summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-05-19lockdep: Prepare for noinstr sectionsPeter Zijlstra
Force inlining and prevent instrumentation of all sorts by marking the functions which are invoked from low level entry code with 'noinstr'. Split the irqflags tracking into two parts. One which does the heavy lifting while RCU is watching and the final one which can be invoked after RCU is turned off. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.484532537@linutronix.de
2020-04-08locking/lockdep: Improve 'invalid wait context' splatPeter Zijlstra
The 'invalid wait context' splat doesn't print all the information required to reconstruct / validate the error, specifically the irq-context state is missing. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2020-03-30Merge tag 'x86-entry-2020-03-30' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull x86 entry code updates from Thomas Gleixner: - Convert the 32bit syscalls to be pt_regs based which removes the requirement to push all 6 potential arguments onto the stack and consolidates the interface with the 64bit variant - The first small portion of the exception and syscall related entry code consolidation which aims to address the recently discovered issues vs. RCU, int3, NMI and some other exceptions which can interrupt any context. The bulk of the changes is still work in progress and aimed for 5.8. - A few lockdep namespace cleanups which have been applied into this branch to keep the prerequisites for the ongoing work confined. * tag 'x86-entry-2020-03-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (35 commits) x86/entry: Fix build error x86 with !CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS lockdep: Rename trace_{hard,soft}{irq_context,irqs_enabled}() lockdep: Rename trace_softirqs_{on,off}() lockdep: Rename trace_hardirq_{enter,exit}() x86/entry: Rename ___preempt_schedule x86: Remove unneeded includes x86/entry: Drop asmlinkage from syscalls x86/entry/32: Enable pt_regs based syscalls x86/entry/32: Use IA32-specific wrappers for syscalls taking 64-bit arguments x86/entry/32: Rename 32-bit specific syscalls x86/entry/32: Clean up syscall_32.tbl x86/entry: Remove ABI prefixes from functions in syscall tables x86/entry/64: Add __SYSCALL_COMMON() x86/entry: Remove syscall qualifier support x86/entry/64: Remove ptregs qualifier from syscall table x86/entry: Move max syscall number calculation to syscallhdr.sh x86/entry/64: Split X32 syscall table into its own file x86/entry/64: Move sys_ni_syscall stub to common.c x86/entry/64: Use syscall wrappers for x32_rt_sigreturn x86/entry: Refactor SYS_NI macros ...
2020-03-21lockdep: Rename trace_{hard,soft}{irq_context,irqs_enabled}()Peter Zijlstra
Continue what commit: d820ac4c2fa8 ("locking: rename trace_softirq_[enter|exit] => lockdep_softirq_[enter|exit]") started, rename these to avoid confusing them with tracepoints. git grep -l "trace_\(soft\|hard\)\(irq_context\|irqs_enabled\)" | while read file; do sed -ie 's/trace_\(soft\|hard\)\(irq_context\|irqs_enabled\)/lockdep_\1\2/g' $file; done Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200320115859.178626842@infradead.org
2020-03-21lockdep: Rename trace_softirqs_{on,off}()Peter Zijlstra
Continue what commit: d820ac4c2fa8 ("locking: rename trace_softirq_[enter|exit] => lockdep_softirq_[enter|exit]") started, rename these to avoid confusing them with tracepoints. git grep -l "trace_softirqs_\(on\|off\)" | while read file; do sed -ie 's/trace_softirqs_\(on\|off\)/lockdep_softirqs_\1/g' $file; done Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200320115859.119434738@infradead.org
2020-03-21lockdep: Add hrtimer context tracing bitsSebastian Andrzej Siewior
Set current->irq_config = 1 for hrtimers which are not marked to expire in hard interrupt context during hrtimer_init(). These timers will expire in softirq context on PREEMPT_RT. Setting this allows lockdep to differentiate these timers. If a timer is marked to expire in hard interrupt context then the timer callback is not supposed to acquire a regular spinlock instead of a raw_spinlock in the expiry callback. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.534508206@linutronix.de
2020-03-21lockdep: Introduce wait-type checksPeter Zijlstra
Extend lockdep to validate lock wait-type context. The current wait-types are: LD_WAIT_FREE, /* wait free, rcu etc.. */ LD_WAIT_SPIN, /* spin loops, raw_spinlock_t etc.. */ LD_WAIT_CONFIG, /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_LOCK, spinlock_t etc.. */ LD_WAIT_SLEEP, /* sleeping locks, mutex_t etc.. */ Where lockdep validates that the current lock (the one being acquired) fits in the current wait-context (as generated by the held stack). This ensures that there is no attempt to acquire mutexes while holding spinlocks, to acquire spinlocks while holding raw_spinlocks and so on. In other words, its a more fancy might_sleep(). Obviously RCU made the entire ordeal more complex than a simple single value test because RCU can be acquired in (pretty much) any context and while it presents a context to nested locks it is not the same as it got acquired in. Therefore its necessary to split the wait_type into two values, one representing the acquire (outer) and one representing the nested context (inner). For most 'normal' locks these two are the same. [ To make static initialization easier we have the rule that: .outer == INV means .outer == .inner; because INV == 0. ] It further means that its required to find the minimal .inner of the held stack to compare against the outer of the new lock; because while 'normal' RCU presents a CONFIG type to nested locks, if it is taken while already holding a SPIN type it obviously doesn't relax the rules. Below is an example output generated by the trivial test code: raw_spin_lock(&foo); spin_lock(&bar); spin_unlock(&bar); raw_spin_unlock(&foo); [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] ----------------------------- swapper/0/1 is trying to lock: ffffc90000013f20 (&bar){....