| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
There are some targets (register blocks) in the Ocelot switch that are
instantiated more than once. For example, the VCAP IS1, IS2 and ES0
blocks all share the same register layout for interacting with the cache
for the TCAM and the action RAM.
For the VCAPs, the procedure for servicing them is actually common. We
just need an API specifying which VCAP we are talking to, and we do that
via these raw ocelot_target_read and ocelot_target_write accessors.
In plain ocelot_read, the target is encoded into the register enum
itself:
u16 target = reg >> TARGET_OFFSET;
For the VCAPs, the registers are currently defined like this:
enum ocelot_reg {
[...]
S2_CORE_UPDATE_CTRL = S2 << TARGET_OFFSET,
S2_CORE_MV_CFG,
S2_CACHE_ENTRY_DAT,
S2_CACHE_MASK_DAT,
S2_CACHE_ACTION_DAT,
S2_CACHE_CNT_DAT,
S2_CACHE_TG_DAT,
[...]
};
which is precisely what we want to avoid, because we'd have to duplicate
the same register map for S1 and for S0, and then figure out how to pass
VCAP instance-specific registers to the ocelot_read calls (basically
another lookup table that undoes the effect of shifting with
TARGET_OFFSET).
So for some targets, propose a more raw API, similar to what is
currently done with ocelot_port_readl and ocelot_port_writel. Those
targets can only be accessed with ocelot_target_{read,write} and not
with ocelot_{read,write} after the conversion, which is fine.
The VCAP registers are not actually modified to use this new API as of
this patch. They will be modified in the next one.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Currently Felix and Ocelot share the same bit layout in these per-port
registers, but Seville does not. So we need reg_fields for that.
Actually since these are per-port registers, we need to also specify the
number of ports, and register size per port, and use the regmap API for
multiple ports.
There's a more subtle point to be made about the other 2 register
fields:
- QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE_SCH_NEXT_CFG
- QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE_INGRESS_DROP_MODE
which we are not writing any longer, for 2 reasons:
- Using the previous API (ocelot_write_rix), we were only writing 1 for
Felix and Ocelot, which was their hardware-default value, and which
there wasn't any intention in changing.
- In the case of SCH_NEXT_CFG, in fact Seville does not have this
register field at all, and therefore, if we want to have common code
we would be required to not write to it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
At the moment, there are some minimal register differences between
VSC7514 Ocelot and VSC9959 Felix. To be precise, the PCS1G registers are
missing from Felix because it was integrated with an NXP PCS.
But with VSC9953 Seville (not yet introduced), the register differences
are more pronounced. The MAC registers are located at different offsets
within the DEV_GMII target. So we need to refactor the driver to keep a
regmap even for per-port registers. The callers of the ocelot_port_readl
and ocelot_port_writel were kept unchanged, only the implementation is
now more generic.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Let's make this ioremap and regmap init code common. It should not
be platform dependent as it should be usable by PCI devices too.
Use better names where necessary to avoid clashes.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add a driver for Microsemi Ocelot Ethernet switch support.
This makes two modules:
mscc_ocelot_common handles all the common features that doesn't depend on
how the switch is integrated in the SoC. Currently, it handles offloading
bridging to the hardware. ocelot_io.c handles register accesses. This is
unfortunately needed because the register layout is packed and then depends
on the number of ports available on the switch. The register definition
files are automatically generated.
ocelot_board handles the switch integration on the SoC and on the board.
Frame injection and extraction to/from the CPU port is currently done using
register accesses which is quite slow. DMA is possible but the port is not
able to absorb the whole switch bandwidth.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
