| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Tx power limit is stored separately by 2G and 5G.
But driver did not get tx power limit from 5G and causes incorrect tx
power. Check if the channel is beyond 2G and get the corresponding tx
power limit.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The orig variable is taken but not used, remove it
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Rename the function names to make them have the same prefix "rtw_phy"
for the tx power setting routines. Only the function names and
corresponding identation are modified.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The type change from (void *) to (struct rtw_dev *) is redundant.
Just pass the right type and compiler can check that for us.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Some functions that should be static are unnecessarily exposed, remove
their declaration in header file phy.h.
After resolving their declaration order, they can be declared as static.
So this commit changes nothing except the order and marking them static.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next
Kalle Valu says:
====================
wireless-drivers-next patches for 5.3
First set of patches for 5.3, but not that many patches this time.
This pull request fails to compile with the tip tree due to
ktime_get_boot_ns() API changes there. It should be easy for Linus to
fix it in p54 driver once he pulls this, an example resolution here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625160432.533aa140@canb.auug.org.au
Major changes:
airo
* switch to use skcipher interface
p54
* support boottime in scan results
rtw88
* add fast xmit support
* add random mac address on scan support
rt2x00
* add software watchdog to detect hangs, it's disabled by default
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Collision of writing rf registers could occur if the driver writes
rf registers by direct write while the hardware is writing other rf
registers by pi write simultaneously.
Hardware pi write can be triggered by rf calibrations sometimes, so
the driver can not always write rf registers by direct write
protection. Direct write protection can make sure that there is no
hardware pi write during the direct write.
According to some experiments, if we add direct write protection
when switching channel, the performance of rf calibration will not
be affected.
Signed-off-by: Chien-Hsun Liao <ben.liao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:851:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_cck_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:852:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ofdm_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:853:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:854:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:855:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:856:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_c2h_cmd_handle_ext' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:50:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_send_h2c_command' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The new rssi_level should be stored in si, otherwise the rssi_level will
never be updated and get a wrong RA mask, which is calculated by the
rssi level
If a wrong RA mask is chosen, the firmware will pick some *bad rates*.
The most hurtful scene will be in *noisy environment*, such as office or
public area with many APs and users.
The latency would be high and the overall throughput would be only half
or less.
Tested in 2.4G in office area, with this patch the throughput increased
from such as "1x Mbps -> 4x Mbps".
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
My compiler complains about:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi’:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:430:26: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
linear = db_invert_table[i][j];
According to comment power_db should be in range 1 ~ 96 .
To fix add check for boundaries before access the array.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_get_channel_group’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:907:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
WARN_ON(1);
^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:908:2: note: here
case 1:
^~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/bcd.h:5,
from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:5:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘phy_get_2g_tx_power_index’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1021:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
WARN_ON(1);
^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1022:2: note: here
case RTW_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
This is a new mac80211 driver for Realtek 802.11ac wireless network chips.
rtw88 now supports RTL8822BE/RTL8822CE now, with basic station mode
functionalities. The firmware for both can be found at linux-firmware.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git
For RTL8822BE: rtw88/rtw8822b_fw.bin
For RTL8822CE: rtw88/rtw8822c_fw.bin
And for now, only PCI buses (RTL8xxxE) are supported. We will add support
for USB and SDIO in the future. The bus interface abstraction can be seen
in this driver such as hci.h. Most of the hardware setting are the same
except for some TRX path or probing setup should be separated.
Supported:
* Basic STA/AP/ADHOC mode, and TDLS (STA is well tested)
Missing feature:
* WOW/PNO
* USB & SDIO bus (such as RTL8xxxU/RTL8xxxS)
* BT coexistence (8822B/8822C are combo ICs)
* Multiple interfaces (for now single STA is better supported)
* Dynamic hardware calibrations (to improve/stabilize performance)
Potential problems:
* static calibration spends too much time, and it is painful for
driver to leave IDLE state. And slows down associate process.
But reload function are under development, will be added soon!
* TRX statictics misleading, as we are not reporting status correctly,
or say, not reporting for "every" packet.
The next patch set should have BT coexistence code since RTL8822B/C are
combo ICs, and the driver for BT can be found after Linux Kernel v4.20.
So it is better to add it first to make WiFi + BT work concurrently.
Although now rtw88 is simple but we are developing more features for it.
Even we want to add support for more chips such as RTL8821C/RTL8814B.
Finally, rtw88 has many authors, listed alphabetically:
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