}-{3:3}, at: kernel_init+0xdb/0x187 other info that might help us debug this: 1 lock held by swapper/0/1: #0: ffffc90000013ee0 (&foo){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernel_init+0xd1/0x187 The way to read it is to look at the new -{n,m} part in the lock description; -{3:3} for the attempted lock, and try and match that up to the held locks, which in this case is the one: -{2,2}. This tells that the acquiring lock requires a more relaxed environment than presented by the lock stack. Currently only the normal locks and RCU are converted, the rest of the lockdep users defaults to .inner = INV which is ignored. More conversions can be done when desired. The check for spinlock_t nesting is not enabled by default. It's a separate config option for now as there are known problems which are currently addressed. The config option allows to identify these problems and to verify that the solutions found are indeed solving them. The config switch will be removed and the checks will permanently enabled once the vast majority of issues has been addressed. [ bigeasy: Move LD_WAIT_FREE,… out of CONFIG_LOCKDEP to avoid compile failure with CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK + !CONFIG_LOCKDEP] [ tglx: Add the config option ] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200321113242.427089655@linutronix.de
2020-03-20lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversionsPeter Zijlstra
nmi_enter() does lockdep_off() and hence lockdep ignores everything. And NMI context makes it impossible to do full IN-NMI tracking like we do IN-HARDIRQ, that could result in graph_lock recursion. However, since look_up_lock_class() is lockless, we can find the class of a lock that has prior use and detect IN-NMI after USED, just not USED after IN-NMI. NOTE: By shifting the lockdep_off() recursion count to bit-16, we can easily differentiate between actual recursion and off. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200221134215.090538203@infradead.org
2020-03-20locking/lockdep: Rework lockdep_lockPeter Zijlstra
A few sites want to assert we own the graph_lock/lockdep_lock, provide a more conventional lock interface for it with a number of trivial debug checks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313102107.GX12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-03-20locking/lockdep: Fix bad recursion patternPeter Zijlstra
There were two patterns for lockdep_recursion: Pattern-A: if (current->lockdep_recursion) return current->lockdep_recursion = 1; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion = 0; Pattern-B: current->lockdep_recursion++; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion--; But a third pattern has emerged: Pattern-C: current->lockdep_recursion = 1; /* do stuff */ current->lockdep_recursion = 0; And while this isn't broken per-se, it is highly dangerous because it doesn't nest properly. Get rid of all Pattern-C instances and shore up Pattern-A with a warning. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200313093325.GW12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2020-03-20locking/lockdep: Avoid recursion in lockdep_count_{for,back}ward_deps()Boqun Feng
Qian Cai reported a bug when PROVE_RCU_LIST=y, and read on /proc/lockdep triggered a warning: [ ] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled) ... [ ] Call Trace: [ ] lock_is_held_type+0x5d/0x150 [ ] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x64/0x80 [ ] rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xac/0x100 [ ] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0xc0/0xc0 [ ] ? __slab_free+0x421/0x540 [ ] ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 [ ] ? __kmalloc_node+0x1d7/0x320 [ ] ? kvmalloc_node+0x6f/0x80 [ ] __bfs+0x28a/0x3c0 [ ] ? class_equal+0x30/0x30 [ ] lockdep_count_forward_deps+0x11a/0x1a0 The warning got triggered because lockdep_count_forward_deps() call __bfs() without current->lockdep_recursion being set, as a result a lockdep internal function (__bfs()) is checked by lockdep, which is unexpected, and the inconsistency between the irq-off state and the state traced by lockdep caused the warning. Apart from this warning, lockdep internal functions like __bfs() should always be protected by current->lockdep_recursion to avoid potential deadlocks and data inconsistency, therefore add the current->lockdep_recursion on-and-off section to protect __bfs() in both lockdep_count_forward_deps() and lockdep_count_backward_deps() Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312151258.128036-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2020-02-11locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entriesWaiman Long
Once a lock class is zapped, all the lock chains that include the zapped class are essentially useless. The lock_chain structure itself can be reused, but not the corresponding chain_hlocks[] entries. Over time, we will run out of chain_hlocks entries while there are still plenty of other lockdep array entries available. To fix this imbalance, we have to make chain_hlocks entries reusable just like the others. As the freed chain_hlocks entries are in blocks of various lengths. A simple bitmap like the one used in the other reusable lockdep arrays isn't applicable. Instead the chain_hlocks entries are put into bucketed lists (MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS) of chain blocks. Bucket 0 is the variable size bucket which houses chain blocks of size larger than MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS sorted in decreasing size order. Initially, the whole array is in one chain block (the primordial chain block) in bucket 0. The minimum size of a chain block is 2 chain_hlocks entries. That will be the minimum allocation size. In other word, allocation requests for one chain_hlocks entry will cause 2-entry block to be returned and hence 1 entry will be wasted. Allocation