Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
As all PCS are using the neg_mode parameter rather than the legacy
an_mode, remove the ability to use the legacy an_mode. We remove the
tests in the phylink code, unconditionally passing the PCS neg_mode
parameter to PCS methods, and remove setting the flag from drivers.
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/E1tidPn-0040hd-2R@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The lan969x switch device supports manual frame injection and extraction
to and from the switch core, using a number of injection and extraction
queues. This technique is currently supported, but delivers poor
performance compared to Frame DMA (FDMA).
This lan969x implementation of FDMA, hooks into the existing FDMA for
Sparx5, but requires its own RX and TX handling, as lan969x does not
support the same native cache coherency that Sparx5 does. Effectively,
this means that we are going to use the DMA mapping API for mapping and
unmapping TX buffers. The RX loop will utilize the page pool API for
efficient RX handling. Other than that, the implementation is largely
the same, and utilizes the FDMA library for DCB and DB handling.
Some numbers:
Manual injection/extraction (before this series):
// iperf3 -c 1.0.1.1
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 345 MBytes 289 Mbits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.06 sec 345 MBytes 288 Mbits/sec receiver
FDMA (after this series):
// iperf3 -c 1.0.1.1
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-10.03 sec 1.10 GBytes 940 Mbits/sec sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.07 sec 1.10 GBytes 936 Mbits/sec receiver
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-5-v2-5-c468f02fd623@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
We are going to implement the RX and TX paths a bit differently on
lan969x and therefore need to introduce new ops for FDMA functions:
init, deinit, xmit and poll. Assign the Sparx5 equivalents for these and
update the code throughout. Also add a 'struct net_device' argument to
the xmit() function, as we will be needing that for lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-5-v2-4-c468f02fd623@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The function sparx5_fdma_tx_activate() is responsible for configuring
the TX FDMA instance and activating the channel. TX activation has
previously been done in the xmit() function, when the first frame is
transmitted. Now that we have separate functions for starting and
stopping the FDMA, it seems reasonable to move the TX activation to the
start function. This change has no implications on the functionality.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-5-v2-3-c468f02fd623@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The two functions: sparx5_fdma_{start(),stop()} are responsible for a
number of things, namely: allocation and initialization of FDMA buffers,
activation FDMA channels in hardware and activation of the NAPI
instance.
This patch splits the buffer allocation and initialization into init and
deinit functions, and the channel and NAPI activation into start and
stop functions. This serves two purposes: 1) the start() and stop()
functions can be reused for lan969x and 2) prepares for future MTU
change support, where we must be able to stop and start the FDMA
channels and NAPI instance, without free'ing and reallocating the FDMA
buffers.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-5-v2-2-c468f02fd623@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In a previous series, we made sure that FDMA was not initialized and
started on lan969x. Now that we are going to support it, undo that
change. In addition, make sure the chip ID check is only applicable on
Sparx5, as this is a check that is only relevant on this platform.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250113-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-5-v2-1-c468f02fd623@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Pass the current neg_mode into the .pcs_get_state() method. Update all
users of phylink PCS.
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Tested-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/E1tXGeT-000Et3-4L@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The lan969x switch device includes two RGMII port interfaces (port 28
and 29) supporting data speeds of 1 Gbps, 100 Mbps and 10 Mbps. MAC
level delays are configurable through the HSIO_WRAP target, by choosing
a phase shift selector, corresponding to a certain time delay in nano
seconds.
Add new file: lan969x_rgmii.c that contains the implementation for
configuring the RGMII port devices. MAC level delays are configured
using the "{rx,tx}-internal-delay-ps" properties. These properties must
be specified independently of the phy-mode. If missing, or set to zero,
the MAC will not apply any delay.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-8-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Configuration of RGMII is done by configuring the GPIO and clock
settings in the HSIOWRAP target, and configuring the RGMII port devices
in the DEVRGMII target. Both targets contain registers replicated for
the number of RGMII port devices, which is two.
Add said targets and register macros required to configure RGMII.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-7-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
When doing a port config, we verify the port speed against the PHY mode
and supported speeds of that PHY mode. Add checks for the four RGMII phy
modes: RGMII, RGMII_ID, RGMII_TXID and RGMII_RXID.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-6-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The RGMII ports have no PCS to configure. Make sure we only return the
PCS for port modes that require it.
