summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-05-17btrfs: set correct ram_bytes when splitting ordered extentQu Wenruo
commit 63a6ce5a1a6261e4c70bad2b55c4e0de8da4762e upstream. [BUG] When running generic/287, the following file extent items can be generated: item 16 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 2682880) itemoff 15305 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 1378414592 nr 462848 extent data offset 0 nr 462848 ram 2097152 extent compression 0 (none) Note that file extent item is not a compressed one, but its ram_bytes is way larger than its disk_num_bytes. According to btrfs on-disk scheme, ram_bytes should match disk_num_bytes if it's not a compressed one. [CAUSE] Since commit b73a6fd1b1ef ("btrfs: split partial dio bios before submit"), for partial dio writes, we would split the ordered extent. However the function btrfs_split_ordered_extent() doesn't update the ram_bytes even it has already shrunk the disk_num_bytes. Originally the function btrfs_split_ordered_extent() is only introduced for zoned devices in commit d22002fd37bd ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered extent when bio is sent"), but later commit b73a6fd1b1ef ("btrfs: split partial dio bios before submit") makes non-zoned btrfs affected. Thankfully for un-compressed file extent, we do not really utilize the ram_bytes member, thus it won't cause any real problem. [FIX] Also update btrfs_ordered_extent::ram_bytes inside btrfs_split_ordered_extent(). Fixes: d22002fd37bd ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered extent when bio is sent") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-05-17btrfs: add missing mutex_unlock in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()Dominique Martinet
commit 9af503d91298c3f2945e73703f0e00995be08c30 upstream. The previous patch that replaced BUG_ON by error handling forgot to unlock the mutex in the error path. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zh%2fHpAGFqa7YAFuM@duo.ucw.cz Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> Fixes: 7411055db5ce ("btrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de> Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-05-17btrfs: fix kvcalloc() arguments order in btrfs_ioctl_send()Dmitry Antipov
commit 6ff09b6b8c2fb6b3edda4ffaa173153a40653067 upstream. When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231220 (experimental) and W=1, I've noticed the following warning: fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl_send': fs/btrfs/send.c:8208:44: warning: 'kvcalloc' sizes specified with 'sizeof' in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Wcalloc-transposed-args] 8208 | sctx->clone_roots = kvcalloc(sizeof(*sctx->clone_roots), | ^ Since 'n' and 'size' arguments of 'kvcalloc()' are multiplied to calculate the final size, their actual order doesn't affect the result and so this is not a bug. But it's still worth to fix it. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-05-17btrfs: always clear PERTRANS metadata during commitBoris Burkov
[ Upstream commit 6e68de0bb0ed59e0554a0c15ede7308c47351e2d ] It is possible to clear a root's IN_TRANS tag from the radix tree, but not clear its PERTRANS, if there is some error in between. Eliminate that possibility by moving the free up to where we clear the tag. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-05-17btrfs: make btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() free delalloc reserveBoris Burkov
[ Upstream commit 3c6f0c5ecc8910d4ffb0dfe85609ebc0c91c8f34 ] Currently, this call site in btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() only converts the reservation. We are marking it not delalloc, so I don't think it makes sense to keep the rsv around. This is a path where we are not sure to join a transaction, so it leads to incorrect free-ing during umount. Helps with the pass rate of generic/269 and generic/475. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-05-17btrfs: return accurate error code on open failure in open_fs_devices()Anand Jain
[ Upstream commit 2f1aeab9fca1a5f583be1add175d1ee95c213cfa ] When attempting to exclusive open a device which has no exclusive open permission, such as a physical device associated with the flakey dm device, the open operation will fail, resulting in a mount failure. In this particular scenario, we erroneously return -EINVAL instead of the correct error code provided by the bdev_open_by_path() function, which is -EBUSY. Fix this, by returning error code from the bdev_open_by_path() function. With this correction, the mount error message will align with that of ext4 and xfs. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-05-02btrfs: fix information leak in btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino()Johannes Thumshirn
commit 2f7ef5bb4a2f3e481ef05fab946edb97c84f67cf upstream. Syzbot reported the following information leak for in btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino(): BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:40 instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline] _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:40 copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:191 [inline] btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x440/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3499 btrfs_ioctl+0x714/0x1260 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x261/0x450 fs/ioctl.c:890 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:890 x64_sys_call+0x1883/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Uninit was created at: __kmalloc_large_node+0x231/0x370 mm/slub.c:3921 __do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3954 [inline] __kmalloc_node+0xb07/0x1060 mm/slub.c:3973 kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:648 [inline] kvmalloc_node+0xc0/0x2d0 mm/util.c:634 kvmalloc include/linux/slab.h:766 [inline] init_data_container+0x49/0x1e0 fs/btrfs/backref.c:2779 btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x17c/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3480 btrfs_ioctl+0x714/0x1260 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0x261/0x450 fs/ioctl.c:890 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:890 x64_sys_call+0x1883/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Bytes 40-65535 of 65536 are uninitialized Memory access of size 65536 starts at ffff888045a40000 This happens, because we're copying a 'struct btrfs_data_container' back to user-space. This btrfs_data_container is allocated in 'init_data_container()' via kvmalloc(), which does not zero-fill the memory. Fix this by using kvzalloc() which zeroes out the memory on allocation. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reported-by: <syzbot+510a1abbb8116eeb341d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-05-02btrfs: scrub: run relocation repair when/only neededNaohiro Aota
commit 7192833c4e55b26e8f15ef58577867a1bc808036 upstream. When btrfs scrub finds an error, it reads mirrors to find correct data. If all the errors are fixed, sctx->error_bitmap is cleared for the stripe range. However, in the zoned mode, it runs relocation to repair scrub errors when the bitmap is *not* empty, which is a flipped condition. Also, it runs the relocation even if the scrub is read-only. This was missed by a fix in commit 1f2030ff6e49 ("btrfs: scrub: respect the read-only flag during repair"). The repair is only necessary when there is a repaired sector and should be done on read-write scrub. So, tweak the condition for both regular and zoned case. Fixes: 54765392a1b9 ("btrfs: scrub: introduce helper to queue a stripe for scrub") Fixes: 1f2030ff6e49 ("btrfs: scrub: respect the read-only flag during repair") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-05-02btrfs: fix wrong block_start calculation for btrfs_drop_extent_map_range()Qu Wenruo
commit fe1c6c7acce10baf9521d6dccc17268d91ee2305 upstream. [BUG] During my extent_map cleanup/refactor, with extra sanity checks, extent-map-tests::test_case_7() would not pass the checks. The problem is, after btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(), the resulted extent_map has a @block_start way too large. Meanwhile my btrfs_file_extent_item based members are returning a correct @disk_bytenr/@offset combination. The extent map layout looks like this: 0 16K 32K 48K | PINNED | | Regular | The regular em at [32K, 48K) also has 32K @block_start. Then drop range [0, 36K), which should shrink the regular one to be [36K, 48K). However the @block_start is incorrect, we expect 32K + 4K, but got 52K. [CAUSE] Inside btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() function, if we hit an extent_map that covers the target range but is still beyond it, we need to split that extent map into half: |<-- drop range -->| |<----- existing extent_map --->| And if the extent map is not compressed, we need to forward extent_map::block_start by the difference between the end of drop range and the extent map start. However in that particular case, the difference is calculated using (start + len - em->start). The problem is @start can be modified if the drop range covers any pinned extent. This leads to wrong calculation, and would be caught by my later extent_map sanity checks, which checks the em::block_start against btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_bytenr + btrfs_file_extent_item::offset. This is a regression caused by commit c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range"), which removed the @len update for pinned extents. [FIX] Fix it by avoiding using @start completely, and use @end - em->start instead, which @end is exclusive bytenr number. And update the test case to verify the @block_start to prevent such problem from happening. Thankfully this is not going to lead to any data corruption, as IO path does not utilize btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() with @skip_pinned set. So this fix is only here for the sake of consistency/correctness. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Fixes: c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-05-02btrfs: fallback if compressed IO fails for ENOSPCSweet Tea Dorminy
