summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-08-14RISC-V: hwprobe: Add SCALAR to misaligned perf definesEvan Green
In preparation for misaligned vector performance hwprobe keys, rename the hwprobe key values associated with misaligned scalar accesses to include the term SCALAR. Leave the old defines in place to maintain source compatibility. This change is intended to be a functional no-op. Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809214444.3257596-3-evan@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-08-14RISC-V: hwprobe: Add MISALIGNED_PERF keyEvan Green
RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 was mistakenly flagged as a bitmask in hwprobe_key_is_bitmask(), when in reality it was an enum value. This causes problems when used in conjunction with RISCV_HWPROBE_WHICH_CPUS, since SLOW, FAST, and EMULATED have values whose bits overlap with each other. If the caller asked for the set of CPUs that was SLOW or EMULATED, the returned set would also include CPUs that were FAST. Introduce a new hwprobe key, RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_PERF, which returns the same values in response to a direct query (with no flags), but is properly handled as an enumerated value. As a result, SLOW, FAST, and EMULATED are all correctly treated as distinct values under the new key when queried with the WHICH_CPUS flag. Leave the old key in place to avoid disturbing applications which may have already come to rely on the key, with or without its broken behavior with respect to the WHICH_CPUS flag. Fixes: e178bf146e4b ("RISC-V: hwprobe: Introduce which-cpus flag") Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809214444.3257596-2-evan@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-07-26RISC-V: Provide the frequency of time CSR via hwprobePalmer Dabbelt
The RISC-V architecture makes a real time counter CSR (via RDTIME instruction) available for applications in U-mode but there is no architected mechanism for an application to discover the frequency the counter is running at. Some applications (e.g., DPDK) use the time counter for basic performance analysis as well as fine grained time-keeping. Add support to the hwprobe system call to export the time CSR frequency to code running in U-mode. Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240702033731.71955-2-cuiyunhui@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-07-22RISC-V: hwprobe: sort EXT_KEY()s in hwprobe_isa_ext0() alphabeticallyConor Dooley
Currently the entries appear to be in a random order (although according to Palmer he has tried to sort them by key value) which makes it harder to find entries in a growing list, and more likely to have conflicts as all patches are adding to the end of the list. Sort them alphabetically instead. Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240717-dedicate-squeamish-7e4ab54df58f@spud Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-07-12Merge patch series "riscv: Apply Zawrs when available"Palmer Dabbelt
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> says: Zawrs provides two instructions (wrs.nto and wrs.sto), where both are meant to allow the hart to enter a low-power state while waiting on a store to a memory location. The instructions also both wait an implementation-defined "short" duration (unless the implementation terminates the stall for another reason). The difference is that while wrs.sto will terminate when the duration elapses, wrs.nto, depending on configuration, will either just keep waiting or an ILL exception will be raised. Linux will use wrs.nto, so if platforms have an implementation which falls in the "just keep waiting" category (which is not expected), then it should _not_ advertise Zawrs in the hardware description. Like wfi (and with the same {m,h}status bits to configure it), when wrs.nto is configured to raise exceptions it's expected that the higher privilege level will see the instruction was a wait instruction, do something, and then resume execution following the instruction. For example, KVM does configure exceptions for wfi (hstatus.VTW=1) and therefore also for wrs.nto. KVM does this for wfi since it's better to allow other tasks to be scheduled while a VCPU waits for an interrupt. For waits such as those where wrs.nto/sto would be used, which are typically locks, it is also a good idea for KVM to be involved, as it can attempt to schedule the lock holding VCPU. This series starts with Christoph's addition of the riscv smp_cond_load_relaxed function which applies wrs.sto when available. That patch has been reworked to use wrs.nto and to use the same approach as Arm for the wait loop, since we can't have arbitrary C code between the load-reserved and the wrs. Then, hwprobe support is added (since the instructions are also usable from usermode), and finally KVM is taught about wrs.nto, allowing guests to see and use the Zawrs extension. We still don't have test results from hardware, and it's not possible to prove that using Zawrs is a win when testing on QEMU, not even when oversubscribing VCPUs to guests. However, it is possible to use KVM selftests to force a scenario where we can prove Zawrs does its job and does it well. [4] is a test which does this and, on my machine, without Zawrs it takes 16 seconds to complete and with Zawrs it takes 0.25 seconds. This series is also available here [1]. In order to use QEMU for testing a build with [2] is needed. In order to enable guests to use Zawrs with KVM using kvmtool, the branch at [3] may be used. [1] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commits/riscv/zawrs-v3/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240312152901.512001-2-ajones@ventanamicro.com/ [3] https://github.com/jones-drew/kvmtool/commits/riscv/zawrs/ [4] https://github.com/jones-drew/linux/commit/cb2beccebcece10881db842ed69bdd5715cfab5d Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240426100820.14762-8-ajones@ventanamicro.com * b4-shazam-merge: KVM: riscv: selftests: Add Zawrs extension to get-reg-list test KVM: riscv: Support guest wrs.nto riscv: hwprobe: export Zawrs ISA extension riscv: Add Zawrs support for spinlocks dt-bindings: riscv: Add Zawrs ISA extension description riscv: Provide a definition for 'pause' Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-07-12riscv: hwprobe: export Zawrs ISA extensionAndrew Jones
Export Zawrs ISA extension through hwprobe. [Palmer: there's a gap in the numbers here as there will be a merge conflict when this is picked up. To avoid confusion I just set the hwprobe ID to match what it would be post-merge.] Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240426100820.14762-12-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-07-11riscv: hwprobe: export highest virtual userspace addressClément Léger