requests for the chain_hlocks are fulfilled first by looking for chain block of matching size. If not found, the first chain block from bucket[0] (the largest one) is split. That can cause hlock entries fragmentation and reduce allocation efficiency if a chain block of size > MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS is ever zapped and put back to after the primordial chain block. So the MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS must be large enough that this should seldom happen. By reusing the chain_hlocks entries, we are able to handle workloads that add and zap a lot of lock classes without the risk of running out of chain_hlocks entries as long as the total number of outstanding lock classes at any time remain within a reasonable limit. Two new tracking counters, nr_free_chain_hlocks & nr_large_chain_blocks, are added to track the total number of chain_hlocks entries in the free bucketed lists and the number of large chain blocks in buckets[0] respectively. The nr_free_chain_hlocks replaces nr_chain_hlocks. The nr_large_chain_blocks counter enables to see if we should increase the number of buckets (MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS) available so as to avoid to avoid the fragmentation problem in bucket[0]. An internal nfsd test that ran for more than an hour and kept on loading and unloading kernel modules could cause the following message to be displayed. [ 4318.443670] BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low! The patched kernel was able to complete the test with a lot of free chain_hlocks entries to spare: # cat /proc/lockdep_stats : dependency chains: 18867 [max: 65536] dependency chain hlocks: 74926 [max: 327680] dependency chain hlocks lost: 0 : zapped classes: 1541 zapped lock chains: 56765 large chain blocks: 1 By changing MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS to 3 and add a counter for the size of the largest chain block. The system still worked and We got the following lockdep_stats data: dependency chains: 18601 [max: 65536] dependency chain hlocks used: 73133 [max: 327680] dependency chain hlocks lost: 0 : zapped classes: 1541 zapped lock chains: 56702 large chain blocks: 45165 large chain block size: 20165 By running the test again, I was indeed able to cause chain_hlocks entries to get lost: dependency chain hlocks used: 74806 [max: 327680] dependency chain hlocks lost: 575 : large chain blocks: 48737 large chain block size: 7 Due to the fragmentation, it is possible that the "MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS too low!" error can happen even if a lot of of chain_hlocks entries appear to be free. Fortunately, a MAX_CHAIN_BUCKETS value of 16 should be big enough that few variable sized chain blocks, other than the initial one, should ever be present in bucket 0. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-7-longman@redhat.com
2020-02-11locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped lock chainsWaiman Long
Add a new counter nr_zapped_lock_chains to track the number lock chains that have been removed. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-6-longman@redhat.com
2020-02-11locking/lockdep: Throw away all lock chains with zapped classWaiman Long
If a lock chain contains a class that is zapped, the whole lock chain is likely to be invalid. If the zapped class is at the end of the chain, the partial chain without the zapped class should have been stored already as the current code will store all its predecessor chains. If the zapped class is somewhere in the middle, there is no guarantee that the partial chain will actually happen. It may just clutter up the hash and make searching slower. I would rather prefer storing the chain only when it actually happens. So just dump the corresponding chain_hlocks entries for now. A latter patch will try to reuse the freed chain_hlocks entries. This patch also changes the type of nr_chain_hlocks to unsigned integer to be consistent with the other counters. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-5-longman@redhat.com
2020-02-11locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped classesWaiman Long
The whole point of the lockdep dynamic key patch is to allow unused locks to be removed from the lockdep data buffers so that existing buffer space can be reused. However, there is no way to find out how many unused locks are zapped and so we don't know if the zapping process is working properly. Add a new nr_zapped_classes counter to track that and show it in /proc/lockdep_stats. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-4-longman@redhat.com
2020-02-11locking/lockdep: Decrement IRQ context counters when removing lock chainWaiman Long
There are currently three counters to track the IRQ context of a lock chain - nr_hardirq_chains, nr_softirq_chains and nr_process_chains. They are incremented when a new lock chain is added, but they are not decremented when a lock chain is removed. That causes some of the statistic counts reported by /proc/lockdep_stats to be incorrect. IRQ Fix that by decrementing the right counter when a lock chain is removed. Since inc_chains() no longer accesses hardirq_context and softirq_context directly, it is moved out from the CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS conditional compilation block. Fixes: a0b0fd53e1e6 ("locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use") Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200206152408.24165-2-longman@redhat.com
2019-12-25locking/lockdep: Fix buffer overrun problem in stack_trace[]Waiman Long
