summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-08-22bpf: allow bpf_fastcall for bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx and bpf_rdonly_castEduard Zingerman
do_misc_fixups() relaces bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() and bpf_rdonly_cast() by a single instruction "r0 = r1". This follows bpf_fastcall contract. This commit allows bpf_fastcall pattern rewrite for these two functions in order to use them in bpf_fastcall selftests. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822084112.3257995-5-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-22bpf: support bpf_fastcall patterns for kfuncsEduard Zingerman
Recognize bpf_fastcall patterns around kfunc calls. For example, suppose bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() follows bpf_fastcall contract (which it does), in such a case allow verifier to rewrite BPF program below: r2 = 1; *(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r2; call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx]; r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 32); r0 = r2; By removing the spill/fill pair: r2 = 1; call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx]; r0 = r2; Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822084112.3257995-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-22bpf: rename nocsr -> bpf_fastcall in verifierEduard Zingerman
Attribute used by LLVM implementation of the feature had been changed from no_caller_saved_registers to bpf_fastcall (see [1]). This commit replaces references to nocsr by references to bpf_fastcall to keep LLVM and Kernel parts in sync. [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105417 Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240822084112.3257995-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-21bpf: allow passing struct bpf_iter_<type> as kfunc argumentsAndrii Nakryiko
There are potentially useful cases where a specific iterator type might need to be passed into some kfunc. So, in addition to existing bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs, allow to pass iterator pointer to any kfunc. We employ "__iter" naming suffix for arguments that are meant to accept iterators. We also enforce that they accept PTR -> STRUCT btf_iter_<type> type chain and point to a valid initialized on-the-stack iterator state. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240808232230.2848712-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-08-13bpf: switch maps to CLASS(fd, ...)Al Viro
Calling conventions for __bpf_map_get() would be more convenient if it left fpdut() on failure to callers. Makes for simpler logics in the callers. Among other things, the proof of memory safety no longer has to rely upon file->private_data never being ERR_PTR(...) for bpffs files. Original calling conventions made it impossible for the caller to tell whether __bpf_map_get() has returned ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) because it has found the file not be a bpf map one (in which case it would've done fdput()) or because it found that ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) in file->private_data of a bpf map file (in which case fdput() would _not_ have been done). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-08-13bpf: factor out fetching bpf_map from FD and adding it to used_maps listAndrii Nakryiko
Factor out the logic to extract bpf_map instances from FD embedded in bpf_insns, adding it to the list of used_maps (unless it's already there, in which case we just reuse map's index). This simplifies the logic in resolve_pseudo_ldimm64(), especially around `struct fd` handling, as all that is now neatly contained in the helper and doesn't leak into a dozen error handling paths. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-08-12bpf: Fix a kernel verifier crash in stacksafe()Yonghong Song
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext. Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code: if (exact != NOT_EXACT && old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) return false; The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack. If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound access will happen. To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise, cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal. Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks") Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf, x86, riscv, arm: no_caller_saved_registers for bpf_get_smp_processor_id()Eduard Zingerman
The function bpf_get_smp_processor_id() is processed in a different way, depending on the arch: - on x86 verifier replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a sequence of instructions that modify only r0; - on riscv64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a sequence of instructions that modify only r0; - on arm64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a sequence of instructions that modify only r0 and tmp registers. These rewrites satisfy attribute no_caller_saved_registers contract. Allow rewrite of no_caller_saved_registers patterns for bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in order to use this function as a canary for no_caller_saved_registers tests. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper callsEduard Zingerman
GCC and LLVM define a no_caller_saved_registers function attribute. This attribute means that function scratches only some of the caller saved registers defined by ABI. For BPF the set of such registers could be defined as follows: - R0 is scratched only if function is non-void; - R1-R5 are scratched only if corresponding parameter type is defined in the function prototype. This commit introduces flag bpf_func_prot->allow_nocsr. If this flag is set for some helper function, verifier assumes that it follows no_caller_saved_registers calling convention. The contract between kernel and clang allows to simultaneously use such functions and maintain backwards compatibility with old kernels that don't understand no_caller_saved_registers calls (nocsr for short): - clang generates a simple pattern for nocsr calls, e.g.: r1 = 1; r2 = 2; *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1; *(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r2; call %[to_be_inlined] r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16); r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8); r0 = r1; r0 += r2; exit; - kernel removes unnecessary spills and fills, if called function is inlined by verifier or current JIT (with assumption that patch inserted by verifier or JIT honors nocsr contract, e.g. does not scratch r3-r5 for the example above), e.g. the code above would be transformed to: r1 = 1; r2 = 2; call %[to_be_inlined] r0 = r1; r0 += r2; exit; Technically, the transformation is split into the following phases: - function mark_nocsr_patterns(), called from bpf_check() searches and marks potential patterns in instruction auxiliary data; - upon stack read or write access, function check_nocsr_stack_contract() is used to verify if stack offsets, presumably reserved for nocsr patterns, are used only from those patterns; - function remove_nocsr_spills_fills(), called from bpf_check(), applies the rewrite for valid patterns. See comment in mark_nocsr_pattern_for_call() for more details. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-3-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: add a get_helper_proto() utility functionEduard Zingerman
Extract the part of check_helper_call() as a utility function allowing to query 'struct bpf_func_proto' for a specific helper function id. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722233844.1406874-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: Get better reg range with ldsx and 32bit compareYonghong Song
With latest llvm19, the selftest iters/iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count failed with -mcpu=v4. The following are the details: 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; int iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count(const void *ctx) @ iters.c:1420 0: (b4) w7 = 0 ; R7_w=0 ; int i, n = loop_data.n, sum = 0; @ iters.c:1422 1: (18) r1 = 0xffffc90000191478 ; R1_w=map_value(map=iters.bss,ks=4,vs=1280,off=1144) 3: (61) r6 = *(u32 *)(r1 +128) ; R1_w=map_value(map=iters.bss,ks=4,vs=1280,off=1144) R6_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; if (n > ARRAY_SIZE(loop_data.data)) @ iters.c:1424 4: (26) if w6 > 0x20 goto pc+27 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) 5: (bf) r8 = r10 ; R8_w=fp0 R10=fp0 6: (07) r8 += -8 ; R8_w=fp-8 ; bpf_for(i, 0, n) { @ iters.c:1427 7: (bf) r1 = r8 ; R1_w=fp-8 R8_w=fp-8 8: (b4) w2 = 0 ; R2_w=0 9: (bc) w3 = w6 ; R3_w=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R6_w=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) 10: (85) call bpf_iter_num_new#45179 ; R0=scalar() fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=0) refs=2 11: (bf) r1 = r8 ; R1=fp-8 R8=fp-8 refs=2 12: (85) call bpf_iter_num_next#45181 13: R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R6=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R7=0 R8=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=1) refs=2 ; bpf_for(i, 0, n) { @ iters.c:1427 13: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 ; R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) refs=2 14: (81) r1 = *(s32 *)(r0 +0) ; R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R1_w=scalar(smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff) refs=2 15: (ae) if w1 < w6 goto pc+4 20: R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R1=scalar(smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=smax32=umax32=31,umax=0xffffffff0000001f,smin32=0,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff0000001f)) R6=scalar(id=1,smin=umin=smin32=umin32=1,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R7=0 R8=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=1) refs=2 ; sum += loop_data.data[i]; @ iters.c:1429 20: (67) r1 <<= 2 ; R1_w=scalar(smax=0x7ffffffc0000007c,umax=0xfffffffc0000007c,smin32=0,smax32=umax32=124,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffc0000007c)) refs=2 21: (18) r2 = 0xffffc90000191478 ; R2_w=map_value(map=iters.bss,ks=4,vs=1280,off=1144) refs=2 23: (0f) r2 += r1 math between map_value pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed The source code: int iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count(const void *ctx) { int i, n = loop_data.n, sum = 0; if (n > ARRAY_SIZE(loop_data.data)) return 0; bpf_for(i, 0, n) { /* no rechecking of i against ARRAY_SIZE(loop_data.n) */ sum += loop_data.data[i]; } return