| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
After TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI got dropped, the only flag left is
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT. The flag indicates if the caller wants to see
tdx_hypercall_args updated based on the hypercall output.
Drop the flags and provide __tdx_hypercall_ret() that matches
TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT semantics.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230321003511.9469-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull Intel Trust Domain Extensions (TDX) updates from Dave Hansen:
"Other than a minor fixup, the content here is to ensure that TDX
guests never see virtualization exceptions (#VE's) that might be
induced by the untrusted VMM.
This is a highly desirable property. Without it, #VE exception
handling would fall somewhere between NMIs, machine checks and total
insanity. With it, #VE handling remains pretty mundane.
Summary:
- Fixup comment typo
- Prevent unexpected #VE's from:
- Hosts removing perfectly good guest mappings (SEPT_VE_DISABLE)
- Excessive #VE notifications (NOTIFY_ENABLES) which are delivered
via a #VE"
* tag 'x86_tdx_for_6.3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/tdx: Do not corrupt frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()
x86/tdx: Disable NOTIFY_ENABLES
x86/tdx: Relax SEPT_VE_DISABLE check for debug TD
x86/tdx: Use ReportFatalError to report missing SEPT_VE_DISABLE
x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments
x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments
x86/tdx: Add more registers to struct tdx_hypercall_args
x86/tdx: Fix typo in comment in __tdx_hypercall()
|
|
If compiled with CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y, objtool is not happy that
__tdx_hypercall() messes up RBP:
objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x7f: return with modified stack frame
Rework the function to store TDX_HCALL_ flags on stack instead of RBP.
[ dhansen: minor changelog tweaks ]
Fixes: c30c4b2555ba ("x86/tdx: Refactor __tdx_hypercall() to allow pass down more arguments")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301290255.buUBs99R-lkp@intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230130135354.27674-1-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
So far __tdx_hypercall() only handles six arguments for VMCALL.
Expanding it to six more register would allow to cover more use-cases
like ReportFatalError() and Hyper-V hypercalls.
With all preparations in place, the expansion is pretty straight
forward.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-5-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
RDI is the first argument to __tdx_hypercall() that used to pass pointer
to struct tdx_hypercall_args. RSI is the second argument that contains
flags, such as TDX_HCALL_HAS_OUTPUT and TDX_HCALL_ISSUE_STI.
RDI and RSI can also be used as arguments to TDVMCALL leafs. Move RDI to
RAX and RSI to RBP to free up them for the hypercall arguments.
RAX saved on stack during TDCALL as it returns status code in the
register.
RBP value has to be restored before returning from __tdx_hypercall() as
it is callee-saved register.
This is preparatory patch. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-4-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
Comment in __tdx_hypercall() points that RAX==0 indicates TDVMCALL
failure which is opposite of the truth: RAX==0 is success.
Fix the comment. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230126221159.8635-2-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
|
|
objtool found a few cases where this code called out into instrumented
code:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x2c: call to hcall_func.constprop.0() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __halt+0x3f: call to __tdx_hypercall() leaves .noinstr.text section
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x66: call to __tdx_hypercall_failed() leaves .noinstr.text section
Fix it by:
- moving TDX tdcall assembly methods into .noinstr.text (they are already noistr-clean)
- marking __tdx_hypercall_failed() as 'noinstr'
- annotating hcall_func() as __always_inline
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195541.111485720@infradead.org
|
|
Now that arch_cpu_idle() is expected to return with IRQs disabled,
avoid the useless STI/CLI dance.
Per the specs this is supposed to work, but nobody has yet relied up
this behaviour so broken implementations are possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112195540.682137572@infradead.org
|
|
Because build-testing is over-rated, fix a few trivial objtool complaints:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_module_call+0x3e: missing int3 after ret
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall+0x6e: missing int3 after ret
Fixes: eb94f1b6a70a ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220520083839.GR2578@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net
|
|
objdump complains:
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __tdx_hypercall()+0x74: unreachable instruction
because __tdx_hypercall_failed() won't return but panic the guest.
Annotate that that is ok and desired.
Fixes: eb94f1b6a70a ("x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220420115025.5448-1-bp@alien8.de
|
|
The HLT instruction is a privileged instruction, executing it stops
instruction execution and places the processor in a HALT state. It
is used in kernel for cases like reboot, idle loop and exception fixup
handlers. For the idle case, interrupts will be enabled (using STI)
before the HLT instruction (this is also called safe_halt()).
To support the HLT instruction in TDX guests, it needs to be emulated
using TDVMCALL (hypercall to VMM). More details about it can be found
in Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Guest-Host-Communication
Interface (GHCI) specification, section TDVMCALL[Instruction.HLT].
In TDX guests, executing HLT instruction will generate a #VE, which is
used to emulate the HLT instruction. But #VE based emulation will not
work for the safe_halt() flavor, because it requires STI instruction to
be executed just before the TDCALL. Since idle loop is the only user of
safe_halt() variant, handle it as a special case.
To avoid *safe_halt() call in the idle function, define the
tdx_guest_idle() and use it to override the "x86_idle" function pointer
for a valid TDX guest.
Alternative choices like PV ops have been considered for adding
safe_halt() support. But it was rejected because HLT paravirt calls
only exist under PARAVIRT_XXL, and enabling it in TDX guest just for
safe_halt() use case is not worth the cost.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
Guests communicate with VMMs with hypercalls. Historically, these
are implemented using instructions that are known to cause VMEXITs
like VMCALL, VMLAUNCH, etc. However, with TDX, VMEXITs no longer
expose the guest state to the host. This prevents the old hypercall
mechanisms from working. So, to communicate with VMM, TDX
specification defines a new instruction called TDCALL.
In a TDX based VM, since the VMM is an untrusted entity, an intermediary
layer -- TDX module -- facilitates secure communication between the host
and the guest. TDX module is loaded like a firmware into a special CPU
mode called SEAM. TDX guests communicate with the TDX module using the
TDCALL instruction.
A guest uses TDCALL to communicate with both the TDX module and VMM.
The value of the RAX register when executing the TDCALL instruction is
used to determine the TDCALL type. A leaf of TDCALL used to communicate
with the VMM is called TDVMCALL.
Add generic interfaces to communicate with the TDX module and VMM
(using the TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_module_call() - Used to communicate with the TDX module (via
TDCALL instruction).
__tdx_hypercall() - Used by the guest to request services from
the VMM (via TDVMCALL leaf of TDCALL).
Also define an additional wrapper _tdx_hypercall(), which adds error
handling support for the TDCALL failure.
The __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions are
implemented in assembly in a .S file. The TDCALL ABI requires
shuffling arguments in and out of registers, which proved to be
awkward with inline assembly.
Just like syscalls, not all TDVMCALL use cases need to use the same
number of argument registers. The implementation here picks the current
worst-case scenario for TDCALL (4 registers). For TDCALLs with fewer
than 4 arguments, there will end up being a few superfluous (cheap)
instructions. But, this approach maximizes code reuse.
For registers used by the TDCALL instruction, please check TDX GHCI
specification, the section titled "TDCALL instruction" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL
Interface".
Based on previous patch by Sean Christopherson.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
