summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-05-02drm: panel: jd9365da: fix reset signal polarity in unprepareHugo Villeneuve
commit 095c8e61f4c71cd4630ee11a82e82cc341b38464 upstream. commit a8972d5a49b4 ("drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: fix reset signal polarity") fixed reset signal polarity in jadard_dsi_probe() and jadard_prepare(). It was not done in jadard_unprepare() because of an incorrect assumption about reset line handling in power off mode. After looking into the datasheet, it now appears that before disabling regulators, the reset line is deasserted first, and if reset_before_power_off_vcioo is true, then the reset line is asserted. Fix reset polarity by inverting gpiod_set_value() second argument in in jadard_unprepare(). Fixes: 6b818c533dd8 ("drm: panel: Add Jadard JD9365DA-H3 DSI panel") Fixes: 2b976ad760dc ("drm/panel: jd9365da: Support for kd101ne3-40ti MIPI-DSI panel") Fixes: a8972d5a49b4 ("drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: fix reset signal polarity") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250417195507.778731-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250417195507.778731-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2025-02-27drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: fix reset signal polarityHugo Villeneuve
commit a8972d5a49b408248294b5ecbdd0a085e4726349 upstream. In jadard_prepare() a reset pulse is generated with the following statements (delays ommited for clarity): gpiod_set_value(jadard->reset, 1); --> Deassert reset gpiod_set_value(jadard->reset, 0); --> Assert reset for 10ms gpiod_set_value(jadard->reset, 1); --> Deassert reset However, specifying second argument of "0" to gpiod_set_value() means to deassert the GPIO, and "1" means to assert it. If the reset signal is defined as GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in the DTS, the above statements will incorrectly generate the reset pulse (inverted) and leave it asserted (LOW) at the end of jadard_prepare(). Fix reset behavior by inverting gpiod_set_value() second argument in jadard_prepare(). Also modify second argument to devm_gpiod_get() in jadard_dsi_probe() to assert the reset when probing. Do not modify it in jadard_unprepare() as it is already properly asserted with "1", which seems to be the intended behavior. Fixes: 6b818c533dd8 ("drm: panel: Add Jadard JD9365DA-H3 DSI panel") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240927135306.857617-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240927135306.857617-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-12-09drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: Remove unused num_init_cmds structure memberHugo Villeneuve
commit 66ae275365be4f118abe2254a0ced1d913af93f2 upstream. Now that the driver has been converted to use wrapped MIPI DCS functions, the num_init_cmds structure member is no longer needed, so remove it. Fixes: 35583e129995 ("drm/panel: panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3: use wrapped MIPI DCS functions") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@dimonoff.com> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240930170503.1324560-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240930170503.1324560-1-hugo@hugovil.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-08-19drm/panel: jd9365da: Modify the init code of MelfasZhaoxiong Lv
Modify the Melfas panel init code to satisfy the gamma value of 2.2 Acked-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807100429.13260-3-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240807100429.13260-3-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-08-19drm/panel: jd9365da: Move "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" cmdsZhaoxiong Lv
Move the "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" command from enable() to init() function. As mentioned in the patch: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240624141926.5250-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com/ The Mediatek Soc DSI host has different modes in prepare() and enable() functions, prepare() is in LP mode and enable() is in HS mode. Since the "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" command must also be sent in LP mode, so we also move "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" command to the init() function. We have no other actions in the enable() function after moves "exit sleep mode" and "set display on", and we checked the call of the enable() function during the "startup" process. It seems that only one judgment was made in drm_panel_enabel(). If the panel does not define enable(), the judgment will skip the enable() and continue execution. This does not seem to have any other effect, and we found that some drivers also seem to have no enable() function added, for example: panel-asus-z00t-tm5p5-n35596 / panel-boe-himax8279d... In addition, we briefly tested the kingdisplay_kd101ne3 panel and melfas_lmfbx101117480 panel, and it seems that there is no garbage on the panel, so we delete enable() function. After moving the "exit sleep mode" and "set display on" command to the init() function, we no longer need additional delay judgment, so we delete variables "exit_sleep_to_display_on_delay_ms" and "display_on_delay_ms". Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Acked-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240807100429.13260-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240807100429.13260-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-07-09drm/panel: jd9365da: Break some CMDS into helper functionsCong Yang
These panels have some common cmds (e0h~e3h,80h), let's break them into helper functions. Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240704045017.2781991-4-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240704045017.2781991-4-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-07-09drm/panel: jd9365da: Support for Melfas lmfbx101117480 MIPI-DSI panelCong Yang
The Melfas lmfbx101117480 is a 10.1" WXGA TFT-LCD panel, use jd9365da controller, which fits in nicely with the existing panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3 driver. Hence, we add a new compatible with panel specific config. Signed-off-by: Cong Yang <yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240704045017.2781991-3-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240704045017.2781991-3-yangcong5@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-06-28drm/panel: jd9365da: Add the function of adjusting orientationZhaoxiong Lv
This driver does not have the function to adjust the orientation, so this function is added. Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624141926.5250-6-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624141926.5250-6-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-06-28drm/panel: jd9365da: Support for kd101ne3-40ti MIPI-DSI panelZhaoxiong Lv
The K&d kd101ne3-40ti is a 10.1" WXGA TFT-LCD panel, use jd9365da controller,which fits in nicely with the existing panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3 driver.Hence,we add a new compatible with panel specific config. Although they have the same control IC, the two panels are different, and the timing will be slightly different, so we added some variables in struct jadard_panel_desc to control the timing. Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Acked-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624141926.5250-5-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624141926.5250-5-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-06-28drm/panel: panel-jadard-jd9365da-h3: use wrapped MIPI DCS functionsZhaoxiong Lv
Remove conditional code and always use mipi_dsi_dcs_*multi() wrappers to simplify driver's init/enable/exit code. Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624141926.5250-4-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624141926.5250-4-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2024-06-28drm/panel: jd9365da: Modify the method of sending commandsZhaoxiong Lv
Currently, the init_code of the jd9365da driver is placed in the enable() function and sent, but this seems to take a long time. It takes 17ms to send each instruction (an init code consists of about 200 instructions), so it takes about 3.5s to send the init_code. So we moved the sending of the inti_code to the prepare() function, and each instruction seemed to take only 25μs. We checked the DSI host and found that the difference in command sending time is caused by the different modes of the DSI host in prepare() and enable() functions. Our DSI Host only supports sending cmd in LP mode, The prepare() function can directly send init_code (LP->cmd) in LP mode, but the enable() function is in HS mode and needs to switch to LP mode before sending init code (HS->LP->cmd->HS). Therefore, it takes longer to send the command. Signed-off-by: Zhaoxiong Lv <lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624141926.5250-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240624141926.5250-2-lvzhaoxiong@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com
2023-07-21drm: Explicitly include correct DT includesRob Herring
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus. As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they "temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to explicitly include the correct includes. Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org
2023-01-27drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: Add Radxa Display 8HDJagan Teki
Radxa Display 8HD is a family of DSI panels from Radxa that uses jd9365da-h3 IC. Add support for it. Co-developed-by: Stephen Chen <stephen@radxa.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Chen <stephen@radxa.com> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230123183312.436573-4-jagan@edgeble.ai
2023-01-27drm: panel: jd9365da-h3: Add Radxa Display 10HDJagan Teki
Radxa Display 10HD is a family of DSI panels from Radxa that uses jd9365da-h3 IC. Add panel support for it. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230123183312.436573-2-jagan@edgeble.ai
2022-11-09drm: panel: Add Jadard JD9365DA-H3 DSI panelJagan Teki
Jadard JD9365DA-H3 is WXGA MIPI DSI panel and it support TFT dot matrix LCD with 800RGBx1280 dots at maximum. Add support for it. Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@edgeble.ai> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221108173120.618312-4-jagan@edgeble.ai