summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-07-27ACPI: property: Tie data nodes to acpi handlesSakari Ailus
ACPICA allows associating additional information (i.e. pointers with specific tag) to acpi_handles. The acpi_device's are associated to acpi_handle's in acpi_tie_acpi_dev() in scan.c, do the same here for the _DSD data nodes. This allows direct data node references in properties, implemented later on in the series. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-27ACPI: property: Return type of acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() should be boolSakari Ailus
The value acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() returns is bool so change the return type of the function to match that. Fixes: 445b0eb058f5 ("ACPI / property: Add support for data-only subnodes") Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-26ACPI: CPPC: Do not prevent CPPC from working in the futureRafael J. Wysocki
There is a problem with the current revision checks in is_cppc_supported() that they essentially prevent the CPPC support from working if a new _CPC package format revision being a proper superset of the v3 and only causing _CPC to return a package with more entries (while retaining the types and meaning of the entries defined by the v3) is introduced in the future and used by the platform firmware. In that case, as long as the number of entries in the _CPC return package is at least CPPC_V3_NUM_ENT, it should be perfectly fine to use the v3 support code and disregard the additional package entries added by the new package format revision. For this reason, drop is_cppc_supported() altogether, put the revision checks directly into acpi_cppc_processor_probe() so they are easier to follow and rework them to take the case mentioned above into account. Fixes: 4773e77cdc9b ("ACPI / CPPC: Add support for CPPC v3") Cc: 4.18+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.18+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-26ACPI: PM: x86: Print messages regarding LPS0 idle supportRafael J. Wysocki
Because suspend-to-idle is always supported and on x86 it is the only way to suspend the system if S3 is not supported by the platform, the kernel attempts to enter low-power S0 idle in the suspend-to-idle flow regardless of whether or not the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag is set in the FADT. However, if that flag is not set, residency counters associated with low-power S0 idle may not count and the platform may refuse to put the EC into a low-power mode, for example. For this reason, print diagnostic messages when the platform should achieve significant energy savings in low-power S0 idle (because the ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 flag is set in the FADT) and when suspend-to-idle becomes the default suspend method (because low-power S0 idle should be equally or more efficient than S3, if available). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
2022-07-22ACPI: PPTT: Leave the table mapped for the runtime usageSudeep Holla
Currently, everytime an information needs to be fetched from the PPTT, the table is mapped via acpi_get_table() and unmapped after the use via acpi_put_table() which is fine. However we do this at runtime especially when the CPU is hotplugged out and plugged in back since we re-populate the cache topology and other information. However, with the support to fetch LLC information from the PPTT in the cpuhotplug path which is executed in the atomic context, it is preferred to avoid mapping and unmapping of the PPTT for every single use as the acpi_get_table() might sleep waiting for a mutex. In order to avoid the same, the table is needs to just mapped once on the boot CPU and is never unmapped allowing it to be used at runtime with out the hassle of mapping and unmapping the table. Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> -- Hi Rafael, Sorry to bother you again on this PPTT changes. Guenter reported an issue with lockdep enabled in -next that include my cacheinfo/arch_topology changes to utilise LLC from PPTT in the CPU hotplug path. Please ack the change once you are happy so that I can get it merged with other fixes via Greg's tree. Regards, Sudeep Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220720-arch_topo_fixes-v3-2-43d696288e84@arm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-07-21ACPI: resource: skip IRQ override on AMD Zen platformsChuanhong Guo
IRQ override isn't needed on modern AMD Zen systems. There's an active low keyboard IRQ on AMD Ryzen 6000 and it will stay this way on newer platforms. This IRQ override breaks keyboards for almost all Ryzen 6000 laptops currently on the market. Skip this IRQ override for all AMD Zen platforms because this IRQ override is supposed to be a workaround for buggy ACPI DSDT and we can't have a long list of all future AMD CPUs/Laptops in the kernel code. If a device with buggy ACPI DSDT shows up, a separated list containing just them should be created. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216118 Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Tested-by: XiaoYan Li <lxy.lixiaoyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-20irqchip / ACPI: Introduce ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_LPIC for LoongArchJianmin Lv
