Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Previously on the embedded CPU platform SRIOV was never enabled/disabled
via mlx5_core_sriov_configure. Host VF updates are provided by an event
handler. Now in the disable flow it must be known if this is a disable
due to driver unload or SRIOV detach, or if the user updated the number
of VFs. If due to change in the number of VFs only wait for the pages of
ECVFs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
The VFs on the host and the embedded CPU platform share function
numbers. Set the ec_vf_function field to query the caps for the correct
function.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Prior to enabling EC VF functionality the vport number and function ID
were always the same. That's not the case now. Use the correct vport
number to modify the HCA vport context.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
When the embedded cpu supports SRIOV it can be enabled and disabled
independently from the host SRIOV. Track the pages separately so we can
properly wait for returned VF pages.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add and remove the peer miss rules for EC VFs. It's possible that there
are different amounts of total VFs per function so only create rules for
the minimum number of max VFs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add init, load, unload, and cleanup of the EC VF vports. This includes
changes in how eswitch SRIOV is managed. Previous on an embedded CPU
platform the number of VFs provided when enabling the eswitch was always
0, host VFs vports are handled in the eswitch functions change event
handler. Now track the number of EC VFs as well, so they can be handled
properly in the enable/disable flows.
There are only 3 marks available for use in xarrays, all 3 were already
in use for this use case. EC VF vports are in a known range so we can
access them by index instead of marks.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
These functions are for query/set by vport, there was an underlying
assumption that vport was equal to function ID. That's not the case for
EC VF functions. Set the ec_vf_function bit accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Enable creation of a devlink port for EC VF vports.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Instead of using type specific iterators which are only used in one place
just traverse the xarray. It will provide suitable ordering based on the
vport numbers. This will also eliminate the need for changes here when
new types are added.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/saeed/linux
Saeed Mahameed says:
====================
mlx5-updates-2023-06-06
1) Support 4 ports VF LAG, part 2/2
2) Few extra trivial cleanup patches
Shay Drory Says:
================
Support 4 ports VF LAG, part 2/2
This series continues the series[1] "Support 4 ports VF LAG, part1/2".
This series adds support for 4 ports VF LAG (single FDB E-Switch).
This series of patches refactoring LAG code that make assumptions
about VF LAG supporting only two ports and then enable 4 ports VF LAG.
Patch 1:
- Fix for ib rep code
Patches 2-5:
- Refactors LAG layer.
Patches 6-7:
- Block LAG types which doesn't support 4 ports.
Patch 8:
- Enable 4 ports VF LAG.
This series specifically allows HCAs with 4 ports to create a VF LAG
with only 4 ports. It is not possible to create a VF LAG with 2 or 3
ports using HCAs that have 4 ports.
Currently, the Merged E-Switch feature only supports HCAs with 2 ports.
However, upcoming patches will introduce support for HCAs with 4 ports.
In order to activate VF LAG a user can execute:
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.0 mode switchdev
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.1 mode switchdev
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.2 mode switchdev
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.3 mode switchdev
ip link add name bond0 type bond
ip link set dev bond0 type bond mode 802.3ad
ip link set dev eth2 master bond0
ip link set dev eth3 master bond0
ip link set dev eth4 master bond0
ip link set dev eth5 master bond0
Where eth2, eth3, eth4 and eth5 are net-interfaces of pci/0000:08:00.0
pci/0000:08:00.1 pci/0000:08:00.2 pci/0000:08:00.3 respectively.
