorislav Petkov
Fix this link error: ERROR: modpost: "rcu_idle_enter" [drivers/acpi/processor.ko] undefined! ERROR: modpost: "rcu_idle_exit" [drivers/acpi/processor.ko] undefined! when CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as module. PeterZ says that in light of ARM needing those soon too, they should simply be exported. Fixes: 1fecfdbb7acc ("ACPI: processor: Take over RCU-idle for C3-BM idle") Reported-by: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmckrcu@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-09-03Merge branch 'strictgp.2020.08.24a' into HEADPaul E. McKenney
strictgp.2020.08.24a: Strict grace periods for KASAN testing.
2020-09-03rcu: Shrink each possible cpu krcpZqiang
CPUs can go offline shortly after kfree_call_rcu() has been invoked, which can leave memory stranded until those CPUs come back online. This commit therefore drains the kcrp of each CPU, not just the ones that happen to be online. Acked-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Remove unused "cpu" parameter from rcu_report_qs_rdp()Paul E. McKenney
The "cpu" parameter to rcu_report_qs_rdp() is not used, with rdp->cpu being used instead. Furtheremore, every call to rcu_report_qs_rdp() invokes it on rdp->cpu. This commit therefore removes this unused "cpu" parameter and converts a check of rdp->cpu against smp_processor_id() to a WARN_ON_ONCE(). Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Report QS for outermost PREEMPT=n rcu_read_unlock() for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
The CONFIG_PREEMPT=n instance of rcu_read_unlock is even more aggressively than that of CONFIG_PREEMPT=y in deferring reporting quiescent states to the RCU core. This is just what is wanted in normal use because it reduces overhead, but the resulting delay is not what is wanted for kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. This commit therefore adds an rcu_read_unlock_strict() function that checks for exceptional conditions, and reports the newly started quiescent state if it is safe to do so, also doing a spin-delay if requested via rcutree.rcu_unlock_delay. This commit also adds a call to rcu_read_unlock_strict() from the CONFIG_PREEMPT=n instance of __rcu_read_unlock(). [ paulmck: Fixed bug located by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> ] Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Execute RCU reader shortly after rcu_core for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
A kernel built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y needs a quiescent state to appear very shortly after a CPU has noticed a new grace period. Placing an RCU reader immediately after this point is ineffective because this normally happens in softirq context, which acts as a big RCU reader. This commit therefore introduces a new per-CPU work_struct, which is used at the end of rcu_core() processing to schedule an RCU read-side critical section from within a clean environment. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: IPI all CPUs at GP end for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
Currently, each CPU discovers the end of a given grace period on its own time, which is again good for efficiency but bad for fast grace periods, given that it is things like kfree() within the RCU callbacks that will cause trouble for pointers leaked from RCU read-side critical sections. This commit therefore uses on_each_cpu() to IPI each CPU after grace-period cleanup in order to inform each CPU of the end of the old grace period in a timely manner, but only in kernels build with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: IPI all CPUs at GP start for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
Currently, each CPU discovers the beginning of a given grace period on its own time, which is again good for efficiency but bad for fast grace periods. This commit therefore uses on_each_cpu() to IPI each CPU after grace-period initialization in order to inform each CPU of the new grace period in a timely manner, but only in kernels build with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Attempt QS when CPU discovers GP for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
A given CPU normally notes a new grace period during one RCU_SOFTIRQ, but avoids reporting the corresponding quiescent state until some later RCU_SOFTIRQ. This leisurly approach improves efficiency by increasing the number of update requests served by each grace period, but is not what is needed for kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. This commit therefore adds a new rcu_strict_gp_check_qs() function which, in CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y kernels, simply enters and immediately exist an RCU read-side critical section. If the CPU is in a quiescent state, the rcu_read_unlock() will attempt to report an immediate quiescent state. This rcu_strict_gp_check_qs() function is invoked from note_gp_changes(), so that a CPU just noticing a new grace period might immediately report a quiescent state for that grace period. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Force DEFAULT_RCU_BLIMIT to 1000 for strict RCU GPsPaul E. McKenney
The value of DEFAULT_RCU_BLIMIT is normally set to 10, the idea being to avoid needless response-time degradation due to RCU callback invocation. However, when CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y it is better to avoid throttling callback execution in order to better detect pointer leaks from RCU read-side critical sections. This commit therefore sets the value of DEFAULT_RCU_BLIMIT to 1000 in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Restrict default jiffies_till_first_fqs for strict RCU GPsPaul E. McKenney