For LoongArch, ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_LPIC is introduced, and then the callback acpi_get_gsi_domain_id and acpi_gsi_to_irq_fallback are implemented. The acpi_get_gsi_domain_id callback returns related fwnode handle of irqdomain for different GSI range. The acpi_gsi_to_irq_fallback will create new mapping for gsi when the mapping of it is not found. Signed-off-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1658314292-35346-14-git-send-email-lvjianmin@loongson.cn
2022-07-20ACPI: irq: Allow acpi_gsi_to_irq() to have an arch-specific fallbackMarc Zyngier
It appears that the generic version of acpi_gsi_to_irq() doesn't fallback to establishing a mapping if there is no pre-existing one while the x86 version does. While arm64 seems unaffected by it, LoongArch is relying on the x86 behaviour. In an effort to prevent new architectures from reinventing the proverbial wheel, provide an optional callback that the arch code can set to restore the x86 behaviour. Hopefully we can eventually get rid of this in the future once the expected behaviour has been clarified. Reported-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1658314292-35346-4-git-send-email-lvjianmin@loongson.cn
2022-07-20APCI: irq: Add support for multiple GSI domainsMarc Zyngier
In an unfortunate departure from the ACPI spec, the LoongArch architecture split its GSI space across multiple interrupt controllers. In order to be able to reuse the core code and prevent architectures from reinventing an already square wheel, offer the arch code the ability to register a dispatcher function that will return the domain fwnode for a given GSI. The ARM GIC drivers are updated to support this (with a single domain, as intended). Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@loongson.cn> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1658314292-35346-3-git-send-email-lvjianmin@loongson.cn
2022-07-18ACPI: CPPC: Don't require flexible address space if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is ↵Mario Limonciello
supported Commit 0651ab90e4ad ("ACPI: CPPC: Check _OSC for flexible address space") changed _CPC probing to require flexible address space to be negotiated for CPPC to work. However it was observed that this caused a regression for Arek's ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503QM which previously CPPC worked, but now it stopped working. To avoid causing a regression waive this failure when the CPU is known to support CPPC. Cc: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216248 Fixes: 0651ab90e4ad ("ACPI: CPPC: Check _OSC for flexible address space") Reported-and-tested-by: Arek Ruśniak <arek.rusi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-15ACPI: video: Use native backlight on Dell Inspiron N4010Hans de Goede
The Dell Inspiron N4010 does not have ACPI backlight control, so acpi_video_get_backlight_type()'s heuristics return vendor as the type to use. But the vendor interface is broken, where as the native (intel_backlight) works well, add a quirk to use native. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/CALF=6jEe5G8+r1Wo0vvz4GjNQQhdkLT5p8uCHn6ZXhg4nsOWow@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-and-tested-by: Ben Greening <bgreening@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-15ACPI: PM: s2idle: Use LPS0 idle if ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 is unsetRafael J. Wysocki
If the PNP0D80 device is present and its _DSM appears to be valid, there is no reason to avoid using it even if ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 is unset in the FADT, because suspend-to-idle may be the only way to suspend the system if S3 is not supported by the platform, so do not return early from lps0_device_attach() in that case. However, still check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 when deciding whether or not suspend-to-idle should be the default system suspend method. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
2022-07-15Revert "ACPI / PM: LPIT: Register sysfs attributes based on FADT"Rafael J. Wysocki
Revert commit 1cdda9486f51 ("ACPI / PM: LPIT: Register sysfs attributes based on FADT"), because what it did was more confusing than it would be to allow the sysfs attributes in question to be created regardless of whether or not the relevant flag was set in the FADT. If ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 is not set, it need not mean that LPIT is invalid and low-power S0 idle is not usable. It merely means that using S3 on the given system is more beneficial from the energy saving perspective than using low-power S0 idle. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
