| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We have a complex loop design for find_free_extent(), that has different
behavior for each loop, some even includes new chunk allocation.
Instead of putting such a long code into find_free_extent() and makes it
harder to read, just extract them into find_free_extent_update_loop().
With all the cleanups, the main find_free_extent() should be pretty
barebone:
find_free_extent()
|- Iterate through all block groups
| |- Get a valid block group
| |- Try to do clustered allocation in that block group
| |- Try to do unclustered allocation in that block group
| |- Check if the result is valid
| | |- If valid, then exit
| |- Jump to next block group
|
|- Push harder to find free extents
|- If not found, re-iterate all block groups
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ copy callchain from changelog to function comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
find_free_extent_unclustered()
This patch will extract unclsutered extent allocation code into
find_free_extent_unclustered().
And this helper function will use return value to indicate what to do
next.
This should make find_free_extent() a little easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
[Update merge conflict with fb5c39d7a887 ("btrfs: don't use ctl->free_space for max_extent_size")]
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We have two main methods to find free extents inside a block group:
1) clustered allocation
2) unclustered allocation
This patch will extract the clustered allocation into
find_free_extent_clustered() to make it a little easier to read.
Instead of jumping between different labels in find_free_extent(), the
helper function will use return value to indicate different behavior.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Instead of tons of different local variables in find_free_extent(),
extract them into find_free_extent_ctl structure, and add better
explanation for them.
Some modification may looks redundant, but will later greatly simplify
function parameter list during find_free_extent() refactor.
Also add two comments to co-operate with fb5c39d7a887 ("btrfs: don't use
ctl->free_space for max_extent_size"), to make ffe_ctl->max_extent_size
update more reader-friendly.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Introduce a new wrapper update_bytes_pinned to replace open coded
bytes_pinned modifiers. Now the underflows of space_info::bytes_pinned
get detected and reported.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Although we have space_info::bytes_may_use underflow detection in
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota(), we have more callers who are
subtracting number from space_info::bytes_may_use.
So instead of doing underflow detection for every caller, introduce a
new wrapper update_bytes_may_use() to replace open coded bytes_may_use
modifiers.
This also introduce a macro to declare more wrappers, but currently
space_info::bytes_may_use is the mostly interesting one.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We were not handling the reserved byte accounting properly for data
references. Metadata was fine, if it errored out the error paths would
free the bytes_reserved count and pin the extent, but it even missed one
of the error cases. So instead move this handling up into
run_one_delayed_ref so we are sure that both cases are properly cleaned
up in case of a transaction abort.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
max_extent_size is supposed to be the largest contiguous range for the
space info, and ctl->free_space is the total free space in the block
group. We need to keep track of these separately and _only_ use the
max_free_space if we don't have a max_extent_size, as that means our
original request was too large to search any of the block groups for and
therefore wouldn't have a max_extent_size set.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we use up our block group before allocating a new one we'll easily
get a max_extent_size that's set really really low, which will result in
a lot of fragmentation. We need to make sure we're resetting the
max_extent_size when we add a new chunk or add new space.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
When writing out a block group free space cache we can end deadlocking
with ourselves on an extent buffer lock resulting in a warning like the
following:
[245043.379979] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2608 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:251 btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[245043.392792] CPU: 4 PID: 2608 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G
W I 4.16.8 #1
[245043.395489] RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x1be/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[245043.396791] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000424b840 EFLAGS: 00010246
[245043.398093] RAX: 0000000000000a30 RBX: ffff8807e20a3d20 RCX: 0000000000000001
[245043.399414] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff8807e20a3d20
[245043.400732] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff88041f39a700 R09: ffff880000000000