sum; } The insn #14 is a sign-extenstion load which is related to 'int i'. The insn #15 did a subreg comparision. Note that smin=0xffffffff80000000 and this caused later insn #23 failed verification due to unbounded min value. Actually insn #15 R1 smin range can be better. Before insn #15, we have R1_w=scalar(smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff) With the above range, we know for R1, upper 32bit can only be 0xffffffff or 0. Otherwise, the value range for R1 could be beyond [smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff]. After insn #15, for the true patch, we know smin32=0 and smax32=32. With the upper 32bit 0xffffffff, then the corresponding value is [0xffffffff00000000, 0xffffffff00000020]. The range is obviously beyond the original range [smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff] and the range is not possible. So the upper 32bit must be 0, which implies smin = smin32 and smax = smax32. This patch fixed the issue by adding additional register deduction after 32-bit compare insn. If the signed 32-bit register range is non-negative then 64-bit smin is in range of [S32_MIN, S32_MAX], then the actual 64-bit smin/smax should be the same as 32-bit smin32/smax32. With this patch, iters/iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count succeeded with better register range: from 15 to 20: R0=rdonly_mem(id=7,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R1_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=31,var_off=(0x0; 0x1f)) R6=scalar(id=1,smin=umin=smin32=umin32=1,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R7=scalar(id=9,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=scalar(id=9,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R10=fp0 fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=3) refs=2 Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240723162933.2731620-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: Fail verification for sign-extension of packet data/data_end/data_metaYonghong Song
syzbot reported a kernel crash due to commit 1f1e864b6555 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses"). The reason is due to sign-extension of 32-bit load for packet data/data_end/data_meta uapi field. The original code looks like: r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */ r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80) /* load __sk_buff->data_end */ r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto +1 ... Note that __sk_buff->data load has 32-bit sign extension. After verification and convert_ctx_accesses(), the final asm code looks like: r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r2 = (s32)r2 r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 ... Note that 'r2 = (s32)r2' may make the kernel __sk_buff->data address invalid which may cause runtime failure. Currently, in C code, typically we have void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data; void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; ... and it will generate r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 If we allow sign-extension, void *data = (void *)(long)(int)skb->data; void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end; ... the generated code looks like r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208) r2 <<= 32 r2 s>>= 32 r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80) r0 = r2 r0 += 8 if r3 > r0 goto pc+1 and this will cause verification failure since "r2 <<= 32" is not allowed as "r2" is a packet pointer. To fix this issue for case r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */ this patch added additional checking in is_valid_access() callback function for packet data/data_end/data_meta access. If those accesses are with sign-extenstion, the verification will fail. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/000000000000c90eee061d236d37@google.com/ Reported-by: syzbot+ad9ec60c8eaf69e6f99c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 1f1e864b6555 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses") Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240723153439.2429035-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: Fix compare error in function retval_range_withinXu Kuohai
After checking lsm hook return range in verifier, the test case "test_progs -t test_lsm" failed, and the failure log says: libbpf: prog 'test_int_hook': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'test_int_hook': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @ lsm.c:89 0: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +24) ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-4095,smax=smax32=0) R1=ctx() [...] 24: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff ; int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @ lsm.c:89 25: (95) exit At program exit the register R0 has smin=4294967295 smax=4294967295 should have been in [-4095, 0] It can be seen that instruction "w0 = -1" zero extended -1 to 64-bit register r0, setting both smin and smax values of r0 to 4294967295. This resulted in a false reject when r0 was checked with range [-4095, 0]. Given bpf lsm does not return 64-bit values, this patch fixes it by changing the compare between r0 and return range from 64-bit operation to 32-bit operation for bpf lsm. Fixes: 8fa4ecd49b81 ("bpf: enforce exact retval range on subprog/callback exit") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240719110059.797546-5-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf, lsm: Add check for BPF LSM return valueXu Kuohai
A bpf prog returning a positive number attached to file_alloc_security hook makes kernel panic. This happens because file system can not filter out the positive number returned by the LSM prog using IS_ERR, and misinterprets this positive number as a file pointer. Given that hook file_alloc_security never returned positive number before the introduction of BPF LSM, and other BPF LSM hooks may encounter similar issues, this patch adds LSM return value check in verifier, to ensure no unexpected value is returned. Fixes: 520b7aa00d8c ("bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks") Reported-by: Xin Liu <liuxin350@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240719110059.797546-3-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: Check unsupported ops from the bpf_struct_ops's cfi_stubsMartin KaFai Lau
The bpf_tcp_ca struct_ops currently uses a "u32 unsupported_ops[]" array to track which ops is not supported. After cfi_stubs had been added, the function pointer in cfi_stubs is also NULL for the unsupported ops. Thus, the "u32 unsupported_ops[]" becomes redundant. This observation was originally brought up in the bpf/cfi discussion: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJoEkdjyCEJRPASjBw1QGsKYrF33QdMGc1RZa9b88bAEA@mail.gmail.com/ The recent bpf qdisc patch (https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240714175130.4051012-6-amery.hung@bytedance.com/) also needs to specify quite many unsupported ops. It is a good time to clean it up. This patch removes the need of "u32 unsupported_ops[]" and tests for null-ness in the cfi_stubs instead. Testing the cfi_stubs is done in a new function bpf_struct_ops_supported(). The verifier will call bpf_struct_ops_supported() when loading the struct_ops program. The ".check_member" is removed from the bpf_tcp_ca in this patch. ".check_member" could still be useful for other subsytems to enforce other restrictions (e.g. sched_ext checks for prog->sleepable). To keep the same error return, ENOTSUPP is used. Cc: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240722183049.2254692-2-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2024-07-29bpf: Remove mark_precise_scalar_ids()Eduard Zingerman
Function mark_precise_scalar_ids() is superseded by bt_sync_linked_regs() and equal scalars tracking in jump history. mark_precise_scalar_ids() propagates precision over registers sharing same ID on parent/child state boundaries, while jump history records allow bt_sync_linked_regs() to propagate same information with instruction level granularity, which is strictly more precise. This commit removes mark_precise_scalar_ids() and updates test cases in progs/verifier_scalar_ids to reflect new verifier behavior. The tests are updated in the following manner: - mark_precise_scalar_ids() propagated precision regardless of presence of conditional jumps, while new jump history based logic only kicks in when conditional jumps are present. Hence test cases are augmented with conditional jumps to still trigger precision propagation. - As equal scalars tracking no longer relies on parent/child state boundaries some test cases are no longer interesting, such test cases are removed, namely: - precision_same_state and precision_cross_state are superseded by linked_regs_bpf_k; - precision_same_state_broken_link and equal_scalars_broken_link are superseded by linked_regs_broken_link. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240718202357.1746514-3-eddyz87@gmail.com
2024-07-29bpf: Track equal scalars history on per-instruction levelEduard Zingerman
Use bpf_verifier_state->jmp_history to track which registers were updated by find_equal_scalars() (renamed to collect_linked_regs()) when conditional jump was verified. Use recorded information in backtrack_insn() to propagate precision. E.g. for the following program: while verifying instructions 1: r1 = r0 | 2: if r1 < 8 goto ... | push r0,r1 as linked registers in jmp_history 3: if r0 > 16 goto ... | push r0,r1 as linked registers in jmp_history 4: r2 = r10 | 5: r2 += r0 v mark_chain_precision(r0) while doing mark_chain_precision(r0) 5: r2 += r0 | mark r0 precise 4: r2 = r10 | 3: if r0 > 16 goto ... | mark r0,r1 as precise 2: if r1 < 8 goto ... | mark r0,r1 as precise 1: r1 = r0 v Technically, do this as follows: - Use 10 bits to identify each register that gains range because of sync_linked_regs(): - 3 bits for frame number; - 6 bits for register or stack slot number; - 1 bit to indicate if register is spilled. - Use u64 as a vector of 6 such records + 4 bits for vector length. - Augment struct bpf_jmp_history_entry with a field 'linked_regs' representing such vector. - When doing check_cond_jmp_op() remember up to 6 registers that gain range because of sync_linked_regs() in such a vector. - Don't propagate range information and reset IDs for registers that don't fit in 6-value vector. - Push a pair {instruction index, linked registers vector} to bpf_verifier_state->jmp_history. - When doing backtrack_insn() check if any of recorded linked registers is currently marked precise, if so mark all linked registers as precise. This also requires fixes for two test_verifier tests: - precise: test 1 - precise: test 2 Both tests contain the following instruction sequence: 19: (bf) r2 = r9 ; R2=scalar(id=3) R9=scalar(id=3) 20: (a5) if r2 < 0x8 goto pc+1 ; R2=scalar(id=3,umin=8) 21: (95) exit 22: (07) r2 += 1 ; R2_w=scalar(id=3+1,...) 23: (bf) r1 = r10 ; R1_w=fp0 R10=fp0 24: (07) r1 += -8 ; R1_w=fp-8 25: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=0 26: (85) call bpf_probe_read_kernel#113 The call to bpf_probe_read_kernel() at (26) forces r2 to be precise. Previously, this forced all registers with same id to become precise immediately when mark_chain_precision() is called. After this change, the precision is propagated to registers sharing same id only when 'if' instruction is backtracked. Hence verification log for both tests is changed: regs=r2,r9 -> regs=r2 for instructions 25..20. Fixes: 904e6ddf4133 ("bpf: Use scalar ids in mark_chain_precision()") Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240718202357.1746514-2-eddyz87@gmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4BzZ0xidVCqB47XnkXcNhkPWF6_nTV7yt+_Lf0kcFEut2Mg@mail.gmail.com/
