summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-02-08drm/i915: Remove lite restore definesMika Kuoppala
We have switched from tail manipulation to forced context restore to implement WaIdleLiteRestore. Remove the old defines and comments. Note: we still do emit the WA tail, and use it as our first attempt to avoid forcing a full-restore instead of a lite-restore, we just have a much stronger backup mechanism for repeated preemptions. References: f26a9e959a7b ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore") Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200203163312.15475-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
2020-02-07Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queuedRodrigo Vivi
Moving the base forward since this one was so old. New base contains fixes that we needed. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
2020-02-07drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAILChris Wilson
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted RING_TAIL, as it turns out that timeslicing was causing unexpected rewinds. <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851190us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: expired last=130:4698, prio=3, hint=3 <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851192us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 66:119966, current 119964 <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851195us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4698, current 4695 <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851198us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695 ^---- Note we unwind 2 requests from the same context <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851208us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695 <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851213us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 134:1508, current 1506 ^---- But to apply the new timeslice, we have to replay the first request before the new client can start -- the unexpected RING_TAIL rewind <idle>-0 0d.s2 1280851219us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { 130:4696*, 134:1508 } synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851239us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=5, tail=0 synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851240us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[0]: status=0x00008002:0x00000000 ^---- Preemption event for the ELSP update; note the lite-restore synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851243us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempted { 130:4698, 66:119966 } synmark2-5425 2..s. 1280851246us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { 130:4696*, 134:1508 } synmark2-5425 2.... 1280851462us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4700, current 4695 synmark2-5425 2.... 1280852111us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4702, current 4695 synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852296us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=0, tail=2 synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852297us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[1]: status=0x00000814:0x00000000 synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852299us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 130:4696!, 134:1508 } synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852301us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[2]: status=0x00000818:0x00000040 synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852302us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 134:1508, 0:0 } synmark2-5425 2.Ns1 1280852313us : process_csb: process_csb:2336 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(*execlists->active) && !reset_in_progress(execlists)) Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing") Referenecs: 82c69bf58650 ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207211452.2860634-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-07drm/i915/gt: Protect execlists_hold/unhold from new waitersChris Wilson
As we may add new waiters to a request as it is being run, we need to mark the list iteration as being safe for concurrent addition. v2: Mika spotted that we used the same trick for signalers_list, so warn the compiler about the lockless walk there as well. Fixes: 32ff621fd744 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207110213.2734386-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-07drm/i915/gt: Protect defer_request() from new waitersChris Wilson
Mika spotted <4>[17436.705441] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI <4>[17436.705447] CPU: 2 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/2 Not tainted 5.5.0+ #1 <4>[17436.705449] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/Z170M-PLUS, BIOS 3805 05/16/2018 <4>[17436.705512] RIP: 0010:__execlists_submission_tasklet+0xc4d/0x16e0 [i915] <4>[17436.705516] Code: c5 4c 8d 60 e0 75 17 e9 8c 07 00 00 49 8b 44 24 20 49 39 c5 4c 8d 60 e0 0f 84 7a 07 00 00 49 8b 5c 24 08 49 8b 87 80 00 00 00 <48> 39 83 d8 fe ff ff 75 d9 48 8b 83 88 fe ff ff a8 01 0f 84 b6 05 <4>[17436.705518] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000012ce80 EFLAGS: 00010083 <4>[17436.705521] RAX: ffff88822ae42000 RBX: 5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a RCX: dead000000000122 <4>[17436.705523] RDX: ffff88822ae42588 RSI: ffff8881e32a7908 RDI: ffff8881c429fd48 <4>[17436.705525] RBP: ffffc9000012cf00 R08: ffff88822ae42588 R09: 00000000fffffffe <4>[17436.705527] R10: ffff8881c429fb80 R11: 00000000a677cf08 R12: ffff8881c42a0aa8 <4>[17436.705529] R13: ffff8881c429fd38 R14: ffff88822ae42588 R15: ffff8881c429fb80 <4>[17436.705532] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88822ed00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4>[17436.705534] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4>[17436.705536] CR2: 00007f858c76d000 CR3: 0000000005610003 CR4: 00000000003606e0 <4>[17436.705538] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 <4>[17436.705540] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 <4>[17436.705542] Call Trace: <4>[17436.705545] <IRQ> <4>[17436.705603] execlists_submission_tasklet+0xc0/0x130 [i915] which is us consuming a partially initialised new waiter in defer_requests(). We can prevent this by initialising the i915_dependency prior to making it visible, and since we are using a concurrent list_add/iterator mark them up to the compiler. Fixes: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200206204915.2636606-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-31drm/i915: extract engine WA programming to common resume functionDaniele Ceraolo Spurio
The workarounds are a common "feature" across gens and submission mechanisms and we already call the other WA related functions from common engine ones (<setup/cleanup>_common), so it makes sense to do the same with WA application. Medium-term, This will help us reduce the duplication once the GuC resume function is added, but short term it will also allow us to use the workaround lists for pre-gen8 engine workarounds. Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200131075716.2212299-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-30drm/i915: Use the async worker to avoid reclaim tainting the ggtt->mutexChris Wilson
On Braswell and Broxton (also known as Valleyview and Apollolake), we need to serialise updates of the GGTT using the big stop_machine() hammer. This has the side effect of appearing to lockdep as a possible reclaim (since it uses the cpuhp mutex and that is tainted by per-cpu allocations). However, we want to use vm->mutex (including ggtt->mutex) from within the shrinker and so must avoid such possible taints. For this purpose, we introduced the asynchronous vma binding and we can apply it to the PIN_GLOBAL so long as take care to add the necessary waits for the worker afterwards. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/211 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130181710.2030251-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-30drm/i915/execlists: Ignore discrepancies in pending[] across resetsChris Wilson
When we reset the engine, we first remove the guilty request from the active list. If it so happens that there is a pending preemption event to process before we handle the reset, when we inspect that event we find ourselves a little confused as we have bent the rules slightly to perform the reset. Just ignore any discrepancies inside reset, we know we'll start again from scratch afterwards. <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6..s1 537441383us : execlists_reset: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: reset for CS error <0>[ 536.940213] i915_sel-7302 2d..1 537441386us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: submit { 10c59:2*, 10c5a:2 } <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6d.s2 537471320us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: fence 10c59:2, current 1 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6d.s2 537471321us : execlists_hold: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: fence 10c59:2, current 1 on hold <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537471328us : intel_engine_reset: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: flags=10 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537471421us : execlists_reset_prepare: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: depth<-1 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537471422us : intel_engine_stop_cs: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537472424us : intel_engine_stop_cs: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: timed out on STOP_RING -> IDLE <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537472429us : __intel_gt_reset: 0000:00:02.0 engine_mask=4 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6.Ns1 537472442us : execlists_reset_rewind: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472443us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: cs-irq head=4, tail=5 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472444us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: csb[5]: status=0x00008002:0x20000060 <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472464us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: preempted { 10c59:2*, 0:0 } <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472465us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: promote { 10c59:2*, 10c5a:2 } <0>[ 536.940213] <idle>-0 6dNs2 537472706us : assert_pending_valid: assert_pending_valid:1417 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq)) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200129165935.1266132-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-29drm/i915/gt: Hook up CS_MASTER_ERROR_INTERRUPTChris Wilson