[245043.402021] R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffff8807e20a3d20 R12: ffff8807cb220630
[245043.403296] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff8807cb220628 R15: ffff88041fbdf000
[245043.404780] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88082fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[245043.406050] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[245043.407321] CR2: 00007fffdbdb9f10 CR3: 0000000001c09005 CR4: 00000000000206e0
[245043.408670] Call Trace:
[245043.409977] btrfs_search_slot+0x761/0xa60 [btrfs]
[245043.411278] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x62/0xb0 [btrfs]
[245043.412572] btrfs_insert_item+0x5b/0xc0 [btrfs]
[245043.413922] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0xfb/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[245043.415216] do_chunk_alloc+0x1e5/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[245043.416487] find_free_extent+0xcd0/0xf60 [btrfs]
[245043.417813] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x96/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[245043.419105] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xfb/0x4a0 [btrfs]
[245043.420378] __btrfs_cow_block+0x127/0x550 [btrfs]
[245043.421652] btrfs_cow_block+0xee/0x190 [btrfs]
[245043.422979] btrfs_search_slot+0x227/0xa60 [btrfs]
[245043.424279] ? btrfs_update_inode_item+0x59/0x100 [btrfs]
[245043.425538] ? iput+0x72/0x1e0
[245043.426798] write_one_cache_group.isra.49+0x20/0x90 [btrfs]
[245043.428131] btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x102/0x420 [btrfs]
[245043.429419] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x11b/0x880 [btrfs]
[245043.430712] ? start_transaction+0x8e/0x410 [btrfs]
[245043.432006] transaction_kthread+0x184/0x1a0 [btrfs]
[245043.433341] kthread+0xf0/0x130
[245043.434628] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x4e0/0x4e0 [btrfs]
[245043.435928] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40
[245043.437236] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[245043.441054] ---[ end trace 15abaa2aaf36827f ]---
This is because at write_one_cache_group() when we are COWing a leaf from
the extent tree we end up allocating a new block group (chunk) and,
because we have hit a threshold on the number of bytes reserved for system
chunks, we attempt to finalize the creation of new block groups from the
current transaction, by calling btrfs_create_pending_block_groups().
However here we also need to modify the extent tree in order to insert
a block group item, and if the location for this new block group item
happens to be in the same leaf that we were COWing earlier, we deadlock
since btrfs_search_slot() tries to write lock the extent buffer that we
locked before at write_one_cache_group().
We have already hit similar cases in the past and commit d9a0540a79f8
("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation") fixed some
of those cases by delaying the creation of pending block groups at the
known specific spots that could lead to a deadlock. This change reworks
that commit to be more generic so that we don't have to add similar logic
to every possible path that can lead to a deadlock. This is done by
making __btrfs_cow_block() disallowing the creation of new block groups
(setting the transaction's can_flush_pending_bgs to false) before it
attempts to allocate a new extent buffer for either the extent, chunk or
device trees, since those are the trees that pending block creation
modifies. Once the new extent buffer is allocated, it allows creation of
pending block groups to happen again.
This change depends on a recent patch from Josef which is not yet in
Linus' tree, named "btrfs: make sure we create all new block groups" in
order to avoid occasional warnings at btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata().
Fixes: d9a0540a79f8 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock when finalizing block group creation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199753
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJtFHUTHna09ST-_EEiyWmDH6gAqS6wa=zMNMBsifj8ABu99cw@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: E V <eliventer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The avg_delayed_ref_runtime can be referenced from the transaction
handle.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It can be referenced from the transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since trans is only used for referring to delayed_refs, there is no need
to pass it instead of delayed_refs to btrfs_delayed_ref_lock().
No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since trans is only used for referring to delayed_refs, there is no need
to pass it instead of delayed_refs to btrfs_select_ref_head(). No
functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Allocating new chunks modifies both the extent and chunk tree, which can
trigger new chunk allocations. So instead of doing list_for_each_safe,
just do while (!list_empty()) so we make sure we don't exit with other
pending bg's still on our list.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Reloc tree doesn't contribute to qgroup numbers, as we have accounted
them at balance time (see replace_path()).
