summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-01-06drm/i915: Merge i915_request.flags with i915_request.fence.flagsChris Wilson
As we already have a flags field buried within i915_request, reuse it! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-06drm/i915/selftests: Impose a timeout for request submissionChris Wilson
Avoid spinning indefinitely waiting for the request to be submitted, and instead apply a timeout. A secondary benefit is that the error message will show which suspect is blocked. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-03drm/i915/gt: Clear LRC image inlineChris Wilson
When creating the initial LRC image, we also want to clear the MI_NOOPs and register values. Rather than use a blanket memset beforehand, apply the clears inline, close the context image and force inhibition of the uninitialised reminder. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-03drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image stateChris Wilson
Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if the engine samples beyond our defined region, will fail to start. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-21drm/i915: Remove i915->kernel_contextChris Wilson
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate address space (for our own protection). Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use. GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context the execution environment on the GPU. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-20drm/i915: Drop GEM context as a direct link from i915_requestChris Wilson
Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to client interfaces and self-contained. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-25drm/i915: Serialise with engine-pm around requests on the kernel_contextChris Wilson
As the engine->kernel_context is used within the engine-pm barrier, we have to be careful when emitting requests outside of the barrier, as the strict timeline locking rules do not apply. Instead, we must ensure the engine_park() cannot be entered as we build the request, which is simplest by taking an explicit engine-pm wakeref around the request construction. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-22drm/i915/selftests: Force bonded submission to overlapChris Wilson
Bonded request submission is designed to allow requests to execute in parallel as laid out by the user. If the master request is already finished before its bonded pair is submitted, the pair were not destined to run in parallel and we lose the information about the master engine to dictate selection of the secondary. If the second request was required to be run on a particular engine in a virtual set, that should have been specified, rather than left to the whims of a random unconnected requests! In the selftest, I made the mistake of not ensuring the master would overlap with its bonded pairs, meaning that it could indeed complete before we submitted the bonds. Those bonds were then free to select any available engine in their virtual set, and not the one expected by the test. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191122112152.660743-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-21drm/i915/selftests: Always hold a reference on a waited upon requestChris Wilson
Whenever we wait on a request, make sure we actually hold a reference to it and that it cannot be retired/freed on another CPU! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121071044.97798-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-15drm/i915/selftests: Exercise long preemption chainsChris Wilson
Verify that we can execute a long chain of dependent requests from userspace, each one slightly more important than the last. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191114225736.616885-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-02drm/i915/execlists: Verify context register state before executionChris Wilson
Check that the context's ring register state still matches our expectations prior to execution. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191102125739.24626-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-11-01drm/i915/selftests: Start kthreads before stoppingChris Wilson
An interesting observation made with our parallel selftests was that on our small/single cpu systems we would call kthread_stop() before the kthreads were spawned. If this happens, the kthread is never run at all; completely bypassing the test. A simple yield() from the parent will ensure that all children have the opportunity to start before we reap them. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101084940.31838-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-29drm/i915/gt: Make timeslice duration configurableChris Wilson
Execlists uses a scheduling quantum (a timeslice) to alternate execution between ready-to-run contexts of equal priority. This ensures that all users (though only if they of equal importance) have the opportunity to run and prevents livelocks where contexts may have implicit ordering due to userspace semaphores. However, not all workloads necessarily benefit from timeslicing and in the extreme some sysadmin may want to disable or reduce the timeslicing granularity. The timeslicing mechanism can be compiled out^W^W disabled (but should DCE!) with ./scripts/config --set-val DRM_I915_TIMESLICE_DURATION 0 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191029091632.26281-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-28drm/i915/selftests: Check a few more fixed locations within the context imageChris Wilson