Now that we have offline error capture and can reset an engine from inside an atomic context while also preserving the GPU state for post-mortem analysis, it is time to handle error interrupts thrown by the command parser. This provides a much, much faster mechanism for us to detect known problems than using heartbeats/hangchecks, and also provides a mechanism for when those are disabled. However, it is limited to problems the HW can detect in the CS and so not a complete solution for detecting lockups. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128204318.4182039-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-29drm/i915/execlist: Mark up racy read of execlists->pending[0]Chris Wilson
We write to execlists->pending[0] in process_csb() to acknowledge the completion of the ESLP update, outside of the main spinlock. When we check the current status of the previous submission in __execlists_submission_tasklet() we should therefore use READ_ONCE() to reflect and document the unsynchronized read. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128171614.3845825-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/i915/perf: Fix OA context id overlap with idle context idUmesh Nerlige Ramappa
Engine context pinned in perf OA was set to same context id as the idle context. Set the context id to an unused value. Clear the sw context id field in lrc descriptor before ORing with ce->tag (Chris) Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/756 Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200124013701.40609-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
2020-01-22drm/i915/execlists: Reclaim the hanging virtual requestChris Wilson
If we encounter a hang on a virtual engine, as we process the hang the request may already have been moved back to the virtual engine (we are processing the hang on the physical engine). We need to reclaim the request from the virtual engine so that the locking is consistent and local to the real engine on which we will hold the request for error state capturing. v2: Pull the reclamation into execlists_hold() and assert that cannot be called from outside of the reset (i.e. with the tasklet disabled). v3: Added selftest v4: Drop the reference owned by the virtual engine Fixes: 748317386afb ("drm/i915/execlists: Offline error capture") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/hang Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-22drm/i915/execlists: Take a reference while capturing the guilty requestChris Wilson
Thanks to preempt-to-busy, we leave the request on the HW as we submit the preemption request. This means that the request may complete at any moment as we process HW events, and in particular the request may be retired as we are planning to capture it for a preemption timeout. Be more careful while obtaining the request to capture after a preemption timeout, and check to see if it completed before we were able to put it on the on-hold list. If we do see it did complete just before we capture the request, proclaim the preemption-timeout a false positive and pardon the reset as we should hit an arbitration point momentarily and so be able to process the preemption. Note that even after we move the request to be on hold it may be retired (as the reset to stop the HW comes after), so we do require to hold our own reference as we work on the request for capture (and all of the peeking at state within the request needs to be carefully protected). Fixes: 32ff621fd744 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-20Backmerge v5.5-rc7 into drm-nextDave Airlie
msm needs 5.5-rc4, go to the latest. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
2020-01-16drm/i915/execlists: Offline error captureChris Wilson
Currently, we skip error capture upon forced preemption. We apply forced preemption when there is a higher priority request that should be running but is being blocked, and we skip inline error capture so that the preemption request is not further delayed by a user controlled capture -- extending the denial of service. However, preemption reset is also used for heartbeats and regular GPU hangs. By skipping the error capture, we remove the ability to debug GPU hangs. In order to capture the error without delaying the preemption request further, we can do an out-of-line capture by removing the guilty request from the execution queue and scheduling a worker to dump that request. When removing a request, we need to remove the entire context and all descendants from the execution queue, so that they do not jump past. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738 Fixes: 3a7a92aba8fb ("drm/i915/execlists: Force preemption") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-16drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requestsChris Wilson
In order to support out-of-line error capture, we need to remove the active request from HW and put it to one side while a worker compresses and stores all the details associated with that request. (As that compression may take an arbitrary user-controlled amount of time, we want to let the engine continue running on other workloads while the hanging request is dumped.) Not only do we need to remove the active request, but we also have to remove its context and all requests that were dependent on it (both in flight, queued and future submission). Finally once the capture is complete, we need to be able to resubmit the request and its dependents and allow them to execute. v2: Replace stack recursion with a simple list. v3: Check all the parents, not just the first, when searching for a stuck ancestor! References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-16drm/i915: Keep track of request among the scheduling listsChris Wilson