If the lockdep code is really running out of the stack_trace entries, it is likely that buffer overrun can happen and the data immediately after stack_trace[] will be corrupted. If there is less than LOCK_TRACE_SIZE_IN_LONGS entries left before the call to save_trace(), the max_entries computation will leave it with a very large positive number because of its unsigned nature. The subsequent call to stack_trace_save() will then corrupt the data after stack_trace[]. Fix that by changing max_entries to a signed integer and check for negative value before calling stack_trace_save(). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 12593b7467f9 ("locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191220135128.14876-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-11-13locking/lockdep: Update the comment for __lock_release()Dan Carpenter
This changes "to the list" to "from the list" and also deletes the obsolete comment about the "@nested" argument. The "nested" argument was removed in this commit, earlier this year: 5facae4f3549 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()"). Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191104091252.GA31509@mwanda Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-10-09locking/lockdep: Remove unused @nested argument from lock_release()Qian Cai
Since the following commit: b4adfe8e05f1 ("locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_release") @nested is no longer used in lock_release(), so remove it from all lock_release() calls and friends. Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: airlied@linux.ie Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: alexander.levin@microsoft.com Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: duyuyang@gmail.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: jack@suse.com Cc: jlbec@evilplan.or Cc: joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com Cc: joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com Cc: jslaby@suse.com Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Cc: mark@fasheh.com Cc: mhocko@kernel.org Cc: mripard@kernel.org Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Cc: rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Cc: sean@poorly.run Cc: st@kernel.org Cc: tj@kernel.org Cc: tytso@mit.edu Cc: vdavydov.dev@gmail.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1568909380-32199-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-09-16Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: - improve rwsem scalability - add uninitialized rwsem debugging check - reduce lockdep's stacktrace memory usage and add diagnostics - misc cleanups, code consolidation and constification * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usage locking/mutex: Use mutex flags macro instead of hard code locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c locking/qspinlock,x86: Clarify virt_spin_lock_key locking/rwsem: Check for operations on an uninitialized rwsem locking/rwsem: Make handoff writer optimistically spin on owner locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statistics locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces stacktrace: Constify 'entries' arguments locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not modified
2019-08-01lockdep: Make print_lock() address visiblePaul E. McKenney
Security is a wonderful thing, but so is the ability to debug based on lockdep warnings. This commit therefore makes lockdep lock addresses visible in the clear. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statisticsBart Van Assche
Report the number of stack traces and the number of stack trace hash chains. These two numbers are useful because these allow to estimate the number of stack trace hash collisions. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-5-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack tracesBart Van Assche
Although commit 669de8bda87b ("kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues") unregisters dynamic lockdep keys when a workqueue is destroyed, a side effect of that commit is that all stack traces associated with the lockdep key are leaked when a workqueue is destroyed. Fix this by storing each unique stack trace once. Other changes in this patch are: - Use NULL instead of { .nr_entries = 0 } to represent 'no trace'. - Store a pointer to a stack trace in struct lock_class and struct lock_list instead of storing 'nr_entries' and 'offset'. This patch avoids that the following program triggers the "BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!" complaint: #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int main() { for (;;) { int fd = open("/dev/infiniband/rdma_cm", O_RDWR); close(fd); } } Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-4-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not ↵Bart Van Assche
modified This patch does not change the behavior of the lockdep code. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-2-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Clean up #ifdef checksArnd Bergmann
As Will Deacon points out, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING implies TRACE_IRQFLAGS, so the conditions I added in the previous patch, and some others in the same file can be simplified by only checking for the former. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Fixes: 886532aee3cd ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628102919.2345242-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-25locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && ↵Arnd Bergmann
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING The last cleanup patch triggered another issue, as now another function should be moved into the same section: kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3580:12: error: 'mark_lock' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, Move mark_lock() into the same #ifdef section as its only caller, and remove the now-unused mark_lock_irq() stub helper. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Fixes: 0d2cc3b34532 ("locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190617124718.1232976-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON()Kobe Wu
