summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_main.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-07-02tpm_tis_spi: Prefer async probeDouglas Anderson
On a Chromebook I'm working on I noticed a big (~1 second) delay during bootup where nothing was happening. Right around this big delay there were messages about the TPM: [ 2.311352] tpm_tis_spi spi0.0: TPM ready IRQ confirmed on attempt 2 [ 3.332790] tpm_tis_spi spi0.0: Cr50 firmware version: ... I put a few printouts in and saw that tpm_tis_spi_init() (specifically tpm_chip_register() in that function) was taking the lion's share of this time, though ~115 ms of the time was in cr50_print_fw_version(). Let's make a one-line change to prefer async probe for tpm_tis_spi. There's no reason we need to block other drivers from probing while we load. NOTES: * It's possible that other hardware runs through the init sequence faster than Cr50 and this isn't such a big problem for them. However, even if they are faster they are still doing _some_ transfers over a SPI bus so this should benefit everyone even if to a lesser extent. * It's possible that there are extra delays in the code that could be optimized out. I didn't dig since once I enabled async probe they no longer impacted me. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-07-02tpm_tis_spi: Don't send anything during flow controlDouglas Anderson
During flow control we are just reading from the TPM, yet our spi_xfer has the tx_buf and rx_buf both non-NULL which means we're requesting a full duplex transfer. SPI is always somewhat of a full duplex protocol anyway and in theory the other side shouldn't really be looking at what we're sending it during flow control, but it's still a bit ugly to be sending some "random" data when we shouldn't. The default tpm_tis_spi_flow_control() tries to address this by setting 'phy->iobuf[0] = 0'. This partially avoids the problem of sending "random" data, but since our tx_buf and rx_buf both point to the same place I believe there is the potential of us sending the TPM's previous byte back to it if we hit the retry loop. Another flow control implementation, cr50_spi_flow_control(), doesn't address this at all. Let's clean this up and just make the tx_buf NULL before we call flow_control(). Not only does this ensure that we're not sending any "random" bytes but it also possibly could make the SPI controller behave in a slightly more optimal way. NOTE: no actual observed problems are fixed by this patch--it's was just made based on code inspection. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-03-13tpm_tis_spi: use new 'delay' structure for SPI transfer delaysAlexandru Ardelean
In a recent change to the SPI subsystem [1], a new 'delay' struct was added to replace the 'delay_usecs'. This change replaces the current 'delay_usecs' with 'delay' for this driver. The 'spi_transfer_delay_exec()' function [in the SPI framework] makes sure that both 'delay_usecs' & 'delay' are used (in this order to preserve backwards compatibility). [1] commit bebcfd272df6485 ("spi: introduce `delay` field for `spi_transfer` + spi_transfer_delay_exec()") Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
2020-02-17tpm: Revert tpm_tis_spi_mod.ko to tpm_tis_spi.ko.Jarkko Sakkinen
Revert tpm_tis_spi_mod.ko back to tpm_tis_spi.ko as the rename could break user space scripts. This can be achieved by renaming tpm_tis_spi.c as tpm_tis_spi_main.c. Then tpm_tis_spi-y can be used inside the makefile. Cc: Andrey Pronin <apronin@chromium.org> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5.x Fixes: 797c0113c9a4 ("tpm: tpm_tis_spi: Support cr50 devices") Reported-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com> Tested-by: Alexander Steffen <Alexander.Steffen@infineon.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>