commit 131a821a243f89be312ced9e62ccc37b2cf3846c upstream. In commit b4ccace878f4 ("btrfs: refactor submit_compressed_extents()"), if an async extent compressed but failed to find enough space, we changed from falling back to an uncompressed write to just failing the write altogether. The principle was that if there's not enough space to write the compressed version of the data, there can't possibly be enough space to write the larger, uncompressed version of the data. However, this isn't necessarily true: due to fragmentation, there could be enough discontiguous free blocks to write the uncompressed version, but not enough contiguous free blocks to write the smaller but unsplittable compressed version. This has occurred to an internal workload which relied on write()'s return value indicating there was space. While rare, it has happened a few times. Thus, in order to prevent early ENOSPC, re-add a fallback to uncompressed writing. Fixes: b4ccace878f4 ("btrfs: refactor submit_compressed_extents()") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Co-developed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev> Signed-off-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-17btrfs: qgroup: convert PREALLOC to PERTRANS after record_root_in_transBoris Burkov
commit 211de93367304ab395357f8cb12568a4d1e20701 upstream. The transaction is only able to free PERTRANS reservations for a root once that root has been recorded with the TRANS tag on the roots radix tree. Therefore, until we are sure that this root will get tagged, it isn't safe to convert. Generally, this is not an issue as *some* transaction will likely tag the root before long and this reservation will get freed in that transaction, but technically it could stick around until unmount and result in a warning about leaked metadata reservation space. This path is most exercised by running the generic/269 fstest with CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG. Fixes: a6496849671a ("btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-17btrfs: record delayed inode root in transactionBoris Burkov
commit 71537e35c324ea6fbd68377a4f26bb93a831ae35 upstream. When running delayed inode updates, we do not record the inode's root in the transaction, but we do allocate PREALLOC and thus converted PERTRANS space for it. To be sure we free that PERTRANS meta rsv, we must ensure that we record the root in the transaction. Fixes: 4f5427ccce5d ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Use new qgroup meta rsv for delayed inode and item") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-17btrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup prealloc rsv leak in subvolume operationsBoris Burkov
commit 74e97958121aa1f5854da6effba70143f051b0cd upstream. Create subvolume, create snapshot and delete subvolume all use btrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata() to reserve metadata for the changes done to the parent subvolume's fs tree, which cannot be mediated in the normal way via start_transaction. When quota groups (squota or qgroups) are enabled, this reserves qgroup metadata of type PREALLOC. Once the operation is associated to a transaction, we convert PREALLOC to PERTRANS, which gets cleared in bulk at the end of the transaction. However, the error paths of these three operations were not implementing this lifecycle correctly. They unconditionally converted the PREALLOC to PERTRANS in a generic cleanup step regardless of errors or whether the operation was fully associated to a transaction or not. This resulted in error paths occasionally converting this rsv to PERTRANS without calling record_root_in_trans successfully, which meant that unless that root got recorded in the transaction by some other thread, the end of the transaction would not free that root's PERTRANS, leaking it. Ultimately, this resulted in hitting a WARN in CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG builds at unmount for the leaked reservation. The fix is to ensure that every qgroup PREALLOC reservation observes the following properties: 1. any failure before record_root_in_trans is called successfully results in freeing the PREALLOC reservation. 2. after record_root_in_trans, we convert to PERTRANS, and now the transaction owns freeing the reservation. This patch enforces those properties on the three operations. Without it, generic/269 with squotas enabled at mkfs time would fail in ~5-10 runs on my system. With this patch, it ran successfully 1000 times in a row. Fixes: e85fde5162bf ("btrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup meta rsv leak for subvolume operations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-17btrfs: qgroup: correctly model root qgroup rsv in convertBoris Burkov
commit 141fb8cd206ace23c02cd2791c6da52c1d77d42a upstream. We use add_root_meta_rsv and sub_root_meta_rsv to track prealloc and pertrans reservations for subvolumes when quotas are enabled. The convert function does not properly increment pertrans after decrementing prealloc, so the count is not accurate. Note: we check that the fs is not read-only to mirror the logic in qgroup_convert_meta, which checks that before adding to the pertrans rsv. Fixes: 8287475a2055 ("btrfs: qgroup: Use root::qgroup_meta_rsv_* to record qgroup meta reserved space") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-13btrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()David Sterba
[ Upstream commit 3c6ee34c6f9cd12802326da26631232a61743501 ] Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer fails. The pointers are not printed so we don't accidentally leak kernel addresses. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-13btrfs: export: handle invalid inode or root reference in btrfs_get_parent()David Sterba
[ Upstream commit 26b66d1d366a375745755ca7365f67110bbf6bd5 ] The get_parent handler looks up a parent of a given dentry, this can be either a subvolume or a directory. The search is set up with offset -1 but it's never expected to find such item, as it would break allowed range of inode number or a root id. This means it's a corruption (ext4 also returns this error code). Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-13btrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()David Sterba
[ Upstream commit 7411055db5ce64f836aaffd422396af0075fdc99 ] The unhandled case in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() loop is a corruption, as it could be caused only by two impossible conditions: - at first the search key is set up to look for a chunk tree item, with offset -1, this is an inexact search and the key->offset will contain the correct offset upon a successful search, a valid chunk tree item cannot have an offset -1 - after first successful search, the found_key corresponds to a chunk item, the offset is decremented by 1 before the next loop, it's impossible to find a chunk item there due to alignment and size constraints Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-10btrfs: fix race when detecting delalloc ranges during fiemapFilipe Manana
