Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Impact: cleanup, avoid sparse warnings
declare bitfield as unsigned to avoid dubious bitfield issue
CHECK arch/x86/kernel/tlb_64.c
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:136:22: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:138:25: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:140:15: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:143:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:146:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:149:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:151:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:155:14: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:159:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:173:19: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:181:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:185:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:188:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
CHECK arch/x86/kernel/tlb_uv.c
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:136:22: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:138:25: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:140:15: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:143:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:146:14: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:149:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:151:18: warning: dubious bitfield without explicit `signed' or `unsigned'
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:155:14: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:159:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:173:19: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:181:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:185:18: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h:188:16: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
|
|
Drop double underscores from header guards in arch/x86/include. They
are used inconsistently, and are not necessary.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
|
|
Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since:
a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless.
b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
|