| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As the name states "thermal_core.h" is the header file for the core
components of the thermal framework.
Too many drivers are including it. Hopefully the recent cleanups
helped to self encapsulate the code a bit more and prevented the
drivers to need this header.
Remove this inclusion in every place where it is possible.
Some other drivers did a confusion with the core header and the one
exported in linux/thermal.h. They include the former instead of the
latter. The changes also fix this.
The tegra/soctherm driver still remains as it uses an internal
function which need to be replaced.
The Intel HFI driver uses the netlink internal framework core and
should be changed to prevent to deal with the internals.
No functional changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> # armada_thermal.c
Reviewed-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com> # uniphier_thermal.c
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> # rcar_gen3_thermal.c
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> # amlogic_thermal.c
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> # bcm2835_thermal.c
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> # tegra30-tsensor.c
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230206153432.1017282-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
die_id is an u16 quantity. On single-die systems the default value of
die_id is 0. No need to check for negative values.
Plus, removing this check makes Coverity happy.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
Some processors issue more than one HFI interrupt with the same
timestamp. Each interrupt must be acknowledged to let the hardware issue
new HFI interrupts. But this can't be done without some additional flow
modification in the existing interrupt handling.
For background, the HFI interrupt is a package level thermal interrupt
delivered via a LVT. This LVT is common for both the CPU and package
level interrupts. Hence, all CPUs receive the HFI interrupts. But only
one CPU should process interrupt and others simply exit by issuing EOI
to LAPIC.
The current HFI interrupt processing flow:
1. Receive Thermal interrupt
2. Check if there is an active HFI status in MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS
3. Try and get spinlock, one CPU will enter spinlock and others
will simply return from here to issue EOI.
(Let's assume CPU 4 is processing interrupt)
4. Check the stored time-stamp from the HFI memory time-stamp
5. if same
6. ignore interrupt, unlock and return
7. Copy the HFI message to local buffer
8. unlock spinlock
9. ACK HFI interrupt
10. Queue the message for processing in a work-queue
It is tempting to simply acknowledge all the interrupts even if they
have the same timestamp. This may cause some interrupts to not be
processed.
Let's say CPU5 is slightly late and reaches step 4 while CPU4 is
between steps 8 and 9.
Currently we simply ignore interrupts with the same timestamp. No
issue here for CPU5. When CPU4 acknowledges the interrupt, the next
HFI interrupt can be delivered.
If we acknowledge interrupts with the same timestamp (at step 6), there
is a race condition. Under the same scenario, CPU 5 will acknowledge
the HFI interrupt. This lets hardware generate another HFI interrupt,
before CPU 4 start executing step 9. Once CPU 4 complete step 9, it
will acknowledge the newly arrived HFI interrupt, without actually
processing it.
Acknowledge the interrupt when holding the spinlock. This avoids
contention of the interrupt acknowledgment.
Updated flow:
1. Receive HFI Thermal interrupt
2. Check if there is an active HFI status in MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS
3. Try and get spin-lock
Let's assume CPU 4 is processing interrupt
4.1 Read MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS and check HFI status bit
4.2 If hfi status is 0
4.3 unlock spinlock
4.4 return
4.5 Check the stored time-stamp from the HFI memory time-stamp
5. if same
6.1 ACK HFI Interrupt,
6.2 unlock spinlock
6.3 return
7. Copy the HFI message to local buffer
8. ACK HFI interrupt
9. unlock spinlock
10. Queue the message for processing in a work-queue
To avoid taking the lock unnecessarily, intel_hfi_process_event() checks
the status of the HFI interrupt before taking the lock. If CPU5 is late,
when it starts processing the interrupt there are two scenarios:
a) CPU4 acknowledged the HFI interrupt before CPU5 read
MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS. CPU5 exits.
b) CPU5 reads MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS before CPU4 has acknowledged the
interrupt. CPU5 will take the lock if CPU4 has released it. It then
re-reads MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS. If there is not a new interrupt,
the HFI status bit is clear and CPU5 exits. If a new HFI interrupt
was generated it will find that the status bit is set and it will
continue to process the interrupt. In this case even if timestamp
is not changed, the ACK can be issued as this is a new interrupt.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arshad, Adeel<adeel.arshad@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The clearing of the package thermal status is done by Read-Modify-Write
operation. This may result in clearing of some new status bits which are
being or about to be processed.
For example, while clearing of HFI status, after read of thermal status
register, a new thermal status bit is set by the hardware. But during
write back, the newly generated status bit will be set to 0 or cleared.
So, it is not safe to do read-modify-write.
Since thermal status Read-Write bits can be set to only 0 not 1, it is
safe to set all other bits to 1 which are not getting cleared.