2024-07-21Merge tag 'mm-stable-2024-07-21-14-50' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Pull MM updates from Andrew Morton: - In the series "mm: Avoid possible overflows in dirty throttling" Jan Kara addresses a couple of issues in the writeback throttling code. These fixes are also targetted at -stable kernels. - Ryusuke Konishi's series "nilfs2: fix potential issues related to reserved inodes" does that. This should actually be in the mm-nonmm-stable tree, along with the many other nilfs2 patches. My bad. - More folio conversions from Kefeng Wang in the series "mm: convert to folio_alloc_mpol()" - Kemeng Shi has sent some cleanups to the writeback code in the series "Add helper functions to remove repeated code and improve readability of cgroup writeback" - Kairui Song has made the swap code a little smaller and a little faster in the series "mm/swap: clean up and optimize swap cache index". - In the series "mm/memory: cleanly support zeropage in vm_insert_page*(), vm_map_pages*() and vmf_insert_mixed()" David Hildenbrand has reworked the rather sketchy handling of the use of the zeropage in MAP_SHARED mappings. I don't see any runtime effects here - more a cleanup/understandability/maintainablity thing. - Dev Jain has improved selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.c's handling of higher addresses, for aarch64. The (poorly named) series is "Restructure va_high_addr_switch". - The core TLB handling code gets some cleanups and possible slight optimizations in Bang Li's series "Add update_mmu_tlb_range() to simplify code". - Jane Chu has improved the handling of our fake-an-unrecoverable-memory-error testing feature MADV_HWPOISON in the series "Enhance soft hwpoison handling and injection". - Jeff Johnson has sent a billion patches everywhere to add MODULE_DESCRIPTION() to everything. Some landed in this pull. - In the series "mm: cleanup MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY mode", Kefeng Wang has simplified migration's use of hardware-offload memory copying. - Yosry Ahmed performs more folio API conversions in his series "mm: zswap: trivial folio conversions". - In the series "large folios swap-in: handle refault cases first", Chuanhua Han inches us forward in the handling of large pages in the swap code. This is a cleanup and optimization, working toward the end objective of full support of large folio swapin/out. - In the series "mm,swap: cleanup VMA based swap readahead window calculation", Huang Ying has contributed some cleanups and a possible fixlet to his VMA based swap readahead code. - In the series "add mTHP support for anonymous shmem" Baolin Wang has taught anonymous shmem mappings to use multisize THP. By default this is a no-op - users must opt in vis sysfs controls. Dramatic improvements in pagefault latency are realized. - David Hildenbrand has some cleanups to our remaining use of page_mapcount() in the series "fs/proc: move page_mapcount() to fs/proc/internal.h". - David also has some highmem accounting cleanups in the series "mm/highmem: don't track highmem pages manually". - Build-time fixes and cleanups from John Hubbard in the series "cleanups, fixes, and progress towards avoiding "make headers"". - Cleanups and consolidation of the core pagemap handling from Barry Song in the series "mm: introduce pmd|pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp helpers and utilize them". - Lance Yang's series "Reclaim lazyfree THP without splitting" has reduced the latency of the reclaim of pmd-mapped THPs under fairly common circumstances. A 10x speedup is seen in a microbenchmark. It does this by punting to aother CPU but I guess that's a win unless all CPUs are pegged. - hugetlb_cgroup cleanups from Xiu Jianfeng in the series "mm/hugetlb_cgroup: rework on cftypes". - Miaohe Lin's series "Some cleanups for memory-failure" does just that thing. - Someone other than SeongJae has developed a DAMON feature in Honggyu Kim's series "DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory". This adds DAMON features which may be used to help determine the efficiency of our placement of CXL/PCIe attached DRAM. - DAMON user API centralization and simplificatio work in SeongJae Park's series "mm/damon: introduce DAMON parameters online commit function". - In the series "mm: page_type, zsmalloc and page_mapcount_reset()" David Hildenbrand does some maintenance work on zsmalloc - partially modernizing its use of pageframe fields. - Kefeng Wang provides more folio conversions in the series "mm: remove page_maybe_dma_pinned() and page_mkclean()". - More cleanup from David Hildenbrand, this time in the series "mm/memory_hotplug: use PageOffline() instead of PageReserved() for !ZONE_DEVICE". It "enlightens memory hotplug more about PageOffline() pages" and permits the removal of some virtio-mem hacks. - Barry Song's series "mm: clarify folio_add_new_anon_rmap() and __folio_add_anon_rmap()" is a cleanup to the anon folio handling in preparation for mTHP (multisize THP) swapin. - Kefeng Wang's series "mm: improve clear and copy user folio" implements more folio conversions, this time in the area of large folio userspace copying. - The series "Docs/mm/damon/maintaier-profile: document a mailing tool and community meetup series" tells people how to get better involved with other DAMON developers. From SeongJae Park. - A large series ("kmsan: Enable on s390") from Ilya Leoshkevich does that. - David Hildenbrand sends along more cleanups, this time against the migration code. The series is "mm/migrate: move NUMA hinting fault folio isolation + checks under PTL". - Jan Kara has found quite a lot of strangenesses and minor errors in the readahead code. He addresses this in the series "mm: Fix various readahead quirks". - SeongJae Park's series "selftests/damon: test DAMOS tried regions and {min,max}_nr_regions" adds features and addresses errors in DAMON's self testing code. - Gavin Shan has found a userspace-triggerable WARN in the pagecache code. The series "mm/filemap: Limit page cache size to that supported by xarray" addresses this. The series is marked cc:stable. - Chengming Zhou's series "mm/ksm: cmp_and_merge_page() optimizations and cleanup" cleans up and slightly optimizes KSM. - Roman Gushchin has separated the memcg-v1 and memcg-v2 code - lots of code motion. The series (which also makes the memcg-v1 code Kconfigurable) are "mm: memcg: separate legacy cgroup v1 code and put under config option" and "mm: memcg: put cgroup v1-specific memcg data under CONFIG_MEMCG_V1" - Dan Schatzberg's series "Add swappiness argument to memory.reclaim" adds an additional feature to this cgroup-v2 control file. - The series "Userspace controls soft-offline pages" from Jiaqi Yan permits userspace to stop the kernel's automatic treatment of excessive correctable memory errors. In order to permit userspace to monitor and handle this situation. - Kefeng Wang's series "mm: migrate: support poison recover from migrate folio" teaches the kernel to appropriately handle migration from poisoned source folios rather than simply panicing. - SeongJae Park's series "Docs/damon: minor fixups and improvements" does those things. - In the series "mm/zsmalloc: change back to per-size_class lock" Chengming Zhou improves zsmalloc's scalability and memory utilization. - Vivek Kasireddy's series "mm/gup: Introduce memfd_pin_folios() for pinning memfd folios" makes the GUP code use FOLL_PIN rather than bare refcount increments. So these paes can first be moved aside if they reside in the movable zone or a CMA block. - Andrii Nakryiko has added a binary ioctl()-based API to /proc/pid/maps for much faster reading of vma information. The series is "query VMAs from /proc/<pid>/maps". - In the series "mm: introduce per-order mTHP split counters" Lance Yang improves the kernel's presentation of developer information related to multisize THP splitting. - Michael Ellerman has developed the series "Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64)". This permits userspace to use all available huge page sizes. - In the series "revert unconditional slab and page allocator fault injection calls" Vlastimil Babka removes a performance-affecting and not very useful feature from slab fault injection. * tag 'mm-stable-2024-07-21-14-50' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (411 commits) mm/mglru: fix ineffective protection calculation mm/zswap: fix a white space issue mm/hugetlb: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference when migrating hugetlb folio mm/hugetlb: fix possible recursive locking detected warning mm/gup: clear the LRU flag of a page before adding to LRU batch mm/numa_balancing: teach mpol_to_str about the balancing mode mm: memcg1: convert charge move flags to unsigned long long alloc_tag: fix page_ext_get/page_ext_put sequence during page splitting lib: reuse page_ext_data() to obtain codetag_ref lib: add missing newline character in the warning message mm/mglru: fix overshooting shrinker memory mm/mglru: fix div-by-zero in vmpressure_calc_level() mm/kmemleak: replace strncpy() with strscpy() mm, page_alloc: put should_fail_alloc_page() back behing CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC mm, slab: put should_failslab() back behind CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB mm: ignore data-race in __swap_writepage hugetlbfs: ensure generic_hugetlb_get_unmapped_area() returns higher address than mmap_min_addr mm: shmem: rename mTHP shmem counters mm: swap_state: use folio_alloc_mpol() in __read_swap_cache_async() mm/migrate: putback split folios when numa hint migration fails ...