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() will turn off debug_locks and makes print_unlock_imbalance_bug() return directly. Remove a redundant whitespace. Signed-off-by: Kobe Wu <kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org> Cc: <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com> Cc: Eason Lin <eason-yh.lin@mediatek.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1559217575-30298-1-git-send-email-kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero referencesImre Deak
The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_c; struct mutex lock_c; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_c, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_c, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_c); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); (**) will trigger the following error in __lock_release() when calling mutex_release() at **: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) The problem is that the hlock merging happening at * updates the references for test_ww_class incorrectly to 3 whereas it should've updated it to 4 (representing all the instances for ww_ctx and ww_lock_[abc]). Fix this by updating the references during merging correctly taking into account that we can have non-zero references (both for the hlock that we merge into another hlock or for the hlock we are merging into). Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-2-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Fix OOO unlock when hlocks need mergingImre Deak
The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct mutex lock_c; struct mutex lock_d; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); triggers the following WARN in __lock_release() when doing the unlock at *: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1); The problem is that the WARN check doesn't take into account the merging of ww_lock_a and ww_lock_b which results in decreasing curr->lockdep_depth by 2 not only 1. Note that the following sequence doesn't trigger the WARN, since there won't be any hlock merging. ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); mutex_init(&lock_d); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); mutex_lock(&lock_d); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_d); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); In general both of the above two sequences are valid and shouldn't trigger any lockdep warning. Fix this by taking the decrement due to the hlock merging into account during lock release and hlock class re-setting. Merging can't happen during lock downgrading since there won't be a new possibility to merge hlocks in that case, so add a WARN if merging still happens then. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-1-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove !dir in lock irq usage checkYuyang Du
In mark_lock_irq(), the following checks are performed: ---------------------------------- | -> | unsafe | read unsafe | |----------------------------------| | safe | F B | F* B* | |----------------------------------| | read safe | F? B* | - | ---------------------------------- Where: F: check_usage_forwards B: check_usage_backwards *: check enabled by STRICT_READ_CHECKS ?: check enabled by the !dir condition From checking point of view, the special F? case does not make sense, whereas it perhaps is made for peroformance concern. As later patch will address this issue, remove this exception, which makes the checks consistent later. With STRICT_READ_CHECKS = 1 which is default, there is no functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-24-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Adjust new bit cases in mark_lockYuyang Du
The new bit can be any possible lock usage except it is garbage, so the cases in switch can be made simpler. Warn early on if wrong usage bit is passed without taking locks. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-23-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initializationYuyang Du
Lock usage bit initialization is consolidated into one function mark_usage(). Trivial readability improvement. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-22-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Check redundant dependency only when CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALLYuyang Du
As Peter has put it all sound and complete for the cause, I simply quote: "It (check_redundant) was added for cross-release (which has since been reverted) which would generate a lot of redundant links (IIRC) but having it makes the reports more convoluted -- basically, if we had an A-B-C relation, then A-C will not be added to the graph because it is already covered. This then means any report will include B, even though a shorter cycle might have been possible." This would increase the number of direct dependencies. For a simple workload (make clean; reboot; make vmlinux -j8), the data looks like this: CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL: direct dependencies: 6926 !CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SMALL: direct dependencies: 9052 (+30.7%) Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-21-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Refactorize check_noncircular and check_redundantYuyang Du
These two functions now handle different check results themselves. A new check_path function is added to check whether there is a path in the dependency graph. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-20-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in __lock_releaseYuyang Du
The @nested is not used in __release_lock so remove it despite that it is not used in lock_release in the first place. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-19-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove redundant argument in check_deadlockYuyang Du
In check_deadlock(), the third argument read comes from the second argument hlock so that it can be removed. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-18-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Update comments on dependency searchYuyang Du