2022-07-15Merge tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v5.19-4' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86 Pull x86 platform driver fixes from Hans de Goede: "Highlights: - Fix brightness key events getting reported twice on some Dells. Regression caused by recent Panasonic hotkey fixes - Fix poweroff no longer working on some devices regression caused by recent poweroff handler rework - Mark new (in 5.19) Intel IFS driver as broken, because of some issues surrounding the userspace (sysfs) API which need to be cleared up - Some hardware-id / quirk additions" * tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v5.19-4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86: ACPI: video: Fix acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() platform/x86: intel_atomisp2_led: Also turn off the always-on camera LED on the Asus T100TAF platform/x86/intel/ifs: Mark as BROKEN platform/x86: asus-wmi: Add key mappings efi: Fix efi_power_off() not being run before acpi_power_off() when necessary platform/x86: x86-android-tablets: Fix Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 830/1050 poweroff again platform/x86: gigabyte-wmi: add support for B660I AORUS PRO DDR4 platform/x86/amd/pmc: Add new platform support platform/x86/amd/pmc: Add new acpi id for PMC controller
2022-07-15ACPI: utils: Add api to read _SUB from ACPIStefan Binding
Add a wrapper function to read the _SUB string from ACPI. Signed-off-by: Stefan Binding <sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220707151037.3901050-2-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
2022-07-14PCI: loongson: Add ACPI init supportHuacai Chen
Loongson PCH (LS7A chipset) will be used by both MIPS-based and LoongArch- based Loongson processors. MIPS-based Loongson uses FDT, while LoongArch- based Loongson uses ACPI. Add ACPI init support for the driver in pci-loongson.c because it is currently FDT-only. LoongArch is a new RISC ISA, mainline support will come soon, and documentations are here (in translation): https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220714124216.1489304-4-chenhuacai@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-07-14ACPI: video: Fix acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses()Hans de Goede
Commit 3a0cf7ab8df3 ("ACPI: video: Change how we determine if brightness key-presses are handled") made acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() report false when none of the ACPI Video Devices support backlight control. But it turns out that at least on a Dell Inspiron N4010 there is no ACPI backlight control, yet brightness hotkeys are still reported through the ACPI Video Bus; and since acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() now returns false, brightness keypresses are now reported twice. To fix this rename the has_backlight flag to may_report_brightness_keys and also set it the first time a brightness key press event is received. Depending on the delivery of the other ACPI (WMI) event vs the ACPI Video Bus event this means that the first brightness key press might still get reported twice, but all further keypresses will be filtered as before. Note that this relies on other drivers reporting brightness key events calling acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() when delivering the events (rather then once during driver probe). This is already required and documented in include/acpi/video.h: /* * Note: The value returned by acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() * may change over time and should not be cached. */ Fixes: 3a0cf7ab8df3 ("ACPI: video: Change how we determine if brightness key-presses are handled") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/regressions/CALF=6jEe5G8+r1Wo0vvz4GjNQQhdkLT5p8uCHn6ZXhg4nsOWow@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-and-tested-by: Ben Greening <bgreening@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220713211101.85547-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
2022-07-14ACPI: video: Shortening quirk list by identifying Clevo by board_name onlyWerner Sembach
Taking a recent change in the i8042 quirklist to this one: Clevo board_names are somewhat unique, and if not: The generic Board_-/Sys_Vendor string "Notebook" doesn't help much anyway. So identifying the devices just by the board_name helps keeping the list significantly shorter and might even hit more devices requiring the fix. Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com> Fixes: c844d22fe0c0 ("ACPI: video: Force backlight native for Clevo NL5xRU and NL5xNU") Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-14ACPI: video: Force backlight native for some TongFang devicesWerner Sembach
The TongFang PF5PU1G, PF4NU1F, PF5NU1G, and PF5LUXG/TUXEDO BA15 Gen10, Pulse 14/15 Gen1, and Pulse 15 Gen2 have the same problem as the Clevo NL5xRU and NL5xNU/TUXEDO Aura 15 Gen1 and Gen2: They have a working native and video interface. However the default detection mechanism first registers the video interface before unregistering it again and switching to the native interface during boot. This results in a dangling SBIOS request for backlight change for some reason, causing the backlight to switch to ~2% once per boot on the first power cord connect or disconnect event. Setting the native interface explicitly circumvents this buggy behaviour by avoiding the unregistering process. Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@tuxedocomputers.com> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-14PCI/ACPI: Guard ARM64-specific mcfg_quirksHuacai Chen
