| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Use the standard [CONNECTOR:%d:%s] format in the DRRS debugs.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220310004802.16310-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Pass the fixed_mode as const to intel_drrs_init() since it's
not supposed to mutate the mode.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220310004802.16310-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Only seamless DRRS needs the frontbuffer tracking, so check for that.
Also use != consistently instead of randomly picking < as the comparison
operator.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220310004802.16310-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Make life simpler by always programming DP M2/N2 with a consistent
value. This will lets use do state readout+chec unconditionally.
I was first going to just set M2/N2=M1/N1 but then it occurred
to me that it might interfere with fastboot on account of BIOS
likely leaving the registers zeroed. So let's zero out the values
instead (except TU where a zero register value actually means '1').
Still not sure that's the best approach but lets go with it for
now.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-14-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the "can we do DRRS?" check into helper in order
to reduce the clutter in intel_drrs_compute_config().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Currently we allow DRRS on IVB PCH ports, but we're missing a
few programming steps meaning it is guaranteed to not work.
And on HSW DRRS is not supported on anything but port A ever
as only transcoder EDP has the M2/N2 registers (though I'm
not sure if HSW ever has eDP on any other port).
Starting from BDW all transcoders have the dynamically
reprogrammable M/N registers so DRRS could work on any
port.
Stop initializing DRRS on ports where it cannot possibly work.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Instead of passing in the whole crtc state let's pass in just
the bits of state we need. This will help with the DRRS code
which shouldn't really be accessing the atomic state stuff directly
as it gets called outside the normal atomic flows.
v2: Fix set_m1_n1 vs. set_m2_n2 fumble for i9xx (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious.
Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the
M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those
do not have the M2/N2 registers.
Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a
higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable()
later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also
why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2()
so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen
transcoder supports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
I want to make a clean split betwen the CPU vs. PCH transcoder
programming. To that end eliminate intel_dp_set_m_n() and just
call the individual CPU/PCH transcoder functions directly.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Split the drrs code that actually changes the refresh rate
(via PIPECONF or M/N values) to small helper functions that
only deal with the hardware details an nothing else. We'll
soon have a third way of doing this, and it's less confusing
when each difference method lives in its own funciton.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220127093303.17309-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Rename the gmch_* M/N members to data_* to match the register
definitions and thus make life a little less confusing.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220127093303.17309-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Frontbuffer rendering will be dropped for modern platforms but
before that we to prepare DRRS for it.
intel_drrs_flush and intel_drrs_invalidate will not be called
for platforms that will not support frontbuffer rendering so DRRS
needs another way to be notified about to page flips so it can change
between high and low refresh rates as needed.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210903221036.34770-3-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
Both functions are pretty much equal, with minor changes that can be
handled by a single parameter.
v3:
- not scheduling work from invalidate operations
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210903221036.34770-2-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
It started as a code style fix for the lines above 100 col but it
turned out to simplifications to intel_drrs_set_state().
Now it receives the desired refresh rate type, high or low.
v3:
- Fixed the mode refesh rate debug message
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210903221036.34770-1-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
We had a mix of intel_edp_drrs_*(), intel_dp_drrs_*() and
intel_dp_set_drrs_state(), so properly renaming all functions to
keep the same pattern.
While at it, also dropping intel_dp_set_drrs_state from the
documentation as it is a static function.
v3:
- dropping documentation style comment in static function
(intel_drrs_set_state)
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210827174253.51122-3-jose.souza@intel.com
|
|
intel_dp.c is a 5k lines monster, so moving DRRS out of it to reduce
some lines from it.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210827174253.51122-2-jose.souza@intel.com
|