If we keep track of when the i915_request.sched.link is on the HW runlist, or in the priority queue we can simplify our interactions with the request (such as during rescheduling). This also simplifies the next patch where we introduce a new in-between list, for requests that are ready but neither on the run list or in the queue. v2: Update i915_sched_node.link explanation for current usage where it is a link on both the queue and on the runlists. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-16drm/i915/execlists: Leave resetting ring to intel_ringChris Wilson
We need to allow concurrent intel_context_unpin, which means avoiding doing destructive operations like intel_ring_reset(). This was already fixed for intel_ring_unpin() in commit 0725d9a31869 ("drm/i915/gt: Make intel_ring_unpin() safe for concurrent pint"), but I overlooked that execlists_context_unpin() also made the same mistake. Reported-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Fixes: 841350223816 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin") References: 0725d9a31869 ("drm/i915/gt: Make intel_ring_unpin() safe for concurrent pint") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200115175829.2761329-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-15drm/i915/gt: Use the BIT when checking the flags, not the indexChris Wilson
In converting over to using set_bit()/test_bit(), when manually inspecting the rq->fence.flags, we need to use BIT(). Fixes: e1c31fb5dde3 ("drm/i915: Merge i915_request.flags with i915_request.fence.flags") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200115122509.2673075-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-13Merge tag 'Intel-CVE-2019-14615' from bundle by Akeem Abodunrin.Linus Torvalds
Merge Intel Gen9 graphics fix from Akeem Abodunrin: "Insufficient control flow in certain data structures for some Intel Processors with Intel Processor Graphics may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access This provides mitigation for Gen9 hardware. Note that Gen8 is not impacted due to a previously implemented workaround. The mitigation involves using an existing hardware feature to forcibly clear down all EU state at each context switch" * tag 'Intel-CVE-2019-14615' of emailed bundle from Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com>: drm/i915/gen9: Clear residual context state on context switch
2020-01-13drm/i915/gt: Always reset the timeslice after a context switchChris Wilson
Currently, we reset the timer after a pre-eemption event. This has the side-effect that the timeslice runs into the second context after the first is completed after a normal promotion event, causing the second context to be swapped out early and switched for a third context. To be more fair, we want to reset the clock after promotion as well. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200113214546.1990139-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-09drm/i915/gen9: Clear residual context state on context switchAkeem G Abodunrin
Intel ID: PSIRT-TA-201910-001 CVEID: CVE-2019-14615 Intel GPU Hardware prior to Gen11 does not clear EU state during a context switch. This can result in information leakage between contexts. For Gen8 and Gen9, hardware provides a mechanism for fast cleardown of the EU state, by issuing a PIPE_CONTROL with bit 27 set. We can use this in a context batch buffer to explicitly cleardown the state on every context switch. As this workaround is already in place for gen8, we can borrow the code verbatim for Gen9. Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Akeem G Abodunrin <akeem.g.abodunrin@intel.com> Cc: Kumar Valsan Prathap <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com> Cc: Balestrieri Francesco <francesco.balestrieri@intel.com> Cc: Bloomfield Jon <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Cc: Dutt Sudeep <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>
2020-01-09drm/i915/gt: Pull context activation into central intel_context_pin()Chris Wilson
While this is encroaching on midlayer territory, having already made the state allocation a previous step in pinning, we can now pull the common intel_context_active_acquire() into intel_context_pin() itself. This is a prelude to make the activation a separate step inside pinning, outside of the ce->pin_mutex Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200109085717.873326-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-09drm/i915: Revert "drm/i915/tgl: Wa_1607138340"Tvrtko Ursulin
This reverts commit 08fff7aeddc9dd72161b4c8fc27fbab12b4b9352. For some yet unexplained reason not having this improves stability of some media workloads. Promise is that the media hang will be root caused properly and in the meantime absence of this workaround is unlikely to cause problems. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Francesco Balestrieri <francesco.balestrieri@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tony Ye <tony.ye@intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200108161954.29739-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2020-01-07drm/i915/gt: Always force restore freshly pinned contextsChris Wilson