Guard ARM64-specific quirks with CONFIG_ARM64 to avoid build errors, since mcfg_quirks will be shared by more than one architectures. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220714124216.1489304-2-chenhuacai@loongson.cn Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
2022-07-06ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR info directlyShameer Kolothum
This will provide a way for SMMU drivers to retrieve StreamIDs associated with IORT RMR nodes and use that to set bypass settings for those IDs. Tested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Tested-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615101044.1972-6-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2022-07-06ACPI/IORT: Add support to retrieve IORT RMR reserved regionsShameer Kolothum
Parse through the IORT RMR nodes and populate the reserve region list corresponding to a given IOMMU and device(optional). Also, go through the ID mappings of the RMR node and retrieve all the SIDs associated with it. Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Tested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Tested-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615101044.1972-5-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2022-07-06ACPI/IORT: Provide a generic helper to retrieve reserve regionsShameer Kolothum
Currently IORT provides a helper to retrieve HW MSI reserve regions. Change this to a generic helper to retrieve any IORT related reserve regions. This will be useful when we add support for RMR nodes in subsequent patches. [Lorenzo: For ACPI IORT] Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Tested-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615101044.1972-4-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2022-07-06ACPI/IORT: Make iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions() return voidShameer Kolothum
At present iort_iommu_msi_get_resv_regions() returns the number of MSI reserved regions on success and there are no users for this. The reserved region list will get populated anyway for platforms that require the HW MSI region reservation. Hence, change the function to return void instead. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Tested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> Tested-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615101044.1972-3-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
2022-07-05context_tracking: Take idle eqs entrypoints over RCUFrederic Weisbecker
The RCU dynticks counter is going to be merged into the context tracking subsystem. Start with moving the idle extended quiescent states entrypoints to context tracking. For now those are dumb redirections to existing RCU calls. [ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@sony.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Cc: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com> Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Alex Belits <abelits@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com> Tested-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
2022-07-05ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add support for upcoming AMD uPEP HID AMDI008Shyam Sundar S K
New version of uPEP will have a separate ACPI id, add that to the support list. Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-05ACPI: CPPC: Don't require _OSC if X86_FEATURE_CPPC is supportedMario Limonciello
commit 72f2ecb7ece7 ("ACPI: bus: Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported") added support for claiming to support CPPC in _OSC on non-Intel platforms. This unfortunately caused a regression on a vartiety of AMD platforms in the field because a number of AMD platforms don't set the `_OSC` bit 5 or 6 to indicate CPPC or CPPC v2 support. As these AMD platforms already claim CPPC support via a dedicated MSR from `X86_FEATURE_CPPC`, use this enable this feature rather than requiring the `_OSC` on platforms with a dedicated MSR. If there is additional breakage on the shared memory designs also missing this _OSC, additional follow up changes may be needed. Fixes: 72f2ecb7ece7 ("Set CPPC _OSC bits for all and when CPPC_LIB is supported") Reported-by: Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-05ACPI: CPPC: Only probe for _CPC if CPPC v2 is ackedMario Limonciello
