| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Extend the SCMI transport layer to support mailbox controllers that expose
communication channels that are unidirectional by nature.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404115026.2828149-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
When mailboxes are used as a transport it is possible to setup the SCMI
transport layer, depending on the underlying channels configuration, to use
one or two mailboxes, associated, respectively, to one or two, distinct,
shared memory areas: any other combination should be treated as invalid.
Add more strict checking of SCMI mailbox transport device node descriptors.
Fixes: 5c8a47a5a91d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307162324.891866-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Refactor channels initialization to use dedicated transport devices
instead of using devices borrowed from the SCMI drivers.
Initialize all channels, as described in the device tree, upfront during
SCMI core stack probe phase and free all of them, including the underlying
devices, when the SCMI core is removed.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
SCMI transport operation .chan_available determines in a transport
specific way if an SCMI channel is still available and to be configured.
Such information is derived by analyzing bits of device node in a
transport specific way, all it needs is a device node to operate up on,
not necessarily a full blown device.
Simplify the helper to receive in input a reference to a device_node
instead of a device carrying a pointer to such device_node.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221222185049.737625-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
SCMI transports based on shared memory, at start of transmissions, have
to wait for the shared Tx channel area to be eventually freed by the
SCMI platform before accessing the channel. In fact the channel is owned
by the SCMI platform until marked as free by the platform itself and,
as such, cannot be used by the agent until relinquished.
As a consequence a badly misbehaving SCMI platform firmware could lock
the channel indefinitely and make the kernel side SCMI stack loop
forever waiting for such channel to be freed, possibly hanging the
whole boot sequence.
Add a timeout to the existent Tx waiting spin-loop so that, when the
system ends up in this situation, the SCMI stack can at least bail-out,
nosily warn the user, and abort the transmission.
Reported-by: YaxiongTian <iambestgod@outlook.com>
Suggested-by: YaxiongTian <iambestgod@outlook.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221028140833.280091-3-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Add a new xfer parameter to mark_txdone transport operation which enables
the SCMI core to optionally pass back into the transport layer a reference
to the xfer descriptor that is being handled.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220195646.44498-9-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Add a new opaque void *priv parameter to scmi_rx_callback which can be
optionally provided by the transport layer when invoking scmi_rx_callback
and that will be passed back to the transport layer in xfer->priv.
This can be used by transports that needs to keep track of their specific
data structures together with the valid xfers.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803131024.40280-15-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
The shared memory node used for communication between the firmware and
the OS should be compatible with "arm,scmi-shmem". Add the check for the
same while parsing the node before fetching the memory regions.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210602073851.1005607-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>
Cc: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
scmi_mailbox is obtained from cinfo->transport_info and the first
call to mailbox_chan_free frees the channel and sets cinfo->transport_info
to NULL. Care is taken to check for non NULL smbox->chan but smbox can
itself be NULL. Fix it by checking for it without which, kernel crashes
with below NULL pointer dereference and eventually kernel panic.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 0000000000000038
Modules linked in: scmi_module(-)
Hardware name: ARM LTD ARM Juno Development Platform/ARM Juno
Development Platform, BIOS EDK II Sep 2 2020
pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
pc : mailbox_chan_free+0x2c/0x70 [scmi_module]
lr : idr_for_each+0x6c/0xf8
Call trace:
mailbox_chan_free+0x2c/0x70 [scmi_module]
idr_for_each+0x6c/0xf8
scmi_remove+0xa8/0xf0 [scmi_module]
platform_drv_remove+0x34/0x58
device_release_driver_internal+0x118/0x1f0
driver_detach+0x58/0xe8
bus_remove_driver+0x64/0xe0
driver_unregister+0x38/0x68
platform_driver_unregister+0x1c/0x28
scmi_driver_exit+0x38/0x44 [scmi_module]
---[ end trace 17bde19f50436de9 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: 0x1d0000 from 0xffff800010000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0x80000000
CPU features: 0x0240022,25806004
Memory Limit: none
---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception ]---
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200908112611.31515-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: 5c8a47a5a91d ("firmware: arm_scmi: Make scmi core independent of the transport type")
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
These are never modified, so make them const to allow the compiler to
put them in read-only memory.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200906230452.33410-4-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
SCMI transport operation .clear_notification() is indeed a generic method
to clear the channel in a transport dependent way, as such it could be a
useful helper also in other contexts.
Rename such method as .clear_channel(), renaming accordingly also its
already existent call-sites.
No functional change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420152315.21008-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Add common transport-layer methods to:
- fetch a notification instead of a response
- clear a pending notification
Add also all the needed support in mailbox/shmem transports.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200327143438.5382-4-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
The SCMI specification is fairly independent of the transport protocol,
which can be a simple mailbox (already implemented) or anything else.
The current Linux implementation however is very much dependent on the
mailbox transport layer.
This patch makes the SCMI core code (driver.c) independent of the
mailbox transport layer and moves all mailbox related code to a new
file: mailbox.c and all struct shared_mem related code to a new file:
shmem.c.
We can now implement more transport protocols to transport SCMI
messages.
The transport protocols just need to provide struct scmi_transport_ops,
with its version of the callbacks to enable exchange of SCMI messages.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8698a3cec199b8feab35c2339f02dc232bfd773b.1580448239.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