[ Upstream commit 978b63f7464abcfd364a6c95f734282c50f3decf ] For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc). This however introduced a race that makes us miss delalloc ranges for file regions that are currently holes, so the caller of fiemap will not be aware that there's data for some file regions. This can be quite serious for some use cases - for example in coreutils versions before 9.0, the cp program used fiemap to detect holes and data in the source file, copying only regions with data (extents or delalloc) from the source file to the destination file in order to preserve holes (see the documentation for its --sparse command line option). This means that if cp was used with a source file that had delalloc in a hole, the destination file could end up without that data, which is effectively a data loss issue, if it happened to hit the race described below. The race happens like this: 1) Fiemap is called, without the FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC flag, for a file that has delalloc in the file range [64M, 65M[, which is currently a hole; 2) Fiemap locks the inode in shared mode, then starts iterating the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, without having the whole fiemap target range locked in the inode's io tree - the change introduced recently by commit b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"). It only locks ranges in the io tree when it finds a hole or prealloc extent since that commit; 3) Note that fiemap clones each leaf before using it, and this is to avoid deadlocks when locking a file range in the inode's io tree and the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to some file, because writing to the page with btrfs_page_mkwrite() will wait on any ordered extent for the page's range and the ordered extent needs to lock the range and may need to modify the same leaf, therefore leading to a deadlock on the leaf; 4) While iterating the file extent items in the cloned leaf before finding the hole in the range [64M, 65M[, the delalloc in that range is flushed and its ordered extent completes - meaning the corresponding file extent item is in the inode's subvolume tree, but not present in the cloned leaf that fiemap is iterating over; 5) When fiemap finds the hole in the [64M, 65M[ range by seeing the gap in the cloned leaf (or a file extent item with disk_bytenr == 0 in case the NO_HOLES feature is not enabled), it will lock that file range in the inode's io tree and then search for delalloc by checking for the EXTENT_DELALLOC bit in the io tree for that range and ordered extents (with btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range()). But it finds nothing since the delalloc in that range was already flushed and the ordered extent completed and is gone - as a result fiemap will not report that there's delalloc or an extent for the range [64M, 65M[, so user space will be mislead into thinking that there's a hole in that range. This could actually be sporadically triggered with test case generic/094 from fstests, which reports a missing extent/delalloc range like this: # generic/094 2s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad) # --- tests/generic/094.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.830519425 +0100 # +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad 2024-02-28 11:00:00.381071525 +0000 # @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ # QA output created by 094 # fiemap run with sync # fiemap run without sync # +ERROR: couldn't find extent at 7 # +map is 'HHDDHPPDPHPH' # +logical: [ 5.. 6] phys: 301517.. 301518 flags: 0x800 tot: 2 # +logical: [ 8.. 8] phys: 301520.. 301520 flags: 0x800 tot: 1 # ... # (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/094.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad' to see the entire diff) So in order to fix this, while still avoiding deadlocks in the case where the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file, change fiemap to work like the following: 1) Always lock the whole range in the inode's io tree before starting to iterate the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, just like we did before commit b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"); 2) Now instead of writing to the fiemap buffer every time we have an extent to report, write instead to a temporary buffer (1 page), and when that buffer becomes full, stop iterating the file extent items, unlock the range in the io tree, release the search path, submit all the entries kept in that buffer to the fiemap buffer, and then resume the search for file extent items after locking again the remainder of the range in the io tree. The buffer having a size of a page, allows for 146 entries in a system with 4K pages. This is a large enough value to have a good performance by avoiding too many restarts of the search for file extent items. In other words this preserves the huge performance gains made in the last two years to fiemap, while avoiding the deadlocks in case the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file (useless in practice, but possible and exercised by fuzz testing and syzbot). Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-10btrfs: ensure fiemap doesn't race with writes when FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC is givenFilipe Manana
[ Upstream commit 418b09027743d9a9fb39116bed46a192f868a3c3 ] When FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC is given to fiemap the expectation is that that are no concurrent writes and we get a stable view of the inode's extent layout. When the flag is given we flush all IO (and wait for ordered extents to complete) and then lock the inode in shared mode, however that leaves open the possibility that a write might happen right after the flushing and before locking the inode. So fix this by flushing again after locking the inode - we leave the initial flushing before locking the inode to avoid holding the lock and blocking other RO operations while waiting for IO and ordered extents to complete. The second flushing while holding the inode's lock will most of the time do nothing or very little since the time window for new writes to have happened is small. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Stable-dep-of: 978b63f7464a ("btrfs: fix race when detecting delalloc ranges during fiemap") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-03btrfs: zoned: use zone aware sb location for scrubJohannes Thumshirn
commit 74098a989b9c3370f768140b7783a7aaec2759b3 upstream. At the moment scrub_supers() doesn't grab the super block's location via the zoned device aware btrfs_sb_log_location() but via btrfs_sb_offset(). This leads to checksum errors on 'scrub' as we're not accessing the correct location of the super block. So use btrfs_sb_log_location() for getting the super blocks location on scrub. Reported-by: WA AM <waautomata@gmail.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CANU2Z0EvUzfYxczLgGUiREoMndE9WdQnbaawV5Fv5gNXptPUKw@mail.gmail.com CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-03btrfs: zoned: don't skip block groups with 100% zone unusableJohannes Thumshirn
commit a8b70c7f8600bc77d03c0b032c0662259b9e615e upstream. Commit f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") changed the behaviour of deleting unused block-groups on zoned filesystems. Starting with this commit, we're using btrfs_space_info_used() to calculate the number of used bytes in a space_info. But btrfs_space_info_used() also accounts btrfs_space_info::bytes_zone_unusable as used bytes. So if a block group is 100% zone_unusable it is skipped from the deletion step. In order not to skip fully zone_unusable block-groups, also check if the block-group has bytes left that can be used on a zoned filesystem. Fixes: f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-03btrfs: fix race in read_extent_buffer_pages()Tavian Barnes
commit ef1e68236b9153c27cb7cf29ead0c532870d4215 upstream. There are reports from tree-checker that detects corrupted nodes, without any obvious pattern so possibly an overwrite in memory. After some debugging it turns out there's a race when reading an extent buffer the uptodate status can be missed. To prevent concurrent reads for the same extent buffer, read_extent_buffer_pages() performs these checks: /* (1) */ if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags)) return 0; /* (2) */ if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags)) goto done; At this point, it seems safe to start the actual read operation. Once that completes, end_bbio_meta_read() does /* (3) */ set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb); /* (4) */ clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags); Normally, this is enough to ensure only one read happens, and all other callers wait for it to finish before returning. Unfortunately, there is a racey interleaving: Thread A | Thread B | Thread C ---------+----------+--------- (1) | | | (1) | (2) | | (3) | | (4) | | | (2) | | | (1) When this happens, thread B kicks of an unnecessary read. Worse, thread C will see UPTODATE set and return immediately, while the read from thread B is still in progress. This race could result in tree-checker errors like this as the extent buffer is concurrently modified: BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256 block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356 expect [256, 18446744073709551360] Fix it by testing UPTODATE again after setting the READING bit, and if it's been set, skip the unnecessary read. Fixes: d7172f52e993 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for extent_buffer reading") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f51a6d5d7432455a6a858d51b49ecac183e0bbc9.1706312914.git.wqu@suse.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c7241ea4-fcc6-48d2-98c8-b5ea790d6c89@gmx.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Tavian Barnes <tavianator@tavianator.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ minor update of changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-03btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent lockingJosef Bacik
