| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Now that we don't include i915_drv.h via any headers from display, we
can reliably remove unnecessary i915_drv.h includes and be sure they're
not indirectly included. Add other includes where needed.
v2: Fix 32-bit build
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241217132147.2008057-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Going forward, struct intel_display shall replace struct
drm_i915_private as the main display device data pointer type. Convert
intel_hti.[ch] to struct intel_display.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240813164123.2674462-7-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Rather than embeddeding the display's device info within the main device
info structure, just provide a pointer to the display-specific
structure. This is in preparation for moving the display device info
definitions into the display code itself and for eventually allowing the
pointer to be assigned at runtime on platforms that use GMD_ID for
device identification.
In the future, this will also eventually allow the same display device
info structures to be used outside the current i915 code (e.g., from the
Xe driver).
v2:
- Move introduction of DISPLAY_INFO() to this patch. (Andrzej)
v3:
- Also use DISPLAY_INFO() in intel_display_reg_defs.h. (Andrzej)
- Use "{}" instead of "{ 0 }" for empty struct init. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230523195609.73627-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
|
|
If phy is PHY_NONE, the shift to register bits becomes negative. Check
and warn about this.
Reported-by: coverity-bot <keescook@chromium.org>
References: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202211180848.D39006C@keescook
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221122120948.3436180-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Move display hti/hdport related members under drm_i915_private display
sub-struct.
Prefer adding anonymous sub-structs even for single members that aren't
our own structs.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221109144209.3624739-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
The HTI or HDPORT handling is sprinkled around. Centralize to one place.
Add a note about how subtle the mapping from HDPORT_STATE register to
dpll mask actually is.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221109144209.3624739-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