It is highly unlikely, but still conceivable, that we submit a context with the same GGTT address as last active on the HW. In this case, with a matching LRCA, the HW would not restore the new context image causing a potential violation of our context isolation. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200107172842.3315449-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-07drm/i915/gt: Take responsibility for engine->release as the last stepChris Wilson
In order to avoid a double cleanup on error, take ownership of engine->release past the point of no [error] return. Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Fixes: e26b6d434147 ("drm/i915/gt: Pull GT initialisation under intel_gt_init()") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200107143118.3288995-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-07drm/i915/gt: Mark up virtual engine uabi_instanceChris Wilson
Be sure to initialise the uabi_instance on the virtual engine to the special invalid value, just in case we ever peek at it from the uAPI. Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Fixes: 750e76b4f9f6 ("drm/i915/gt: Move the [class][inst] lookup for engines onto the GT") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106123921.2543886-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit f75fc37b5e70b75f21550410f88e2379648120e2) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-01-06drm/i915/gt: Mark up virtual engine uabi_instanceChris Wilson
Be sure to initialise the uabi_instance on the virtual engine to the special invalid value, just in case we ever peek at it from the uAPI. Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Fixes: 750e76b4f9f6 ("drm/i915/gt: Move the [class][inst] lookup for engines onto the GT") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106123921.2543886-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-06drm/i915/gt: Use memset_p to clear the portsChris Wilson
Put memset_p to use to clear the array of pointers used for tracking the ELSP. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-06drm/i915: Merge i915_request.flags with i915_request.fence.flagsChris Wilson
As we already have a flags field buried within i915_request, reuse it! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-03drm/i915/gt: Always poison the kernel_context image before unparkingChris Wilson
Keep scrubbing the kernel_context image with poison before we reset it in order to demonstrate that we will be resilient in the case where it is accidentally overwritten on idle. Suggested-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-03drm/i915/gt: Ignore stale context state upon resumeChris Wilson
We leave the kernel_context on the HW as we suspend (and while idle). There is no guarantee that is complete in memory, so we try to inhibit restoration from the kernel_context. Reinforce the inhibition by scrubbing the context. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-03drm/i915/gt: Clear LRC image inlineChris Wilson
When creating the initial LRC image, we also want to clear the MI_NOOPs and register values. Rather than use a blanket memset beforehand, apply the clears inline, close the context image and force inhibition of the uninitialised reminder. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-03drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image stateChris Wilson
Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if the engine samples beyond our defined region, will fail to start. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102131707.1463945-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-30drm/i915/gt: Leave RING_BB_STATE to default valueChris Wilson
Do not reset RING_BB_STATE, leaving it to the default state value. This prevents bdw/bsw from getting confused when executing batches from the GGTT. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191230165821.3840449-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-30drm/i915/gt: Avoid using tag 0 for the very first submissionChris Wilson
Assume that the HW starts off with tag 0 "active" and so avoid using tag 0 for our own first ELSP submission. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191229183153.3719869-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-30drm/i915/gt: Ensure that all new contexts clear STOP_RINGChris Wilson
Set up the RING_MI_MODE in new contexts to clear the STOP_RING bit, just in case they find it still set after a reset (as they are the first contexts to be run). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191229183153.3719869-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-22drm/i915/gt: Merge engine init/setup loopsChris Wilson
Now that we don't need to create GEM contexts in the middle of engine construction, we can pull the engine init/setup loops together. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222144046.1674865-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-22drm/i915/gt: Pull GT initialisation under intel_gt_init()Chris Wilson
Begin pulling the GT setup underneath a single GT umbrella; let intel_gt take ownership of its engines! As hinted, the complication is the lifetime of the probed engine versus the active lifetime of the GT backends. We need to detect the engine layout early and keep it until the end so that we can sanitize state on takeover and release. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222120752.1368352-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-21drm/i915: Remove i915->kernel_contextChris Wilson