commit b0ad381fa7690244802aed119b478b4bdafc31dd upstream. While working on the patchset to remove extent locking I got a lockdep splat with fiemap and pagefaulting with my new extent lock replacement lock. This deadlock exists with our normal code, we just don't have lockdep annotations with the extent locking so we've never noticed it. Since we're copying the fiemap extent to user space on every iteration we have the chance of pagefaulting. Because we hold the extent lock for the entire range we could mkwrite into a range in the file that we have mmap'ed. This would deadlock with the following stack trace [<0>] lock_extent+0x28d/0x2f0 [<0>] btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x273/0x8a0 [<0>] do_page_mkwrite+0x50/0xb0 [<0>] do_fault+0xc1/0x7b0 [<0>] __handle_mm_fault+0x2fa/0x460 [<0>] handle_mm_fault+0xa4/0x330 [<0>] do_user_addr_fault+0x1f4/0x800 [<0>] exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x1e0 [<0>] asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [<0>] rep_movs_alternative+0x33/0x70 [<0>] _copy_to_user+0x49/0x70 [<0>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0xc8/0x120 [<0>] emit_fiemap_extent+0x4d/0xa0 [<0>] extent_fiemap+0x7f8/0xad0 [<0>] btrfs_fiemap+0x49/0x80 [<0>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x3e1/0xb50 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x1a0 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 I wrote an fstest to reproduce this deadlock without my replacement lock and verified that the deadlock exists with our existing locking. To fix this simply don't take the extent lock for the entire duration of the fiemap. This is safe in general because we keep track of where we are when we're searching the tree, so if an ordered extent updates in the middle of our fiemap call we'll still emit the correct extents because we know what offset we were on before. The only place we maintain the lock is searching delalloc. Since the delalloc stuff can change during writeback we want to lock the extent range so we have a consistent view of delalloc at the time we're checking to see if we need to set the delalloc flag. With this patch applied we no longer deadlock with my testcase. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-04-03btrfs: fix off-by-one chunk length calculation at contains_pending_extent()Filipe Manana
[ Upstream commit ae6bd7f9b46a29af52ebfac25d395757e2031d0d ] At contains_pending_extent() the value of the end offset of a chunk we found in the device's allocation state io tree is inclusive, so when we calculate the length we pass to the in_range() macro, we must sum 1 to the expression "physical_end - physical_offset". In practice the wrong calculation should be harmless as chunks sizes are never 1 byte and we should never have 1 byte ranges of unallocated space. Nevertheless fix the wrong calculation. Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.lyakas@zadara.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAOcd+r30e-f4R-5x-S7sV22RJPe7+pgwherA6xqN2_qe7o4XTg@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 1c11b63eff2a ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-04-03btrfs: qgroup: always free reserved space for extent recordsQu Wenruo
[ Upstream commit d139ded8b9cdb897bb9539eb33311daf9a177fd2 ] [BUG] If qgroup is marked inconsistent (e.g. caused by operations needing full subtree rescan, like creating a snapshot and assign to a higher level qgroup), btrfs would immediately start leaking its data reserved space. The following script can easily reproduce it: mkfs.btrfs -O quota -f $dev mount $dev $mnt btrfs subvolume create $mnt/subv1 btrfs qgroup create 1/0 $mnt # This snapshot creation would mark qgroup inconsistent, # as the ownership involves different higher level qgroup, thus # we have to rescan both source and snapshot, which can be very # time consuming, thus here btrfs just choose to mark qgroup # inconsistent, and let users to determine when to do the rescan. btrfs subv snapshot -i 1/0 $mnt/subv1 $mnt/snap1 # Now this write would lead to qgroup rsv leak. xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64k" $mnt/file1 # And at unmount time, btrfs would report 64K DATA rsv space leaked. umount $mnt And we would have the following dmesg output for the unmount: BTRFS info (device dm-1): last unmount of filesystem 14a3d84e-f47b-4f72-b053-a8a36eef74d3 BTRFS warning (device dm-1): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 65536 [CAUSE] Since commit e15e9f43c7ca ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"), we introduce a mode for btrfs qgroup to skip the timing consuming backref walk, if the qgroup is already inconsistent. But this skip also covered the data reserved freeing, thus the qgroup reserved space for each newly created data extent would not be freed, thus cause the leakage. [FIX] Make the data extent reserved space freeing mandatory. The qgroup reserved space handling is way cheaper compared to the backref walking part, and we always have the super sensitive leak detector, thus it's definitely worth to always free the qgroup reserved data space. Reported-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com> Fixes: e15e9f43c7ca ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216196 Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserveFilipe Manana
[ Upstream commit c7bb26b847e5b97814f522686068c5628e2b3646 ] At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve without locking its spinlock, which makes KCSAN complain because the size of a block reserve is always updated while holding its spinlock. The report from KCSAN is the following: [653.313148] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv [btrfs] / btrfs_use_block_rsv [btrfs] [653.314755] read to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 7519 on cpu 0: [653.314779] btrfs_use_block_rsv+0xe4/0x2f8 [btrfs] [653.315606] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xdc/0x998 [btrfs] [653.316421] btrfs_force_cow_block+0x220/0xe38 [btrfs] [653.317242] btrfs_cow_block+0x1ac/0x568 [btrfs] [653.318060] btrfs_search_slot+0xda2/0x19b8 [btrfs] [653.318879] btrfs_del_csums+0x1dc/0x798 [btrfs] [653.319702] __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0xc24/0x2028 [btrfs] [653.320538] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xd3c/0x2390 [btrfs] [653.321340] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xae/0x290 [btrfs] [653.322140] flush_space+0x5e4/0x718 [btrfs] [653.322958] btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space+0x102/0x2f8 [btrfs] [653.323781] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [653.323800] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [653.323817] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [653.323836] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [653.323855] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 [653.323887] write to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 576 on cpu 3: [653.323906] btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv+0x1a4/0x250 [btrfs] [653.324699] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x468/0x6d8 [btrfs] [653.325494] btrfs_free_extent+0x76/0x120 [btrfs] [653.326280] __btrfs_mod_ref+0x6a8/0x6b8 [btrfs] [653.327064] btrfs_dec_ref+0x50/0x70 [btrfs] [653.327849] walk_up_proc+0x236/0xa50 [btrfs] [653.328633] walk_up_tree+0x21c/0x448 [btrfs] [653.329418] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x802/0x1328 [btrfs] [653.330205] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x184/0x238 [btrfs] [653.330995] cleaner_kthread+0x2b0/0x2f0 [btrfs] [653.331781] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [653.331800] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [653.331818] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 So add a helper to get the size of a block reserve while holding the lock. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26btrfs: fix data races when accessing the reserved amount of block reservesFilipe Manana
[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ] At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is always updated while holding the spinlock. The reports from KCSAN are like the following: [117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs] [117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3: [117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs] [117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs] [117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs] [117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs] [117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs] [117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs] [117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs] [117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs] [117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0 [117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728 [117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs] [117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498 [117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150 [117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88 [117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210 [117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0 [117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98 [117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0: [117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs] [117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs] [117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs] [117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs] [117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs] [117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838 [117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10 [117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230 [117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8 [117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30 So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-06btrfs: send: don't issue unnecessary zero writes for trailing holeFilipe Manana
