| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Few commands provide the list of description partially and require
to be called consecutively until all the descriptors are fetched
completely. In such cases, we don't release the buffers and reuse
them for consecutive transmits.
However, currently we don't reset the Rx size which will be set as
per the response for the last transmit. This may result in incorrect
response size being interpretted as the firmware may repond with size
greater than the one set but we read only upto the size set by previous
response.
Let us reset the receive buffer size to max possible in such cases as
we don't know the exact size of the response.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201012141746.32575-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: b6f20ff8bd94 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol")
Reported-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
In preparation to enable building SCMI as a single module, let us move
the SCMI protocol registration call into the driver. This enables us
to also add unregistration of the SCMI protocols.
The main reason for this is to keep it simple instead of maintaining
it as separate modules and dealing with all possible initcall races
and deferred probe handling. We can move it as separate modules if
needed in future.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200907195046.56615-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
These are never modified, so make them const to allow the compiler to
put them in read-only memory.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200906230452.33410-4-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Kbuild test robot reports the following sparse warning:
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:142:21:
sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Use NULL pointer instead of integer 0 for rate pointer and fix the
warning.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200717140405.17905-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Instead of relying on the firmware to keep the clock rates sorted, let
us sort the list. This is not essential for clock layer but it helps
to find the min and max rates easily from the list.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200709081705.46084-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Fixes: 5f6c6430e904 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol")
Reported-and-tested-by: Dien Pham <dien.pham.ry@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
In order to avoid querying the individual protocol versions multiple
time with more that one device created for each protocol, we can simple
store the copy in the protocol specific private data and use them whenever
required.
Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Instead of type-casting the {tx,rx}.buf all over the place while
accessing them to read/write __le{32,64} from/to the firmware, let's
use the existing {get,put}_unaligned_le{32,64} accessors to hide all
the type cast ugliness.
Suggested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum
number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the
platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous
clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached.
Tracking the current count of pending asynchronous clock set rate
requests, we can decide if the incoming/new request for clock set rate
can be handled asynchronously or not until the maximum limit is
reached.
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
CLOCK_PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES provides attributes to indicate the maximum
number of pending asynchronous clock rate changes supported by the
platform. If it's non-zero, then we should be able to use asynchronous
clock rate set for any clocks until the maximum limit is reached.
In order to add that support, let's drop the config flag passed to
clk_ops->rate_set and handle the asynchronous requests dynamically.
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
The boolean rate_discrete needs to be assigned to clk->rate_discrete,
so that clock driver can distinguish between the continuous range and
discrete rates. It uses this in scmi_clk_round_rate could get the
rounded value if it's a continuous range.
Fixes: 5f6c6430e904 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol")
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
[sudeep.holla: updated commit message]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
Replace all the memcpy() for copying name strings from the firmware with
strlcpy() to make sure we are bounded by the source buffer size and we
also always have NULL-terminated strings.
This is needed to avoid out of bounds accesses if the firmware returns
a non-terminated string.
Reported-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux into next/drivers
SCMI cleanups for v4.18
This contains all of the trivial review comments that were not
addressed as the series was already queued up for v4.17 and were not
critical to go as fixes.
They generally just improve code readability, fix kernel-docs, remove
unused/unnecessary code, follow standard function naming and simplifies
certain exit paths.
* tag 'scmi-updates-4.18' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux:
firmware: arm_scmi: simplify exit path by returning on error
firmware: arm_scmi: improve exit paths and code readability
firmware: arm_scmi: remove unnecessary bitmap_zero
firmware: arm_scmi: drop unused `con_priv` structure member
firmware: arm_scmi: rename scmi_xfer_{init,get,put}
firmware: arm_scmi: rename get_transition_latency and add_opps_to_device
firmware: arm_scmi: fix kernel-docs documentation
firmware: arm_scmi: improve code readability using bitfield accessor macros
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
|
|
Just after the initial patches were queued, Jonathan Cameron mentioned
that scmi_one_xfer_{get_put} were not very clear and suggested to use
scmi_xfer_{alloc,free}. While I agree to some extent, the reason not to
have alloc/free as these are preallocated buffers and these functions
just returns a reference to free slot in that preallocated array.
However it was agreed to drop "_one" as it's implicit that we are always
dealing with one slot anyways.
This patch updates the name accordingly dropping "_one" in both {get,put}
functions. Also scmi_one_xfer_init is renamed as scmi_xfer_get_init to
reflect the fact that it gets the free slots and then initialise it.
Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
The null check on clk->name is redundant since name is a char array
and can never be null, so the check is always true. Remove it.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1466117 ("Array compared against 0")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
gcc-5.3 and earlier warns that rate_discrete maybe-uninitialized
../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:185:5: warning: 'rate_discrete'
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (rate_discrete)
^
../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:128:7: note:
'rate_discrete' was declared here
bool rate_discrete;
^
This patch fixing the warning by initialising rate_discrete and also using
goto label for the error path.
Fixes: 5f6c6430e904 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol")
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
[sudeep.holla: added one line description to the commit message]
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
|
The clock protocol is intended for management of clocks. It is used to
enable or disable clocks, and to set and get the clock rates. This
protocol provides commands to describe the protocol version, discover
various implementation specific attributes, describe a clock, enable
and disable a clock and get/set the rate of the clock synchronously or
asynchronously.
This patch adds initial support for the clock protocol.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
|