Skipping the unneeded subtree tracing should reduce the overhead.
[[Benchmark]]
Hardware:
VM 4G vRAM, 8 vCPUs,
disk is using 'unsafe' cache mode,
backing device is SAMSUNG 850 evo SSD.
Host has 16G ram.
Mkfs parameter:
--nodesize 4K (To bump up tree size)
Initial subvolume contents:
4G data copied from /usr and /lib.
(With enough regular small files)
Snapshots:
16 snapshots of the original subvolume.
each snapshot has 3 random files modified.
balance parameter:
-m
So the content should be pretty similar to a real world root fs layout.
| v4.19-rc1 | w/ patchset | diff (*)
---------------------------------------------------------------
relocated extents | 22929 | 22900 | -0.1%
qgroup dirty extents | 227757 | 167139 | -26.6%
time (sys) | 65.253s | 50.123s | -23.2%
time (real) | 74.032s | 52.551s | -29.0%
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Refactor the delayed refs loop by using the newly introduced
btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head function. This greatly simplifies
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs and makes it more obvious what is happening.
We now have 1 loop which iterates the existing delayed_heads and then
each selected ref head is processed by the new helper. All existing
semantics of the code are preserved so no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This patch introduces a new helper encompassing the implicit inner loop
in __btrfs_run_delayed_refs which processes all the refs for a given
head. The code is mostly copy/paste, the only difference is that if we
detect a newer reference then -EAGAIN is returned so that callers can
react correctly.
Also, at the end of the loop the head is relocked and
btrfs_merge_delayed_refs is run again to retain the pre-refactoring
semantics.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
This is in preparation to refactor the giant loop in
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs. As a first step define a new function
which implements acquiring a reference to a btrfs_delayed_refs_head and
use it. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
rb_first_cached() trades an extra pointer "leftmost" for doing the same
job as rb_first() but in O(1).
Functions manipulating href->ref_tree need to get the first entry, this
converts href->ref_tree to use rb_first_cached().
For more details about the optimization see patch "Btrfs: delayed-refs:
use rb_first_cached for href_root".
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
rb_first_cached() trades an extra pointer "leftmost" for doing the same
job as rb_first() but in O(1).
Functions manipulating href_root need to get the first entry, this
converts href_root to use rb_first_cached().
This patch is first in the sequenct of similar updates to other rbtrees
and this is analysis of the expected behaviour and improvements.
There's a common pattern:
while (node = rb_first) {
entry = rb_entry(node)
next = rb_next(node)
rb_erase(node)
cleanup(entry)
}
rb_first needs to traverse the tree up to logN depth, rb_erase can
completely reshuffle the tree. With the caching we'll skip the traversal
in rb_first. That's a cached memory access vs looped pointer
dereference trade-off that IMHO has a clear winner.
Measurements show there's not much difference in a sample tree with
10000 nodes: 4.5s / rb_first and 4.8s / rb_first_cached. Real effects of
caching and pointer chasing are unpredictable though.
Further optimzations can be done to avoid the expensive rb_erase step.
In some cases it's ok to process the nodes in any order, so the tree can
be traversed in post-order, not rebalancing the children nodes and just
calling free. Care must be taken regarding the next node.
Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog from mail discussions ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
While testing my backport I noticed there was a panic if I ran
generic/416 generic/417 generic/418 all in a row. This just happened to
uncover a race where we had outstanding IO after we destroy all of our
workqueues, and then we'd go to queue the endio work on those free'd
workqueues.
This is because we aren't waiting for the caching threads to be done
before freeing everything up, so to fix this make sure we wait on any
outstanding caching that's being done before we free up the block group,
so we're sure to be done with all IO by the time we get to
btrfs_stop_all_workers(). This fixes the panic I was seeing
consistently in testing.
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:6112!