The breadth-first search is implemented as flat-out non-recursive now, but the comments are still describing it as recursive, update the comments in that regard. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-16-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Avoid constant checks in __bfs by using offset referenceYuyang Du
In search of a dependency in the lock graph, there is contant checks for forward or backward search. Directly reference the field offset of the struct that differentiates the type of search to avoid those checks. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-15-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change the return type of __cq_dequeue()Yuyang Du
With the change, we can slightly adjust the code to iterate the queue in BFS search, which simplifies the code. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-14-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change type of the element field in circular_queueYuyang Du
The element field is an array in struct circular_queue to keep track of locks in the search. Making it the same type as the locks avoids type cast. Also fix a typo and elaborate the comment above struct circular_queue. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-13-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Update commentYuyang Du
A leftover comment is removed. While at it, add more explanatory comments. Such a trivial patch! Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-12-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove unused argument in validate_chain() and check_deadlock()Yuyang Du
The lockdep_map argument in them is not used, remove it. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-11-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change the range of class_idx in held_lock structYuyang Du
held_lock->class_idx is used to point to the class of the held lock. The index is shifted by 1 to make index 0 mean no class, which results in class index shifting back and forth but is not worth doing so. The reason is: (1) there will be no "no-class" held_lock to begin with, and (2) index 0 seems to be used for error checking, but if something wrong indeed happened, the index can't be counted on to distinguish it as that something won't set the class_idx to 0 on purpose to tell us it is wrong. Therefore, change the index to start from 0. This saves a lot of back-and-forth shifts and a class slot back to lock_classes. Since index 0 is now used for lock class, we change the initial chain key to -1 to avoid key collision, which is due to the fact that __jhash_mix(0, 0, 0) = 0. Actually, the initial chain key can be any arbitrary value other than 0. In addition, a bitmap is maintained to keep track of the used lock classes, and we check the validity of the held lock against that bitmap. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-10-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Define INITIAL_CHAIN_KEY for chain keys to start withYuyang Du
Chain keys are computed using Jenkins hash function, which needs an initial hash to start with. Dedicate a macro to make this clear and configurable. A later patch changes this initial chain key. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-9-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Use lockdep_init_task for task initiation consistentlyYuyang Du
Despite that there is a lockdep_init_task() which does nothing, lockdep initiates tasks by assigning lockdep fields and does so inconsistently. Fix this by using lockdep_init_task(). Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-8-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Print the right depth for chain key collisionYuyang Du
Since chains are separated by IRQ context, so when printing a chain the depth should be consistent with it. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-6-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Remove useless conditional macroYuyang Du
Since #defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) is used in the scope of #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, it can be removed. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-5-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checksYuyang Du
The lock usage bit characters are defined and determined with tricks. Add some explanation to make it a bit clearer, then adjust the logic to check the usage, which optimizes the code a bit. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-4-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Change all print_*() return type to voidYuyang Du
Since none of the print_*() function's return value is necessary, change their return type to void. No functional change. In cases where an invariable return value is used, this change slightly improves readability, i.e.: print_x(); return 0; is definitely better than: return print_x(); /* where print_x() always returns 0 */ Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: bvanassche@acm.org Cc: frederic@kernel.org Cc: ming.lei@redhat.com Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-2-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-05-24locking/lockdep: Remove the unused print_lock_trace() functionAnders Roxell
gcc warns that function print_lock_trace() is unused if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING isn't set: ../kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2820:13: warning: ‘print_lock_trace’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function] Rework so we remove the function if CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING isn't set. Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: will.deacon@arm.com Fixes: c120bce78065 ("lockdep: Simplify stack trace handling") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190516191326.27003-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-07-30 04:43:39 +0000