Previously the kernel used to ignore whether the firmware masked CPPC or CPPCv2 and would just pretend that it worked. When support for the USB4 bit in _OSC was introduced from commit 9e1f561afb ("ACPI: Execute platform _OSC also with query bit clear") the kernel began to look at the return when the query bit was clear. This caused regressions that were misdiagnosed and attempted to be solved as part of commit 2ca8e6285250 ("Revert "ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag""). This caused a different regression where non-Intel systems weren't able to negotiate _OSC properly. This was reverted in commit 2ca8e6285250 ("Revert "ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag"") and attempted to be fixed by commit c42fa24b4475 ("ACPI: bus: Avoid using CPPC if not supported by firmware") but the regression still returned. These systems with the regression only load support for CPPC from an SSDT dynamically when _OSC reports CPPC v2. Avoid the problem by not letting CPPC satisfy the requirement in `acpi_cppc_processor_probe`. Reported-by: CUI Hao <cuihao.leo@gmail.com> Reported-by: maxim.novozhilov@gmail.com Reported-by: lethe.tree@protonmail.com Reported-by: garystephenwright@gmail.com Reported-by: galaxyking0419@gmail.com Fixes: c42fa24b4475 ("ACPI: bus: Avoid using CPPC if not supported by firmware") Fixes: 2ca8e6285250 ("Revert "ACPI Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag"") Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213023 Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075387 Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: CUI Hao <cuihao.leo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-05ACPI: VIOT: Fix ACS setupEric Auger
Currently acpi_viot_init() gets called after the pci device has been scanned and pci_enable_acs() has been called. So pci_request_acs() fails to be taken into account leading to wrong single iommu group topologies when dealing with multi-function root ports for instance. We cannot simply move the acpi_viot_init() earlier, similarly as the IORT init because the VIOT parsing relies on the pci scan. However we can detect VIOT is present earlier and in such a case, request ACS. Introduce a new acpi_viot_early_init() routine that allows to call pci_request_acs() before the scan. While at it, guard the call to pci_request_acs() with #ifdef CONFIG_PCI. Fixes: 3cf485540e7b ("ACPI: Add driver for the VIOT table") Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Reported-by: Jin Liu <jinl@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Tested-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-04ACPI: Remove the unused find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology()Sudeep Holla
The sole user of this find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology() was arm64 topology which is now consolidated into the generic arch_topology without the need of this function. Drop the unused function find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704101605.1318280-22-sudeep.holla@arm.com Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Reported-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2022-07-04ACPI: PPTT: Use table offset as fw_token instead of virtual addressSudeep Holla
There is need to use the cache sharing information quite early during the boot before the secondary cores are up and running. The permanent memory map for all the ACPI tables(via acpi_permanent_mmap) is turned on in acpi_early_init() which is quite late for the above requirement. As a result there is possibility that the ACPI PPTT gets mapped to different virtual addresses. In such scenarios, using virtual address as fw_token before the acpi_permanent_mmap is enabled results in different fw_token for the same cache entity and hence wrong cache sharing information will be deduced based on the same. Instead of using virtual address, just use the table offset as the unique firmware token for the caches. The same offset is used as ACPI identifiers if the firmware has not set a valid one for other entries in the ACPI PPTT. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220704101605.1318280-2-sudeep.holla@arm.com Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2022-07-01ACPI: bus: Drop unused list heads from struct acpi_deviceRafael J. Wysocki
Drop the children and node list heads that have no more users from struct acpi_device and the code manipulating them from __acpi_device_add() and acpi_device_del(). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
2022-06-30ACPI: Move PRM config option under the main ACPI configSudeep Holla
Currently PRM(Platform Runtime Mechanism) config option is listed along with the main ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) option at the same level. On ARM64 platforms unlike x86, ACPI option is listed at the topmost level of configuration menu. It is rather very confusing to see PRM option also listed along with ACPI in the topmost level. Move the same under ACPI config option. No functional change, just changes the level of visibility of this option under the configuration menu. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2022-06-30ACPI: Enable Platform Runtime Mechanism(PRM) support on ARM64Sudeep Holla
There is interest to make use of PRM(Platform Runtime Mechanism) even on ARM64 ACPI platforms. Allow PRM to be enabled on ARM64 platforms. It will be enabled by default as on x86_64. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2022-06-30ACPI: PRM: Change handler_addr type to void pointerSudeep Holla