2024-07-17mm, page_alloc: put should_fail_alloc_page() back behing CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOCVlastimil Babka
This mostly reverts commit af3b854492f3 ("mm/page_alloc.c: allow error injection"). The commit made should_fail_alloc_page() a noinline function that's always called from the page allocation hotpath, even if it's empty because CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC is not enabled, and there is no option to disable it and prevent the associated function call overhead. As with the preceding patch "mm, slab: put should_failslab back behind CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB" and for the same reasons, put the should_fail_alloc_page() back behind the config option. When enabled, the ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION and BTF_ID records are preserved so it's not a complete revert. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-fault-injection-reverts-v1-2-9e2651945d68@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-07-17mm, slab: put should_failslab() back behind CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLABVlastimil Babka
Patch series "revert unconditional slab and page allocator fault injection calls". These two patches largely revert commits that added function call overhead into slab and page allocation hotpaths and that cannot be currently disabled even though related CONFIG_ options do exist. A much more involved solution that can keep the callsites always existing but hidden behind a static key if unused, is possible [1] and can be pursued by anyone who believes it's necessary. Meanwhile the fact the should_failslab() error injection is already not functional on kernels built with current gcc without anyone noticing [2], and lukewarm response to [1] suggests the need is not there. I believe it will be more fair to have the state after this series as a baseline for possible further optimisation, instead of the unconditional overhead. For example a possible compromise for anyone who's fine with an empty function call overhead but not the full CONFIG_FAILSLAB / CONFIG_FAIL_PAGE_ALLOC overhead is to reuse patch 1 from [1] but insert a static key check only inside should_failslab() and should_fail_alloc_page() before performing the more expensive checks. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240620-fault-injection-statickeys-v2-0-e23947d3d84b@suse.cz/#t [2] https://github.com/bpftrace/bpftrace/issues/3258 This patch (of 2): This mostly reverts commit 4f6923fbb352 ("mm: make should_failslab always available for fault injection"). The commit made should_failslab() a noinline function that's always called from the slab allocation hotpath, even if it's empty because CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB is not enabled, and there is no option to disable that call. This is visible in profiles and the function call overhead can be noticeable especially with cpu mitigations. Meanwhile the bpftrace program example in the commit silently does not work without CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB anyway with a recent gcc, because the empty function gets a .constprop clone that is actually being called (uselessly) from the slab hotpath, while the error injection is hooked to the original function that's not being called at all [1]. Thus put the whole should_failslab() function back behind CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB. It's not a complete revert of 4f6923fbb352 - the int return type that returns -ENOMEM on failure is preserved, as well ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION annotation. The BTF_ID() record that was meanwhile added is also guarded by CONFIG_SHOULD_FAILSLAB. [1] https://github.com/bpftrace/bpftrace/issues/3258 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-fault-injection-reverts-v1-0-9e2651945d68@suse.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240711-b4-fault-injection-reverts-v1-1-9e2651945d68@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev> Cc: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-07-12bpf: use check_sub_overflow() to check for subtraction overflowsShung-Hsi Yu
Similar to previous patch that drops signed_add*_overflows() and uses (compiler) builtin-based check_add_overflow(), do the same for signed_sub*_overflows() and replace them with the generic check_sub_overflow() to make future refactoring easier and have the checks implemented more efficiently. Unsigned overflow check for subtraction does not use helpers and are simple enough already, so they're left untouched. After the change GCC 13.3.0 generates cleaner assembly on x86_64: if (check_sub_overflow(*dst_smin, src_reg->smax_value, dst_smin) || 139bf: mov 0x28(%r12),%rax 139c4: mov %edx,0x54(%r12) 139c9: sub %r11,%rax 139cc: mov %rax,0x28(%r12) 139d1: jo 14627 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x1237> check_sub_overflow(*dst_smax, src_reg->smin_value, dst_smax)) { 139d7: mov 0x30(%r12),%rax 139dc: sub %r9,%rax 139df: mov %rax,0x30(%r12) if (check_sub_overflow(*dst_smin, src_reg->smax_value, dst_smin) || 139e4: jo 14627 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x1237> ... *dst_smin = S64_MIN; 14627: movabs $0x8000000000000000,%rax 14631: mov %rax,0x28(%r12) *dst_smax = S64_MAX; 14636: sub $0x1,%rax 1463a: mov %rax,0x30(%r12) Before the change it gives: if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) || 13a50: mov 0x28(%r12),%rdi 13a55: mov %edx,0x54(%r12) dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; 13a5a: movabs $0x7fffffffffffffff,%rdx 13a64: mov %eax,0x50(%r12) dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; 13a69: movabs $0x8000000000000000,%rax s64 res = (s64)((u64)a - (u64)b); 13a73: mov %rdi,%rsi 13a76: sub %rcx,%rsi if (b < 0) 13a79: test %rcx,%rcx 13a7c: js 145ea <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x119a> if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) || 13a82: cmp %rsi,%rdi 13a85: jl 13ac7 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x677> signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smin_val)) { 13a87: mov 0x30(%r12),%r8 s64 res = (s64)((u64)a - (u64)b); 13a8c: mov %r8,%rax 13a8f: sub %r9,%rax return res > a; 13a92: cmp %rax,%r8 13a95: setl %sil if (b < 0) 13a99: test %r9,%r9 13a9c: js 147d1 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x1381> dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; 13aa2: movabs $0x7fffffffffffffff,%rdx dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; 13aac: movabs $0x8000000000000000,%rax if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) || 13ab6: test %sil,%sil 13ab9: jne 13ac7 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x677> dst_reg->smin_value -= smax_val; 13abb: mov %rdi,%rax dst_reg->smax_value -= smin_val; 13abe: mov %r8,%rdx dst_reg->smin_value -= smax_val; 13ac1: sub %rcx,%rax dst_reg->smax_value -= smin_val; 13ac4: sub %r9,%rdx 13ac7: mov %rax,0x28(%r12) ... 13ad1: mov %rdx,0x30(%r12) ... if (signed_sub_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smax_val) || 145ea: cmp %rsi,%rdi 145ed: jg 13ac7 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x677> 145f3: jmp 13a87 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x637> Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240712080127.136608-4-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-07-12bpf: use check_add_overflow() to check for addition overflowsShung-Hsi Yu
signed_add*_overflows() was added back when there was no overflow-check helper. With the introduction of such helpers in commit f0907827a8a91 ("compiler.h: enable builtin overflow checkers and add fallback code"), we can drop signed_add*_overflows() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c and use the generic check_add_overflow() instead. This will make future refactoring easier, and takes advantage of compiler-emitted hardware instructions that efficiently implement these checks. After the change GCC 13.3.0 generates cleaner assembly on x86_64: err = adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(env, insn, dst_reg, *src_reg); 13625: mov 0x28(%rbx),%r9 /* r9 = src_reg->smin_value */ 13629: mov 0x30(%rbx),%rcx /* rcx = src_reg->smax_value */ ... if (check_add_overflow(*dst_smin, src_reg->smin_value, dst_smin) || 141c1: mov %r9,%rax 141c4: add 0x28(%r12),%rax 141c9: mov %rax,0x28(%r12) 141ce: jo 146e4 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x1294> check_add_overflow(*dst_smax, src_reg->smax_value, dst_smax)) { 141d4: add 0x30(%r12),%rcx 141d9: mov %rcx,0x30(%r12) if (check_add_overflow(*dst_smin, src_reg->smin_value, dst_smin) || 141de: jo 146e4 <adjust_reg_min_max_vals+0x1294> ... *dst_smin = S64_MIN; 146e4: movabs $0x8000000000000000,%rax 146ee: mov %rax,0x28(%r12) *dst_smax = S64_MAX; 146f3: sub $0x1,%rax 146f7: mov %rax,0x30(%r12) Before the change it gives: s64 smin_val = src_reg->smin_value; 675: mov 0x28(%rsi),%r8 s64 smax_val = src_reg->smax_value; u64 umin_val = src_reg->umin_value; u64 umax_val = src_reg->umax_value; 679: mov %rdi,%rax /* rax = dst_reg */ if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) || 67c: mov 0x28(%rdi),%rdi /* rdi = dst_reg->smin_value */ u64 umin_val = src_reg->umin_value; 680: mov 0x38(%rsi),%rdx u64 umax_val = src_reg->umax_value; 684: mov 0x40(%rsi),%rcx s64 res = (s64)((u64)a + (u64)b); 688: lea (%r8,%rdi,1),%r9 /* r9 = dst_reg->smin_value + src_reg->smin_value */ return res < a; 68c: cmp %r9,%rdi 68f: setg %r10b /* r10b = (dst_reg->smin_value + src_reg->smin_value) > dst_reg->smin_value */ if (b < 0) 693: test %r8,%r8 696: js 72b <scalar_min_max_add+0xbb> signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smax_val)) { dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; dst_reg->smax_value = S64_MAX; 69c: movabs $0x7fffffffffffffff,%rdi s64 smax_val = src_reg->smax_value; 6a6: mov 0x30(%rsi),%r8 dst_reg->smin_value = S64_MIN; 6aa: 00 00 00 movabs $0x8000000000000000,%rsi if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) || 6b4: test %r10b,%r10b /* (dst_reg->smin_value + src_reg->smin_value) > dst_reg->smin_value ? goto 6cb */ 6b7: jne 6cb <scalar_min_max_add+0x5b> signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smax_value, smax_val)) { 6b9: mov 0x30(%rax),%r10 /* r10 = dst_reg->smax_value */ s64 res = (s64)((u64)a + (u64)b); 6bd: lea (%r10,%r8,1),%r11 /* r11 = dst_reg->smax_value + src_reg->smax_value */ if (b < 0) 6c1: test %r8,%r8 6c4: js 71e <scalar_min_max_add+0xae> if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) || 6c6: cmp %r11,%r10 /* (dst_reg->smax_value + src_reg->smax_value) <= dst_reg->smax_value ? goto 723 */ 6c9: jle 723 <scalar_min_max_add+0xb3> } else { dst_reg->smin_value += smin_val; dst_reg->smax_value += smax_val; } 6cb: mov %rsi,0x28(%rax) ... 6d5: mov %rdi,0x30(%rax) ... if (signed_add_overflows(dst_reg->smin_value, smin_val) || 71e: cmp %r11,%r10 721: jl 6cb <scalar_min_max_add+0x5b> dst_reg->smin_value += smin_val; 723: mov %r9,%rsi dst_reg->smax_value += smax_val; 726: mov %r11,%rdi 729: jmp 6cb <scalar_min_max_add+0x5b> return res > a; 72b: cmp %r9,%rdi 72e: setl %r10b 732: jmp 69c <scalar_min_max_add+0x2c> 737: nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) Note: unlike adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() and scalar*_min_max_add(), it is necessary to introduce intermediate variable in adjust_jmp_off() to keep the functional behavior unchanged. Without an intermediate variable imm/off will be altered even on overflow. Suggested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240712080127.136608-3-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-07-12bpf: fix overflow check in adjust_jmp_off()Shung-Hsi Yu
