summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-11-12bpf: Support private stack for struct_ops progsYonghong Song
For struct_ops progs, whether a particular prog uses private stack depends on prog->aux->priv_stack_requested setting before actual insn-level verification for that prog. One particular implementation is to piggyback on struct_ops->check_member(). The next patch has an example for this. The struct_ops->check_member() sets prog->aux->priv_stack_requested to be true which enables private stack usage. The struct_ops prog follows the same rule as kprobe/tracing progs after function bpf_enable_priv_stack(). For example, even a struct_ops prog requests private stack, it could still use normal kernel stack if the stack size is small (< 64 bytes). Similar to tracing progs, nested same cpu same prog run will be skipped. A field (recursion_detected()) is added to bpf_prog_aux structure. If bpf_prog->aux->recursion_detected is implemented by the struct_ops subsystem and nested same cpu/prog happens, the function will be triggered to report an error, collect related info, etc. Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112163933.2224962-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-11-12bpf: Enable private stack for eligible subprogsYonghong Song
If private stack is used by any subprog, set that subprog prog->aux->jits_use_priv_stack to be true so later jit can allocate private stack for that subprog properly. Also set env->prog->aux->jits_use_priv_stack to be true if any subprog uses private stack. This is a use case for a single main prog (no subprogs) to use private stack, and also a use case for later struct-ops progs where env->prog->aux->jits_use_priv_stack will enable recursion check if any subprog uses private stack. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112163912.2224007-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-11-12bpf: Find eligible subprogs for private stack supportYonghong Song
Private stack will be allocated with percpu allocator in jit time. To avoid complexity at runtime, only one copy of private stack is available per cpu per prog. So runtime recursion check is necessary to avoid stack corruption. Current private stack only supports kprobe/perf_event/tp/raw_tp which has recursion check in the kernel, and prog types that use bpf trampoline recursion check. For trampoline related prog types, currently only tracing progs have recursion checking. To avoid complexity, all async_cb subprogs use normal kernel stack including those subprogs used by both main prog subtree and async_cb subtree. Any prog having tail call also uses kernel stack. To avoid jit penalty with private stack support, a subprog stack size threshold is set such that only if the stack size is no less than the threshold, private stack is supported. The current threshold is 64 bytes. This avoids jit penality if the stack usage is small. A useless 'continue' is also removed from a loop in func check_max_stack_depth(). Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241112163907.2223839-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-11-11bpf: Drop special callback reference handlingKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Logic to prevent callbacks from acquiring new references for the program (i.e. leaving acquired references), and releasing caller references (i.e. those acquired in parent frames) was introduced in commit 9d9d00ac29d0 ("bpf: Fix reference state management for synchronous callbacks"). This was necessary because back then, the verifier simulated each callback once (that could potentially be executed N times, where N can be zero). This meant that callbacks that left lingering resources or cleared caller resources could do it more than once, operating on undefined state or leaking memory. With the fixes to callback verification in commit ab5cfac139ab ("bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times"), all of this extra logic is no longer necessary. Hence, drop it as part of this commit. Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241109231430.2475236-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-11-11bpf: Refactor active lock managementKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
When bpf_spin_lock was introduced originally, there was deliberation on whether to use an array of lock IDs, but since bpf_spin_lock is limited to holding a single lock at any given time, we've been using a single ID to identify the held lock. In preparation for introducing spin locks that can be taken multiple times, introduce support for acquiring multiple lock IDs. For this purpose, reuse the acquired_refs array and store both lock and pointer references. We tag the entry with REF_TYPE_PTR or REF_TYPE_LOCK to disambiguate and find the relevant entry. The ptr field is used to track the map_ptr or btf (for bpf_obj_new allocations) to ensure locks can be matched with protected fields within the same "allocation", i.e. bpf_obj_new object or map value. The struct active_lock is changed to an int as the state is part of the acquired_refs array, and we only need active_lock as a cheap way of detecting lock presence. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241109231430.2475236-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-11-11bpf: Add support for uprobe multi session attachJiri Olsa
Adding support to attach BPF program for entry and return probe of the same function. This is common use case which at the moment requires to create two uprobe multi links. Adding new BPF_TRACE_UPROBE_SESSION attach type that instructs kernel to attach single link program to both entry and exit probe. It's possible to control execution of the BPF program on return probe simply by returning zero or non zero from the entry BPF program execution to execute or not the BPF program on return probe respectively. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-4-jolsa@kernel.org
2024-11-11bpf: Allow return values 0 and 1 for kprobe sessionJiri Olsa