As we use hard coded offsets for a few locations within the context image, include those in the selftests to assert that they are valid. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191028121803.29408-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-26drm/i915/tgl: Adjust the location of RING_MI_MODE in the context imageChris Wilson
The location of RING_MI_MODE (used to stop the ring across resets) moved for Tigerlake. Fixup the new location and include a selftest to verify the location in the default context image. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191026082220.32632-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-23drm/i915/execlists: Cancel banned contexts on schedule-outChris Wilson
On schedule-out (CS completion) of a banned context, scrub the context image so that we do not replay the active payload. The intent is that we skip banned payloads on request submission so that the timeline advancement continues on in the background. However, if we are returning to a preempted request, i915_request_skip() is ineffective and instead we need to patch up the context image so that it continues from the start of the next request. v2: Fixup cancellation so that we only scrub the payload of the active request and do not short-circuit the breadcrumbs (which might cause other contexts to execute out of order). v3: Grammar pass Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023133108.21401-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-23drm/i915/execlists: Force preemptionChris Wilson
If the preempted context takes too long to relinquish control, e.g. it is stuck inside a shader with arbitration disabled, evict that context with an engine reset. This ensures that preemptions are reasonably responsive, providing a tighter QoS for the more important context at the cost of flagging unresponsive contexts more frequently (i.e. instead of using an ~10s hangcheck, we now evict at ~100ms). The challenge of lies in picking a timeout that can be reasonably serviced by HW for typical workloads, balancing the existing clients against the needs for responsiveness. Note that coupled with timeslicing, this will lead to rapid GPU "hang" detection with multiple active contexts vying for GPU time. The forced preemption mechanism can be compiled out with ./scripts/config --set-val DRM_I915_PREEMPT_TIMEOUT 0 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191023133108.21401-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-22drm/i915: Drop assertion that ce->pin_mutex guards state updatesChris Wilson
The actual conditions are that we know the GPU is not accessing the context, and we hold a pin on the context image to allow CPU access. We used a fake lock on ce->pin_mutex so that we could try and use lockdep to assert that access is serialised, but the various different hardirq/softirq contexts where we need to *fake* holding the pin_mutex are causing more trouble. Still it would be nice if we did have a way to reassure ourselves that the direct update to the context image is serialised with GPU execution. In the meantime, stop lockdep complaining about false irq inversions. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111923 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022122845.25038-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-18drm/i915/execlists: Don't merely skip submission if maybe timeslicingChris Wilson
Normally, we try and skip submission if ELSP[1] is filled. However, we may desire to enable timeslicing due to the queue priority, even if ELSP[1] itself does not require timeslicing. That is the queue is equal priority to ELSP[0] and higher priority then ELSP[1]. Previously, we would wait until the context switch to preempt the current ELSP[1], but with timeslicing, we want to preempt ELSP[0] and replace it with the queue. In writing the test case, it become quickly apparent that we were also suppressing the tasklet during promotion and so failing to notice when the queue started requiring timeslicing. Fixes: 2229adc81380 ("drm/i915/execlist: Trim immediate timeslice expiry") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191018072027.31948-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-18drm/i915: Pass in intel_gt at some for_each_engine sitesTvrtko Ursulin
Where the function, or code segment, operates on intel_gt, we need to start passing it instead of i915 to for_each_engine(_masked). This is another partial step in migration of i915->engines[] to gt->engines[]. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191017094500.21831-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2019-10-16drm/i915/selftests: Teach execlists to take intel_gt as its argumentChris Wilson
The execlists selftests are hardware centric and so want to use the gt as its target. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191016120249.22714-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-16drm/i915/selftests: Drop stale struct_mutexChris Wilson
A lately added test was missed when applying the struct_mutex removal patches. Do so now. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015085911.10317-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-14drm/i915/selftests: Check that GPR are cleared for new contextsChris Wilson
We want the general purpose registers to be clear in all new contexts so that we can be confident that no information is leaked from one to the next. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014090757.32111-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-14drm/i915/selftests: Check known register values within the contextChris Wilson