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-5-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
When doing a port config, we configure low-speed port devices, among
other things. We have a check to ensure, that the device is indeed a
low-speed device, an not a high-speed device. Add an additional check,
to ensure that the device is not an RGMII device.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-4-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that we can check if a given port is an RGMII port, use it in the
following cases:
- To set RGMII PHY modes for RGMII port devices.
- To avoid checking for a SerDes node in the devicetree, when the port
is an RGMII port.
- To bail out of sparx5_port_init() when the common configuration is
done.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-3-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The lan969x device contains two RGMII port interfaces, sitting at port
28 and 29. Add function: is_port_rgmii() to the match data ops, that
checks if a given port is an RGMII port or not. For Sparx5, this
function always returns false.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-2-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The sparx5_port_init() does initial configuration of a variety of
different features and options for each port. Some are shared for all
types of devices, some are not. As it is now, common configuration is
done after configuration of low-speed devices. This will not work when
adding RGMII support in a subsequent patch.
In preparation for lan969x RGMII support, move a block of code, that
configures 2g5 devices, down. This ensures that the configuration common
to all devices is done before configuration of 2g5, 5g, 10g and 25g
devices.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@sartura.hr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241220-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-4-v5-1-fa8ba5dff732@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
On port initialization, we configure the maximum frame length accepted
by the receive module associated with the port. This value is currently
written to the MAX_LEN field of the DEV10G_MAC_ENA_CFG register, when in
fact, it should be written to the DEV10G_MAC_MAXLEN_CFG register. Fix
this.
Fixes: 946e7fd5053a ("net: sparx5: add port module support")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
When doing port mirroring, the physical port to send the frame to, is
written to the FRMC_PORT_VAL field of the QFWD_FRAME_COPY_CFG register.
This field is 7 bits wide on sparx5 and 6 bits wide on lan969x, and has
a default value of 65 and 30, respectively (the number of front ports).
On mirror deletion, we set the default value of the monitor port to
65 for this field, in case no more ports exists for the mirror. Needless
to say, this will not fit the 6 bits on lan969x.
Fix this by correctly using the n_ports constant instead.
Fixes: 3f9e46347a46 ("net: sparx5: use SPX5_CONST for constants which already have a symbol")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The FDMA handler is responsible for scheduling a NAPI poll, which will
eventually fetch RX packets from the FDMA queue. Currently, the FDMA
handler is run in a threaded context. For some reason, this kills
performance. Admittedly, I did not do a thorough investigation to see
exactly what causes the issue, however, I noticed that in the other
driver utilizing the same FDMA engine, we run the FDMA handler in hard
IRQ context.
Fix this performance issue, by running the FDMA handler in hard IRQ
context, not deferring any work to a thread.
Prior to this change, the RX UDP performance was:
Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter
0.00-10.20 sec 44.6 MBytes 36.7 Mbits/sec 0.027 ms
After this change, the rx UDP performance is:
Interval Transfer Bitrate Jitter
0.00-9.12 sec 1.01 GBytes 953 Mbits/sec 0.020 ms
Fixes: 10615907e9b5 ("net: sparx5: switchdev: adding frame DMA functionality")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
We are mixing the use of spin_lock() and spin_lock_irqsave() functions
in the PTP handler of lan969x. Fix this by correctly using the _irqsave
variants.
Fixes: 24fe83541755 ("net: lan969x: add PTP handler function")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-10-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com/
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Depmod reports a cyclic dependency between modules sparx5-switch.ko and
lan969x-switch.ko:
depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: lan969x_switch -> sparx5_switch -> lan969x_switch
depmod: ERROR: Found 2 modules in dependency cycles!
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modinst:132: depmod] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2
This makes sense, as they both require symbols from each other.
Fix this by compiling lan969x support into the sparx5-switch.ko module.
In order to do this, in a sensible way, we move the lan969x/ dir into
the sparx5/ dir and do some code cleanup of code that is no longer
required.
After this patch, depmod will no longer complain, as lan969x support is
compiled into the sparx5-swicth.ko module, and can no longer be compiled
as a standalone module.
Fixes: 98a01119608d ("net: sparx5: add compatible string for lan969x")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The is_sparx5() check was introduced in an earlier series, to make sure
the sparx5_vcap_init() was not executed on lan969x, as it was not
implemented there yet. Now that it is, remove that check.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Emil Schulz Østergaard <jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x VCAP support, add the following three new
VCAP constants to match data:
- vcaps_cfg (contains configuration data for each VCAP).