The kprobe session program can return only 0 or 1, instruct verifier to check for that. Fixes: 535a3692ba72 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session attach") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2024-11-04bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULLKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases, a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this issue is available in [0]. Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL, causing explicit NULL checks to be deleted, and accesses to such pointers potentially crashing the kernel. To fix this, mark raw_tp arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL, and then special case the dereference and pointer arithmetic to permit it, and allow passing them into helpers/kfuncs; these exceptions are made for raw_tp programs only. Ensure that we don't do this when ref_obj_id > 0, as in that case this is an acquired object and doesn't need such adjustment. The reason we do mask_raw_tp_trusted_reg logic is because other will recheck in places whether the register is a trusted_reg, and then consider our register as untrusted when detecting the presence of the PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag. To allow safe dereference, we enable PROBE_MEM marking when we see loads into trusted pointers with PTR_MAYBE_NULL. While trusted raw_tp arguments can also be passed into helpers or kfuncs where such broken assumption may cause issues, a future patch set will tackle their case separately, as PTR_TO_BTF_ID (without PTR_TRUSTED) can already be passed into helpers and causes similar problems. Thus, they are left alone for now. It is possible that these checks also permit passing non-raw_tp args that are trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID with null marking. In such a case, allowing dereference when pointer is NULL expands allowed behavior, so won't regress existing programs, and the case of passing these into helpers is the same as above and will be dealt with later. Also update the failure case in tp_btf_nullable selftest to capture the new behavior, as the verifier will no longer cause an error when directly dereference a raw tracepoint argument marked as __nullable. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZrCZS6nisraEqehw@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Reported-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104171959.2938862-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-11-03bpf: Unify resource leak checksKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
There are similar checks for covering locks, references, RCU read sections and preempt_disable sections in 3 places in the verifer, i.e. for tail calls, bpf_ld_[abs, ind], and exit path (for BPF_EXIT and bpf_throw). Unify all of these into a common check_resource_leak function to avoid code duplication. Also update the error strings in selftests to the new ones in the same change to ensure clean bisection. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103225940.1408302-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-11-03bpf: Tighten tail call checks for lingering locks, RCU, preempt_disableKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
There are three situations when a program logically exits and transfers control to the kernel or another program: bpf_throw, BPF_EXIT, and tail calls. The former two check for any lingering locks and references, but tail calls currently do not. Expand the checks to check for spin locks, RCU read sections and preempt disabled sections. Spin locks are indirectly preventing tail calls as function calls are disallowed, but the checks for preemption and RCU are more relaxed, hence ensure tail calls are prevented in their presence. Fixes: 9bb00b2895cb ("bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()") Fixes: fc7566ad0a82 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_preempt_[disable,enable] kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241103225940.1408302-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-24Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpfAlexei Starovoitov
Cross-merge bpf fixes after downstream PR. No conflicts. Adjacent changes in: include/linux/bpf.h include/uapi/linux/bpf.h kernel/bpf/btf.c kernel/bpf/helpers.c kernel/bpf/syscall.c kernel/bpf/verifier.c kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c mm/slab_common.c tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024215724.60017-1-daniel@iogearbox.net/ Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-24bpf: Handle BPF_UPTR in verifierKui-Feng Lee
This patch adds BPF_UPTR support to the verifier. Not that only the map_value will support the "__uptr" type tag. This patch enforces only BPF_LDX is allowed to the value of an uptr. After BPF_LDX, it will mark the dst_reg as PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL with size deduced from the field.kptr.btf_id. This will make the dst_reg pointed memory to be readable and writable as scalar. There is a redundant "val_reg = reg_state(env, value_regno);" statement in the check_map_kptr_access(). This patch takes this chance to remove it also. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023234759.860539-3-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-23bpf: fix do_misc_fixups() for bpf_get_branch_snapshot()Andrii Nakryiko
We need `goto next_insn;` at the end of patching instead of `continue;`. It currently works by accident by making verifier re-process patched instructions. Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Fixes: 314a53623cd4 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_branch_snapshot() helper") Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241023161916.2896274-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-22bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaningDaniel Borkmann
Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg() has the following code: if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) /* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw * mode so that the program is required to * initialize all the memory that the helper could * just partially fill up. */ meta = NULL; This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example, .rodata global maps. The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type") got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to". The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only assumes the latter memory is read instead. Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the BPF verifier checks for writing to memory. Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO} we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg(). Fixes: 7b3552d3f9f6 ("bpf: Reject writes for PTR_TO_MAP_KEY in check_helper_mem_access") Fixes: 97e6d7dab1ca ("bpf: Check PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY in check_helper_mem_access") Fixes: 15baa55ff5b0 ("bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context") Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021152809.33343-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-17bpf: Fix incorrect delta propagation between linked registersDaniel Borkmann