adjust_jmp_off() incorrectly used the insn->imm field for all overflow check, which is incorrect as that should only be done or the BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA case, not the general jump instruction case. Fix it by using insn->off for overflow check in the general case. Fixes: 5337ac4c9b80 ("bpf: Fix the corner case with may_goto and jump to the 1st insn.") Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240712080127.136608-2-shung-hsi.yu@suse.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-07-09bpf: relax zero fixed offset constraint on KF_TRUSTED_ARGS/KF_RCUMatt Bobrowski
Currently, BPF kfuncs which accept trusted pointer arguments i.e. those flagged as KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, KF_RCU, or KF_RELEASE, all require an original/unmodified trusted pointer argument to be supplied to them. By original/unmodified, it means that the backing register holding the trusted pointer argument that is to be supplied to the BPF kfunc must have its fixed offset set to zero, or else the BPF verifier will outright reject the BPF program load. However, this zero fixed offset constraint that is currently enforced by the BPF verifier onto BPF kfuncs specifically flagged to accept KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU trusted pointer arguments is rather unnecessary, and can limit their usability in practice. Specifically, it completely eliminates the possibility of constructing a derived trusted pointer from an original trusted pointer. To put it simply, a derived pointer is a pointer which points to one of the nested member fields of the object being pointed to by the original trusted pointer. This patch relaxes the zero fixed offset constraint that is enforced upon BPF kfuncs which specifically accept KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, or KF_RCU arguments. Although, the zero fixed offset constraint technically also applies to BPF kfuncs accepting KF_RELEASE arguments, relaxing this constraint for such BPF kfuncs has subtle and unwanted side-effects. This was discovered by experimenting a little further with an initial version of this patch series [0]. The primary issue with relaxing the zero fixed offset constraint on BPF kfuncs accepting KF_RELEASE arguments is that it'd would open up the opportunity for BPF programs to supply both trusted pointers and derived trusted pointers to them. For KF_RELEASE BPF kfuncs specifically, this could be problematic as resources associated with the backing pointer could be released by the backing BPF kfunc and cause instabilities for the rest of the kernel. With this new fixed offset semantic in-place for BPF kfuncs accepting KF_TRUSTED_ARGS and KF_RCU arguments, we now have more flexibility when it comes to the BPF kfuncs that we're able to introduce moving forward. Early discussions covering the possibility of relaxing the zero fixed offset constraint can be found using the link below. This will provide more context on where all this has stemmed from [1]. Notably, pre-existing tests have been updated such that they provide coverage for the updated zero fixed offset functionality. Specifically, the nested offset test was converted from a negative to positive test as it was already designed to assert zero fixed offset semantics of a KF_TRUSTED_ARGS BPF kfunc. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZnA9ndnXKtHOuYMe@google.com/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZhkbrM55MKQ0KeIV@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240709210939.1544011-1-mattbobrowski@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-07-09Merge tag 'for-netdev' of ↵Paolo Abeni
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2024-07-08 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. We've added 102 non-merge commits during the last 28 day(s) which contain a total of 127 files changed, 4606 insertions(+), 980 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Support resilient split BTF which cuts down on duplication and makes BTF as compact as possible wrt BTF from modules, from Alan Maguire & Eduard Zingerman. 2) Add support for dumping kfunc prototypes from BTF which enables both detecting as well as dumping compilable prototypes for kfuncs, from Daniel Xu. 3) Batch of s390x BPF JIT improvements to add support for BPF arena and to implement support for BPF exceptions, from Ilya Leoshkevich. 4) Batch of riscv64 BPF JIT improvements in particular to add 12-argument support for BPF trampolines and to utilize bpf_prog_pack for the latter, from Pu Lehui. 5) Extend BPF test infrastructure to add a CHECKSUM_COMPLETE validation option for skbs and add coverage along with it, from Vadim Fedorenko. 6) Inline bpf_get_current_task/_btf() helpers in the arm64 BPF JIT which gives a small 1% performance improvement in micro-benchmarks, from Puranjay Mohan. 7) Extend the BPF verifier to track the delta between linked registers in order to better deal with recent LLVM code optimizations, from Alexei Starovoitov. 8) Fix bpf_wq_set_callback_impl() kfunc signature where the third argument should have been a pointer to the map value, from Benjamin Tissoires. 9) Extend BPF selftests to add regular expression support for test output matching and adjust some of the selftest when compiled under gcc, from Cupertino Miranda. 10) Simplify task_file_seq_get_next() and remove an unnecessary loop which always iterates exactly once anyway, from Dan Carpenter. 11) Add the capability to offload the netfilter flowtable in XDP layer through kfuncs, from Florian Westphal & Lorenzo Bianconi. 12) Various cleanups in networking helpers in BPF selftests to shave off a few lines of open-coded functions on client/server handling, from Geliang Tang. 13) Properly propagate prog->aux->tail_call_reachable out of BPF verifier, so that x86 JIT does not need to implement detection, from Leon Hwang. 14) Fix BPF verifier to add a missing check_func_arg_reg_off() to prevent an out-of-bounds memory access for dynpointers, from Matt Bobrowski. 15) Fix bpf_session_cookie() kfunc to return __u64 instead of long pointer as it might lead to problems on 32-bit archs, from Jiri Olsa. 16) Enhance traffic validation and dynamic batch size support in xsk selftests, from Tushar Vyavahare. bpf-next-for-netdev * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (102 commits) selftests/bpf: DENYLIST.aarch64: Remove fexit_sleep selftests/bpf: amend for wrong bpf_wq_set_callback_impl signature bpf: helpers: fix bpf_wq_set_callback_impl signature libbpf: Add NULL checks to bpf_object__{prev_map,next_map} selftests/bpf: Remove exceptions tests from DENYLIST.s390x s390/bpf: Implement exceptions s390/bpf: Change seen_reg to a mask bpf: Remove unnecessary loop in task_file_seq_get_next() riscv, bpf: Optimize stack usage of trampoline bpf, devmap: Add .map_alloc_check selftests/bpf: Remove arena tests from DENYLIST.s390x selftests/bpf: Add UAF tests for arena atomics selftests/bpf: Introduce __arena_global s390/bpf: Support arena atomics s390/bpf: Enable arena s390/bpf: Support address space cast instruction s390/bpf: Support BPF_PROBE_MEM32 s390/bpf: Land on the next JITed instruction after exception s390/bpf: Introduce pre- and post- probe functions s390/bpf: Get rid of get_probe_mem_regno() ... ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240708221438.10974-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
2024-07-02bpf: Fix atomic probe zero-extensionIlya Leoshkevich
Zero-extending results of atomic probe operations fails with: verifier bug. zext_dst is set, but no reg is defined The problem is that insn_def_regno() handles BPF_ATOMICs, but not BPF_PROBE_ATOMICs. Fix by adding the missing condition. Fixes: d503a04f8bc0 ("bpf: Add support for certain atomics in bpf_arena to x86 JIT") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240701234304.14336-2-iii@linux.ibm.com
2024-06-27Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR. No conflicts. Adjacent changes: e3f02f32a050 ("ionic: fix kernel panic due to multi-buffer handling") d9c04209990b ("ionic: Mark error paths in the data path as unlikely") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-06-26bpf: add missing check_func_arg_reg_off() to prevent out-of-bounds memory ↵Matt Bobrowski