SMP PTI
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 27165 Comm: kworker/u4:7 Not tainted 4.16.0-02155-g3553e54a578d-dirty #875
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014
Workqueue: btrfs-cache btrfs_cache_helper
RIP: 0010:btrfs_map_bio+0x346/0x370
RSP: 0000:ffffc900061e79d0 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880071542e00 RCX: 0000000000533000
RDX: ffff88006bb74380 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff880078160000
RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff8800781cd200 R09: 0000000000503000
R10: ffff88006cd21200 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8800781cd200 R15: ffff880071542e00
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000000817ffc4 CR3: 0000000078314000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
btree_submit_bio_hook+0x8a/0xd0
submit_one_bio+0x5d/0x80
read_extent_buffer_pages+0x18a/0x320
btree_read_extent_buffer_pages+0xbc/0x200
? alloc_extent_buffer+0x359/0x3e0
read_tree_block+0x3d/0x60
read_block_for_search.isra.30+0x1a5/0x360
btrfs_search_slot+0x41b/0xa10
btrfs_next_old_leaf+0x212/0x470
caching_thread+0x323/0x490
normal_work_helper+0xc5/0x310
process_one_work+0x141/0x340
worker_thread+0x44/0x3c0
kthread+0xf8/0x130
? process_one_work+0x340/0x340
? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
RIP: btrfs_map_bio+0x346/0x370 RSP: ffffc900061e79d0
---[ end trace 827eb13e50846033 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Kernel Offset: disabled
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Commit 499f377f49f08 (btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM)
fixed free space trimming, but introduced latency when it was running.
This is due to it pinning the transaction using both a incremented
refcount and holding the commit root sem for the duration of a single
trim operation.
This was to ensure safety but it's unnecessary. We already hold the the
chunk mutex so we know that the chunk we're using can't be allocated
while we're trimming it.
In order to check against chunks allocated already in this transaction,
we need to check the pending chunks list. To to that safely without
joining the transaction (or attaching than then having to commit it) we
need to ensure that the dev root's commit root doesn't change underneath
us and the pending chunk lists stays around until we're done with it.
We can ensure the former by holding the commit root sem and the latter
by pinning the transaction. We do this now, but the critical section
covers the trim operation itself and we don't need to do that.
This patch moves the pinning and unpinning logic into helpers and unpins
the transaction after performing the search and check for pending
chunks.
Limiting the critical section of the transaction pinning improves the
latency substantially on slower storage (e.g. image files over NFS).
Fixes: 499f377f49f08 ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
We check whether any device the file system is using supports discard in
the ioctl call, but then we attempt to trim free extents on every device
regardless of whether discard is supported. Due to the way we mask off
EOPNOTSUPP, we can end up issuing the trim operations on each free range
on devices that don't support it, just wasting time.
Fixes: 499f377f49f08 ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_trim_fs iterates over the fs_devices->alloc_list while holding the
device_list_mutex. The problem is that ->alloc_list is protected by the
chunk mutex. We don't want to hold the chunk mutex over the trim of the
entire file system. Fortunately, the ->dev_list list is protected by
the dev_list mutex and while it will give us all devices, including
read-only devices, we already just skip the read-only devices. Then we
can continue to take and release the chunk mutex while scanning each
device.
Fixes: 499f377f49f ("btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
fstrim on some btrfs only trims the unallocated space, not trimming any
space in existing block groups.
[CAUSE]
Before fstrim_range passed to btrfs_trim_fs(), it gets truncated to
range [0, super->total_bytes). So later btrfs_trim_fs() will only be
able to trim block groups in range [0, super->total_bytes).
While for btrfs, any bytenr aligned to sectorsize is valid, since btrfs
uses its logical address space, there is nothing limiting the location
where we put block groups.
For filesystem with frequent balance, it's quite easy to relocate all
block groups and bytenr of block groups will start beyond
super->total_bytes.
In that case, btrfs will not trim existing block groups.
[FIX]
Just remove the truncation in btrfs_ioctl_fitrim(), so btrfs_trim_fs()
can get the unmodified range, which is normally set to [0, U64_MAX].