Nathaniel reported a bug in the linked scalar delta tracking, which can lead to accepting a program with OOB access. The specific code is related to the sync_linked_regs() function and the BPF_ADD_CONST flag, which signifies a constant offset between two scalar registers tracked by the same register id. The verifier attempts to track "similar" scalars in order to propagate bounds information learned about one scalar to others. For instance, if r1 and r2 are known to contain the same value, then upon encountering 'if (r1 != 0x1234) goto xyz', not only does it know that r1 is equal to 0x1234 on the path where that conditional jump is not taken, it also knows that r2 is. Additionally, with env->bpf_capable set, the verifier will track scalars which should be a constant delta apart (if r1 is known to be one greater than r2, then if r1 is known to be equal to 0x1234, r2 must be equal to 0x1233.) The code path for the latter in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() is reached when processing both 32 and 64-bit addition operations. While adjust_reg_min_max_vals() knows whether dst_reg was produced by a 32 or a 64-bit addition (based on the alu32 bool), the only information saved in dst_reg is the id of the source register (reg->id, or'ed by BPF_ADD_CONST) and the value of the constant offset (reg->off). Later, the function sync_linked_regs() will attempt to use this information to propagate bounds information from one register (known_reg) to others, meaning, for all R in linked_regs, it copies known_reg range (and possibly adjusting delta) into R for the case of R->id == known_reg->id. For the delta adjustment, meaning, matching reg->id with BPF_ADD_CONST, the verifier adjusts the register as reg = known_reg; reg += delta where delta is computed as (s32)reg->off - (s32)known_reg->off and placed as a scalar into a fake_reg to then simulate the addition of reg += fake_reg. This is only correct, however, if the value in reg was created by a 64-bit addition. When reg contains the result of a 32-bit addition operation, its upper 32 bits will always be zero. sync_linked_regs() on the other hand, may cause the verifier to believe that the addition between fake_reg and reg overflows into those upper bits. For example, if reg was generated by adding the constant 1 to known_reg using a 32-bit alu operation, then reg->off is 1 and known_reg->off is 0. If known_reg is known to be the constant 0xFFFFFFFF, sync_linked_regs() will tell the verifier that reg is equal to the constant 0x100000000. This is incorrect as the actual value of reg will be 0, as the 32-bit addition will wrap around. Example: 0: (b7) r0 = 0; R0_w=0 1: (18) r1 = 0x80000001; R1_w=0x80000001 3: (37) r1 /= 1; R1_w=scalar() 4: (bf) r2 = r1; R1_w=scalar(id=1) R2_w=scalar(id=1) 5: (bf) r4 = r1; R1_w=scalar(id=1) R4_w=scalar(id=1) 6: (04) w2 += 2147483647; R2_w=scalar(id=1+2147483647,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 7: (04) w4 += 0 ; R4_w=scalar(id=1+0,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) 8: (15) if r2 == 0x0 goto pc+1 10: R0=0 R1=0xffffffff80000001 R2=0x7fffffff R4=0xffffffff80000001 R10=fp0 What can be seen here is that r1 is copied to r2 and r4, such that {r1,r2,r4}.id are all the same which later lets sync_linked_regs() to be invoked. Then, in a next step constants are added with alu32 to r2 and r4, setting their ->off, as well as id |= BPF_ADD_CONST. Next, the conditional will bind r2 and propagate ranges to its linked registers. The verifier now believes the upper 32 bits of r4 are r4=0xffffffff80000001, while actually r4=r1=0x80000001. One approach for a simple fix suitable also for stable is to limit the constant delta tracking to only 64-bit alu addition. If necessary at some later point, BPF_ADD_CONST could be split into BPF_ADD_CONST64 and BPF_ADD_CONST32 to avoid mixing the two under the tradeoff to further complicate sync_linked_regs(). However, none of the added tests from dedf56d775c0 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests for add_const") make this necessary at this point, meaning, BPF CI also passes with just limiting tracking to 64-bit alu addition. Fixes: 98d7ca374ba4 ("bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers.") Reported-by: Nathaniel Theis <nathaniel.theis@nccgroup.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241016134913.32249-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
2024-10-16mm/bpf: Add bpf_get_kmem_cache() kfuncNamhyung Kim
The bpf_get_kmem_cache() is to get a slab cache information from a virtual address like virt_to_cache(). If the address is a pointer to a slab object, it'd return a valid kmem_cache pointer, otherwise NULL is returned. It doesn't grab a reference count of the kmem_cache so the caller is responsible to manage the access. The returned point is marked as PTR_UNTRUSTED. The intended use case for now is to symbolize locks in slab objects from the lock contention tracepoints. Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> (mm/*) Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> #mm/slab Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010232505.1339892-3-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-15bpf: Fix truncation bug in coerce_reg_to_size_sx()Dimitar Kanaliev
coerce_reg_to_size_sx() updates the register state after a sign-extension operation. However, there's a bug in the assignment order of the unsigned min/max values, leading to incorrect truncation: 0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar() 1: (57) r0 &= 1 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1)) 2: (07) r0 += 254 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=254,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0xfe; 0x1)) 3: (bf) r0 = (s8)r0 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-2,smax=smax32=-1,umin=umin32=0xfffffffe,umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0xfffffffffffffffe; 0x1)) In the current implementation, the unsigned 32-bit min/max values (u32_min_value and u32_max_value) are assigned directly from the 64-bit signed min/max values (s64_min and s64_max): reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = s64_min; reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value = s64_max; Due to the chain assigmnent, this is equivalent to: reg->u32_min_value = s64_min; // Unintended truncation reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value; reg->u32_max_value = s64_max; // Unintended truncation reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value; Fixes: 1f9a1ea821ff ("bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns") Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dimitar Kanaliev <dimitar.kanaliev@siteground.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241014121155.92887-2-dimitar.kanaliev@siteground.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-10bpf: fix kfunc btf caching for modulesToke Høiland-Jørgensen