accesses Currently, it's possible to pass in a modified CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to a global function as an argument. The adverse effects of this is that BPF helpers can continue to make use of this modified CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR from within the context of the global function, which can unintentionally result in out-of-bounds memory accesses and therefore compromise overall system stability i.e. [ 244.157771] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140 [ 244.161345] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810914be68 by task test_progs/302 [ 244.167151] CPU: 0 PID: 302 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G O E 6.10.0-rc3-00131-g66b586715063 #533 [ 244.174318] Call Trace: [ 244.175787] <TASK> [ 244.177356] dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0 [ 244.179531] print_report+0xce/0x670 [ 244.182314] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x200/0x3e0 [ 244.184908] kasan_report+0xd7/0x110 [ 244.187408] ? bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140 [ 244.189714] ? bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140 [ 244.192020] bpf_dynptr_data+0x137/0x140 [ 244.194264] bpf_prog_b02a02fdd2bdc5fa_global_call_bpf_dynptr_data+0x22/0x26 [ 244.198044] bpf_prog_b0fe7b9d7dc3abde_callback_adjust_bpf_dynptr_reg_off+0x1f/0x23 [ 244.202136] bpf_user_ringbuf_drain+0x2c7/0x570 [ 244.204744] ? 0xffffffffc0009e58 [ 244.206593] ? __pfx_bpf_user_ringbuf_drain+0x10/0x10 [ 244.209795] bpf_prog_33ab33f6a804ba2d_user_ringbuf_callback_const_ptr_to_dynptr_reg_off+0x47/0x4b [ 244.215922] bpf_trampoline_6442502480+0x43/0xe3 [ 244.218691] __x64_sys_prlimit64+0x9/0xf0 [ 244.220912] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x1d0 [ 244.223043] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [ 244.226458] RIP: 0033:0x7ffa3eb8f059 [ 244.228582] Code: 08 89 e8 5b 5d c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 8f 1d 0d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 244.241307] RSP: 002b:00007ffa3e9c6eb8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000012e [ 244.246474] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffa3e9c7cdc RCX: 00007ffa3eb8f059 [ 244.250478] RDX: 00007ffa3eb162b4 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007ffa3e9c7fb0 [ 244.255396] RBP: 00007ffa3e9c6ed0 R08: 00007ffa3e9c76c0 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 244.260195] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: ffffffffffffff80 [ 244.264201] R13: 000000000000001c R14: 00007ffc5d6b4260 R15: 00007ffa3e1c7000 [ 244.268303] </TASK> Add a check_func_arg_reg_off() to the path in which the BPF verifier verifies the arguments of global function arguments, specifically those which take an argument of type ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY. Also, process_dynptr_func() doesn't appear to perform any explicit and strict type matching on the supplied register type, so let's also enforce that a register either type PTR_TO_STACK or CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR is by the caller. Reported-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240625062857.92760-1-mattbobrowski@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-24bpf: Fix may_goto with negative offset.Alexei Starovoitov
Zac's syzbot crafted a bpf prog that exposed two bugs in may_goto. The 1st bug is the way may_goto is patched. When offset is negative it should be patched differently. The 2nd bug is in the verifier: when current state may_goto_depth is equal to visited state may_goto_depth it means there is an actual infinite loop. It's not correct to prune exploration of the program at this point. Note, that this check doesn't limit the program to only one may_goto insn, since 2nd and any further may_goto will increment may_goto_depth only in the queued state pushed for future exploration. The current state will have may_goto_depth == 0 regardless of number of may_goto insns and the verifier has to explore the program until bpf_exit. Fixes: 011832b97b31 ("bpf: Introduce may_goto instruction") Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQL-15aNp04-cyHRn47Yv61NXfYyhopyZtUyxNojUZUXpA@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240619235355.85031-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2024-06-21bpf: Fix the corner case with may_goto and jump to the 1st insn.Alexei Starovoitov
When the following program is processed by the verifier: L1: may_goto L2 goto L1 L2: w0 = 0 exit the may_goto insn is first converted to: L1: r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8) if r11 == 0x0 goto L2 r11 -= 1 *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r11 goto L1 L2: w0 = 0 exit then later as the last step the verifier inserts: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = BPF_MAX_LOOPS as the first insn of the program to initialize loop count. When the first insn happens to be a branch target of some jmp the bpf_patch_insn_data() logic will produce: L1: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = BPF_MAX_LOOPS r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8) if r11 == 0x0 goto L2 r11 -= 1 *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r11 goto L1 L2: w0 = 0 exit because instruction patching adjusts all jmps and calls, but for this particular corner case it's incorrect and the L1 label should be one instruction down, like: *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = BPF_MAX_LOOPS L1: r11 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8) if r11 == 0x0 goto L2 r11 -= 1 *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r11 goto L1 L2: w0 = 0 exit and that's what this patch is fixing. After bpf_patch_insn_data() call adjust_jmp_off() to adjust all jmps that point to newly insert BPF_ST insn to point to insn after. Note that bpf_patch_insn_data() cannot easily be changed to accommodate this logic, since jumps that point before or after a sequence of patched instructions have to be adjusted with the full length of the patch. Conceptually it's somewhat similar to "insert" of instructions between other instructions with weird semantics. Like "insert" before 1st insn would require adjustment of CALL insns to point to newly inserted 1st insn, but not an adjustment JMP insns that point to 1st, yet still adjusting JMP insns that cross over 1st insn (point to insn before or insn after), hence use simple adjust_jmp_off() logic to fix this corner case. Ideally bpf_patch_insn_data() would have an auxiliary info to say where 'the start of newly inserted patch is', but it would be too complex for backport. Fixes: 011832b97b31 ("bpf: Introduce may_goto instruction") Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ_WWx8w4b=6Gc2EpzAjgv+6A0ridnMz2TvS2egj4r3Gw@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240619011859.79334-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2024-06-20bpf: remove unused parameter in __bpf_free_used_btfsRafael Passos
Fixes a compiler warning. The __bpf_free_used_btfs function was taking an extra unused struct bpf_prog_aux *aux param Signed-off-by: Rafael Passos <rafael@rcpassos.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615022641.210320-3-rafael@rcpassos.me Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-20bpf, verifier: Correct tail_call_reachable for bpf progLeon Hwang
It's confusing to inspect 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' with drgn[0], when bpf prog has tail call but 'tail_call_reachable' is false. This patch corrects 'tail_call_reachable' when bpf prog has tail call. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-20Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR. Conflicts: drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c 1e7962114c10 ("bnxt_en: Restore PTP tx_avail count in case of skb_pad() error") 165f87691a89 ("bnxt_en: add timestamping statistics support") No adjacent changes. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-06-17bpf: Add missed var_off setting in coerce_subreg_to_size_sx()Yonghong Song
In coerce_subreg_to_size_sx(), for the case where upper sign extension bits are the same for smax32 and smin32 values, we missed to setup properly. This is especially problematic if both smax32 and smin32's sign extension bits are 1. The following is a simple example illustrating the inconsistent verifier states due to missed var_off: 0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar() 1: (bf) r3 = r0 ; R0_w=scalar(id=1) R3_w=scalar(id=1) 2: (57) r3 &= 15 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=15,var_off=(0x0; 0xf)) 3: (47) r3 |= 128 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=128,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=143,var_off=(0x80; 0xf)) 4: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (alu): range bounds violation u64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s64=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] u32=[0xffffff80, 0x8f] s32=[0x80, 0xffffff8f] var_off=(0x80, 0xf) The var_off=(0x80, 0xf) is not correct, and the correct one should be var_off=(0xffffff80; 0xf) since from insn 3, we know that at insn 4, the sign extension bits will be 1. This patch fixed this issue by setting var_off properly. Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174632.3995278-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-17bpf: Add missed var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val()Yonghong Song
Zac reported a verification failure and Alexei reproduced the issue with a simple reproducer ([1]). The verification failure is due to missed setting for var_off. The following is the reproducer in [1]: 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387) ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R10=fp0 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f)) 2: (36) if w7 >= 0x2533823b goto pc-3 mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 2 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1 mark_precise: frame0: regs=r7 stack= before 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 mark_precise: frame0: regs=r3 stack= before 0: (71) r3 = *(u8 *)(r10 -387) 2: R7_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f)) 3: (b4) w0 = 0 ; R0_w=0 4: (95) exit Note that after insn 1, the var_off for R7 is (0x0; 0x7f). This is not correct since upper 24 bits of w7 could be 0 or 1. So correct var_off should be (0x0; 0xffffffff). Missing var_off setting in set_sext32_default_val() caused later incorrect analysis in zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) and reg_bounds_sync(dst_reg). To fix the issue, set var_off correctly in set_sext32_default_val(). The correct reg state after insn 1 becomes: 1: (bc) w7 = (s8)w3 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff)) R7_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=-128,smax32=127,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) and at insn 2, the verifier correctly determines either branch is possible. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQLPU0Shz7dWV4bn2BgtGdxN3uFHPeobGBA72tpg5Xoykw@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 8100928c8814 ("bpf: Support new sign-extension mov insns") Reported-by: Zac Ecob <zacecob@protonmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240615174626.3994813-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-14bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers.Alexei Starovoitov