Some userspace applications (OpenJDK for instance) uses the free MSBs in pointers to insert additional information for their own logic and need to get this information from somewhere. Currently they rely on parsing /proc/cpuinfo "mmu=svxx" string to obtain the current value of virtual address usable bits [1]. Since this reflect the raw supported MMU mode, it might differ from the logical one used internally which is why arch_get_mmap_end() is used. Exporting the highest mmapable address through hwprobe will allow a more stable interface to be used. For that purpose, add a new hwprobe key named RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_HIGHEST_VIRT_ADDRESS which will export the highest userspace virtual address. Link: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_riscv/vm_version_linux_riscv.cpp#L171 [1] Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240410144558.1104006-1-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-06-26riscv: hwprobe: export Zcmop ISA extensionClément Léger
Export Zcmop ISA extension through hwprobe. Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240619113529.676940-15-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-06-26riscv: hwprobe: export Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb ISA extensionsClément Léger
Export Zca, Zcf, Zcd and Zcb ISA extension through hwprobe. Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240619113529.676940-10-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-06-26riscv: hwprobe: export Zimop ISA extensionClément Léger
Export Zimop ISA extension through hwprobe. Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240619113529.676940-4-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-05-30riscv: vector: adjust minimum Vector requirement to ZVE32XAndy Chiu
Make has_vector() to check for ZVE32X. Every in-kernel usage of V that requires a more complicate version of V must then call out explicitly. Also, change riscv_v_first_use_handler(), and boot code that calls riscv_v_setup_vsize() to accept ZVE32X. Most kernel/user interfaces requires minimum of ZVE32X. Thus, programs compiled and run with ZVE32X should be supported by the kernel on most aspects. This includes context-switch, signal, ptrace, prctl, and hwprobe. One exception is that ELF_HWCAP returns 'V' only if full V is supported on the platform. This means that the system without a full V must not rely on ELF_HWCAP to tell whether it is allowable to execute Vector without first invoking a prctl() check. Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com> Acked-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240510-zve-detection-v5-7-0711bdd26c12@sifive.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-05-30riscv: hwprobe: add zve Vector subextensions into hwprobe interfaceAndy Chiu
The following Vector subextensions for "embedded" platforms are added into RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0: - ZVE32X - ZVE32F - ZVE64X - ZVE64F - ZVE64D Extensions ending with an X indicates that the platform doesn't have a vector FPU. Extensions ending with F/D mean that whether single (F) or double (D) precision vector operation is supported. The number 32 or 64 follows from ZVE tells the maximum element length. Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com> Reviewed-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240510-zve-detection-v5-6-0711bdd26c12@sifive.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-04-28riscv: hwprobe: export Zihintpause ISA extensionClément Léger
Export the Zihintpause ISA extension through hwprobe which allows using "pause" instructions. Some userspace applications (OpenJDK for instance) uses this to handle some locking back-off. Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221083108.1235311-1-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-03-13riscv: Set unaligned access speed at compile timeCharlie Jenkins
Introduce Kconfig options to set the kernel unaligned access support. These options provide a non-portable alternative to the runtime unaligned access probe. To support this, the unaligned access probing code is moved into it's own file and gated behind a new RISCV_PROBE_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_SUPPORT option. Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240308-disable_misaligned_probe_config-v9-4-a388770ba0ce@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-01-09Merge patch series "riscv: hwprobe: add Zicond, Zacas and Ztso support"Palmer Dabbelt
Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com> says: This series add support for a few more extensions that are present in the RVA22U64/RVA23U64 (either mandatory or optional) and that are useful for userspace: - Zicond - Zacas - Ztso Series currently based on riscv/for-next. * b4-shazam-lts: riscv: hwprobe: export Zicond extension riscv: hwprobe: export Zacas ISA extension riscv: add ISA extension parsing for Zacas dt-bindings: riscv: add Zacas ISA extension description riscv: hwprobe: export Ztso ISA extension riscv: add ISA extension parsing for Ztso Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231220155723.684081-1-cleger@rivosinc.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-01-09Merge patch series "RISC-V: hwprobe: Introduce which-cpus"Palmer Dabbelt
Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> says: This series introduces a flag for the hwprobe syscall which effectively reverses its behavior from getting the values of keys for a set of cpus to getting the cpus for a set of key-value pairs. * b4-shazam-merge: RISC-V: selftests: Add which-cpus hwprobe test RISC-V: hwprobe: Introduce which-cpus flag RISC-V: Move the hwprobe syscall to its own file RISC-V: hwprobe: Clarify cpus size parameter Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122164700.127954-6-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-01-03RISC-V: hwprobe: Introduce which-cpus flagAndrew Jones
Introduce the first flag for the hwprobe syscall. The flag basically reverses its behavior, i.e. instead of populating the values of keys for a given set of cpus, the set of cpus after the call is the result of finding a set which supports the values of the keys. In order to do this, we implement a pair compare function which takes the type of value (a single value vs. a bitmask of booleans) into consideration. We also implement vdso support for the new flag. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122164700.127954-9-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2024-01-03RISC-V: Move the hwprobe syscall to its own fileAndrew Jones
As Palmer says, hwprobe is "sort of its own thing now, and it's only going to get bigger..." Suggested-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122164700.127954-8-ajones@ventanamicro.com Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>