The verifier contains a cache for looking up module BTF objects when calling kfuncs defined in modules. This cache uses a 'struct bpf_kfunc_btf_tab', which contains a sorted list of BTF objects that were already seen in the current verifier run, and the BTF objects are looked up by the offset stored in the relocated call instruction using bsearch(). The first time a given offset is seen, the module BTF is loaded from the file descriptor passed in by libbpf, and stored into the cache. However, there's a bug in the code storing the new entry: it stores a pointer to the new cache entry, then calls sort() to keep the cache sorted for the next lookup using bsearch(), and then returns the entry that was just stored through the stored pointer. However, because sort() modifies the list of entries in place *by value*, the stored pointer may no longer point to the right entry, in which case the wrong BTF object will be returned. The end result of this is an intermittent bug where, if a BPF program calls two functions with the same signature in two different modules, the function from the wrong module may sometimes end up being called. Whether this happens depends on the order of the calls in the BPF program (as that affects whether sort() reorders the array of BTF objects), making it especially hard to track down. Simon, credited as reporter below, spent significant effort analysing and creating a reproducer for this issue. The reproducer is added as a selftest in a subsequent patch. The fix is straight forward: simply don't use the stored pointer after calling sort(). Since we already have an on-stack pointer to the BTF object itself at the point where the function return, just use that, and populate it from the cache entry in the branch where the lookup succeeds. Fixes: 2357672c54c3 ("bpf: Introduce BPF support for kernel module function calls") Reported-by: Simon Sundberg <simon.sundberg@kau.se> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010-fix-kfunc-btf-caching-for-modules-v2-1-745af6c1af98@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-10bpf: fix argument type in bpf_loop documentationMatteo Croce
The `index` argument to bpf_loop() is threaded as an u64. This lead in a subtle verifier denial where clang cloned the argument in another register[1]. [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/34650#issuecomment-2401092895 Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <teknoraver@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010035652.17830-1-technoboy85@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-09bpf: use kvzmalloc to allocate BPF verifier environmentRik van Riel
The kzmalloc call in bpf_check can fail when memory is very fragmented, which in turn can lead to an OOM kill. Use kvzmalloc to fall back to vmalloc when memory is too fragmented to allocate an order 3 sized bpf verifier environment. Admittedly this is not a very common case, and only happens on systems where memory has already been squeezed close to the limit, but this does not seem like much of a hot path, and it's a simple enough fix. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008170735.16766766@imladris.surriel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-03bpf: Use KF_FASTCALL to mark kfuncs supporting fastcall contractEduard Zingerman
In order to allow pahole add btf_decl_tag("bpf_fastcall") for kfuncs supporting bpf_fastcall, mark such functions with KF_FASTCALL in id_set8 objects. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240916091712.2929279-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-10-01bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_defEduard Zingerman
Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set: 0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns 1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 &= 0x7fffffff 2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0 3: if w0 < 10 goto +0 --------------> r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r) 4: r1 >>= 32 r11 <<= 32 (r) 5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r) 6: exit; if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0 r1 >>= 32 r0 = r1 exit (or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that require zero extension for upper register half). The following happens w/o this patch: - r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0); - w1 is marked as subreg at (2); - w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state(); - w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2) for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set; - because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r)); - this random value is read at (5). Fixes: 75748837b7e5 ("bpf: Propagate scalar ranges through register assignments.") Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/7e2aa30a62d740db182c170fdd8f81c596df280d.camel@gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240924210844.1758441-1-eddyz87@gmail.com
2024-09-24Merge tag 'bpf-next-6.12-struct-fd' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Pull bpf 'struct fd' updates from Alexei Starovoitov: "This includes struct_fd BPF changes from Al and Andrii" * tag 'bpf-next-6.12-struct-fd' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: bpf: convert bpf_token_create() to CLASS(fd, ...) security,bpf: constify struct path in bpf_token_create() LSM hook bpf: more trivial fdget() conversions bpf: trivial conversions for fdget() bpf: switch maps to CLASS(fd, ...) bpf: factor out fetching bpf_map from FD and adding it to used_maps list bpf: switch fdget_raw() uses to CLASS(fd_raw, ...) bpf: convert __bpf_prog_get() to CLASS(fd, ...)