handler_addr is a virtual address passed to efi_call_virt_pointer. While x86 currently type cast it into the pointer in it's arch specific arch_efi_call_virt() implementation, ARM64 is restrictive for right reasons. Convert the handler_addr type from u64 to void pointer. Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2022-06-30ACPI: bus: Drop driver member of struct acpi_deviceUwe Kleine-König
struct acpi_device::driver tracks the same information as the driver member of struct acpi_device::dev. Fix all users of the former to use the latter and drop the redundant data from struct acpi_device. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-30ACPI: bus: Drop redundant check in acpi_device_remove()Uwe Kleine-König
A bus remove callback is only ever called by the device core with a bound driver. So there is no need to check if the driver is non-NULL. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> [ rjw: Added empty code line after if () ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: APEI: Fix _EINJ vs EFI_MEMORY_SPDan Williams
When a platform marks a memory range as "special purpose" it is not onlined as System RAM by default. However, it is still suitable for error injection. Add IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED to einj_error_inject() as a permissible memory type in the sanity checking of the arguments to _EINJ. Fixes: 262b45ae3ab4 ("x86/efi: EFI soft reservation to E820 enumeration") Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reported-by: Omar Avelar <omar.avelar@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: LPSS: Fix missing check in register_device_clock()huhai
register_device_clock() misses a check for platform_device_register_simple(). Add a check to fix it. Signed-off-by: huhai <huhai@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: APEI: Better fix to avoid spamming the console with old error logsTony Luck
The fix in commit 3f8dec116210 ("ACPI/APEI: Limit printable size of BERT table data") does not work as intended on systems where the BIOS has a fixed size block of memory for the BERT table, relying on s/w to quit when it finds a record with estatus->block_status == 0. On these systems all errors are suppressed because the check: if (region_len < ACPI_BERT_PRINT_MAX_LEN) always fails. New scheme skips individual CPER records that are too large, and also limits the total number of records that will be printed to 5. Fixes: 3f8dec116210 ("ACPI/APEI: Limit printable size of BERT table data") Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: PM: save NVS memory for Lenovo G40-45Manyi Li
[821d6f0359b0614792ab8e2fb93b503e25a65079] is to make machines produced from 2012 to now not saving NVS region to accelerate S3. But, Lenovo G40-45, a platform released in 2015, still needs NVS memory saving during S3. A quirk is introduced for this platform. Signed-off-by: Manyi Li <limanyi@uniontech.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: EC: Drop unused ident initializers from dmi_system_id tablesHans de Goede
Drop the unused const string ident initializers from the dmi_system_id tables to make the object size a bit smaller. While at it also use proper named struct-member initializers for the ec_dmi_table[]. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: EC: Re-use boot_ec when possible even when EC_FLAGS_TRUST_DSDT_GPE is setHans de Goede
EC_FLAGS_TRUST_DSDT_GPE only does anything when the: if (boot_ec && ec->command_addr == boot_ec->command_addr && ec->data_addr == boot_ec->data_addr) conditions are all true. Normally acpi_ec_add() would re-use the boot_ec struct acpi_ec in this case. But when the EC_FLAGS_TRUST_DSDT_GPE flag was set the code would continue with a newly allocated (second) struct acpi_ec. There is no reason to use a second struct acpi_ec if all the above checks match. Instead just change boot_ec->gpe to ec->gpe, when the flag is set, similar to how this is already one done for boot_ec->handle. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: EC: Drop the EC_FLAGS_IGNORE_DSDT_GPE quirkHans de Goede
It seems that these quirks are no longer necessary since commit 69b957c26b32 ("ACPI: EC: Fix possible issues related to EC initialization order"), which has fixed this in a generic manner. There are 3 commits adding DMI entries with this quirk (adding multiple DMI entries per commit). 2/3 commits are from before the generic fix. Which leaves commit 6306f0431914 ("ACPI: EC: Make more Asus laptops use ECDT _GPE"), which was committed way after the generic fix. But this was just due to slow upstreaming of it. This commit stems from Endless from 15 Aug 2017 (committed upstream 20 May 2021): https://github.com/endlessm/linux/pull/288 The current code should work fine without this: 1. The EC_FLAGS_IGNORE_DSDT_GPE flag is only checked in ec_parse_device(), like this: if (boot_ec && boot_ec_is_ecdt && EC_FLAGS_IGNORE_DSDT_GPE) { ec->gpe = boot_ec->gpe; } else { /* parse GPE */ } 2. ec_parse_device() is only called from acpi_ec_add() and acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() 3. acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() starts with: if (boot_ec) return; so it only calls ec_parse_device() when boot_ec == NULL, meaning that the quirk never triggers for this call. So only the call in acpi_ec_add() matters. 