commit 5897710b28cabab04ea6c7547f27b7989de646ae upstream. If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's end to i_size) and then create an extent in the file that ends before the file's i_size, then when doing an incremental send we will issue a write full of zeroes for the range that starts immediately after the new extent ends up to i_size. While this isn't incorrect because the file ends up with exactly the same data, it unnecessarily results in using extra space at the destination with one or more extents full of zeroes instead of having a hole. In same cases this results in using megabytes or even gigabytes of unnecessary space. Example, reproducer: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdh MNT=/mnt/sdh mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT # Create 1G sparse file. xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1G" $MNT/foobar # Create base snapshot. btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap1 # Create send stream (full send) for the base snapshot. btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT/mysnap1 # Now write one extent at the beginning of the file and one somewhere # in the middle, leaving a gap between the end of this second extent # and the file's size. xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \ -c "pwrite -S 0xcd 512M 128K" \ $MNT/foobar # Now create a second snapshot which is going to be used for an # incremental send operation. btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap2 # Create send stream (incremental send) for the second snapshot. btrfs send -p $MNT/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT/mysnap2 # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and # verify we get the same content that the original filesystem had # and file foobar has only two extents with a size of 128K each. umount $MNT mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV mount $DEV $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT echo -e "\nFile fiemap in the second snapshot:" # Should have: # # 128K extent at file range [0, 128K[ # hole at file range [128K, 512M[ # 128K extent file range [512M, 512M + 128K[ # hole at file range [512M + 128K, 1G[ xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/mysnap2/foobar # File should be using 256K of data (two 128K extents). echo -e "\nSpace used by the file: $(du -h $MNT/mysnap2/foobar | cut -f 1)" umount $MNT Running the test, we can see with fiemap that we get an extent for the range [512M, 1G[, while in the source filesystem we have an extent for the range [512M, 512M + 128K[ and a hole for the rest of the file (the range [512M + 128K, 1G[): $ ./test.sh (...) File fiemap in the second snapshot: /mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0 1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320 2: [1048576..2097151]: 2156544..3205119 1048576 0x1 Space used by the file: 513M This happens because once we finish processing an inode, at finish_inode_if_needed(), we always issue a hole (write operations full of zeros) if there's a gap between the end of the last processed extent and the file's size, even if that range is already a hole in the parent snapshot. Fix this by issuing the hole only if the range is not already a hole. After this change, running the test above, we get the expected layout: $ ./test.sh (...) File fiemap in the second snapshot: /mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar: EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS 0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0 1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320 2: [1048576..1048831]: 26880..27135 256 0x1 3: [1048832..2097151]: hole 1048320 Space used by the file: 256K A test case for fstests will follow soon. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reported-by: Dorai Ashok S A <dash.btrfs@inix.me> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c0bf7818-9c45-46a8-b3d3-513230d0c86e@inix.me/ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-03-06btrfs: dev-replace: properly validate device namesDavid Sterba
commit 9845664b9ee47ce7ee7ea93caf47d39a9d4552c4 upstream. There's a syzbot report that device name buffers passed to device replace are not properly checked for string termination which could lead to a read out of bounds in getname_kernel(). Add a helper that validates both source and target device name buffers. For devid as the source initialize the buffer to empty string in case something tries to read it later. This was originally analyzed and fixed in a different way by Edward Adam Davis (see links). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d1a1d1060cc9c5e7@google.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/tencent_44CA0665C9836EF9EEC80CB9E7E206DF5206@qq.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+33f23b49ac24f986c9e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-03-06btrfs: fix double free of anonymous device after snapshot creation failureFilipe Manana
commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream. When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem. The steps that lead to this: 1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(); 3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev; 4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking; 5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1. Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace: ------------[ cut here ]------------ ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated. WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024 RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525 Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000 RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000 RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246 R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246 FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346 create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837 create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931 btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404 create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848 btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998 btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393 btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857 do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77 RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9 Code: 28 00 00 00 (...) RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658 </TASK> Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change may not fix the case triggered by syzbot. To fix at least the code path from the example above, change btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do the double free. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/ Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-03-06btrfs: fix race between ordered extent completion and fiemapFilipe Manana