2024-09-21Merge tag 'bpf-next-6.12' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Pull bpf updates from Alexei Starovoitov: - Introduce '__attribute__((bpf_fastcall))' for helpers and kfuncs with corresponding support in LLVM. It is similar to existing 'no_caller_saved_registers' attribute in GCC/LLVM with a provision for backward compatibility. It allows compilers generate more efficient BPF code assuming the verifier or JITs will inline or partially inline a helper/kfunc with such attribute. bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx, bpf_rdonly_cast, bpf_get_smp_processor_id are the first set of such helpers. - Harden and extend ELF build ID parsing logic. When called from sleepable context the relevants parts of ELF file will be read to find and fetch .note.gnu.build-id information. Also harden the logic to avoid TOCTOU, overflow, out-of-bounds problems. - Improvements and fixes for sched-ext: - Allow passing BPF iterators as kfunc arguments - Make the pointer returned from iter_next method trusted - Fix x86 JIT convergence issue due to growing/shrinking conditional jumps in variable length encoding - BPF_LSM related: - Introduce few VFS kfuncs and consolidate them in fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c - Enforce correct range of return values from certain LSM hooks - Disallow attaching to other LSM hooks - Prerequisite work for upcoming Qdisc in BPF: - Allow kptrs in program provided structs - Support for gen_epilogue in verifier_ops - Important fixes: - Fix uprobe multi pid filter check - Fix bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers - Track equal scalars history on per-instruction level - Fix tailcall hierarchy on x86 and arm64 - Fix signed division overflow to prevent INT_MIN/-1 trap on x86 - Fix get kernel stack in BPF progs attached to tracepoint:syscall - Selftests: - Add uprobe bench/stress tool - Generate file dependencies to drastically improve re-build time - Match JIT-ed and BPF asm with __xlated/__jited keywords - Convert older tests to test_progs framework - Add support for RISC-V - Few fixes when BPF programs are compiled with GCC-BPF backend (support for GCC-BPF in BPF CI is ongoing in parallel) - Add traffic monitor - Enable cross compile and musl libc * tag 'bpf-next-6.12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (260 commits) btf: require pahole 1.21+ for DEBUG_INFO_BTF with default DWARF version btf: move pahole check in scripts/link-vmlinux.sh to lib/Kconfig.debug btf: remove redundant CONFIG_BPF test in scripts/link-vmlinux.sh bpf: Call the missed kfree() when there is no special field in btf bpf: Call the missed btf_record_free() when map creation fails selftests/bpf: Add a test case to write mtu result into .rodata selftests/bpf: Add a test case to write strtol result into .rodata selftests/bpf: Rename ARG_PTR_TO_LONG test description selftests/bpf: Fix ARG_PTR_TO_LONG {half-,}uninitialized test bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error bpf: Improve check_raw_mode_ok test for MEM_UNINIT-tagged types bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only maps bpf: Remove truncation test in bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers bpf: Fix bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers for 32bit selftests/bpf: Add tests for sdiv/smod overflow cases bpf: Fix a sdiv overflow issue libbpf: Add bpf_object__token_fd accessor docs/bpf: Add missing BPF program types to docs docs/bpf: Add constant values for linkages bpf: Use fake pt_regs when doing bpf syscall tracepoint tracing ...
2024-09-13bpf: Improve check_raw_mode_ok test for MEM_UNINIT-tagged typesDaniel Borkmann
When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM. This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can be passed there, too. The func proto sanity check goes back to commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type"), and its purpose was to detect wrong func protos which had more than just one MEM_UNINIT-tagged type as arguments. The reason more than one is currently not supported is as we mark stack slots with STACK_MISC in check_helper_call() in case of raw mode based on meta.access_size to allow uninitialized stack memory to be passed to helpers when they just write into the buffer. Probing for base type as well as MEM_UNINIT tagging ensures that other types do not get missed (as it used to be the case for ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG}). Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types") Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-4-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-09-13bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only mapsDaniel Borkmann
Lonial found an issue that despite user- and BPF-side frozen BPF map (like in case of .rodata), it was still possible to write into it from a BPF program side through specific helpers having ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as arguments. In check_func_arg() when the argument is as mentioned, the meta->raw_mode is never set. Later, check_helper_mem_access(), under the case of PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE as register base type, it assumes BPF_READ for the subsequent call to check_map_access_type() and given the BPF map is read-only it succeeds. The helpers really need to be annotated as ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} | MEM_UNINIT when results are written into them as opposed to read out of them. The latter indicates that it's okay to pass a pointer to uninitialized memory as the memory is written to anyway. However, ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} is a special case of ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM just with additional alignment requirement. So it is better to just get rid of the ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} special cases altogether and reuse the fixed size memory types. For this, add MEM_ALIGNED to additionally ensure alignment given these helpers write directly into the args via *<ptr> = val. The .arg*_size has been initialized reflecting the actual sizeof(*<ptr>). MEM_ALIGNED can only be used in combination with MEM_FIXED_SIZE annotated argument types, since in !MEM_FIXED_SIZE cases the verifier does not know the buffer size a priori and therefore cannot blindly write *<ptr> = val. Fixes: 57c3bb725a3d ("bpf: Introduce ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} arg types") Reported-by: Lonial Con <kongln9170@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913191754.13290-3-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-09-13bpf: Fix a sdiv overflow issueYonghong Song