Allocate only an internal intel_context for the kernel_context, forgoing a global GEM context for internal use as we only require a separate address space (for our own protection). Now having weaned GT from requiring ce->gem_context, we can stop referencing it entirely. This also means we no longer have to create random and unnecessary GEM contexts for internal use. GEM contexts are now entirely for tracking GEM clients, and intel_context the execution environment on the GPU. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191221160324.1073045-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-20drm/i915/execlists: Select arb on/off around batches based on preemptionChris Wilson
Decide whether or not we need to disable arbitration within user batches based on our intel_engine_has_preemption() flag. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213151331.1788371-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-20drm/i915: Drop GEM context as a direct link from i915_requestChris Wilson
Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to client interfaces and self-contained. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-20drm/i915/gt: Teach veng to defer the context allocationChris Wilson
Since we added the context_alloc callback to intel_context_ops, we can safely install a custom hook for the deferred virtual context allocation. This means that all new contexts behave the same upon creation, simplifying later code. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191219232932.189197-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-19drm/i915/gt: Add breadcrumb retire to physical engineChris Wilson
Avoid adding the retire workers to the virtual engine so that we don't end up in the unenviable situation of trying to free the virtual engine while its worker remains active. Fixes: dc93c9b69315 ("drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement when signaler idles") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/867 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191219221344.161523-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-19drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement when signaler idlesChris Wilson
Very similar to commit 4f88f8747fa4 ("drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement when timeline idles"), but this time instead of coupling into the execlists CS event interrupt, we couple into the breadcrumb interrupt and queue a timeline's retirement when the last signaler is completed. This should allow us to more rapidly park ringbuffer submission, and so help reduce power consumption on older systems. v2: Fixup intel_engine_add_retire() to handle concurrent callers References: 4f88f8747fa4 ("drm/i915/gt: Schedule request retirement when timeline idles") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191219124353.8607-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-18drm/i915/gt: Remove direct invocation of breadcrumb signalingChris Wilson
Only signal the breadcrumbs from inside the irq_work, simplifying our interface and calling conventions. The micro-optimisation here is that by always using the irq_work interface, we know we are always inside an irq-off critical section for the breadcrumb signaling and can ellide save/restore of the irq flags. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217095642.3124521-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-13drm/i915: Introduce new macros for tracingVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota
New macros ENGINE_TRACE(), CE_TRACE(), RQ_TRACE() and GT_TRACE() are introduce to tag device name and engine name with contexts and requests tracing in i915. Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213155152.69182-2-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com
2019-12-10drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestoreChris Wilson
In order to avoid confusing the HW, we must never submit an empty ring during lite-restore, that is we should always advance the RING_TAIL before submitting to stay ahead of the RING_HEAD. Normally this is prevented by keeping a couple of spare NOPs in the request->wa_tail so that on resubmission we can advance the tail. This relies on the request only being resubmitted once, which is the normal condition as it is seen once for ELSP[1] and then later in ELSP[0]. On preemption, the requests are unwound and the tail reset back to the normal end point (as we know the request is incomplete and therefore its RING_HEAD is even earlier). However, if this w/a should fail we would try and resubmit the request with the RING_TAIL already set to the location of this request's wa_tail potentially causing a GPU hang. We can spot when we do try and incorrectly resubmit without advancing the RING_TAIL and spare any embarrassment by forcing the context restore. In the case of preempt-to-busy, we leave the requests running on the HW while we unwind. As the ring is still live, we cannot rewind our rq->tail without forcing a reload so leave it set to rq->wa_tail and only force a reload if we resubmit after a lite-restore. (Normally, the forced reload will be a part of the preemption event.) Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/673 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: stable@kernel.vger.org Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191209023215.3519970-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 82c69bf58650e644c61aa2bf5100b63a1070fd2f) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
2019-12-10drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestoreChris Wilson