[ Upstream commit a1a4a9ca77f143c00fce69c1239887ff8b813bec ] For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc). However by not locking the target extent range for the whole duration of the fiemap call we can race with an ordered extent. This happens like this: 1) The fiemap task finishes processing a file extent item that covers the file range [512K, 1M[, and that file extent item is the last item in the leaf currently being processed; 2) And ordered extent for the file range [768K, 2M[, in COW mode, completes (btrfs_finish_one_ordered()) and the file extent item covering the range [512K, 1M[ is trimmed to cover the range [512K, 768K[ and then a new file extent item for the range [768K, 2M[ is inserted in the inode's subvolume tree; 3) The fiemap task calls fiemap_next_leaf_item(), which then calls btrfs_next_leaf() to find the next leaf / item. This finds that the the next key following the one we previously processed (its type is BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and its offset is 512K), is the key corresponding to the new file extent item inserted by the ordered extent, which has a type of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and an offset of 768K; 4) Later the fiemap code ends up at emit_fiemap_extent() and triggers the warning: if (cache->offset + cache->len > offset) { WARN_ON(1); return -EINVAL; } Since we get 1M > 768K, because the previously emitted entry for the old extent covering the file range [512K, 1M[ ends at an offset that is greater than the new extent's start offset (768K). This makes fiemap fail with -EINVAL besides triggering the warning that produces a stack trace like the following: [1621.677651] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [1621.677656] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 204366 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2492 emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.677899] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...) [1621.677951] CPU: 1 PID: 204366 Comm: pool Not tainted 6.8.0-rc5-btrfs-next-151+ #1 [1621.677954] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [1621.677956] RIP: 0010:emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.678033] Code: 2b 4c 89 63 (...) [1621.678035] RSP: 0018:ffffab16089ffd20 EFLAGS: 00010206 [1621.678037] RAX: 00000000004fa000 RBX: ffffab16089ffe08 RCX: 0000000000009000 [1621.678039] RDX: 00000000004f9000 RSI: 00000000004f1000 RDI: ffffab16089ffe90 [1621.678040] RBP: 00000000004f9000 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000 [1621.678041] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: 0000000041d78000 [1621.678043] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9434f0b17850 [1621.678044] FS: 00007fa6e20006c0(0000) GS:ffff943bdfa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [1621.678046] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [1621.678048] CR2: 00007fa6b0801000 CR3: 000000012d404002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [1621.678053] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [1621.678055] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [1621.678056] Call Trace: [1621.678074] <TASK> [1621.678076] ? __warn+0x80/0x130 [1621.678082] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.678159] ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200 [1621.678164] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70 [1621.678167] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70 [1621.678170] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20 [1621.678178] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs] [1621.678253] extent_fiemap+0x766/0xa30 [btrfs] [1621.678339] btrfs_fiemap+0x45/0x80 [btrfs] [1621.678420] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1e4/0x870 [1621.678431] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xc0 [1621.678434] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x120 [1621.678445] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 There's also another case where before calling btrfs_next_leaf() we are processing a hole or a prealloc extent and we had several delalloc ranges within that hole or prealloc extent. In that case if the ordered extents complete before we find the next key, we may end up finding an extent item with an offset smaller than (or equals to) the offset in cache->offset. So fix this by changing emit_fiemap_extent() to address these three scenarios like this: 1) For the first case, steps listed above, adjust the length of the previously cached extent so that it does not overlap with the current extent, emit the previous one and cache the current file extent item; 2) For the second case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range, and the current file extent item has an offset that matches the offset in the fiemap cache, just discard what we have in the fiemap cache and assign the current file extent item to the cache, since it's more up to date; 3) For the third case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range and the offset of the file extent item we just found is smaller than what we have in the cache, just skip the current file extent item if its range end at or behind the cached extent's end, because we may have emitted (to the fiemap user space buffer) delalloc ranges that overlap with the current file extent item's range. If the file extent item's range goes beyond the end offset of the cached extent, just emit the cached extent and cache a subrange of the file extent item, that goes from the end offset of the cached extent to the end offset of the file extent item. Dealing with those cases in those ways makes everything consistent by reflecting the current state of file extent items in the btree and without emitting extents that have overlapping ranges (which would be confusing and violating expectations). This issue could be triggered often with test case generic/561, and was also hit and reported by Wang Yugui. Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20240223104619.701F.409509F4@e16-tech.com/ Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking") Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-01btrfs: defrag: avoid unnecessary defrag caused by incorrect extent sizeQu Wenruo
commit e42b9d8b9ea2672811285e6a7654887ff64d23f3 upstream. [BUG] With the following file extent layout, defrag would do unnecessary IO and result more on-disk space usage. # mkfs.btrfs -f $dev # mount $dev $mnt # xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 40m" $mnt/foobar # sync # xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 40m 16k" $mnt/foobar # sync Above command would lead to the following file extent layout: item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15816 itemsize 53 generation 7 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 298844160 nr 41943040 extent data offset 0 nr 41943040 ram 41943040 extent compression 0 (none) item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 41943040) itemoff 15763 itemsize 53 generation 8 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 13631488 nr 16384 extent data offset 0 nr 16384 ram 16384 extent compression 0 (none) Which is mostly fine. We can allow the final 16K to be merged with the previous 40M, but it's upon the end users' preference. But if we defrag the file using the default parameters, it would result worse file layout: # btrfs filesystem defrag $mnt/foobar # sync item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15816 itemsize 53 generation 7 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 298844160 nr 41943040 extent data offset 0 nr 8650752 ram 41943040 extent compression 0 (none) item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 8650752) itemoff 15763 itemsize 53 generation 9 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 340787200 nr 33292288 extent data offset 0 nr 33292288 ram 33292288 extent compression 0 (none) item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 41943040) itemoff 15710 itemsize 53 generation 8 type 1 (regular) extent data disk byte 13631488 nr 16384 extent data offset 0 nr 16384 ram 16384 extent compression 0 (none) Note the original 40M extent is still there, but a new 32M extent is created for no benefit at all. [CAUSE] There is an existing check to make sure we won't defrag a large enough extent (the threshold is by default 32M). But the check is using the length to the end of the extent: range_len = em->len - (cur - em->start); /* Skip too large extent */ if (range_len >= extent_thresh) goto next; This means, for the first 8MiB of the extent, the range_len is always smaller than the default threshold, and would not be defragged. But after the first 8MiB, the remaining part would fit the requirement, and be defragged. Such different behavior inside the same extent caused the above problem, and we should avoid different defrag decision inside the same extent. [FIX] Instead of using @range_len, just use @em->len, so that we have a consistent decision among the same file extent. Now with this fix, we won't touch the extent, thus not making it any worse. Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Fixes: 0cb5950f3f3b ("btrfs: fix deadlock when reserving space during defrag") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: don't drop extent_map for free space inode on write errorJosef Bacik
commit 5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade upstream. While running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panic with generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache. assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1 RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0 Call Trace: <TASK> extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0 extent_writepages+0x87/0x110 do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90 __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80 btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50 btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560 btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420 commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360 btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640 __x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in one instance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However on the second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode to get the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with the free space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlocking with the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for the requested range. This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache out we hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This is normal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. We always expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second time through we end up with a bogus extent map. Since we're deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way to fix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failed range. I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to make it easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panic with my error injection test. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: reject encoded write if inode has nodatasum flag setFilipe Manana
