| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
[ upstream commit 45500dc4e01c167ee063f3dcc22f51ced5b2b1e9 ]
io-wq will retry iopoll even when it failed with -EAGAIN. If that
races with task exit, which sets TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for all its workers,
such workers might potentially infinitely spin retrying iopoll again and
again and each time failing on some allocation / waiting / etc. Don't
keep spinning if io-wq is dying.
Fixes: 561fb04a6a225 ("io_uring: replace workqueue usage with io-wq")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit 46a525e199e4037516f7e498c18f065b09df32ac upstream.
This isn't a reliable mechanism to tell if we have task_work pending, we
really should be looking at whether we have any items queued. This is
problematic if forward progress is gated on running said task_work. One
such example is reading from a pipe, where the write side has been closed
right before the read is started. The fput() of the file queues TWA_RESUME
task_work, and we need that task_work to be run before ->release() is
called for the pipe. If ->release() isn't called, then the read will sit
forever waiting on data that will never arise.
Fix this by io_run_task_work() so it checks if we have task_work pending
rather than rely on TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL for that. The latter obviously
doesn't work for task_work that is queued without TWA_SIGNAL.
Reported-by: Christiano Haesbaert <haesbaert@haesbaert.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/665
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
|
commit e6db6f9398dadcbc06318a133d4c44a2d3844e61 upstream.
We have two types of task_work based creation, one is using an existing
worker to setup a new one (eg when going to sleep and we have no free
workers), and the other is allocating a new worker. Only the latter
should be freed when we cancel task_work creation for a new worker.
Fixes: af82425c6a2d ("io_uring/io-wq: free worker if task_work creation is canceled")
Reported-by: syzbot+d56ec896af3637bdb7e4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
commit af82425c6a2d2f347c79b63ce74fca6dc6be157f upstream.
If we cancel the task_work, the worker will never come into existance.
As this is the last reference to it, ensure that we get it freed
appropriately.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: 진호 <wnwlsgh98@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
|
[ Upstream commit ed29b0b4fd835b058ddd151c49d021e28d631ee6 ]
In preparation for splitting io_uring up a bit, move it into its own
top level directory. It didn't really belong in fs/ anyway, as it's
not a file system only API.
This adds io_uring/ and moves the core files in there, and updates the
MAINTAINERS file for the new location.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 998b30c3948e ("io_uring: Fix a null-ptr-deref in io_tctx_exit_cb()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
