| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The value for Channel 14 was wrong. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
|
|
Those comments were wrong, fix them.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
|
|
This enum is already perfectly aliased to enum nl80211_band, and
the only reason for it is that we get IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS out of
it. There's no really good reason to not declare the number of
bands in nl80211 though, so do that and remove the cfg80211 one.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
API version lower than 16 is not supported anymore - don't
load older ucode.
Remove code handling older versions.
Signed-off-by: Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
ilw@linux.intel.com is not available anymore.
linuxwifi@intel.com should be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Fix the gaps between the system requirements and our code.
Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
When there's a bt-wifi contention that requires arbitration,
we use a priority-based mechanism to decide which comm wins.
Over time, use cases become more and more complex, with multiple
concurrent active links with different traffic types and different QoS
requirements, on both WiFi and BT sides.
This, in turn, requires us to elaborate our prioritization mechanism.
However, our legacy products included hw that does not supports this,
so selectively enable this on specific hw - as signaled by the firmware.
Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
|
|
Part of reorganising wireless drivers directory and Kconfig.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