commit 1bd96c92c6a0a4d43815eb685c15aa4b78879dc9 upstream. Currently we allow an encoded write against inodes that have the NODATASUM flag set, either because they are NOCOW files or they were created while the filesystem was mounted with "-o nodatasum". This results in having compressed extents without corresponding checksums, which is a filesystem inconsistency reported by 'btrfs check'. For example, running btrfs/281 with MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o nodatacow" triggers this and 'btrfs check' errors out with: [1/7] checking root items [2/7] checking extents [3/7] checking free space tree [4/7] checking fs roots root 256 inode 257 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing root 256 inode 258 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing ERROR: errors found in fs roots (...) So reject encoded writes if the target inode has NODATASUM set. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: don't reserve space for checksums when writing to nocow filesFilipe Manana
commit feefe1f49d26bad9d8997096e3a200280fa7b1c5 upstream. Currently when doing a write to a file we always reserve metadata space for inserting data checksums. However we don't need to do it if we have a nodatacow file (-o nodatacow mount option or chattr +C) or if checksums are disabled (-o nodatasum mount option), as in that case we are only adding unnecessary pressure to metadata reservations. For example on x86_64, with the default node size of 16K, a 4K buffered write into a nodatacow file is reserving 655360 bytes of metadata space, as it's accounting for checksums. After this change, which stops reserving space for checksums if we have a nodatacow file or checksums are disabled, we only need to reserve 393216 bytes of metadata. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: send: return EOPNOTSUPP on unknown flagsDavid Sterba
commit f884a9f9e59206a2d41f265e7e403f080d10b493 upstream. When some ioctl flags are checked we return EOPNOTSUPP, like for BTRFS_SCRUB_SUPPORTED_FLAGS, BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ARGS_MASK or fallocate modes. The EINVAL is supposed to be for a supported but invalid values or combination of options. Fix that when checking send flags so it's consistent with the rest. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H5rryOLzp3EKq8RTbjMHMHeaJubfpsVLF6H4qJnKCUR1w@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: forbid deleting live subvol qgroupBoris Burkov
commit a8df35619948bd8363d330c20a90c9a7fbff28c0 upstream. If a subvolume still exists, forbid deleting its qgroup 0/subvolid. This behavior generally leads to incorrect behavior in squotas and doesn't have a legitimate purpose. Fixes: cecbb533b5fc ("btrfs: record simple quota deltas in delayed refs") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got readQu Wenruo
commit e03ee2fe873eb68c1f9ba5112fee70303ebf9dfb upstream. [BUG] There is a syzbot crash, triggered by the ASSERT() during subvolume creation: assertion failed: !anon_dev, in fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1319! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_root_ref.part.0+0x9aa/0xa60 <TASK> btrfs_get_new_fs_root+0xd3/0xf0 create_subvol+0xd02/0x1650 btrfs_mksubvol+0xe95/0x12b0 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x2f9/0x4f0 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16b/0x200 btrfs_ioctl+0x35f0/0x5cf0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x210 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] During create_subvol(), after inserting root item for the newly created subvolume, we would trigger btrfs_get_new_fs_root() to get the btrfs_root of that subvolume. The idea here is, we have preallocated an anonymous device number for the subvolume, thus we can assign it to the new subvolume. But there is really nothing preventing things like backref walk to read the new subvolume. If that happens before we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root(), the subvolume would be read out, with a new anonymous device number assigned already. In that case, we would trigger ASSERT(), as we really expect no one to read out that subvolume (which is not yet accessible from the fs). But things like backref walk is still possible to trigger the read on the subvolume. Thus our assumption on the ASSERT() is not correct in the first place. [FIX] Fix it by removing the ASSERT(), and just free the @anon_dev, reset it to 0, and continue. If the subvolume tree is read out by something else, it should have already get a new anon_dev assigned thus we only need to free the preallocated one. Reported-by: Chenyuan Yang <chenyuan0y@gmail.com> Fixes: 2dfb1e43f57d ("btrfs: preallocate anon block device at first phase of snapshot creation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: forbid creating subvol qgroupsBoris Burkov
commit 0c309d66dacddf8ce939b891d9ead4a8e21ad6f0 upstream. Creating a qgroup 0/subvolid leads to various races and it isn't helpful, because you can't specify a subvol id when creating a subvol, so you can't be sure it will be the right one. Any requirements on the automatic subvol can be gratified by using a higher level qgroup and the inheritance parameters of subvol creation. Fixes: cecbb533b5fc ("btrfs: record simple quota deltas in delayed refs") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soonFilipe Manana
commit f4a9f219411f318ae60d6ff7f129082a75686c6c upstream. Before deleting a block group that is in the list of unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs), we check if the block group became used before deleting it, as extents from it may have been allocated after it was added to the list. However even if the block group was not yet used, there may be tasks that have only reserved space and have not yet allocated extents, and they might be relying on the availability of the unused block group in order to allocate extents. The reservation works first by increasing the "bytes_may_use" field of the corresponding space_info object (which may first require flushing delayed items, allocating a new block group, etc), and only later a task does the actual allocation of extents. For metadata we usually don't end up using all reserved space, as we are pessimistic and typically account for the worst cases (need to COW every single node in a path of a tree at maximum possible height, etc). For data we usually reserve the exact amount of space we're going to allocate later, except when using compression where we always reserve space based on the uncompressed size, as compression is only triggered when writeback starts so we don't know in advance how much space we'll actually need, or if the data is compressible. So don't delete an unused block group if the total size of its space_info object minus the block group's size is less then the sum of used space and space that may be used (space_info->bytes_may_use), as that means we have tasks that reserved space and may need to allocate extents from the block group. In this case, besides skipping the deletion, re-add the block group to the list of unused block groups so that it may be reconsidered later, in case the tasks that reserved space end up not needing to allocate extents from it. Allowing the deletion of the block group while we have reserved space, can result in tasks failing to allocate metadata extents (-ENOSPC) while under a transaction handle, resulting in a transaction abort, or failure during writeback for the case of data extents. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23btrfs: add and use helper to check if block group is usedFilipe Manana
commit 1693d5442c458ae8d5b0d58463b873cd879569ed upstream. Add a helper function to determine if a block group is being used and make use of it at btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(). This helper will also be used in future code changes. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: zoned: optimize hint byte for zoned allocatorNaohiro Aota
