| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chunkuang.hu/linux into drm-next
Mediatek DRM Next for Linux 6.6
1. Small mtk-dpi cleanups
2. DisplayPort: support eDP and aux-bus
3. Fix uninitialized symbol
4. Do not check for 0 return after calling platform_get_irq()
5. Convert to platform remove callback returning void
6. Fix coverity issues
7. Fix potential memory leak if vmap() fail
8. Fix void-pointer-to-enum-cast warning
9. Rid W=1 warnings from GPU
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230813152726.14802-1-chunkuang.hu@kernel.org
|
|
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert the mediatek drm drivers from always returning zero in
the remove callback to the void returning variant.
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jyri Sarha <jyri.sarha@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/patch/20230801110239.831099-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
|
|
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org
|
|
Fix the follow sparse warnings by adding missing headers:
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_cec.c:251:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_cec_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ccorr.c:221:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_ccorr_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c:390:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_rdma_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c:209:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_gamma_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c:565:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_ovl_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_color.c:164:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_color_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_aal.c:161:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_disp_aal_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c:1109:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_dpi_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_hdmi_ddc.c:340:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_hdmi_ddc_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c:1223:24: sparse: warning: symbol 'mtk_dsi_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20230110091647.13265-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
|
|
mt8183 gamma module usage is different with before soc,
gamma odd(index start from 0) lut value set to hardware
register should be
the difference of current lut value with last lut value.
for example, chrome os user space set lut
like this(only r chanel for example):
2 4 6 8 10 12.
1) mt8183 gamma driver should set the gamma lut to hardware
register like this:
2 [2] 6 [2] 10 [2]
the value with [] is the difference value
2)gamma hardware process display data with original lut
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220428085829.15855-2-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com/
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
|
|
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c:42: warning: Function parameter or member 'clk' not described in 'mtk_disp_gamma'
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c:42: warning: Function parameter or member 'regs' not described in 'mtk_disp_gamma'
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c:42: warning: Function parameter or member 'cmdq_reg' not described in 'mtk_disp_gamma'
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_gamma.c:42: warning: Function parameter or member 'data' not described in 'mtk_disp_gamma'
Cc: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602143300.2330146-3-lee.jones@linaro.org
|
|
1. Add ovl private data
2. Add rdma private data
3. Add gamma privte data
4. Add main and external path module for crtc create
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
|
|
Not all SoC has dither function in gamma module.
Add private data to control this function setting.
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
|
|
mt8183 gamma module will different with mt8173,
so separate gamma for adding private data.
Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
|
