summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-04-04mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macrosKirill A. Shutemov
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE. This promise never materialized. And unlikely will. We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case, especially on the border between fs and mm. Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much breakage to be doable. Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are not. The changes are pretty straight-forward: - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>; - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN}; - page_cache_get() -> get_page(); - page_cache_release() -> put_page(); This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files. I've called spatch for them manually. The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later. There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also will be addressed with the separate patch. virtual patch @@ expression E; @@ - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ expression E; @@ - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) + E @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT + PAGE_SHIFT @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE + PAGE_SIZE @@ @@ - PAGE_CACHE_MASK + PAGE_MASK @@ expression E; @@ - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E) + PAGE_ALIGN(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_get(E) + get_page(E) @@ expression E; @@ - page_cache_release(E) + put_page(E) Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-22wrappers for ->i_mutex accessAl Viro
parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested}, inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex). Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle ->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held only shared. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-10-12xfs: add missing ilock around dio write last extent alignmentBrian Foster
The iomap codepath (via get_blocks()) acquires and release the inode lock in the case of a direct write that requires block allocation. This is because xfs_iomap_write_direct() allocates a transaction, which means the ilock must be dropped and reacquired after the transaction is allocated and reserved. xfs_iomap_write_direct() invokes xfs_iomap_eof_align_last_fsb() before the transaction is created and thus before the ilock is reacquired. This can lead to calls to xfs_iread_extents() and reads of the in-core extent list without any synchronization (via xfs_bmap_eof() and xfs_bmap_last_extent()). xfs_iread_extents() assert fails if the ilock is not held, but this is not currently seen in practice as the current callers had already invoked xfs_bmapi_read(). What has been seen in practice are reports of crashes down in the xfs_bmap_eof() codepath on direct writes due to seemingly bogus pointer references from xfs_iext_get_ext(). While an explicit reproducer is not currently available to confirm the cause of the problem, crash analysis and code inspection from David Jeffrey had identified the insufficient locking. xfs_iomap_eof_align_last_fsb() is called from other contexts with the inode lock already held, so we cannot acquire it therein. __xfs_get_blocks() acquires and drops the ilock with variable flags to cover the event that the extent list must be read in. The common case is that __xfs_get_blocks() acquires the shared ilock. To provide locking around the last extent alignment call without adding more lock cycles to the dio path, update xfs_iomap_write_direct() to expect the shared ilock held on entry and do the extent alignment under its protection. Demote the lock, if necessary, from __xfs_get_blocks() and push the xfs_qm_dqattach() call outside of the shared lock critical section. Also, add an assert to document that the extent list is always expected to be present in this path. Otherwise, we risk a call to xfs_iread_extents() while under the shared ilock. This is safe as all current callers have executed an xfs_bmapi_read() call under the current iolock context. Reported-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-06-04xfs: saner xfs_trans_commit interfaceChristoph Hellwig
The flags argument to xfs_trans_commit is not useful for most callers, as a commit of a transaction without a permanent log reservation must pass 0 here, and all callers for a transaction with a permanent log reservation except for xfs_trans_roll must pass XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES. So remove the flags argument from the public xfs_trans_commit interfaces, and introduce low-level __xfs_trans_commit variant just for xfs_trans_roll that regrants a log reservation instead of releasing it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-06-04xfs: remove the flags argument to xfs_trans_cancelChristoph Hellwig
xfs_trans_cancel takes two flags arguments: XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES and XFS_TRANS_ABORT. Both of them are a direct product of the transaction state, and can be deducted: - any dirty transaction needs XFS_TRANS_ABORT to be properly canceled, and XFS_TRANS_ABORT is a noop for a transaction that is not dirty. - any transaction with a permanent log reservation needs XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES to be properly canceled, and passing XFS_TRANS_RELEASE_LOG_RES for a transaction without a permanent log reservation is invalid. So just remove the flags argument and do the right thing. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-04-13Merge branch 'xfs-misc-fixes-for-4.1-3' into for-nextDave Chinner
Conflicts: fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
2015-04-13xfs: unlock i_mutex in xfs_break_layoutsChristoph Hellwig
We want to drop all I/O path locks when recalling layouts, and that includes i_mutex for the write path. Without this we get stuck processe when recalls take too long. [dchinner: fix build with !CONFIG_PNFS] Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-02-24xfs: cancel failed transaction in xfs_fs_commit_blocks()Eric Sandeen
If xfs_trans_reserve fails we don't cancel the transaction, and we'll leak the allocated transaction pointer. Spotted by Coverity. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <ssandeen@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-02-16xfs: recall pNFS layouts on conflicting accessChristoph Hellwig
Recall all outstanding pNFS layouts and truncates, writes and similar extent list modifying operations. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
2015-02-16xfs: implement pNFS export operationsChristoph Hellwig
Add operations to export pNFS block layouts from an XFS filesystem. See the previous commit adding the operations for an explanation of them. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>