Compilers can generate the code r1 = r2 r1 += 0x1 if r2 < 1000 goto ... use knowledge of r2 range in subsequent r1 operations So remember constant delta between r2 and r1 and update r1 after 'if' condition. Unfortunately LLVM still uses this pattern for loops with 'can_loop' construct: for (i = 0; i < 1000 && can_loop; i++) The "undo" pass was introduced in LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D121937 to prevent this optimization, but it cannot cover all cases. Instead of fighting middle end optimizer in BPF backend teach the verifier about this pattern. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240613013815.953-3-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2024-06-13bpf: verifier: make kfuncs args nullalbleVadim Fedorenko
Some arguments to kfuncs might be NULL in some cases. But currently it's not possible to pass NULL to any BTF structures because the check for the suffix is located after all type checks. Move it to earlier place to allow nullable args. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613211817.1551967-2-vadfed@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-13bpf: fix UML x86_64 compile failureMaciej Żenczykowski
pcpu_hot (defined in arch/x86) is not available on user mode linux (ARCH=um) Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper") Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613173146.2524647-1-maze@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-13bpf: Reduce stack consumption in check_stack_write_fixed_offDaniel Borkmann
The fake_reg moved into env->fake_reg given it consumes a lot of stack space (120 bytes). Migrate the fake_reg in check_stack_write_fixed_off() as well now that we have it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613115310.25383-2-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-13bpf: Fix reg_set_min_max corruption of fake_regDaniel Borkmann
Juan reported that after doing some changes to buzzer [0] and implementing a new fuzzing strategy guided by coverage, they noticed the following in one of the probes: [...] 13: (79) r6 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0) ; R0=map_value(ks=4,vs=8) R6_w=scalar() 14: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0 15: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff 16: (74) w0 >>= 1 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff 17: (5c) w6 &= w0 ; R0_w=0x7fffffff R6_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffff)) 18: (44) w6 |= 2 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=umax32=0x7fffffff,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) 19: (56) if w6 != 0x7ffffffd goto pc+1 REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (true_reg2): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg1): range bounds violation u64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s64=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] u32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] s32=[0x7fffffff, 0x7ffffffd] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION (false_reg2): const tnum out of sync with range bounds u64=[0x0, 0xffffffffffffffff] s64=[0x8000000000000000, 0x7fffffffffffffff] u32=[0x0, 0xffffffff] s32=[0x80000000, 0x7fffffff] var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) 19: R6_w=0x7fffffff 20: (95) exit from 19 to 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 21: R0=0x7fffffff R6=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=2,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=0x7ffffffe,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd)) R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 21: (14) w6 -= 2147483632 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=14,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd)) 22: (76) if w6 s>= 0xe goto pc+1 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=umin=umin32=2,smax=umax=0xffffffff,smin32=0x80000012,smax32=13,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffd)) 23: (95) exit from 22 to 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 24: R0=0x7fffffff R6_w=14 R7=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) R9=ctx() R10=fp0 fp-24=map_ptr(ks=4,vs=8) fp-40=mmmmmmmm 24: (14) w6 -= 14 ; R6_w=0 [...] What can be seen here is a register invariant violation on line 19. After the binary-or in line 18, the verifier knows that bit 2 is set but knows nothing about the rest of the content which was loaded from a map value, meaning, range is [2,0x7fffffff] with var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffd). When in line 19 the verifier analyzes the branch, it splits the register states in reg_set_min_max() into the registers of the true branch (true_reg1, true_reg2) and the registers of the false branch (false_reg1, false_reg2). Since the test is w6 != 0x7ffffffd, the src_reg is a known constant. Internally, the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized as scalar to the value of 0x7ffffffd, and then passes it onto reg_set_min_max(). Now, for line 19, it is mathematically impossible to take the false branch of this program, yet the verifier analyzes it. It is impossible because the second bit of r6 will be set due to the prior or operation and the constant in the condition has that bit unset (hex(fd) == binary(1111 1101). When the verifier first analyzes the false / fall-through branch, it will compute an intersection between the var_off of r6 and of the constant. This is because the verifier creates a "fake" register initialized to the value of the constant. The intersection result later refines both registers in regs_refine_cond_op(): [...] t = tnum_intersect(tnum_subreg(reg1->var_off), tnum_subreg(reg2->var_off)); reg1->var_off = tnum_with_subreg(reg1->var_off, t); reg2->var_off = tnum_with_subreg(reg2->var_off, t); [...] Since the verifier is analyzing the false branch of the conditional jump, reg1 is equal to false_reg1 and reg2 is equal to false_reg2, i.e. the reg2 is the "fake" register that was meant to hold a constant value. The resulting var_off of the intersection says that both registers now hold a known value of var_off=(0x7fffffff, 0x0) or in other words: this operation manages to make the verifier think that the "constant" value that was passed in the jump operation now holds a different value. Normally this would not be an issue since it should not influence the true branch, however, false_reg2 and true_reg2 are pointers to the same "fake" register. Meaning, the false branch can influence the results of the true branch. In line 24, the verifier assumes R6_w=0, but the actual runtime value in this case is 1. The fix is simply not passing in the same "fake" register location as inputs to reg_set_min_max(), but instead making a copy. Moving the fake_reg into the env also reduces stack consumption by 120 bytes. With this, the verifier successfully rejects invalid accesses from the test program. [0] https://github.com/google/buzzer Fixes: 67420501e868 ("bpf: generalize reg_set_min_max() to handle non-const register comparisons") Reported-by: Juan José López Jaimez <jjlopezjaimez@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613115310.25383-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-12bpf: treewide: Align kfunc signatures to prog point-of-viewDaniel Xu
Previously, kfunc declarations in bpf_kfuncs.h (and others) used "user facing" types for kfuncs prototypes while the actual kfunc definitions used "kernel facing" types. More specifically: bpf_dynptr vs bpf_dynptr_kern, __sk_buff vs sk_buff, and xdp_md vs xdp_buff. It wasn't an issue before, as the verifier allows aliased types. However, since we are now generating kfunc prototypes in vmlinux.h (in addition to keeping bpf_kfuncs.h around), this conflict creates compilation errors. Fix this conflict by using "user facing" types in kfunc definitions. This results in more casts, but otherwise has no additional runtime cost. Note, similar to 5b268d1ebcdc ("bpf: Have bpf_rdonly_cast() take a const pointer"), we also make kfuncs take const arguments where appropriate in order to make the kfunc more permissive. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b58346a63a0e66bc9b7504da751b526b0b189a67.1718207789.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-12bpf: verifier: Relax caller requirements for kfunc projection type argsDaniel Xu
Currently, if a kfunc accepts a projection type as an argument (eg struct __sk_buff *), the caller must exactly provide exactly the same type with provable provenance. However in practice, kfuncs that accept projection types _must_ cast to the underlying type before use b/c projection type layouts are completely made up. Thus, it is ok to relax the verifier rules around implicit conversions. We will use this functionality in the next commit when we align kfuncs to user-facing types. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e2c025cb09ccfd4af1ec9e18284dc3cecff7514d.1718207789.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-10Merge tag 'for-netdev' of ↵Jakub Kicinski