4. acpi_ec_add() does the following after the ec_parse_device() call: if (boot_ec && ec->command_addr == boot_ec->command_addr && ec->data_addr == boot_ec->data_addr && !EC_FLAGS_TRUST_DSDT_GPE) { /* * Trust PNP0C09 namespace location rather than * ECDT ID. But trust ECDT GPE rather than _GPE * because of ASUS quirks, so do not change * boot_ec->gpe to ec->gpe. */ boot_ec->handle = ec->handle; acpi_handle_debug(ec->handle, "duplicated.\n"); acpi_ec_free(ec); ec = boot_ec; } The quirk only matters if boot_ec != NULL and EC_FLAGS_TRUST_DSDT_GPE is never set at the same time as EC_FLAGS_IGNORE_DSDT_GPE. That means that if the addresses match we always enter this if block and then only the ec->handle part of the data stored in ec by ec_parse_device() is used and the rest is thrown away, after which ec is made to point to boot_ec, at which point ec->gpe == boot_ec->gpe, so the same result as with the quirk set, independent of the value of the quirk. Also note the comment in this block which indicates that the gpe result from ec_parse_device() is deliberately not taken to deal with buggy Asus laptops and all DMI quirks setting EC_FLAGS_IGNORE_DSDT_GPE are for Asus laptops. Based on the above I believe that unless on some quirked laptops the ECDT and DSDT EC addresses do not match we can drop the quirk. I've checked dmesg output to ensure the ECDT and DSDT EC addresses match for quirked models using https://linux-hardware.org hw-probe reports. I've been able to confirm that the addresses match for the following models this way: GL702VMK, X505BA, X505BP, X550VXK, X580VD. Whereas for the following models I could find any dmesg output: FX502VD, FX502VE, X542BA, X542BP. Note the models without dmesg all were submitted in patches with a batch of models and other models from the same batch checkout ok. This, combined with that all the code adding the quirks was written before the generic fix makes me believe that it is safe to remove this quirk now. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessos.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: EC: Remove duplicate ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th entry from DMI quirksHans de Goede
Somehow the "ThinkPad X1 Carbon 6th" entry ended up twice in the struct dmi_system_id acpi_ec_no_wakeup[] array. Remove one of the entries. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: processor: Split out thermal initialization from ACPI PSSRiwen Lu
Commit 239708a3af44 ("ACPI: Split out ACPI PSS from ACPI Processor driver"), moves processor thermal registration to acpi_pss_perf_init(), which doesn't get executed if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not enabled. As ARM64 supports P-states using CPPC, it should be possible to also support processor passive cooling even if PSS is not enabled. Split out the processor thermal cooling register from ACPI PSS to support this, and move it into a separate function in processor_thermal.c. Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> [ rjw: Subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-29ACPI: video: Drop X86 dependency from KconfigRiwen Lu
The ACPI video device is also present in ARM64 laptops, so drop the Kconfig dependency on X86 for ACPI_VIDEO. Signed-off-by: Riwen Lu <luriwen@kylinos.cn> [ rjw: Subject rewrite, changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-06-28ACPI: video: Change how we determine if brightness key-presses are handledHans de Goede
Some systems have an ACPI video bus but not ACPI video devices with backlight capability. On these devices brightness key-presses are (logically) not reported through the ACPI video bus. Change how acpi_video_handles_brightness_key_presses() determines if brightness key-presses are handled by the ACPI video driver to avoid vendor specific drivers/platform/x86 drivers filtering out their brightness key-presses even though they are the only ones reporting these presses. Fixes: ed83c9171829 ("platform/x86: panasonic-laptop: Resolve hotkey double trigger bug") Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Seyfried <seife+kernel@b1-systems.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Kenneth Chan <kenneth.t.chan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220624112340.10130-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
2022-06-23ACPI / MMC: PM: Unify fixing up device powerRafael J. Wysocki
Introduce acpi_device_fix_up_power_extended() for fixing up power of a device having an ACPI companion in a manner that takes the device's children into account and make the MMC code use it in two places instead of walking the list of the device ACPI companion's children directly. This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
2022-06-21ACPI: scan: Walk ACPI device's children using driver coreRafael J. Wysocki
Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly, use acpi_dev_for_each_child() or acpi_dev_for_each_child_reverse() to carry out an action for all of the given ACPI device's children. This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>