Create a common interface for clearing package thermal status bits. Use
this interface to replace existing code to clear thermal package status
bits.
It is safe to call from different CPUs without protection as there is no
read-modify-write. Also wrmsrl results in just single instruction. For
example while CPU 0 and CPU 3 are clearing bit 1 and 3 respectively. If
CPU 3 wins the race, it will write 0x4000aa2, then CPU 1 will write
0x4000aa8. The bits which are not part of clear are set to 1. The default
mask for bits, which can be written here is 0x4000aaa.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
A Coverity static code scan raised a potential overflow_before_widen
warning when hfi_features::nr_table_pages is used as an argument to
memcpy in intel_hfi_process_event().
Even though the overflow can never happen (the maximum number of pages of
the HFI table is 0x10 and 0x10 << PAGE_SHIFT = 0x10000), using size_t as
the data type of hfi_features::nr_table_pages makes Coverity happy and
matches the data type of the argument 'size' of memcpy().
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
container_of() will never return NULL, so remove useless code.
Signed-off-by: Haowen Bai <baihaowen@meizu.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
When the hardware issues an HFI event, relay a notification to user space.
This allows user space to respond by reading performance and efficiency of
each CPU and take appropriate action.
For example, when the performance and efficiency of a CPU is 0, user space
can either offline the CPU or inject idle. Also, if user space notices a
downward trend in performance, it may proactively adjust power limits to
avoid future situations in which performance drops to 0.
To avoid excessive notifications, the rate is limited by one HZ per event.
To limit the netlink message size, send parameters for up to 16 CPUs in a
single message. If there are more than 16 CPUs, issue as many messages as
needed to notify the status of all CPUs.
In the HFI specification, both performance and efficiency capabilities are
defined in the [0, 255] range. The existing implementations of HFI hardware
do not scale the maximum values to 255. Since userspace cares about
capability values that are either 0 or show a downward/upward trend, this
fact does not matter much. Relative changes in capabilities are enough. To
comply with the thermal netlink ABI, scale both performance and efficiency
capabilities to the [0, 1023] interval.
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
When hardware wants to inform the operating system about updates in the HFI
table, it issues a package-level thermal event interrupt. For this,
hardware has new interrupt and status bits in the IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_
INTERRUPT and IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS registers. The existing thermal
throttle driver already handles thermal event interrupts: it initializes
the thermal vector of the local APIC as well as per-CPU and package-level
interrupt reporting. It also provides routines to service such interrupts.
Extend its functionality to also handle HFI interrupts.
The frequency of the thermal HFI interrupt is specific to each processor
model. On some processors, a single interrupt happens as soon as the HFI is
enabled and hardware will never update HFI capabilities afterwards. On
other processors, thermal and power constraints may cause thermal HFI
interrupts every tens of milliseconds.
To not overwhelm consumers of the HFI data, use delayed work to throttle
the rate at which HFI updates are processed. Use a dedicated workqueue to
not overload system_wq if hardware issues many HFI updates.
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
All CPUs in a package are represented in an HFI table. There exists an
HFI table per package. Thus, CPUs in a package need to coordinate to
initialize and access the table. Do such coordination during CPU hotplug.
Use the first CPU to come online in a package to initialize the HFI
instance and the data structure representing it. Other CPUs in the same
package need only to register or unregister themselves in that data
structure.
The HFI depends on both the package-level thermal management and the local
APIC thermal local vector. Thus, to ensure that a CPU coming online has an
associated HFI instance when the hardware issues an HFI event, enable the
HFI only after having enabled the local APIC thermal vector. The thermal
throttle driver takes care of the needed package-level initialization.
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
The Intel Hardware Feedback Interface provides guidance to the operating
system about the performance and energy efficiency capabilities of each
CPU in the system. Capabilities are numbers between 0 and 255 where a
higher number represents a higher capability. For each CPU, energy
efficiency and performance are reported as separate capabilities.
Hardware computes these capabilities based on the operating conditions of
the system such as power and thermal limits. These capabilities are shared
with the operating system in a table resident in memory. Each package in
the system has its own HFI instance. Every logical CPU in the package is
represented in the table. More than one logical CPUs may be represented in
a single table entry. When the hardware updates the table, it generates a
package-level thermal interrupt.
The size and format of the HFI table depend on the supported features and
can only be determined at runtime. To minimally initialize the HFI, parse
its features and allocate one instance per package of a data structure with
the necessary parameters to read and navigate a local copy (i.e., owned by
the driver) of individual HFI tables.
A subsequent changeset will provide per-CPU initialization and interrupt
handling.
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Co-developed by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