Check the logical ring context by asserting that the registers hold expected start during execution. (It's a bit chicken-and-egg for how could we manage to execute our request if the registers were not being updated. Still, it's nice to verify that the HW is working as expected.) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014090757.32111-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-10drm/i915/selftests: Check that registers are preserved between virtual enginesChris Wilson
Make sure that we copy across the registers from one engine to the next, as we hop around a virtual engine. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191010110252.17289-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-07drm/i915/selftests: Appease lockdepChris Wilson
Disable irqs around updating the context image to keep lockdep happy: <4>[ 673.483340] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected <4>[ 673.483342] 5.4.0-rc1-CI-Trybot_5118+ #1 Tainted: G U <4>[ 673.483342] -------------------------------------------------------- <4>[ 673.483343] swapper/2/0 just changed the state of lock: <4>[ 673.483344] ffff88845db885a0 (&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1){-...}, at: __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.483387] but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the past: <4>[ 673.483388] (&ce->pin_mutex/2){+...} <4>[ 673.483389] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. <4>[ 673.483390] other info that might help us debug this: <4>[ 673.483390] Chain exists of: &i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1 --> &engine->active.lock --> &ce->pin_mutex/2 <4>[ 673.483392] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: <4>[ 673.483392] CPU0 CPU1 <4>[ 673.483393] ---- ---- <4>[ 673.483393] lock(&ce->pin_mutex/2); <4>[ 673.483394] local_irq_disable(); <4>[ 673.483395] lock(&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1); <4>[ 673.483396] lock(&engine->active.lock); <4>[ 673.483396] <Interrupt> <4>[ 673.483397] lock(&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1); <4>[ 673.483398] *** DEADLOCK *** <4>[ 673.483398] 2 locks held by swapper/2/0: <4>[ 673.483399] #0: ffff8883f61ac9b0 (&(&gt->irq_lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: gen11_gt_irq_handler+0x42/0x280 [i915] <4>[ 673.483433] #1: ffff88845db8c418 (&(&rq->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x34a/0x5a0 [i915] <4>[ 673.483463] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: <4>[ 673.483466] -> (&ce->pin_mutex/2){+...} ops: 614520 { <4>[ 673.483468] HARDIRQ-ON-W at: <4>[ 673.483471] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.483501] live_unlite_restore+0x1d8/0x6c0 [i915] <4>[ 673.483543] __i915_subtests+0xb8/0x210 [i915] <4>[ 673.483581] __run_selftests+0x112/0x170 [i915] <4>[ 673.483615] i915_live_selftests+0x2c/0x60 [i915] <4>[ 673.483644] i915_pci_probe+0x93/0x1b0 [i915] <4>[ 673.483646] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120 <4>[ 673.483648] really_probe+0xea/0x420 <4>[ 673.483649] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120 <4>[ 673.483651] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50 <4>[ 673.483652] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4>[ 673.483653] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4>[ 673.483654] bus_add_driver+0x142/0x220 <4>[ 673.483655] driver_register+0x56/0xf0 <4>[ 673.483657] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4>[ 673.483659] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f8 <4>[ 673.483660] load_module+0x243e/0x29f0 <4>[ 673.483661] __do_sys_finit_module+0xe9/0x110 <4>[ 673.483662] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 673.483665] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 673.483665] INITIAL USE at: <4>[ 673.483667] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.483698] live_unlite_restore+0x1d8/0x6c0 [i915] <4>[ 673.483733] __i915_subtests+0xb8/0x210 [i915] <4>[ 673.483764] __run_selftests+0x112/0x170 [i915] <4>[ 673.483793] i915_live_selftests+0x2c/0x60 [i915] <4>[ 673.483821] i915_pci_probe+0x93/0x1b0 [i915] <4>[ 673.483822] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120 <4>[ 673.483824] really_probe+0xea/0x420 <4>[ 673.483825] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120 <4>[ 673.483826] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50 <4>[ 673.483827] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4>[ 673.483828] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4>[ 673.483829] bus_add_driver+0x142/0x220 <4>[ 673.483830] driver_register+0x56/0xf0 <4>[ 673.483831] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4>[ 673.483833] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f8 <4>[ 673.483834] load_module+0x243e/0x29f0 <4>[ 673.483835] __do_sys_finit_module+0xe9/0x110 <4>[ 673.483836] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 673.483837] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 673.483838] } <4>[ 673.483868] ... key at: [<ffffffffa0a8f132>] __key.70113+0x2/0xffffffffffef2ed0 [i915] <4>[ 673.483869] ... acquired at: <4>[ 673.483935] __execlists_reset+0xfb/0xc20 [i915] <4>[ 673.483965] execlists_reset+0x3d/0x50 [i915] <4>[ 673.483995] intel_engine_reset+0xdf/0x230 [i915] <4>[ 673.484022] live_preempt_hang+0x1d7/0x2e0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484064] __i915_subtests+0xb8/0x210 [i915] <4>[ 673.484130] __run_selftests+0x112/0x170 [i915] <4>[ 673.484163] i915_live_selftests+0x2c/0x60 [i915] <4>[ 