summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-01-28drm/i915/trace: i915_request.prio is a signed valueChris Wilson
Don't confuse the poor developer by writing a negative value as a very large positive, as the flow of requests is already complex enough. Reported-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128151647.3820659-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-28drm/i915/gt: Lift set-wedged engine dumping out of user pathsChris Wilson
The user (e.g. gem_eio) can manipulate the driver into wedging itself, allowing the user to trigger voluminous logging of inconsequential details. If we lift the dump to direct calls to intel_gt_set_wedged(), out of the intel_reset failure handling, we keep the detail logging for what we expect are true HW or test failures without being tricked. Reported-by: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127231540.3302516-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-28drm/i915/gt: Tidy repetition in declaring gen8+ interruptsChris Wilson
We use the same interrupt mask for each engine, so define it once in a local and reuse. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127231540.3302516-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-28drm/i915/gt: Reorganise gen8+ interrupt handlerChris Wilson
We always use a deferred bottom-half (either tasklet or irq_work) for processing the response to an interrupt which means we can recombine the GT irq ack+handler into one. This simplicity is important in later patches as we will need to handle and then ack multiple interrupt levels before acking the GT and master interrupts. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127231540.3302516-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-28drm/i915: Skip capturing errors from internal contextsChris Wilson
We don't want to report errors on the internal contexts to userspace, suppressing their own, so treat them as simulated errors. These mostly arise inside selftests and so are simulated anyway. For the rest, we can rely on the normal debug channels in CI. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200128113426.3711294-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/amd/powerplay: fix spelling mistake "Attemp" -> "Attempt"Colin Ian King
There are several spelling mistakes in PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE messages. Fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amd/display: fix for-loop with incorrectly sized loop counter (v2)Colin Ian King
A for-loop is iterating from 0 up to 1000 however the loop variable count is a u8 and hence not large enough. Fix this by making count an int. Also remove the redundant initialization of count since this is never used and add { } on the loop statement make the loop block clearer. v2: drop useless else (Walter Harms) Addresses-Coverity: ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: ed581a0ace44 ("drm/amd/display: wait for update when setting dpg test pattern") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: enable GPU reset by default on renoirAlex Deucher
Everything is in place. Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: enable GPU reset by default on NaviAlex Deucher
Has been working fine for a while. Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amd/display: do not allocate display_mode_lib unnecessarilyDor Askayo
This allocation isn't required and can fail when resuming from suspend. Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/issues/1009 Signed-off-by: Dor Askayo <dor.askayo@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: add coreboot workaround for KV/KBChristian König
Coreboot seems to have a problem correctly setting up access to the stolen VRAM on KV/KB. Use the direct access only when necessary. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reported-and-tested-by: Fredrik Bruhn <fredrik.bruhn@unibap.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27Revert "drm/amd/display: Don't skip link training for empty dongle"Harry Wentland
This reverts commit 80adaebd2d411b7d6872a097634848a71eb13d20. [WHY] This change was working around a regression that occured in this: commit 0301ccbaf67d ("drm/amd/display: DP Compliance 400.1.1 failure") With the fix to run verify_link_cap when the SINK_COUNT of dongles becomes non-zero this change is no longer needed. Cc: Louis Li <Ching-shih.Li@amd.com> Cc: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Cc: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Cc: Eric Yang <Eric.Yang2@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amd/display: Retrain dongles when SINK_COUNT becomes non-zeroHarry Wentland