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: f4c697e6406d ("btrfs: return EINVAL if start > total_bytes in fitrim ioctl")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Function btrfs_trim_fs() doesn't handle errors in a consistent way. If
error happens when trimming existing block groups, it will skip the
remaining blocks and continue to trim unallocated space for each device.
The return value will only reflect the final error from device trimming.
This patch will fix such behavior by:
1) Recording the last error from block group or device trimming
The return value will also reflect the last error during trimming.
Make developer more aware of the problem.
2) Continuing trimming if possible
If we failed to trim one block group or device, we could still try
the next block group or device.
3) Report number of failures during block group and device trimming
It would be less noisy, but still gives user a brief summary of
what's going wrong.
Such behavior can avoid confusion for cases like failure to trim the
first block group and then only unallocated space is trimmed.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add bg_ret and dev_ret to the messages ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since commit d7df2c796d7e ("Btrfs attach delayed ref updates to delayed
ref heads"), check_delayed_ref() won't return -ENOENT.
In btrfs_cross_ref_exist(), two variables 'ret' and 'ret2' are
originally used to handle -ENOENT error case. Since the code is not
needed anymore, let's just remove 'ret2'.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Here we're not releasing any space, but transferring bytes from
->bytes_may_use to ->bytes_reserved. The last change to the code in
commit 18513091af9483ba8 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's
bytes_may_use timely") removed a conditional tracepoint and the logic
changed too but the tracepiont remained.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
For certain crafted image, whose csum root leaf has missing backref, if
we try to trigger write with data csum, it could cause deadlock with the
following kernel WARN_ON():
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 41 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:230 btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400
CPU: 1 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1+ #8
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper
RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400
Call Trace:
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x39f/0x770
__btrfs_cow_block+0x285/0x9e0
btrfs_cow_block+0x191/0x2e0
btrfs_search_slot+0x492/0x1160
btrfs_lookup_csum+0xec/0x280
btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x2be/0xa60
add_pending_csums+0xaf/0xf0
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x74b/0xc90
finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20
normal_work_helper+0xf6/0x500
btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20
process_one_work+0x302/0x770
worker_thread+0x81/0x6d0
kthread+0x180/0x1d0
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
[CAUSE]
That crafted image has missing backref for csum tree root leaf. And
when we try to allocate new tree block, since there is no
EXTENT/METADATA_ITEM for csum tree root, btrfs consider it's free slot
and use it.
The extent tree of the image looks like:
Normal image | This fuzzed image
----------------------------------+--------------------------------
BG 29360128 | BG 29360128
One empty slot | One empty slot
29364224: backref to UUID tree | 29364224: backref to UUID tree
Two empty slots | Two empty slots
29376512: backref to CSUM tree | One empty slot (bad type) <<<
29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree | 29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree
... | ...
Since bytenr 29376512 has no METADATA/EXTENT_ITEM, when btrfs try to
alloc tree block, it's an valid slot for btrfs.
And for finish_ordered_write, when we need to insert csum, we try to CoW
csum tree root.
By accident, empty slots at bytenr BG_OFFSET, BG_OFFSET + 8K,
BG_OFFSET + 12K is already used by tree block COW for other trees, the
next empty slot is BG_OFFSET + 16K, which should be the backref for CSUM
tree.
But due to the bad type, btrfs can recognize it and still consider it as
an empty slot, and will try to use it for csum tree CoW.
Then in the following call trace, we will try to lock the new tree
block, which turns out to be the old csum tree root which is already
locked:
btrfs_search_slot() called on csum tree root, which is at 29376512
|- btrfs_cow_block()
|- btrfs_set_lock_block()
| |- Now locks tree block 29376512 (old csum tree root)
|- __btrfs_cow_block()
|- btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
|- btrfs_reserve_extent()
| Now it returns tree block 29376512, which extent tree
| shows its empty slot, but it's already hold by csum tree
|- btrfs_init_new_buffer()
|- btrfs_tree_lock()
| Triggers WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid)
|- wait_event()
Wait lock owner to release the lock, but it's
locked by ourself, so it will deadlock
[FIX]
This patch will do the lock_owner and current->pid check at
btrfs_init_new_buffer().