673.484193] i915_pci_probe+0x93/0x1b0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484194] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120 <4>[ 673.484195] really_probe+0xea/0x420 <4>[ 673.484196] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120 <4>[ 673.484197] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50 <4>[ 673.484198] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4>[ 673.484199] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4>[ 673.484200] bus_add_driver+0x142/0x220 <4>[ 673.484202] driver_register+0x56/0xf0 <4>[ 673.484203] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4>[ 673.484204] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f8 <4>[ 673.484205] load_module+0x243e/0x29f0 <4>[ 673.484206] __do_sys_finit_module+0xe9/0x110 <4>[ 673.484207] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 673.484208] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 673.484209] -> (&engine->active.lock){..-.} ops: 972791 { <4>[ 673.484211] IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: <4>[ 673.484213] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484214] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x33/0x50 <4>[ 673.484244] execlists_submission_tasklet+0xaf/0x100 [i915] <4>[ 673.484246] tasklet_action_common.isra.18+0x6c/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484247] __do_softirq+0xdf/0x47f <4>[ 673.484248] irq_exit+0xba/0xc0 <4>[ 673.484249] do_IRQ+0x83/0x160 <4>[ 673.484250] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d <4>[ 673.484252] cpuidle_enter_state+0xb2/0x450 <4>[ 673.484253] cpuidle_enter+0x24/0x40 <4>[ 673.484254] do_idle+0x1e7/0x250 <4>[ 673.484256] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 <4>[ 673.484257] start_secondary+0x15f/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484258] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4>[ 673.484259] INITIAL USE at: <4>[ 673.484261] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484290] intel_engine_init_active+0x7e/0xb0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] intel_engines_setup+0x1cd/0x3b0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_gem_init+0x12d/0x900 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_driver_probe+0xb70/0x15d0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120 <4>[ 673.484305] really_probe+0xea/0x420 <4>[ 673.484305] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120 <4>[ 673.484305] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4>[ 673.484305] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4>[ 673.484305] bus_add_driver+0x142/0x220 <4>[ 673.484305] driver_register+0x56/0xf0 <4>[ 673.484305] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4>[ 673.484305] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f8 <4>[ 673.484305] load_module+0x243e/0x29f0 <4>[ 673.484305] __do_sys_finit_module+0xe9/0x110 <4>[ 673.484305] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 673.484305] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 673.484305] } <4>[ 673.484305] ... key at: [<ffffffffa0a8f160>] __key.70307+0x0/0xffffffffffef2ea0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] ... acquired at: <4>[ 673.484305] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x33/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] execlists_submit_request+0x2b/0x1e0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] submit_notify+0xa8/0x13c [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x81/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_sw_fence_wake+0x51/0x70 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1ee/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x1b/0x30 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] dma_fence_signal_locked+0x9e/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484305] dma_fence_signal+0x1f/0x40 <4>[ 673.484305] fence_work+0x28/0x80 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] process_one_work+0x26a/0x620 <4>[ 673.484305] worker_thread+0x37/0x380 <4>[ 673.484305] kthread+0x119/0x130 <4>[ 673.484305] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] -> (&i915_request_get(rq)->submit/1){-...} ops: 857694 { <4>[ 673.484305] IN-HARDIRQ-W at: <4>[ 673.484305] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484305] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested+0x39/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x3d0/0x5a0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] cs_irq_handler+0x39/0x50 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] gen11_gt_irq_handler+0x17b/0x280 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] gen11_irq_handler+0x54/0xf0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x41/0x2c0 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_edge_irq+0x99/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484305] do_IRQ+0x7e/0x160 <4>[ 673.484305] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d <4>[ 673.484305] cpuidle_enter_state+0xb2/0x450 <4>[ 673.484305] cpuidle_enter+0x24/0x40 <4>[ 673.484305] do_idle+0x1e7/0x250 <4>[ 673.484305] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 <4>[ 673.484305] start_secondary+0x15f/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484305] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4>[ 673.484305] INITIAL USE at: <4>[ 673.484305] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484305] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested+0x39/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __engine_park+0x233/0x420 