If there are idle CPUs, RCU's grace-period kthread will wait several jiffies before even thinking about polling them. This promotes efficiency, which is normally a good thing, but when the kernel has been built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y, we care more about short grace periods. This commit therefore restricts the default jiffies_till_first_fqs value to zero in kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y, which causes RCU's grace-period kthread to poll for idle CPUs immediately after starting a grace period. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Remove unused __rcu_is_watching() functionPaul E. McKenney
The x86/entry work removed all uses of __rcu_is_watching(), therefore this commit removes it entirely. Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: <x86@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Make FQS more aggressive in complaining about offline CPUsJoel Fernandes (Google)
The RCU grace-period kthread's force-quiescent state (FQS) loop should never see an offline CPU that has not yet reported a quiescent state. After all, the offline CPU should have reported a quiescent state during the CPU-offline process, or, failing that, by rcu_gp_init() if it ran concurrently with either the CPU going offline or the last task on a leaf rcu_node structure exiting its RCU read-side critical section while all CPUs corresponding to that structure are offline. The FQS loop should therefore complain if it does see an offline CPU that has not yet reported a quiescent state. And it does, but only once the grace period has been in force for a full second. This commit therefore makes this warning more aggressive, so that it will trigger as soon as the condition makes its appearance. Light testing with TREE03 and hotplug shows no warnings. This commit also converts the warning to WARN_ON_ONCE() in order to stave off possible log spam. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Clarify comments about FQS loop reporting quiescent statesJoel Fernandes (Google)
Since at least v4.19, the FQS loop no longer reports quiescent states for offline CPUs except in emergency situations. This commit therefore fixes the comment in rcu_gp_init() to match the current code. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Move rcu_cpu_started per-CPU variable to rcu_dataPaul E. McKenney
When the rcu_cpu_started per-CPU variable was added by commit f64c6013a202 ("rcu/x86: Provide early rcu_cpu_starting() callback"), there were multiple sets of per-CPU rcu_data structures. Therefore, the rcu_cpu_started flag was added as a separate per-CPU variable. But now there is only one set of per-CPU rcu_data structures, so this commit moves rcu_cpu_started to a new ->cpu_started field in that structure. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Add READ_ONCE() to rcu_do_batch() access to rcu_resched_nsPaul E. McKenney
Given that sysfs can change the value of rcu_resched_ns at any time, this commit adds a READ_ONCE() to the sole access to that variable. While in the area, this commit also adds bounds checking, clamping the value to at least a millisecond, but no longer than a second. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Add READ_ONCE() to rcu_do_batch() access to rcu_divisorPaul E. McKenney
Given that sysfs can change the value of rcu_divisor at any time, this commit adds a READ_ONCE to the sole access to that variable. While in the area, this commit also adds bounds checking, clamping the value to a shift that makes sense for a signed long. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu/tree: Remove CONFIG_PREMPT_RCU check in force_qs_rnp()Neeraj Upadhyay
Originally, the call to rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() from force_qs_rnp() had to be conditioned on CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y, as in commit a77da14ce9af ("rcu: Yet another fix for preemption and CPU hotplug"). However, there is now a CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n definition of rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() that unconditionally returns zero, so invoking it is now safe. In addition, the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=n definition of rcu_initiate_boost() simply releases the rcu_node structure's ->lock, which is what happens when the "if" condition evaluates to false. This commit therefore drops the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU) check, so that rcu_initiate_boost() is called only in CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y kernels when there are readers blocking the current grace period. This does not change the behavior, but reduces code-reader confusion by eliminating non-CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y calls to rcu_initiate_boost(). Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu/tree: Force quiescent state on callback overloadNeeraj Upadhyay
On callback overload, it is necessary to quickly detect idle CPUs, and rcu_gp_fqs_check_wake() checks for this condition. Unfortunately, the code following the call to this function does not repeat this check, which means that in reality no actual quiescent-state forcing, instead only a couple of quick and pointless wakeups at the beginning of the grace period. This commit therefore adds a check for the RCU_GP_FLAG_OVLD flag in the post-wakeup "if" statement in rcu_gp_fqs_loop(). Fixes: 1fca4d12f4637 ("rcu: Expedite first two FQS scans under callback-overload conditions") Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>