Zac Ecob reported a problem where a bpf program may cause kernel crash due to the following error: Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI The failure is due to the below signed divide: LLONG_MIN/-1 where LLONG_MIN equals to -9,223,372,036,854,775,808. LLONG_MIN/-1 is supposed to give a positive number 9,223,372,036,854,775,808, but it is impossible since for 64-bit system, the maximum positive number is 9,223,372,036,854,775,807. On x86_64, LLONG_MIN/-1 will cause a kernel exception. On arm64, the result for LLONG_MIN/-1 is LLONG_MIN. Further investigation found all the following sdiv/smod cases may trigger an exception when bpf program is running on x86_64 platform: - LLONG_MIN/-1 for 64bit operation - INT_MIN/-1 for 32bit operation - LLONG_MIN%-1 for 64bit operation - INT_MIN%-1 for 32bit operation where -1 can be an immediate or in a register. On arm64, there are no exceptions: - LLONG_MIN/-1 = LLONG_MIN - INT_MIN/-1 = INT_MIN - LLONG_MIN%-1 = 0 - INT_MIN%-1 = 0 where -1 can be an immediate or in a register. Insn patching is needed to handle the above cases and the patched codes produced results aligned with above arm64 result. The below are pseudo codes to handle sdiv/smod exceptions including both divisor -1 and divisor 0 and the divisor is stored in a register. sdiv: tmp = rX tmp += 1 /* [-1, 0] -> [0, 1] if tmp >(unsigned) 1 goto L2 if tmp == 0 goto L1 rY = 0 L1: rY = -rY; goto L3 L2: rY /= rX L3: smod: tmp = rX tmp += 1 /* [-1, 0] -> [0, 1] if tmp >(unsigned) 1 goto L1 if tmp == 1 (is64 ? goto L2 : goto L3) rY = 0; goto L2 L1: rY %= rX L2: goto L4 // only when !is64 L3: wY = wY // only when !is64 L4: [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/tPJLTEh7S_DxFEqAI2Ji5MBSoZVg7_G-Py2iaZpAaWtM961fFTWtsnlzwvTbzBzaUzwQAoNATXKUlt0LZOFgnDcIyKCswAnAGdUF3LBrhGQ=@protonmail.com/ Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240913150326.1187788-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-09-11bpf: Support __nullable argument suffix for tp_btfPhilo Lu
Pointers passed to tp_btf were trusted to be valid, but some tracepoints do take NULL pointer as input, such as trace_tcp_send_reset(). Then the invalid memory access cannot be detected by verifier. This patch fix it by add a suffix "__nullable" to the unreliable argument. The suffix is shown in btf, and PTR_MAYBE_NULL will be added to nullable arguments. Then users must check the pointer before use it. A problem here is that we use "btf_trace_##call" to search func_proto. As it is a typedef, argument names as well as the suffix are not recorded. To solve this, I use bpf_raw_event_map to find "__bpf_trace##template" from "btf_trace_##call", and then we can see the suffix. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911033719.91468-2-lulie@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2024-09-09bpf: Fix error message on kfunc arg type mismatchMaxim Mikityanskiy
When "arg#%d expected pointer to ctx, but got %s" error is printed, both template parts actually point to the type of the argument, therefore, it will also say "but got PTR", regardless of what was the actual register type. Fix the message to print the register type in the second part of the template, change the existing test to adapt to the new format, and add a new test to test the case when arg is a pointer to context, but reg is a scalar. Fixes: 00b85860feb8 ("bpf: Rewrite kfunc argument handling") Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxim@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240909133909.1315460-1-maxim@isovalent.com
2024-09-05bpf: use type_may_be_null() helper for nullable-param checkShung-Hsi Yu
Commit 980ca8ceeae6 ("bpf: check bpf_dummy_struct_ops program params for test runs") does bitwise AND between reg_type and PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which is correct, but due to type difference the compiler complains: net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:118:31: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('const enum bpf_reg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 118 | if (info && (info->reg_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL)) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Workaround the warning by moving the type_may_be_null() helper from verifier.c into bpf_verifier.h, and reuse it here to check whether param is nullable. Fixes: 980ca8ceeae6 ("bpf: check bpf_dummy_struct_ops program params for test runs") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404241956.HEiRYwWq-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240905055233.70203-1-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-09-04bpf: Fix indentation issue in epilogue_idxMartin KaFai Lau
There is a report on new indentation issue in epilogue_idx. This patch fixed it. Fixes: 169c31761c8d ("bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408311622.4GzlzN33-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904180847.56947-3-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-09-04bpf: Remove the insn_buf array stack usage from the inline_bpf_loop()Martin KaFai Lau
This patch removes the insn_buf array stack usage from the inline_bpf_loop(). Instead, the env->insn_buf is used. The usage in inline_bpf_loop() needs more than 16 insn, so the INSN_BUF_SIZE needs to be increased from 16 to 32. The compiler stack size warning on the verifier is gone after this change. Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904180847.56947-2-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-29bpf: Make the pointer returned by iter next method validJuntong Deng
Currently we cannot pass the pointer returned by iter next method as argument to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU kfuncs, because the pointer returned by iter next method is not "valid". This patch sets the pointer returned by iter next method to be valid. This is based on the fact that if the iterator is implemented correctly, then the pointer returned from the iter next method should be valid. This does not make NULL pointer valid. If the iter next method has KF_RET_NULL flag, then the verifier will ask the ebpf program to check NULL pointer. KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterator is a special case, the pointer returned by iter next method should only be valid within RCU critical section, so it should be with MEM_RCU, not PTR_TRUSTED. Another special case is bpf_iter_num_next, which returns a pointer with base type PTR_TO_MEM. PTR_TO_MEM should not be combined with type flag PTR_TRUSTED (PTR_TO_MEM already means the pointer is valid). The pointer returned by iter next method of other types of iterators is with PTR_TRUSTED. In addition, this patch adds get_iter_from_state to help us get the current iterator from the current state. Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB584869F8B448EA1C87B7CDA399962@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-29bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_opsMartin KaFai Lau
This patch adds a .gen_epilogue to the bpf_verifier_ops. It is similar to the existing .gen_prologue. Instead of allowing a subsystem to run code at the beginning of a bpf prog, it allows the subsystem to run code just before the bpf prog exit. One of the use case is to allow the upcoming bpf qdisc to ensure that the skb->dev is the same as the qdisc->dev_queue->dev. The bpf qdisc struct_ops implementation could either fix it up or drop the skb. Another use case could be in bpf_tcp_ca.c to enforce snd_cwnd has sane value (e.g. non zero). The epilogue can do the useful thing (like checking skb->dev) if it can access the bpf prog's ctx. Unlike prologue, r1 may not hold the ctx pointer. This patch saves the r1 in the stack if the .gen_epilogue has returned some instructions in the "epilogue_buf". The existing .gen_prologue is done in convert_ctx_accesses(). The new .gen_epilogue is done in the convert_ctx_accesses() also. When it sees the (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT) instruction, it will be patched with the earlier generated "epilogue_buf". The epilogue patching is only done for the main prog. Only one epilogue will be patched to the main program. When the bpf prog has multiple BPF_EXIT instructions, a BPF_JA is used to goto the earlier patched epilogue. Majority of the archs support (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA): x86, arm, s390, risv64, loongarch, powerpc and arc. This patch keeps it simple and always use (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA). A new macro BPF_JMP32_A is added to generate the (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA) insn. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829210833.388152-4-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-29bpf: Adjust BPF_JMP that jumps to the 1st insn of the prologueMartin KaFai Lau
The next patch will add a ctx ptr saving instruction "(r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)" at the beginning for the main prog when there is an epilogue patch (by the .gen_epilogue() verifier ops added in the next patch). There is one corner case if the bpf prog has a BPF_JMP that jumps to the 1st instruction. It needs an adjustment such that those BPF_JMP instructions won't jump to the newly added ctx saving instruction. The commit 5337ac4c9b80 ("bpf: Fix the corner case with may_goto and jump to the 1st insn.") has the details on this case. Note that the jump back to 1st instruction is not limited to the ctx ptr saving instruction. The same also applies to the prologue. A later test, pro_epilogue_goto_start.c, has a test for the prologue only case. Thus, this patch does one adjustment after gen_prologue and the future ctx ptr saving. It is done by adjust_jmp_off(env->prog, 0, delta) where delta has the total number of instructions in the prologue and the future ctx ptr saving instruction. The adjust_jmp_off(env->prog, 0, delta) assumes that the prologue does not have a goto 1st instruction itself. To accommodate the prologue might have a goto 1st insn itself, this patch changes the adjust_jmp_off() to skip considering the instructions between [tgt_idx, tgt_idx + delta). Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829210833.388152-3-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-29bpf: Move insn_buf[16] to bpf_verifier_envMartin KaFai Lau
This patch moves the 'struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16]' stack usage to the bpf_verifier_env. A '#define INSN_BUF_SIZE 16' is also added to replace the ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf) usages. Both convert_ctx_accesses() and do_misc_fixup() are changed to use the env->insn_buf. It is a refactoring work for adding the epilogue_buf[16] in a later patch. With this patch, the stack size usage decreased. Before: ./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22133:5: warning: stack frame size (2584) After: ./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22184:5: warning: stack frame size (2264) Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240829210833.388152-2-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-28bpf: Relax KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs strict type matching constraintJuntong Deng
Currently we cannot pass zero offset (implicit cast) or non-zero offset pointers to KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs. This is because KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs requires strict type matching, but zero offset or non-zero offset does not change the type of pointer, which causes the ebpf program to be rejected by the verifier. This can cause some problems, one example is that bpf_skb_peek_tail kfunc [0] cannot be implemented by just passing in non-zero offset pointers. We cannot pass pointers like &sk->sk_write_queue (non-zero offset) or &sk->__sk_common (zero offset) to KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs. This patch makes KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs not require strict type matching. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/AM6PR03MB5848CA39CB4B7A4397D380B099B12@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com/ Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB5848FD2BD89BF0B6B5AA3B4C99952@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-23bpf: Support bpf_kptr_xchg into local kptrDave Marchevsky
Currently, users can only stash kptr into map values with bpf_kptr_xchg(). This patch further supports stashing kptr into local kptr by adding local kptr as a valid destination type. When stashing into local kptr, btf_record in program BTF is used instead of btf_record in map to search for the btf_field of the local kptr. The local kptr specific checks in check_reg_type() only apply when the source argument of bpf_kptr_xchg() is local kptr. Therefore, we make the scope of the check explicit as the destination now can also be local kptr. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <amery.hung@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813212424.2871455-5-amery.hung@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-23bpf: Rename ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR -> ARG_KPTR_XCHG_DESTDave Marchevsky
ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR is currently only used by the bpf_kptr_xchg helper. Although it limits reg types for that helper's first arg to PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, any arbitrary mapval won't do: further custom verification logic ensures that the mapval reg being xchgd-into is pointing to a kptr field. If this is not the case, it's not safe to xchg into that reg's pointee. Let's rename the bpf_arg_type to more accurately describe the fairly specific expectations that this arg type encodes. This is a nonfunctional change. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <amery.hung@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240813212424.2871455-4-amery.hung@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-22Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpfAlexei Starovoitov
Cross-merge bpf fixes after downstream PR including important fixes (from bpf-next point of view): commit 41c24102af7b ("selftests/bpf: Filter out _GNU_SOURCE when compiling test_cpp") commit fdad456cbcca ("bpf: Fix updating attached freplace prog in prog_array map") No conflicts. Adjacent changes in: include/linux/bpf_verifier.h kernel/bpf/verifier.c tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240813234307.82773-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-22bpf: allow bpf_fastcall for bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx and bpf_rdonly_castEduard Zingerman
do_misc_fixups() relaces bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() and bpf_rdonly_cast() by a single instruction "r0 = r1". This follows bpf_fastcall contract. This commit allows bpf_fastcall pattern rewrite for these two functions in order to use them in bpf_fastcall selftests. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822084112.3257995-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-22bpf: support bpf_fastcall patterns for kfuncsEduard Zingerman