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] ____intel_wakeref_put_last+0x1c/0x70 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] intel_gt_resume+0x202/0x2c0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_gem_init+0x36e/0x900 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_driver_probe+0xb70/0x15d0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] i915_pci_probe+0x43/0x1b0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] pci_device_probe+0x9e/0x120 <4>[ 673.484305] really_probe+0xea/0x420 <4>[ 673.484305] driver_probe_device+0x10b/0x120 <4>[ 673.484305] device_driver_attach+0x4a/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] __driver_attach+0x97/0x130 <4>[ 673.484305] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4>[ 673.484305] bus_add_driver+0x142/0x220 <4>[ 673.484305] driver_register+0x56/0xf0 <4>[ 673.484305] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2ff <4>[ 673.484305] do_init_module+0x56/0x1f8 <4>[ 673.484305] load_module+0x243e/0x29f0 <4>[ 673.484305] __do_sys_finit_module+0xe9/0x110 <4>[ 673.484305] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210 <4>[ 673.484305] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4>[ 673.484305] } <4>[ 673.484305] ... key at: [<ffffffffa0a8f6a1>] __key.80173+0x1/0xffffffffffef2960 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] ... acquired at: <4>[ 673.484305] mark_lock+0x382/0x500 <4>[ 673.484305] __lock_acquire+0x7e1/0x15d0 <4>[ 673.484305] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484305] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested+0x39/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x3d0/0x5a0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] cs_irq_handler+0x39/0x50 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] gen11_gt_irq_handler+0x17b/0x280 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] gen11_irq_handler+0x54/0xf0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x41/0x2c0 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_edge_irq+0x99/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484305] do_IRQ+0x7e/0x160 <4>[ 673.484305] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d <4>[ 673.484305] cpuidle_enter_state+0xb2/0x450 <4>[ 673.484305] cpuidle_enter+0x24/0x40 <4>[ 673.484305] do_idle+0x1e7/0x250 <4>[ 673.484305] cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 <4>[ 673.484305] start_secondary+0x15f/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484305] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 <4>[ 673.484305] stack backtrace: <4>[ 673.484305] CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Tainted: G U 5.4.0-rc1-CI-Trybot_5118+ #1 <4>[ 673.484305] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP TLC, BIOS ICLSFWR1.R00.3183.A00.1905020411 05/02/2019 <4>[ 673.484305] Call Trace: <4>[ 673.484305] <IRQ> <4>[ 673.484305] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b <4>[ 673.484305] check_usage_forwards+0x13c/0x150 <4>[ 673.484305] ? mark_lock+0x382/0x500 <4>[ 673.484305] mark_lock+0x382/0x500 <4>[ 673.484305] ? check_usage_backwards+0x140/0x140 <4>[ 673.484305] __lock_acquire+0x7e1/0x15d0 <4>[ 673.484305] ? debug_object_deactivate+0x17e/0x190 <4>[ 673.484305] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4>[ 673.484305] ? __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave_nested+0x39/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] ? __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x1b2/0x250 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x3d0/0x5a0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] cs_irq_handler+0x39/0x50 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] gen11_gt_irq_handler+0x17b/0x280 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] gen11_irq_handler+0x54/0xf0 [i915] <4>[ 673.484305] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x41/0x2c0 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x2b/0x70 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_irq_event+0x2f/0x50 <4>[ 673.484305] handle_edge_irq+0x99/0x1b0 <4>[ 673.484305] do_IRQ+0x7e/0x160 <4>[ 673.484305] common_interrupt+0xf/0xf <4>[ 673.484305] </IRQ> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004203121.31138-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915/selftests: Drop vestigal struct_mutex guardsChris Wilson
We no longer need struct_mutex to serialise request emission, so remove it from the gt selftests. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-20-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Move context management under GEMChris Wilson
Keep track of the GEM contexts underneath i915->gem.contexts and assign them their own lock for the purposes of list management. v2: Focus on lock tracking; ctx->vm is protected by ctx->mutex v3: Correct split with removal of logical HW ID Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Drop struct_mutex from around i915_retire_requests()Chris Wilson
We don't need to hold struct_mutex now for retiring requests, so drop it from i915_retire_requests() and i915_gem_wait_for_idle(), finally removing I915_WAIT_LOCKED for good. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-04drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutexChris Wilson