- vcaps (contains auto-generated information about VCAP keys and
actions).
- vcap_stats: (contains auto-generated string names of all the keys
and actions)
Add these constants to the Sparx5 match data constants and use them to
initialize the VCAP's in sparx5_vcap_init().
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Emil Schulz Østergaard <jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The Sparx5 VCAP implementation uses the SPX5_PORTS symbol to iterate over
the 65 front ports of Sparx5. Replace the use with the n_ports constant
from the match data, which translates to 65 of Sparx5 and 30 on lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Emil Schulz Østergaard <jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x VCAP support, expose the following symbols for
use by the lan969x VCAP implementation:
- The symbols SPARX5_*_LOOKUPS defines the number of lookups in each
VCAP instance. These are the same for lan969x. Move them to the
header file.
- The struct sparx5_vcap_inst encapsulates information about a single
VCAP instance. Move this struct to the header file and declare the
sparx5_vcap_inst_cfg as extern.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jens Emil Schulz Østergaard <jensemil.schulzostergaard@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Lan969x supports a number of different features, depending on the
target. Add new field sparx5->features and initialize the features based
on the target. Also add the function sparx5_has_feature() and use it
throughout. For now, we only need to handle features: PSFP and PTP -
more will come in the future.
[1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/product/lan9698
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-15-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Add lan9691-switch compatible string to mchp_sparx5_match. Guard it with
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LAN969X_SWITCH) to make sure Sparx5 can be compiled on
its own.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-14-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Use the is_sparx5() macro (introduced in earlier series [1]), in places
where we need to handle things a bit differently on lan969x.
These places are:
- in sparx5_dsm_calendar_update() we need to switch the calendar
from a to b on lan969x.
- in sparx5_start() we need to make sure the HSCH_SYS_CLK_PER
register is only touched on Sparx5.
- in sparx5_start() we need to disable VCAP and FDMA for lan969x
(will come in later series).
- in sparx5_mirror_port_get() we must make sure the
ANA_AC_PROBE_PORT_CFG1 register is only read on Sparx5.
- sparx5_netdev.c and sparx5_packet.c we need to use different IFH
(Internal Frame Header) offsets for lan969x.
- in sparx5_port_fifo_sz() we must bail out on lan969x.
- in sparx5_port_config_low_set() we must configure the phase
detection registers.
- in sparx5_port_config() and sparx5_port_init() we must do some
additional configuration of the port devices.
- in sparx5_dwrr_conf_set() we must derive the scheduling layer
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20241004-b4-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-v2-8-d3290f581663@microchip.com/
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-12-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Lan969x has support for RedBox / HSR / PRP (not implemented yet). In
order to accommodate for this in the future, we need to give lan969x it's
own function for calculating the DSM calendar.
The function calculates the calendar for each taxi bus. The calendar is
used for bandwidth allocation towards the ports attached to the taxi
bus. A calendar configuration consists of up-to 64 slots, which may be
allocated to ports or left unused. Each slot accounts for 1 clock cycle.
Also expose sparx5_cal_speed_to_value(), sparx5_get_port_cal_speed,
sparx5_cal_bw and SPX5_DSM_CAL_EMPTY for use by lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-11-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Add PTP IRQ handler for lan969x. This is required, as the PTP registers
are placed in two different targets on Sparx5 and lan969x. The
implementation is otherwise the same as on Sparx5.
Also, expose sparx5_get_hwtimestamp() for use by lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-10-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Add new file lan969x_regs.c that defines all the register differences
for lan969x, and add it to the lan969x match data.
GW_DEV2G5_PHASE_DETECTOR_CTRL, FP_DEV2G5_PHAD_CTRL_PHAD_ENA and
FP_DEV2G5_PHAD_CTRL_PHAD_FAILED are required by the new register macros
which was introduced earlier. Add these for Sparx5 also.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-7-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Lan969x will require a few additional registers for certain operations.