So above deadlock can be avoided.
Since such problem can only happen in crafted image, we will still
trigger kernel warning for later aborted transaction, but with a little
more meaningful warning message.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200405
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
[BUG]
When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON()
when trying to recover balance:
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10
RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs]
RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202
Call Trace:
walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs]
merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs]
mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs]
mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a
vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140
do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0
ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0
__x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
[CAUSE]
Extent tree corruption. In this particular case, reloc tree root's
owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is
corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree().
[FIX]
It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at
least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully.
And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share
the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make
__del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid
possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes uses the variable "ret" for return value,
but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of
the callers do not handle the return value, so it is safe to drop the
unneeded "ret" and return void. There are no callees that would need the
function to handle or pass the value either.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's
objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid.
They are both set to the same value in __setup_root():
static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
u64 objectid)
{
...
root->objectid = objectid;
...
root->root_key.objectid = objecitd;
...
}
and not changed to other value after initialization.
grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places:
$ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l
133
$ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l
55
(4.17, inc. some noise)
It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems
that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case.
Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove
'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places.
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Since ret must be 0 here, don't have to return. No functional change
and code readability is not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
btrfs_rsv_add_bytes
Using true and false here is closer to the expected semantic than using
0 and 1. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
After btrfs_qgroup_reserve_meta_prealloc(), num_bytes will be assigned
again by btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(). Once block_rsv fails, we
can't properly free the num_bytes of the previous qgroup_reserve. Use a
separate variable to store the num_bytes of the qgroup_reserve.
Delete the comment for the qgroup_reserved that does not exist and add a
comment about use_global_rsv.
Fixes: c4c129db5da8 ("btrfs: drop unused parameter qgroup_reserved")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.18+
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If a crafted image has missing block group items, it could cause
unexpected behavior and breaks the assumption of 1:1 chunk<->block group
mapping.
Although we have the block group -> chunk mapping check, we still need
chunk -> block group mapping check.
This patch will do extra check to ensure each chunk has its
corresponding block group.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
A crafted btrfs image with incorrect chunk<->block group mapping will
trigger a lot of unexpected things as the mapping is essential.
Although the problem can be caught by block group item checker
added in "btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item", it's still not
sufficient. A sufficiently valid block group item can pass the check
added by the mentioned patch but could fail to match the existing chunk.
This patch will add extra block group -> chunk mapping check, to ensure
we have a completely matching (start, len, flags) chunk for each block
group at mount time.
Here we reuse the original helper find_first_block_group(), which is
already doing the basic bg -> chunk checks, adding further checks of the
start/len and type flags.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199837
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There is no user of this function anymore.
This was forgotten to be removed in commit a575ceeb1338
("Btrfs: get rid of unused orphan infrastructure").
Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Leftover after fix e339a6b097c5 ("Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always
use no_quota"), that removed it from the function calls but not the
structure.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
If we're trying to make a data reservation and we have to allocate a
data chunk we could leak ret == 1, as do_chunk_alloc() will return 1 if
it allocated a chunk. Since the end of the function is the success path
just return 0.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In find_free_extent() under checks: label, we have the following code:
search_start = ALIGN(offset, fs_info->stripesize);
/* move on to the next group */
if (search_start + num_bytes >
block_group->key.objectid + block_group->key.offset) {
btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, offset, num_bytes);
goto loop;
}
if (offset < search_start)
btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, offset,
search_start - offset);
BUG_ON(offset > search_start);
However ALIGN() is rounding up, thus @search_start >= @offset and that
BUG_ON() will never be triggered.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
There are many places that open code the duplicity factor of the block
group profiles, create a common helper. This can be easily extended for
more copies.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
The fs_info can be fetched from the transaction handle directly.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
It can be fetched from the transaction handle.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
Introduce a small helper, btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), to acquire locks and
add a block group to unused_bgs list.
No functional modification, and only 3 callers are involved.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
do_chunk_alloc implements logic to detect whether there is currently
pending chunk allocation (by means of space_info->chunk_alloc being
set) and if so it loops around to the 'again' label. Additionally,
based on the state of the space_info (e.g. whether it's full or not)
and the return value of should_alloc_chunk() it decides whether this
is a "hard" error (ENOSPC) or we can just return 0.
This patch refactors all of this:
1. Put order to the scattered ifs handling the various cases in an
easy-to-read if {} else if{} branches. This makes clear the various
cases we are interested in handling.
2. Call should_alloc_chunk only once and use the result in the
if/else if constructs. All of this is done under space_info->lock, so
even before multiple calls of should_alloc_chunk were unnecessary.
3. Rewrite the "do {} while()" loop currently implemented via label
into an explicit loop construct.
4. Move the mutex locking for the case where the caller is the one doing
the allocation. For the case where the caller needs to wait a concurrent
allocation, introduce a pair of mutex_lock/mutex_unlock to act as a
barrier and reword the comment.
5. Switch local vars to bool type where pertinent.
All in all this shouldn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
|
In commit b150a4f10d878 ("Btrfs: use a percpu to keep track of possibly
pinned bytes") we use total_bytes_pinned to track how many bytes we are
going to free in this transaction. When we are close to ENOSPC, we check it
and know if we can make the allocation by commit the current transaction.
For every data/metadata extent we are going to free, we add
total_bytes_pinned in btrfs_free_extent() and btrfs_free_tree_block(), and
release it in unpin_extent_range() when we finish the transaction. So this
is a variable we frequently update but rarely read - just the suitable
use of percpu_counter. But in previous commit we update total_bytes_pinned
by default 32 batch size, making every update essentially a spin lock
protected update. Since every spin lock/unlock operation involves syncing
a globally used variable and some kind of barrier in a SMP system, this is
more expensive than using total_bytes_pinned as a simple atomic64_t.
So fix this by using a customized batch size. Since we only read
total_bytes_pinned when we are close to ENOSPC and fail to allocate new
chunk, we can use a really large batch size and have nearly no penalty
in most cases.
[Test]
We tested the patch on a 4-cores x86 machine:
1. fallocate a 16GiB size test file
2. take snapshot (so all following writes will be COW)
3. run a 180 sec, 4 jobs, 4K random write fio on test file
We also added a temporary lockdep class on percpu_counter's spin lock
used by total_bytes_pinned to track it by lock_stat.
[Results]
unpatched:
lock_stat version 0.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
class name con-bounces contentions
waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces
acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg
total_bytes_pinned_percpu: 82 82
0.21 0.61 29.46 0.36 298340
635973 0.09 11.01 173476.25 0.27
patched:
lock_stat version 0.4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
class name con-bounces contentions
waittime-min waittime-max waittime-total waittime-avg acq-bounces
acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg
total_bytes_pinned_percpu: 1 1
0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 13601
31542 0.14 9.61 11016.90 0.35
[Analysis]
Since the spin lock only protects a single in-memory variable, the
contentions (number of lock acquisitions that had to wait) in both
unpatched and patched version are low. But when we see acquisitions and
acq-bounces, we get much lower counts in patched version. Here the most
important metric is acq-bounces. It means how many times the lock gets
transferred between different cpus, so the patch can really reduce
cacheline bouncing of spin lock (also the global counter of percpu_counter)
in a SMP system.
Fixes: b150a4f10d878 ("Btrfs: use a percpu to keep track of possibly pinned bytes")
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