Forgo the struct_mutex serialisation for i915_active, and interpose its own mutex handling for active/retire. This is a multi-layered sleight-of-hand. First, we had to ensure that no active/retire callbacks accidentally inverted the mutex ordering rules, nor assumed that they were themselves serialised by struct_mutex. More challenging though, is the rule over updating elements of the active rbtree. Instead of the whole i915_active now being serialised by struct_mutex, allocations/rotations of the tree are serialised by the i915_active.mutex and individual nodes are serialised by the caller using the i915_timeline.mutex (we need to use nested spinlocks to interact with the dma_fence callback lists). The pain point here is that instead of a single mutex around execbuf, we now have to take a mutex for active tracker (one for each vma, context, etc) and a couple of spinlocks for each fence update. The improvement in fine grained locking allowing for multiple concurrent clients (eventually!) should be worth it in typical loads. v2: Add some comments that barely elucidate anything :( Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-10-03drm/i915/selftests: Exercise potential false lite-restoreChris Wilson
If execlists's lite-restore is based on the common GEM context tag rather than the per-intel_context LRCA, then a context switch between two intel_contexts on the same engine derived from the same GEM context will perform a lite-restore instead of a full context switch. We can exploit this by poisoning the ringbuffer of the first context and trying to trick a simple RING_TAIL update (i.e. lite-restore) v2: Also check what happens if preempt ce[0] with ce[1] (both instances on the same engine from the same parent context) [Tvrtko] Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191002183459.26614-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-27drm/i915: Pass intel_gt to has-reset?Chris Wilson
As we execute GPU resets on a gt/ basis, and use the intel_gt as the primary for all other reset functions, also use it for the has-reset? predicates. Gradually simplifying the churn of pointers. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190927211749.2181-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-24drm/i915/selftests: Verify the LRC register layout between init and HWChris Wilson
Before we submit the first context to HW, we need to construct a valid image of the register state. This layout is defined by the HW and should match the layout generated by HW when it saves the context image. Asserting that this should be equivalent should help avoid any undefined behaviour and verify that we haven't missed anything important! Of course, having insisted that the initial register state within the LRC should match that returned by HW, we need to ensure that it does. v2: Drop the RELATIVE_MMIO flag from gen11, we ignore it for constructing the lrc image. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190924145950.3011-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-20drm/i915: Mark i915_request.timeline as a volatile, rcu pointerChris Wilson
The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e. before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in a protected context, either during request construction or retirement, where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding the warnings about dangerous access. One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the timeline. v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of refactoring (i915_active_add_request) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-09-12drm/i915/selftests: Keep the engine awake while we keep for preemptionChris Wilson
Keep the engine awake to ensure that we don't inject any pm-idle requests. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190912122639.25224-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-19drm/i915: Serialize against vma movesChris Wilson
Make sure that when submitting requests, we always serialize against potential vma moves and clflushes. Time for a i915_request_await_vma() interface! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190819112033.30638-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-12drm/i915/selftests: Prevent the timeslice expiring during suppression testsChris Wilson
When testing whether we prevent suppressing preemption, it helps to avoid a time slice expiring prematurely. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812091045.29587-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-08drm/i915: Fix up the inverse mapping for default ctx->engines[]Chris Wilson
The order in which we store the engines inside default_engines() for the legacy ctx->engines[] has to match the legacy I915_EXEC_RING selector mapping in execbuf::user_map. If we present VCS2 as being the second instance of the video engine, legacy userspace calls that I915_EXEC_BSD2 and so we need to insert it into the second video slot. v2: Record the legacy mapping (hopefully we can remove this need in the future) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111328 Fixes: 2edda80db3d0 ("drm/i915: Rename engines to match their user interface") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> #v1 Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190808110612.23539-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-08-06drm/i915/gt: Move the [class][inst] lookup for engines onto the GTChris Wilson
To maintain a fast lookup from a GT centric irq handler, we want the engine lookup tables on the intel_gt. To avoid having multiple copies of the same multi-dimension lookup table, move the generic user engine lookup into an rbtree (for fast and flexible indexing). v2: Split uabi_instance cf uabi_class v3: Set uabi_class/uabi_instance after collating all engines to provide a stable uabi across parallel unordered construction. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> #v2 Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806124300.24945-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-31drm/i915/selftests: Pass intel_context to igt_spinnerChris Wilson