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2024-06-06 We've added 54 non-merge commits during the last 10 day(s) which contain a total of 50 files changed, 1887 insertions(+), 527 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add a user space notification mechanism via epoll when a struct_ops object is getting detached/unregistered, from Kui-Feng Lee. 2) Big batch of BPF selftest refactoring for sockmap and BPF congctl tests, from Geliang Tang. 3) Add BTF field (type and string fields, right now) iterator support to libbpf instead of using existing callback-based approaches, from Andrii Nakryiko. 4) Extend BPF selftests for the latter with a new btf_field_iter selftest, from Alan Maguire. 5) Add new kfuncs for a generic, open-coded bits iterator, from Yafang Shao. 6) Fix BPF selftests' kallsyms_find() helper under kernels configured with CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN, from Yonghong Song. 7) Remove a bunch of unused structs in BPF selftests, from David Alan Gilbert. 8) Convert test_sockmap section names into names understood by libbpf so it can deduce program type and attach type, from Jakub Sitnicki. 9) Extend libbpf with the ability to configure log verbosity via LIBBPF_LOG_LEVEL environment variable, from Mykyta Yatsenko. 10) Fix BPF selftests with regards to bpf_cookie and find_vma flakiness in nested VMs, from Song Liu. 11) Extend riscv32/64 JITs to introduce shift/add helpers to generate Zba optimization, from Xiao Wang. 12) Enable BPF programs to declare arrays and struct fields with kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head, from Kui-Feng Lee. * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (54 commits) selftests/bpf: Drop useless arguments of do_test in bpf_tcp_ca selftests/bpf: Use start_test in test_dctcp in bpf_tcp_ca selftests/bpf: Use start_test in test_dctcp_fallback in bpf_tcp_ca selftests/bpf: Add start_test helper in bpf_tcp_ca selftests/bpf: Use connect_to_fd_opts in do_test in bpf_tcp_ca libbpf: Auto-attach struct_ops BPF maps in BPF skeleton selftests/bpf: Add btf_field_iter selftests selftests/bpf: Fix send_signal test with nested CONFIG_PARAVIRT libbpf: Remove callback-based type/string BTF field visitor helpers bpftool: Use BTF field iterator in btfgen libbpf: Make use of BTF field iterator in BTF handling code libbpf: Make use of BTF field iterator in BPF linker code libbpf: Add BTF field iterator selftests/bpf: Ignore .llvm.<hash> suffix in kallsyms_find() selftests/bpf: Fix bpf_cookie and find_vma in nested VM selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_list_head arrays. selftests/bpf: Test global bpf_rb_root arrays and fields in nested struct types. selftests/bpf: Test kptr arrays and kptrs in nested struct fields. bpf: limit the number of levels of a nested struct type. bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively. ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240606223146.23020-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-06-03bpf: Remove unnecessary call to btf_field_type_size().Kui-Feng Lee
field->size has been initialized by bpf_parse_fields() with the value returned by btf_field_type_size(). Use it instead of calling btf_field_type_size() again. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240523174202.461236-3-thinker.li@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-06-03bpf: Remove unnecessary checks on the offset of btf_field.Kui-Feng Lee
reg_find_field_offset() always return a btf_field with a matching offset value. Checking the offset of the returned btf_field is unnecessary. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240523174202.461236-2-thinker.li@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-31bpf: Fix bpf_session_cookie BTF_ID in special_kfunc_set listJiri Olsa
The bpf_session_cookie is unavailable for !CONFIG_FPROBE as reported by Sebastian [1]. To fix that we remove CONFIG_FPROBE ifdef for session kfuncs, which is fine, because there's filter for session programs. Then based on bpf_trace.o dependency: obj-$(CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS) += bpf_trace.o we add bpf_session_cookie BTF_ID in special_kfunc_set list dependency on CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240531071557.MvfIqkn7@linutronix.de/T/#m71c6d5ec71db2967288cb79acedc15cc5dbfeec5 Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Fixes: 5c919acef8514 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session cookie") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240531194500.2967187-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-27bpf: Allow delete from sockmap/sockhash only if update is allowedJakub Sitnicki
We have seen an influx of syzkaller reports where a BPF program attached to a tracepoint triggers a locking rule violation by performing a map_delete on a sockmap/sockhash. We don't intend to support this artificial use scenario. Extend the existing verifier allowed-program-type check for updating sockmap/sockhash to also cover deleting from a map. From now on only BPF programs which were previously allowed to update sockmap/sockhash can delete from these map types. Fixes: ff9105993240 ("bpf, sockmap: Prevent lock inversion deadlock in map delete elem") Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Reported-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: syzbot+ec941d6e24f633a59172@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ec941d6e24f633a59172 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240527-sockmap-verify-deletes-v1-1-944b372f2101@cloudflare.com
2024-05-13Merge tag 'for-netdev' of ↵Jakub Kicinski
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2024-05-13 We've added 119 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain a total of 134 files changed, 9462 insertions(+), 4742 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add BPF JIT support for 32-bit ARCv2 processors, from Shahab Vahedi. 2) Add BPF range computation improvements to the verifier in particular around XOR and OR operators, refactoring of checks for range computation and relaxing MUL range computation so that src_reg can also be an unknown scalar, from Cupertino Miranda. 3) Add support to attach kprobe BPF programs through kprobe_multi link in a session mode, meaning, a BPF program is attached to both function entry and return, the entry program can decide if the return program gets executed and the entry program can share u64 cookie value with return program. Session mode is a common use-case for tetragon and bpftrace, from Jiri Olsa. 4) Fix a potential overflow in libbpf's ring__consume_n() and improve libbpf as well as BPF selftest's struct_ops handling, from Andrii Nakryiko. 5) Improvements to BPF selftests in context of BPF gcc backend, from Jose E. Marchesi & David Faust. 6) Migrate remaining BPF selftest tests from test_sock_addr.c to prog_test- -style in order to retire the old test, run it in BPF CI and additionally expand test coverage, from Jordan Rife. 7) Big batch for BPF selftest refactoring in order to remove duplicate code around common network helpers, from Geliang Tang. 8) Another batch of improvements to BPF selftests to retire obsolete bpf_tcp_helpers.h as everything is available vmlinux.h, from Martin KaFai Lau. 9) Fix BPF map tear-down to not walk the map twice on free when both timer and wq is used, from Benjamin Tissoires. 10) Fix BPF verifier assumptions about socket->sk that it can be non-NULL, from Alexei Starovoitov. 11) Change BTF build scripts to using --btf_features for pahole v1.26+, from Alan Maguire. 12) Small improvements to BPF reusing struct_size() and krealloc_array(), from Andy Shevchenko. 13) Fix s390 JIT to emit a barrier for BPF_FETCH instructions, from Ilya Leoshkevich. 14) Extend TCP ->cong_control() callback in order to feed in ack and flag parameters and allow write-access to tp->snd_cwnd_stamp from BPF program, from Miao Xu. 15) Add support for internal-only per-CPU instructions to inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper call for arm64 and riscv64 BPF JITs, from Puranjay Mohan. 16) Follow-up to remove the redundant ethtool.h from tooling infrastructure, from Tushar Vyavahare. 17) Extend libbpf to support "module:<function>" syntax for tracing programs, from Viktor Malik. * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (119 commits) bpf: make list_for_each_entry portable bpf: ignore expected GCC warning in test_global_func10.c bpf: disable strict aliasing in test_global_func9.c selftests/bpf: Free strdup memory in xdp_hw_metadata selftests/bpf: Fix a few tests for GCC related warnings. bpf: avoid gcc overflow warning in test_xdp_vlan.c tools: remove redundant ethtool.h from tooling infra selftests/bpf: Expand ATTACH_REJECT tests selftests/bpf: Expand getsockname and getpeername tests sefltests/bpf: Expand sockaddr hook deny tests selftests/bpf: Expand sockaddr program return value tests selftests/bpf: Retire test_sock_addr.(c|sh) selftests/bpf: Remove redundant sendmsg test cases selftests/bpf: Migrate ATTACH_REJECT test cases selftests/bpf: Migrate expected_attach_type tests selftests/bpf: Migrate wildcard destination rewrite test selftests/bpf: Migrate sendmsg6 v4 mapped address tests selftests/bpf: Migrate sendmsg deny test cases selftests/bpf: Migrate WILDCARD_IP test selftests/bpf: Handle SYSCALL_EPERM and SYSCALL_ENOTSUPP test cases ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513134114.17575-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2024-05-12riscv, bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id()Puranjay Mohan
Inline the calls to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in the riscv bpf jit. RISCV saves the pointer to the CPU's task_struct in the TP (thread pointer) register. This makes it trivial to get the CPU's processor id. As thread_info is the first member of task_struct, we can read the processor id from TP + offsetof(struct thread_info, cpu). RISCV64 JIT output for `call bpf_get_smp_processor_id` ====================================================== Before After -------- ------- auipc t1,0x848c ld a5,32(tp) jalr 604(t1) mv a5,a0 Benchmark using [1] on Qemu. ./benchs/run_bench_trigger.sh glob-arr-inc arr-inc hash-inc +---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------+ | Name | Before | After | % change | |---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------| | glob-arr-inc | 1.077 ± 0.006M/s | 1.336 ± 0.010M/s | + 24.04% | | arr-inc | 1.078 ± 0.002M/s | 1.332 ± 0.015M/s | + 23.56% | | hash-inc | 0.494 ± 0.004M/s | 0.653 ± 0.001M/s | + 32.18% | +---------------+------------------+------------------+--------------+ NOTE: This benchmark includes changes from this patch and the previous patch that implemented the per-cpu insn. [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/linux/commit/8dec900975ef Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240502151854.9810-3-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-05-06bpf/verifier: relax MUL range computation checkCupertino Miranda
MUL instruction required that src_reg would be a known value (i.e. src_reg would be a const value). The condition in this case can be relaxed, since the range computation algorithm used in current code already supports a proper range computation for any valid range value on its operands. Signed-off-by: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> Cc: David Faust <david.faust@oracle.com> Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Cc: Elena Zannoni <elena.zannoni@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240506141849.185293-6-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>