Some are shared, some are not. Add these.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-5-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, add the sparx5 context pointer to certain
IFH (Internal Frame Header) functions. This is required, as the
is_sparx5() function will be used here in a subsequent patch.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-4-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, rework the function that calculates the SDLB
(Service Dual Leacky Bucket) clock. This is required, as the
HSCH_SYS_CLK_PER register is Sparx5-exclusive. Instead derive the clock
from the core clock, using the sparx5_clk_period() function. The clock
stays the same before and after this patch, only now,
sparx5_sdlb_clk_hz_get() can be used for lan969x too.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-3-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, use spx5_rmw() for enabling the update of
the calendar. This is required to not overwrite the DSM_TAXI_CAL_CFG
register, as an additional write will be added before this one, in a
subsequent patch.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-2-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, add lan969x targets to
sparx5_target_chiptype and set the core clock frequency for these
throughout. Lan969x only supports a core clock frequency of 328MHz.
Also, set the policer update internal (pol_upd_int) matching the 328 MHz
frequency of the lan969x targets.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241024-sparx5-lan969x-switch-driver-2-v2-1-a0b5fae88a0f@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR (net-6.12-rc4).
Conflicts:
107a034d5c1e ("net/mlx5: qos: Store rate groups in a qos domain")
1da9cfd6c41c ("net/mlx5: Unregister notifier on eswitch init failure")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
When port mirroring is added to a port, the bit position of the source
port, needs to be written to the register ANA_AC_PROBE_PORT_CFG. This
register is replicated for n_ports > 32, and therefore we need to derive
the correct register from the port number.
Before this patch, we wrongly calculate the register from portno /
BITS_PER_BYTE, where the divisor ought to be 32, causing any port >=8 to
be written to the wrong register. We fix this, by using do_div(), where
the dividend is the register, the remainder is the bit position and the
divisor is now 32.
Fixes: 4e50d72b3b95 ("net: sparx5: add port mirroring implementation")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241009-mirroring-fix-v1-1-9ec962301989@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Internal ports and PGID's are both defined relative to the number of
front ports on Sparx5. This will not work on lan969x. Instead make them
offsets to the number of front ports and add two helpers to retrieve
them. Use the helpers throughout.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
We dont want to ops out each time a function needs to do some platform
specifics. In particular we have a few places, where it would be
convenient to just branch out on the platform type. Add the function
is_sparx5() and, initially, use it for:
- register writes that should only be done on Sparx5 (QSYS_CAL_CTRL,
CLKGEN_LCPLL1_CORE_CLK).
- function calls that should only be done on Sparx5
(ethtool_op_get_ts_info())
- register writes that are chip-exclusive (MASK_CFG1/2, PGID_CFG1/2,
these are replicated for n_ports >32 on Sparx5).
The is_sparx5() function simply checks the target chip type, to
determine if this is a Sparx5 SKU or not.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The DSM (Disassembler) calendar grants each port access to internal
busses. The configuration of the calendar is done differently on Sparx5
and lan969x. Therefore ops out the function that calculates the
calendar.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The PTP registers are located in two different register targets on
Sparx5 and lan969x. We can't handle this with the register macros, so
ops out the handler.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Port muxing is configured based on the supported port modes. As these
modes can differ on Sparx5 and lan969x we ops out the port muxing
function.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Add getters for getting values in arrays: sdlb_groups and
sparx5_hsch_max_group_rate and ops out the getters, as these arrays will
differ on lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The chip port device index and mode bit can be obtained using the port
number. However the mapping of port number to chip device index and
mode bit differs on Sparx5 and lan969x. Therefore ops out the function.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Add new struct sparx5_ops, containing functions that needs to be
different as the implementation differs on Sparx5 and lan969x. Initially
we add functions for checking the port type (2g5, 5g, 10g or 25g) based
on the port number. Update the code to use the ops instead of the
platform specific functions.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Now that we have indentified all the chip constants, update the use of
them where a symbol is not defined for the constant.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Now that we have indentified all the chip constants, update the use of
them where a symbol is already defined for the constant.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Add new struct sparx5_consts, containing all the chip constants that are
known to be different for Sparx5 and lan969x.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
The *sparx5 context pointer is required in functions that need to access
platform constants (which will be added in a subsequent patch). Prepare
for this by updating the prototype and use of such functions.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
In preparation for lan969x, we need to define the SPX5_PORTS_ALL macro
as 70 (65 front ports + 5 internal ports). This is required as the
SPX5_PORT_CPU will be redefined as an offset to the number of front
ports, in a subsequent patch.
Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|