Recognize bpf_fastcall patterns around kfunc calls. For example, suppose bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() follows bpf_fastcall contract (which it does), in such a case allow verifier to rewrite BPF program below: r2 = 1; *(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r2; call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx]; r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 32); r0 = r2; By removing the spill/fill pair: r2 = 1; call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx]; r0 = r2; Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822084112.3257995-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-22bpf: rename nocsr -> bpf_fastcall in verifierEduard Zingerman
Attribute used by LLVM implementation of the feature had been changed from no_caller_saved_registers to bpf_fastcall (see [1]). This commit replaces references to nocsr by references to bpf_fastcall to keep LLVM and Kernel parts in sync. [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105417 Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822084112.3257995-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-21bpf: allow passing struct bpf_iter_<type> as kfunc argumentsAndrii Nakryiko
There are potentially useful cases where a specific iterator type might need to be passed into some kfunc. So, in addition to existing bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs, allow to pass iterator pointer to any kfunc. We employ "__iter" naming suffix for arguments that are meant to accept iterators. We also enforce that they accept PTR -> STRUCT btf_iter_<type> type chain and point to a valid initialized on-the-stack iterator state. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240808232230.2848712-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-13bpf: switch maps to CLASS(fd, ...)Al Viro
Calling conventions for __bpf_map_get() would be more convenient if it left fpdut() on failure to callers. Makes for simpler logics in the callers. Among other things, the proof of memory safety no longer has to rely upon file->private_data never being ERR_PTR(...) for bpffs files. Original calling conventions made it impossible for the caller to tell whether __bpf_map_get() has returned ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) because it has found the file not be a bpf map one (in which case it would've done fdput()) or because it found that ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) in file->private_data of a bpf map file (in which case fdput() would _not_ have been done). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-08-13bpf: factor out fetching bpf_map from FD and adding it to used_maps listAndrii Nakryiko
Factor out the logic to extract bpf_map instances from FD embedded in bpf_insns, adding it to the list of used_maps (unless it's already there, in which case we just reuse map's index). This simplifies the logic in resolve_pseudo_ldimm64(), especially around `struct fd` handling, as all that is now neatly contained in the helper and doesn't leak into a dozen error handling paths. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-08-12bpf: Fix a kernel verifier crash in stacksafe()Yonghong Song
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext. Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code: if (exact != NOT_EXACT && old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) return false; The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack. If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound access will happen. To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise, cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal. Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks") Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf, x86, riscv, arm: no_caller_saved_registers for bpf_get_smp_processor_id()Eduard Zingerman
The function bpf_get_smp_processor_id() is processed in a different way, depending on the arch: - on x86 verifier replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a sequence of instructions that modify only r0; - on riscv64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a sequence of instructions that modify only r0; - on arm64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a sequence of instructions that modify only r0 and tmp registers. These rewrites satisfy attribute no_caller_saved_registers contract. Allow rewrite of no_caller_saved_registers patterns for bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in order to use this function as a canary for no_caller_saved_registers tests. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper callsEduard Zingerman
GCC and LLVM define a no_caller_saved_registers function attribute. This attribute means that function scratches only some of the caller saved registers defined by ABI. For BPF the set of such registers could be defined as follows: - R0 is scratched only if function is non-void; - R1-R5 are scratched only if corresponding parameter type is defined in the function prototype. This commit introduces flag bpf_func_prot->allow_nocsr. If this flag is set for some helper function, verifier assumes that it follows no_caller_saved_registers calling convention. The contract between kernel and clang allows to simultaneously use such functions and maintain backwards compatibility with old kernels that don't understand no_caller_saved_registers calls (nocsr for short): - clang generates a simple pattern for nocsr calls, e.g.: r1 = 1; r2 = 2; *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1; *(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r2; call %[to_be_inlined] r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16); r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8); r0 = r1; r0 += r2; exit; - kernel removes unnecessary spills and fills, if called function is inlined by verifier or current JIT (with assumption that patch inserted by verifier or JIT honors nocsr contract, e.g. does not scratch r3-r5 for the example above), e.g. the code above would be transformed to: r1 = 1; r2 = 2; call %[to_be_inlined] r0 = r1; r0 += r2; exit; Technically, the transformation is split into the following phases: - function mark_nocsr_patterns(), called from bpf_check() searches and marks potential patterns in instruction auxiliary data; - upon stack read or write access, function check_nocsr_stack_contract() is used to verify if stack offsets, presumably reserved for nocsr patterns, are used only from those patterns; - function remove_nocsr_spills_fills(), called from bpf_check(), applies the rewrite for valid patterns. See comment in mark_nocsr_pattern_for_call() for more details. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: add a get_helper_proto() utility functionEduard Zingerman
Extract the part of check_helper_call() as a utility function allowing to query 'struct bpf_func_proto' for a specific helper function id. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-08-03 07:39:00 +0000