| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
In commit d0563a1297e2 ("powerpc: Implement {cmp}xchg for u8 and u16")
we removed the volatile from __cmpxchg().
This is leading to warnings such as:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c: In function ‘drm_lock_take’:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:484:37: warning: passing argument 1
of ‘__cmpxchg’ discards ‘volatile’ qualifier from pointer target
(__typeof__(*(ptr))) __cmpxchg((ptr), (unsigned long)_o_, \
There doesn't seem to be consensus across architectures whether the
argument is volatile or not, so at least for now put the volatile back.
Fixes: d0563a1297e2 ("powerpc: Implement {cmp}xchg for u8 and u16")
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Implement xchg{u8,u16}{local,relaxed}, and
cmpxchg{u8,u16}{,local,acquire,relaxed}.
It works on all ppc.
remove volatile of first parameter in __cmpxchg_local and __cmpxchg
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
__xchg_called_with_bad_pointer() can't tell us which code uses {cmp}xchg
with an unsupported size, and no error is reported until the link stage.
To make such problems easier to debug, use BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG() instead.
Signed-off-by: pan xinhui <xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Tweak change log wording & add relaxed/acquire]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
fixup
|
|
Implement cmpxchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_relaxed, based on
which _release variants can be built.
To avoid superfluous barriers in _acquire variants, we implement these
operations with assembly code rather use __atomic_op_acquire() to build
them automatically.
For the same reason, we keep the assembly implementation of fully
ordered cmpxchg operations.
However, we don't do the similar for _release, because that will require
putting barriers in the middle of ll/sc loops, which is probably a bad
idea.
Note cmpxchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_relaxed are not
compiler barriers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
Implement xchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic{,64}_xchg_relaxed, based on these
_relaxed variants, release/acquire variants and fully ordered versions
can be built.
Note that xchg{,64}_relaxed and atomic_{,64}_xchg_relaxed are not
compiler barriers.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
According to memory-barriers.txt, xchg*, cmpxchg* and their atomic_
versions all need to be fully ordered, however they are now just
RELEASE+ACQUIRE, which are not fully ordered.
So also replace PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER and PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER with
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER and PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER in
__{cmp,}xchg_{u32,u64} respectively to guarantee fully ordered semantics
of atomic{,64}_{cmp,}xchg() and {cmp,}xchg(), as a complement of commit
b97021f85517 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics")
This patch depends on patch "powerpc: Make value-returning atomics fully
ordered" for PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER definition.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
|
|
We removed the only user of this define in the rtmutex code. Get rid
of it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
|
|
This commit adds the architecture support required to enable the
optimised implementation of lockrefs.
That's as simple as defining arch_spin_value_unlocked() and selecting
the Kconfig option.
We also define cmpxchg64_relaxed(), because the lockref code does not
need the cmpxchg to have barrier semantics.
Using Linus' test case[1] on one system I see a 4x improvement for the
basic enablement, and a further 1.3x for cmpxchg64_relaxed(), for a
total of 5.3x vs the baseline.
On another system I see more like 2x improvement.
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=137782380714721&w=4
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
|
|
Disintegrate asm/system.h for PowerPC.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
|