User can verify LAG state and type via debugfs:
/sys/kernel/debug/mlx5/0000\:08\:00.0/lag/state
/sys/kernel/debug/mlx5/0000\:08\:00.0/lag/type
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230601060118.154015-1-saeed@kernel.org/T/#mf1d2083780970ba277bfe721554d4925f03f36d1
================
* tag 'mlx5-updates-2023-06-06' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/saeed/linux:
net/mlx5e: simplify condition after napi budget handling change
mlx5/core: E-Switch, Allocate ECPF vport if it's an eswitch manager
net/mlx5: Skip inline mode check after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() failure
net/mlx5e: TC, refactor access to hash key
net/mlx5e: Remove RX page cache leftovers
net/mlx5e: Expose catastrophic steering error counters
net/mlx5: Enable 4 ports VF LAG
net/mlx5: LAG, block multiport eswitch LAG in case ldev have more than 2 ports
net/mlx5: LAG, block multipath LAG in case ldev have more than 2 ports
net/mlx5: LAG, change mlx5_shared_fdb_supported() to static
net/mlx5: LAG, generalize handling of shared FDB
net/mlx5: LAG, check if all eswitches are paired for shared FDB
{net/RDMA}/mlx5: introduce lag_for_each_peer
RDMA/mlx5: Free second uplink ib port
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230607210410.88209-1-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
The recently added 'VXLAN_F_LOCALBYPASS' flag is set by default on VXLAN
devices and denotes a behavior that is irrelevant for the hardware data
path. Add it to the lists of IPv4 and IPv6 supported flags to avoid
rejecting offload of VXLAN devices which have this flag set.
Fixes: 69474a8a5837 ("net: vxlan: Add nolocalbypass option to vxlan.")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5533e63643bf719bbe286fef60f749c9cad35005.1686139716.git.petrm@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Since recent commit budget can't be 0 here.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Eswitch vport is needed for eswitch manager when creating LAG,
to create egress rules. However, this was not handled when ECPF is
an eswitch manager.
Signed-off-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Commit bffaa916588e ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add control for inline mode")
added inline mode checking to esw_offloads_start() with a warning
printed out in case there is a problem. Tne inline mode checking was
done even after mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() call failed, which is
pointless.
Later on, commit 8c98ee77d911 ("net/mlx5e: E-Switch, Add extack messages
to devlink callbacks") converted the error/warning prints to extack
setting, which caused that the inline mode check error to overwrite
possible previous extack message when mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked()
failed. User then gets confusing error message.
Fix this by skipping check of inline mode after
mlx5_eswitch_enable_locked() call failed.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, a temp object is filled and used as a key for rhashtable_lookup.
Lookups will only works while key remains the first attribute in the
relevant rhashtable node object.
Fix this by passing a key, instead of a object containing the key.
Signed-off-by: Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Remove unused definitions left after the removal
of the RX page cache feature.
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add generated_pkt_steering_fail and handled_pkt_steering_fail to devlink
heatlth reporter.
generated_pkt_steering_fail indicates the number of packets dropped due to
illegal steering operation within the vport steering domain.
handled_pkt_steering_fail indicates the number of packets dropped due to
illegal steering operation, originated by the vport.
Also, update devlink reporter functionality documentation with the newly
exposed counters.
Signed-off-by: Lama Kayal <lkayal@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Rahul Rameshbabu <rrameshbabu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Now, after all preparation are done, enable 4 ports VF LAG
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
multiport eswitch LAG is not supported over more than two ports. Add a check in
order to block multiport eswitch LAG over such devices.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
multipath LAG is not supported over more than two ports. Add a check in
order to block multipath LAG over such configurations.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
mlx5_shared_fdb_supported() is used only in a single file. Change the
function to be static.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Shared FDB handling is using the assumption that shared FDB can only
be created from two devices.
In order to support shared FDB of more than two devices, iterate over
all LAG ports instead of hard coding only the first two LAG ports
whenever handling shared FDB.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Shared FDB LAG can only work if all eswitches are paired.
Also, whenever two eswitches are paired, devcom is marked as ready.
Therefore, in case of device with two eswitches, checking devcom was
sufficient. However, this is not correct for device with more than
two eswitches, which will be introduced in downstream patch.
Hence, check all eswitches are paired explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Introduce a generic APIs to iterate over all the devices which are part
of the LAG. This API replace mlx5_lag_get_peer_mdev() which retrieve
only a single peer device from the lag.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/saeed/linux
Saeed Mahameed says:
====================
mlx5-updates-2023-05-31
net/mlx5: Support 4 ports VF LAG, part 1/2
This series continues the series[1] "Support 4 ports HCAs LAG mode"
by Mark Bloch. This series adds support for 4 ports VF LAG (single FDB
E-Switch).
This series of patches focuses on refactoring different sections of the
code that make assumptions about VF LAG supporting only two ports. For
instance, it assumes that each device can only have one peer.
Patches 1-5:
- Refactor ETH handling of TC rules of eswitches with peers.
Patch 6:
- Refactors peer miss group table.
Patches 7-9:
- Refactor single FDB E-Switch creation.
Patch 10:
- Refactor the DR layer.
Patches 11-14:
- Refactors devcom layer.
Next series will refactor LAG layer and enable 4 ports VF LAG.
This series specifically allows HCAs with 4 ports to create a VF LAG
with only 4 ports. It is not possible to create a VF LAG with 2 or 3
ports using HCAs that have 4 ports.
Currently, the Merged E-Switch feature only supports HCAs with 2 ports.
However, upcoming patches will introduce support for HCAs with 4 ports.
In order to activate VF LAG a user can execute:
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.0 mode switchdev
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.1 mode switchdev
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.2 mode switchdev
devlink dev eswitch set pci/0000:08:00.3 mode switchdev
ip link add name bond0 type bond
ip link set dev bond0 type bond mode 802.3ad
ip link set dev eth2 master bond0
ip link set dev eth3 master bond0
ip link set dev eth4 master bond0
ip link set dev eth5 master bond0
Where eth2, eth3, eth4 and eth5 are net-interfaces of pci/0000:08:00.0
pci/0000:08:00.1 pci/0000:08:00.2 pci/0000:08:00.3 respectively.
User can verify LAG state and type via debugfs:
/sys/kernel/debug/mlx5/0000\:08\:00.0/lag/state
/sys/kernel/debug/mlx5/0000\:08\:00.0/lag/type
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220510055743.118828-1-saeedm@nvidia.com/
* tag 'mlx5-updates-2023-05-31' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/saeed/linux:
net/mlx5: Devcom, extend mlx5_devcom_send_event to work with more than two devices
net/mlx5: Devcom, introduce devcom_for_each_peer_entry
net/mlx5: E-switch, mark devcom as not ready when all eswitches are unpaired
net/mlx5: Devcom, Rename paired to ready
net/mlx5: DR, handle more than one peer domain
net/mlx5: E-switch, generalize shared FDB creation
net/mlx5: E-switch, Handle multiple master egress rules
net/mlx5: E-switch, refactor FDB miss rule add/remove
net/mlx5: E-switch, enlarge peer miss group table
net/mlx5e: Handle offloads flows per peer
net/mlx5e: en_tc, re-factor query route port
net/mlx5e: rep, store send to vport rules per peer
net/mlx5e: tc, Refactor peer add/del flow
net/mlx5e: en_tc, Extend peer flows to a list
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230602191301.47004-1-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET involves a call to spectrum_core, a separate module.
Instead of making the call on every iteration, cache it up front, and use
the value.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
MLXSW_CORE_RES_GET involves a call to spectrum_core, a separate module.
Instead of making the call on every iteration, cache it up front, and use
the value.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In commit 26029225d992 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Propagate extack
further"), the mlxsw_sp_rif_ops.configure callback got a new argument,
extack. However the callbacks that deal with tunnel configuration,
mlxsw_sp1_rif_ipip_lb_configure() and mlxsw_sp2_rif_ipip_lb_configure(),
were never updated to pass the parameter further. Do that now.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
"Reserved for X" usually means that only X is supposed to use a given
object. Here, it is used in the sense that X should consider the object
"reserved", as in "restricted".
Replace the comment simply by "X", with the implication that that's where
the field is used.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
devices
mlx5_devcom_send_event is used to send event from one eswitch to the
other. In other words, only one event is sent, which means, no error
mechanism is needed.
However, In case devcom have more than two eswitches, a proper error
mechanism is needed. Hence, in case of error, devcom will perform the
error unwind, since devcom knows how many events were successful.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Introduce generic APIs which will retrieve all peers.
This API replace mlx5_devcom_get/release_peer_data which retrieve
only a single peer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Whenever an eswitch is unpaired with another, the driver mark devcom
as not ready. While this is correct in case we are pairing only two
eswitches, in order to support pairing of more than two eswitches,
driver need to mark devcom as not ready only when all eswitches are
unpaired.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
In downstream patch devcom will provide support for more than two
devices. The term 'paired' will be renamed as 'ready' to convey a
more accurate meaning.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, DR domain is using the assumption that each domain can only
have a single peer.
In order to support VF LAG of more then two ports, expand peer domain
to use an array of peers, and align the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Shared FDB creation is hard coded for only two eswitches.
Generalize shared FDB creation so that any number of eswitches could
create shared FDB.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, whenever a shared FDB is created, the slave eswitch is
creating master egress rule to the master eswitch.
In order to support more than two ports, which means there will be
more than one slave eswitch, enlarge bounce_rule, which is used to
create master egress rule, to an xarray.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, E-switch FDB have a single peer miss rule.
In order to support more than one peer, refactor E-switch FDB to
have peer miss rule per peer, and change the code to add/remove a
rule from specific peer.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
There is an implicit assumption that peer miss group table
require to handle only a single peer.
Also, there is an assumption that total_vports of the master
is greater or equal to the total_vports of each peer.
Change the code to support peer miss group for more than one peer.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, E-switch offloads table have a list of all flows that
create a peer_flow over the peer eswitch.
In order to support more than one peer, extend E-switch offloads
table peer_flow to hold an array of lists, where each peer have
dedicate index via mlx5_get_dev_index(). Thereafter, extend original
flow to hold an array of peers as well.
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
query for peer esw outside of if scope.
This is preparation for query route port over multiple peers.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Each representor, for each send queue, is holding a
send_to_vport rule for the peer eswitch.
In order to support more than one peer, and to map between the peer
rules and peer eswitches, refactor representor to hold both the peer
rules and pointer to the peer eswitches.
This enables mlx5 to store send_to_vport rules per peer, where each
peer have dedicate index via mlx5_get_dev_index().
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Move peer_eswitch outside mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_peer_flow() so downstream
patch can call mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_peer_flow() with multiple peers.
Move peer_eswitch in the remove flow as well in order to keep symmetry.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Currently, mlx5e_flow is holding a pointer to a peer_flow, in case one
was created. e.g. There is an assumption that mlx5e_flow can have only
one peer.
In order to support more than one peer, refactor mlx5e_flow to hold a
list of peer flows.
Signed-off-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
In the offending fixes commit I mistakenly removed the reply message of
the port new command. I was under impression it is a new port
notification, partly due to the "notify" in the name of the helper
function. Bring the code sending reply with new port message back, this
time putting it directly to devlink_nl_cmd_port_new_doit()
Fixes: c496daeb8630 ("devlink: remove duplicate port notification")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230531142025.2605001-1-jiri@resnulli.us
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
No conflicts.
Adjacent changes:
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
622ab656344a ("sfc: fix error unwinds in TC offload")
b6583d5e9e94 ("sfc: support TC decap rules matching on enc_src_port")
net/mptcp/protocol.c
5b825727d087 ("mptcp: add annotations around msk->subflow accesses")
e76c8ef5cc5b ("mptcp: refactor mptcp_stream_accept()")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
During driver load it reads embedded_cpu bit from initialization
segment, but the initialization segment is readable only after
initialization bit is cleared.
Move the call to mlx5_read_embedded_cpu() right after initialization bit
cleared.
Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Fixes: 591905ba9679 ("net/mlx5: Introduce Mellanox SmartNIC and modify page management logic")
Reviewed-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
Allocation failure is outside the critical lock section and should
return immediately rather than jumping to the unlock section.
Also unlock as soon as required and remove the now redundant jump label.
Fixes: 80a2a9026b24 ("net/mlx5e: Add a lock on tir list")
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
[ 9.837087] mlx5_core 0000:02:00.0: firmware version: 16.35.2000
[ 9.843126] mlx5_core 0000:02:00.0: 126.016 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (8.0 GT/s PCIe x16 link)
[ 10.311515] mlx5_core 0000:02:00.0: Rate limit: 127 rates are supported, range: 0Mbps to 97656Mbps
[ 10.321948] mlx5_core 0000:02:00.0: E-Switch: Total vports 2, per vport: max uc(128) max mc(2048)
[ 10.344324] mlx5_core 0000:02:00.0: mlx5_pcie_event:301:(pid 88): PCIe slot advertised sufficient power (27W).
[ 10.354339] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffff8ff0ade0
[ 10.361206] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 10.366335] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 10.371467] PGD 81ec39067 P4D 81ec39067 PUD 81ec3a063 PMD 114b07063 PTE 800ffff7e10f5062
[ 10.379544] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[ 10.383721] CPU: 0 PID: 117 Comm: kworker/0:6 Not tainted 6.3.0-13028-g7222f123c983 #1
[ 10.391625] Hardware name: Supermicro X10SRA-F/X10SRA-F, BIOS 2.0b 06/12/2017
[ 10.398750] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
[ 10.403108] RIP: 0010:__bitmap_or+0x10/0x26
[ 10.407286] Code: 85 c0 0f 95 c0 c3 cc cc cc cc 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 89 c9 31 c0 48 83 c1 3f 48 c1 e9 06 39 c>
[ 10.426024] RSP: 0000:ffffb45a0078f7b0 EFLAGS: 00010097
[ 10.431240] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8ff0adc0 RCX: 0000000000000004
[ 10.438365] RDX: ffff9156801967d0 RSI: ffffffff8ff0ade0 RDI: ffff9156801967b0
[ 10.445489] RBP: ffffb45a0078f7e8 R08: 0000000000000030 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 10.452613] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000000000ec
[ 10.459737] R13: ffffffff8ff0ade0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000020
[ 10.466862] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9165bfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 10.474936] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 10.480674] CR2: ffffffff8ff0ade0 CR3: 00000001011ae003 CR4: 00000000003706f0
[ 10.487800] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 10.494922] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 10.502046] Call Trace:
[ 10.504493] <TASK>
[ 10.506589] ? matrix_alloc_area.constprop.0+0x43/0x9a
[ 10.511729] ? prepare_namespace+0x84/0x174
[ 10.515914] irq_matrix_reserve_managed+0x56/0x10c
[ 10.520699] x86_vector_alloc_irqs+0x1d2/0x31e
[ 10.525146] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy+0x39/0x3f
[ 10.530284] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent+0x1a/0x2a
[ 10.535155] intel_irq_remapping_alloc+0x59/0x5e9
[ 10.539859] ? kmem_cache_debug_flags+0x11/0x26
[ 10.544383] ? __radix_tree_lookup+0x39/0xb9
[ 10.548649] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_hierarchy+0x39/0x3f
[ 10.553779] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent+0x1a/0x2a
[ 10.558650] msi_domain_alloc+0x8c/0x120
[ 10.567697] irq_domain_alloc_irqs_locked+0x11d/0x286
[ 10.572741] __irq_domain_alloc_irqs+0x72/0x93
[ 10.577179] __msi_domain_alloc_irqs+0x193/0x3f1
[ 10.581789] ? __xa_alloc+0xcf/0xe2
[ 10.585273] msi_domain_alloc_irq_at+0xa8/0xfe
[ 10.589711] pci_msix_alloc_irq_at+0x47/0x5c
The crash is due to matrix_alloc_area() attempting to access per-CPU
memory for CPUs that are not present on the system. The CPU mask
passed into reserve_managed_vector() via it's @irqd parameter is
corrupted because it contains uninitialized stack data.
Fixes: bbac70c74183 ("net/mlx5: Use newer affinity descriptor")
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
When dynamic IRQ allocation is not supported all IRQs are allocated up
front in mlx5_irq_table_create() instead of dynamically as part of
mlx5_irq_alloc(). In the latter dynamic case irq->map.index is set
via the mapping returned by pci_msix_alloc_irq_at(). In the static case
and prior to commit 1da438c0ae02 ("net/mlx5: Fix indexing of mlx5_irq")
irq->map.index was set in mlx5_irq_alloc() twice once initially to 0 and
then to the requested index before storing in the xarray. After this
commit it is only set to 0 which breaks all other IRQ mappings.
Fix this by setting irq->map.index to the requested index together with
irq->map.virq and improve the related comment to make it clearer which
cases it deals with.
Cc: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
Reviewed-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
Fixes: 1da438c0ae02 ("net/mlx5: Fix indexing of mlx5_irq")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|
|
mlx5 add IRQs to rmap upon MSIX request, and mlx5 remove rmap from
MSIX only if msi_map.index is populated. However, msi_map.index is
populated only when dynamic MSIX is supported. This results in freeing
IRQs without removing them from rmap, which triggers the bellow
WARN_ON[1].
rmap is a feature which have no relation to dynamic MSIX.
Hence, remove the check of msi_map.index when removing IRQ from rmap.
[1]
[ 200.307160 ] WARNING: CPU: 20 PID: 1702 at kernel/irq/manage.c:2034 free_irq+0x2ac/0x358
[ 200.316990 ] CPU: 20 PID: 1702 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.4.0-rc3_for_upstream_min_debug_2023_05_24_14_02 #1
[ 200.318939 ] Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[ 200.321659 ] pc : free_irq+0x2ac/0x358
[ 200.322400 ] lr : free_irq+0x20/0x358
[ 200.337865 ] Call trace:
[ 200.338360 ] free_irq+0x2ac/0x358
[ 200.339029 ] irq_release+0x58/0xd0 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.340093 ] mlx5_irqs_release_vectors+0x80/0xb0 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.341344 ] destroy_comp_eqs+0x120/0x170 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.342469 ] mlx5_eq_table_destroy+0x1c/0x38 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.343645 ] mlx5_unload+0x8c/0xc8 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.344652 ] mlx5_uninit_one+0x78/0x118 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.345745 ] remove_one+0x80/0x108 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.346752 ] pci_device_remove+0x40/0xd8
[ 200.347554 ] device_remove+0x50/0x88
[ 200.348272 ] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c4/0x228
[ 200.349312 ] driver_detach+0x54/0xa0
[ 200.350030 ] bus_remove_driver+0x74/0x100
[ 200.350833 ] driver_unregister+0x34/0x68
[ 200.351619 ] pci_unregister_driver+0x28/0xa0
[ 200.352476 ] mlx5_cleanup+0x14/0x2210 [mlx5_core]
[ 200.353536 ] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x190/0x2e8
[ 200.354495 ] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x6c/0x1d0
[ 200.355455 ] do_el0_svc+0x38/0x98
[ 200.356122 ] el0_svc+0x1c/0x80
[ 200.356739 ] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb4/0x130
[ 200.357604 ] el0t_64_sync+0x174/0x178
[ 200.358345 ] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: 3354822cde5a ("net/mlx5: Use dynamic msix vectors allocation")
Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
|