In order to avoid confusing the HW, we must never submit an empty ring during lite-restore, that is we should always advance the RING_TAIL before submitting to stay ahead of the RING_HEAD. Normally this is prevented by keeping a couple of spare NOPs in the request->wa_tail so that on resubmission we can advance the tail. This relies on the request only being resubmitted once, which is the normal condition as it is seen once for ELSP[1] and then later in ELSP[0]. On preemption, the requests are unwound and the tail reset back to the normal end point (as we know the request is incomplete and therefore its RING_HEAD is even earlier). However, if this w/a should fail we would try and resubmit the request with the RING_TAIL already set to the location of this request's wa_tail potentially causing a GPU hang. We can spot when we do try and incorrectly resubmit without advancing the RING_TAIL and spare any embarrassment by forcing the context restore. In the case of preempt-to-busy, we leave the requests running on the HW while we unwind. As the ring is still live, we cannot rewind our rq->tail without forcing a reload so leave it set to rq->wa_tail and only force a reload if we resubmit after a lite-restore. (Normally, the forced reload will be a part of the preemption event.) Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/673 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: stable@kernel.vger.org Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191209023215.3519970-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-12-09drm/i915/gt: Save irqstate around virtual_context_destroyChris Wilson
As virtual_context_destroy() may be called from a request signal, it may be called from inside an irq-off section, and so we need to do a full save/restore of the irq state rather than blindly re-enable irqs upon unlocking. <4> [110.024262] WARNING: inconsistent lock state <4> [110.024277] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7489+ #1 Tainted: G U <4> [110.024292] -------------------------------- <4> [110.024305] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. <4> [110.024323] kworker/0:0/5 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: <4> [110.024338] ffff88826a0c7a18 (&(&rq->lock)->rlock){?.-.}, at: i915_request_retire+0x221/0x930 [i915] <4> [110.024592] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: <4> [110.024612] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0 <4> [110.024627] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x33/0x50 <4> [110.024788] intel_engine_breadcrumbs_irq+0x38c/0x600 [i915] <4> [110.024808] irq_work_run_list+0x49/0x70 <4> [110.024824] irq_work_run+0x26/0x50 <4> [110.024839] smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x44/0x1e0 <4> [110.024855] irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20 <4> [110.024871] __do_softirq+0xb7/0x47f <4> [110.024885] irq_exit+0xba/0xc0 <4> [110.024898] do_IRQ+0x83/0x160 <4> [110.024910] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d <4> [110.024922] irq event stamp: 172864 <4> [110.024938] hardirqs last enabled at (172863): [<ffffffff819ea214>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 <4> [110.024963] hardirqs last disabled at (172864): [<ffffffff819e9fba>] _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xa/0x40 <4> [110.024988] softirqs last enabled at (172812): [<ffffffff81c00385>] __do_softirq+0x385/0x47f <4> [110.025012] softirqs last disabled at (172797): [<ffffffff810b829a>] irq_exit+0xba/0xc0 <4> [110.025031] other info that might help us debug this: <4> [110.025049] Possible unsafe locking scenario: <4> [110.025065] CPU0 <4> [110.025075] ---- <4> [110.025084] lock(&(&rq->lock)->rlock); <4> [110.025099] <Interrupt> <4> [110.025109] lock(&(&rq->lock)->rlock); <4> [110.025124] *** DEADLOCK *** <4> [110.025144] 4 locks held by kworker/0:0/5: <4> [110.025156] #0: ffff88827588f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1de/0x620 <4> [110.025187] #1: ffffc9000006fe78 ((work_completion)(&engine->retire_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1de/0x620 <4> [110.025219] #2: ffff88825605e270 (&kernel#2){+.+.}, at: engine_retire+0x57/0xe0 [i915] <4> [110.025405] #3: ffff88826a0c7a18 (&(&rq->lock)->rlock){?.-.}, at: i915_request_retire+0x221/0x930 [i915] <4> [110.025634] stack backtrace: <4> [110.025653] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Tainted: G U 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7489+ #1 <4> [110.025675] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017 <4> [110.025856] Workqueue: events engine_retire [i915] <4> [110.025872] Call Trace: <4> [110.025891] dump_stack+0x71/0x9b <4> [110.025907] mark_lock+0x49a/0x500 <4> [110.025926] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x200/0x200 <4> [110.025946] mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 <4> [110.025962] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 <4> [110.025978] lockdep_hardirqs_on+0xa2/0x1c0 <4> [110.025995] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 <4> [110.026171] virtual_context_destroy+0xc5/0x2e0 [i915] <4> [110.026376] __active_retire+0xb4/0x290 [i915] <4> [110.026396] dma_fence_signal_locked+0x9e/0x1b0 <4> [110.026613] i915_request_retire+0x451/0x930 [i915] <4> [110.026766] retire_requests+0x4d/0x60 [i915] <4> [110.026919] engine_retire+0x63/0xe0 [i915] Fixes: b1e3177bd1d8 ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex") Fixes: 6d06779e8672 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205145934.663183-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit 6f7ac8285371fb0df58aba861eaab387f79ed04d) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>