Teach igt_spinner to only use our internal structs, decoupling the interface from the GEM contexts. This makes it easier to avoid requiring ce->gem_context back references for kernel_context that may have them in future. v2: Lift engine lock to verify_wa() caller. v3: Less than v2, but more so Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731081126.9139-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-16drm/i915/execlists: Disable preemption under GVTChris Wilson
Preempt-to-busy uses a GPU semaphore to enforce an idle-barrier across preemption, but mediated gvt does not fully support semaphores. v2: Fiddle around with the flags and settle on using has-semaphores for the core bits so that we retain the ability to preempt our own semaphores. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Cc: Xiaolin Zhang <xiaolin.zhang@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190709091233.8573-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-15drm/i915/selftests: Ignore self-preemption suppression under gvtChris Wilson
GVT forces single port submission of individual requests. We do not enjoy the context amalgamation that the test depends upon for setting up the test (where port 0 has a large number of requests with a priority change somewhere in the middle). Under single request submission of gvt it is quite able for the preemption event to occur while another context is active and so there be a real need to act upon that preemption. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712082549.25053-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-12drm/i915/gt: Use intel_gt as the primary object for handling resetsChris Wilson
Having taken the first step in encapsulating the functionality by moving the related files under gt/, the next step is to start encapsulating by passing around the relevant structs rather than the global drm_i915_private. In this step, we pass intel_gt to intel_reset.c Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712192953.9187-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-09drm/i915: add infrastructure to hold off preemption on a requestLionel Landwerlin
We want to set this flag in the next commit on requests containing perf queries so that the result of the perf query can just be a delta of global counters, rather than doing post processing of the OA buffer. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [ickle: add basic selftest for nopreempt] Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190709164227.25859-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-09drm/i915/selftests: Fill in a little more of the dummy fenceChris Wilson
Initialise the dma_fence innards in preparation for making dma_fence_signal() always check the callback list. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190708113038.19251-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-07-03drm/i915/selftests: Common live setup/teardownChris Wilson
We frequently, but not frequently enough!, remember to flush residual operations and objects at the end of a live subtest. The purpose is to cleanup after every subtest, leaving a clean slate for the next subtest, and perform early detection of leaky state. As this should ideally be common for all live subtests, pull the task into a common teardown routine. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190703091726.11690-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-20drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicingChris Wilson
If we have multiple contexts of equal priority pending execution, activate a timer to demote the currently executing context in favour of the next in the queue when that timeslice expires. This enforces fairness between contexts (so long as they allow preemption -- forced preemption, in the future, will kick those who do not obey) and allows us to avoid userspace blocking forward progress with e.g. unbounded MI_SEMAPHORE_WAIT. For the starting point here, we use the jiffie as our timeslice so that we should be reasonably efficient wrt frequent CPU wakeups. Testcase: igt/gem_exec_scheduler/semaphore-resolve Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620142052.19311-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-19drm/i915: Stop passing I915_WAIT_LOCKED to i915_request_wait()Chris Wilson
Since commit eb8d0f5af4ec ("drm/i915: Remove GPU reset dependence on struct_mutex"), the I915_WAIT_LOCKED flags passed to i915_request_wait() has been defunct. Now go ahead and remove it from all callers. References: eb8d0f5af4ec ("drm/i915: Remove GPU reset dependence on struct_mutex") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190618074153.16055-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-06-14drm/i915: update rpm_get/put to use the rpm structureDaniele Ceraolo Spurio
The functions where internally already only using the structure, so we need to just flip the interface. v2: rebase Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190613232156.34940-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
2019-06-11drm/i915: Pull kref into i915_address_spaceChris Wilson
Make the kref common to both derived structs (i915_ggtt and i915_ppgtt) so that we can safely reference count an abstract ctx->vm address space. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190611091238.15808-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk