| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add a definition for sub-type to the protocol spec doc and a description of
its usage for C arrays in genetlink-legacy.
Signed-off-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Describe the genetlink-legacy support for using struct definitions
for fixed headers and for binary attributes.
Signed-off-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
I relicensed Netlink spec code to GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause but
we still put a slightly different license on the uAPI header
than the rest of the code. Use the Linux-syscall-note on all
the specs and all generated code. It's moot for kernel code,
but should not hurt. This way the licenses match everywhere.
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Fixes: 37d9df224d1e ("ynl: re-license uniformly under GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause")
Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
I was intending to make all the Netlink Spec code BSD-3-Clause
to ease the adoption but it appears that:
- I fumbled the uAPI and used "GPL WITH uAPI note" there
- it gives people pause as they expect GPL in the kernel
As suggested by Chuck re-license under dual. This gives us benefit
of full BSD freedom while fulfilling the broad "kernel is under GPL"
expectations.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230304120108.05dd44c5@kernel.org/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230306200457.3903854-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Pretty much all families use value: 1 or reserve as unspec
the first entry in attribute set and the first operation.
Make this the default. Update documentation (the doc for
values of operations just refers back to doc for attrs
so updating only attrs).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
To avoid having to repeat the entire definition of an attribute
(including the value) use the Attr object from the original set.
In fact this is already the documented expectation.
Fixes: be5bea1cc0bf ("net: add basic C code generators for Netlink")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
We have a bit of documentation about the internals of Netlink
and the specs, but really the goal is for most people to not
worry about those. Add a practical guide for beginners who
want to poke at the specs.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
I had a (bright?) idea of introducing the concept of enum-models
to account for all the weird ways families enumerate their messages.
I've never finished it because generating C code for each of them
is pretty daunting. But for languages which can use ID values directly
the support is simple enough, so clean this up a bit.
"unified" model is what I recommend going forward.
"directional" model is what ethtool uses.
"notify-split" is used by the proposed DPLL code, but we can just
make them use "unified", it hasn't been merged :)
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
Add documentation about the upcoming Netlink protocol specs.
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
nlmsg_flags are full of historical baggage, inconsistencies and
strangeness. Try to document it more thoroughly. Explain the meaning
of the ECHO flag (and while at it clarify the comment in the uAPI).
Handwave a little about the NEW request flags and how they make
sense on the surface but cater to really old paradigm before commands
were a thing.
I will add more notes on how to make use of ECHO and discouragement
for reuse of flags to the kernel-side documentation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220927212306.823862-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
There is currently no way to report via extack in a structured way
that an attribute is missing. This leads to families resorting to
string messages.
Add a pair of attributes - @offset and @type for machine-readable
way of reporting missing attributes. The @offset points to the
nest which should have contained the attribute, @type is the
expected nla_type. The offset will be skipped if the attribute
is missing at the message level rather than inside a nest.
User space should be able to figure out which attribute enum
(AKA attribute space AKA attribute set) the nest pointed to by
@offset is using.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
|
|
Provide a bit of a brain dump of netlink related information
as documentation. Hopefully this will be useful to people
trying to navigate implementing YAML based parsing in languages
we won't be able to help with.
I started writing this doc while trying to figure out what
it'd take to widen the applicability of YAML to good old rtnl,
but the doc grew beyond that as it usually happens.
In all honesty a lot of this information is new to me as I usually
follow the "copy an existing example, drink to forget" process
of writing netlink user space, so reviews will be much appreciated.
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220819200221.422801-2-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