[ Upstream commit 02444f2ac26eae6385a65fcd66915084d15dffba ] Writing sequentially to a huge file on btrfs on a SMR HDD revealed a decline of the performance (220 MiB/s to 30 MiB/s after 500 minutes). The performance goes down because of increased latency of the extent allocation, which is induced by a traversing of a lot of full block groups. So, this patch optimizes the ffe_ctl->hint_byte by choosing a block group with sufficient size from the active block group list, which does not contain full block groups. After applying the patch, the performance is maintained well. Fixes: 2eda57089ea3 ("btrfs: zoned: implement sequential extent allocation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: zoned: factor out prepare_allocation_zoned()Naohiro Aota
[ Upstream commit b271fee9a41ca1474d30639fd6cc912c9901d0f8 ] Factor out prepare_allocation_zoned() for further extension. While at it, optimize the if-branch a bit. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Stable-dep-of: 02444f2ac26e ("btrfs: zoned: optimize hint byte for zoned allocator") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: don't abort filesystem when attempting to snapshot deleted subvolumeOmar Sandoval
commit 7081929ab2572920e94d70be3d332e5c9f97095a upstream. If the source file descriptor to the snapshot ioctl refers to a deleted subvolume, we get the following abort: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 833 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1875 create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] Modules linked in: pata_acpi btrfs ata_piix libata scsi_mod virtio_net blake2b_generic xor net_failover virtio_rng failover scsi_common rng_core raid6_pq libcrc32c CPU: 0 PID: 833 Comm: t_snapshot_dele Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-1.fc39 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa09c01337af8 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9982053e7c78 RCX: 0000000000000027 RDX: ffff99827dc20848 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff99827dc20840 RBP: ffffa09c01337c00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa09c01337998 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffffb96da248 R12: fffffffffffffffe R13: ffff99820535bb28 R14: ffff99820b7bd000 R15: ffff99820381ea80 FS: 00007fe20aadabc0(0000) GS:ffff99827dc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000559a120b502f CR3: 00000000055b6000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: <TASK> ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? __warn+0x81/0x130 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? report_bug+0x171/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x3a/0x70 ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] ? create_pending_snapshot+0x1040/0x1190 [btrfs] create_pending_snapshots+0x92/0xc0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x66b/0xf40 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x301/0x4d0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x80/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x1c2/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xc4/0x150 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x8a6/0x2650 [btrfs] ? kmem_cache_free+0x22/0x340 ? do_sys_openat2+0x97/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x46/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 RIP: 0033:0x7fe20abe83af RSP: 002b:00007ffe6eff1360 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007fe20abe83af RDX: 00007ffe6eff23c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 0000000000000003 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fe20ad16cd0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe6eff13c0 R14: 00007fe20ad45000 R15: 0000559a120b6d58 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdc: state A) in create_pending_snapshot:1875: errno=-2 No such entry BTRFS info (device vdc: state EA): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdc: state EA): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS: error (device vdc: state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2055: errno=-2 No such entry This happens because create_pending_snapshot() initializes the new root item as a copy of the source root item. This includes the refs field, which is 0 for a deleted subvolume. The call to btrfs_insert_root() therefore inserts a root with refs == 0. btrfs_get_new_fs_root() then finds the root and returns -ENOENT if refs == 0, which causes create_pending_snapshot() to abort. Fix it by checking the source root's refs before attempting the snapshot, but after locking subvol_sem to avoid racing with deletion. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: defrag: reject unknown flags of btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_argsQu Wenruo
commit 173431b274a9a54fc10b273b46e67f46bcf62d2e upstream. Add extra sanity check for btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args::flags. This is not really to enhance fuzzing tests, but as a preparation for future expansion on btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args. In the future we're going to add new members, allowing more fine tuning for btrfs defrag. Without the -ENONOTSUPP error, there would be no way to detect if the kernel supports those new defrag features. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: don't warn if discard range is not aligned to sectorDavid Sterba
commit a208b3f132b48e1f94f620024e66fea635925877 upstream. There's a warning in btrfs_issue_discard() when the range is not aligned to 512 bytes, originally added in 4d89d377bbb0 ("btrfs: btrfs_issue_discard ensure offset/length are aligned to sector boundaries"). We can't do sub-sector writes anyway so the adjustment is the only thing that we can do and the warning is unnecessary. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reported-by: syzbot+4a4f1eba14eb5c3417d1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: tree-checker: fix inline ref size in error messagesChung-Chiang Cheng
commit f398e70dd69e6ceea71463a5380e6118f219197e upstream. The error message should accurately reflect the size rather than the type. Fixes: f82d1c7ca8ae ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add EXTENT_ITEM and METADATA_ITEM check") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: ref-verify: free ref cache before clearing mount optFedor Pchelkin
commit f03e274a8b29d1d1c1bbd7f764766cb5ca537ab7 upstream. As clearing REF_VERIFY mount option indicates there were some errors in a ref-verify process, a ref cache is not relevant anymore and should be freed. btrfs_free_ref_cache() requires REF_VERIFY option being set so call it just before clearing the mount option. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller. Reported-by: syzbot+be14ed7728594dc8bd42@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000e5a65c05ee832054@google.com/ Reported-by: syzbot+c563a3c79927971f950f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000007fe09705fdc6086c@google.com/ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: avoid copying BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag to snapshot of subvolume ↵Omar Sandoval
being deleted commit 3324d0547861b16cf436d54abba7052e0c8aa9de upstream. Sweet Tea spotted a race between subvolume deletion and snapshotting that can result in the root item for the snapshot having the BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag set. The race is: Thread 1 | Thread 2 ----------------------------------------------|---------- btrfs_delete_subvolume | btrfs_set_root_flags(BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD)| |btrfs_mksubvol | down_read(subvol_sem) | create_snapshot | ... | create_pending_snapshot | copy root item from source down_write(subvol_sem) | This flag is only checked in send and swap activate, which this would cause to fail mysteriously. create_snapshot() now checks the root refs to reject a deleted subvolume, so we can fix this by locking subvol_sem earlier so that the BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag and the root refs are updated atomically. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reported-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-01-31btrfs: zoned: fix lock ordering in btrfs_zone_activate()Naohiro Aota
commit b18f3b60b35a8c01c9a2a0f0d6424c6d73971dc3 upstream. The btrfs CI reported a lockdep warning as follows by running generic generic/129. WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc5+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/u5:5/793427 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88813256d028 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x5e/0x130 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810a23a318 (&fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: btrfs_zone_finish_one_bg+0x34/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: ... -> #0 (&cache->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}: ... This is because we take fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock after a block_group's lock in btrfs_zone_activate() while doing the opposite in other places. Fix the issue by expanding the fs_info->zone_active_bgs_lock's critical section and taking it before a block_group's lock. Fixes: a7e1ac7bdc5a ("btrfs: zoned: reserve zones for an active metadata/system block group") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6 Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>