[WHY] Two years ago the patch referenced by the Fixes tag stopped running dp_verify_link_cap_with_retries during DP detection when the reason for the detection was a short-pulse interrupt. This effectively meant that we were no longer doing the verify_link_cap training on active dongles when their SINK_COUNT changed from 0 to 1. A year ago this was partly remedied with: commit 80adaebd2d41 ("drm/amd/display: Don't skip link training for empty dongle") This made sure that we trained the dongle on initial hotplug (without connected downstream devices). This is all fine and dandy if it weren't for the fact that there are some dongles on the market that don't like link training when SINK_COUNT is 0 These dongles will in fact indicate a SINK_COUNT of 0 immediately after hotplug, even when a downstream device is connected, and then trigger a shortpulse interrupt indicating a SINK_COUNT change to 1. In order to play nicely we will need our policy to not link train an active DP dongle when SINK_COUNT is 0 but ensure we train it when the SINK_COUNT changes to 1. [HOW] Call dp_verify_link_cap_with_retries on detection even when the detection is triggered from a short pulse interrupt. With this change we can also revert this commit which we'll do in a separate follow-up change: commit 80adaebd2d41 ("drm/amd/display: Don't skip link training for empty dongle") Fixes: 0301ccbaf67d ("drm/amd/display: DP Compliance 400.1.1 failure") Suggested-by: Louis Li <Ching-shih.Li@amd.com> Tested-by: Louis Li <Ching-shih.Li@amd.com> Cc: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Cc: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com> Cc: Eric Yang <Eric.Yang2@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: original raven doesn't support full asic resetAlex Deucher
So don't use it. Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: attempt to enable gfxoff on more raven1 boards (v2)Alex Deucher
Switch to a blacklist so we can disable specific boards that are problematic. v2: make the blacklist non-raven specific. Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amd/amdgpu: fix spelling mistake "to" -> "too"Colin Ian King
There is a spelling mistake in a DRM_ERROR message. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amd/powerplay: use true, false for bool variable in smu7_hwmgr.czhengbin
Fixes coccicheck warning: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:723:2-50: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:733:3-52: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr/smu7_hwmgr.c:747:3-51: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: fix doc by clarifying sched_list definitionNirmoy Das
expand sched_list definition for better understanding. Also fix a typo atleast -> at least Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: initialize bo_va_list when add gws to processxinhui pan
bo_va_list is list_head, so initialize it. Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Feifei Xu <Feifei.Xu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu/vcn: use inst_idx relacing instJames Zhu
Use inst_idx relacing inst in SOC15_DPG_MODE macro to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu/vcn: fix typo errorJames Zhu
Fix typo error, should be inst_idx instead of inst. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu/vcn: fix vcn2.5 instance issueJames Zhu
Fix vcn2.5 instance issue, vcn0 and vcn1 have same register offset Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu/vcn2.5: fix a bug for the 2nd vcn instance (v2)James Zhu
Fix a bug for the 2nd vcn instance at start and stop. v2: squash in unused label removal. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu/vcn: Share vcn_v2_0_dec_ring_test_ring to vcn2.5James Zhu
Share vcn_v2_0_dec_ring_test_ring to vcn2.5 to support vcn software ring. Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Leo Liu <leo.liu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: Use the correct flush_type in flush_gpu_tlb_pasidFelix Kuehling
The flush_type was incorrectly hard-coded to 0 when calling falling back to MMIO-based invalidation in flush_gpu_tlb_pasid. Fixes: ea930000a6dc ("drm/amdgpu: export function to flush TLB via pasid") Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Oak Zeng <Oak.Zeng@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/amdgpu: Fix TLB invalidation request when using semaphoreFelix Kuehling
Use a more meaningful variable name for the invalidation request that is distinct from the tmp variable that gets overwritten when acquiring the invalidation semaphore. Fixes: 4ed8a03740d0 ("drm/amdgpu: invalidate mmhub semaphore workaround in gmc9/gmc10") Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Yong Zhao <Yong.Zhao@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
2020-01-27drm/i915/perf: Fix OA context id overlap with idle context idUmesh Nerlige Ramappa
Engine context pinned in perf OA was set to same context id as the idle context. Set the context id to an unused value. Clear the sw context id field in lrc descriptor before ORing with ce->tag (Chris) Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/756 Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200124013701.40609-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/gt: Acquire ce->active before ce->pin_count/ce->pin_mutexChris Wilson
Similar to commit ac0e331a628b ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") we have the same race of trying to pin the context underneath a mutex while allowing the decrement to be atomic outside of that mutex. This leads to the problem where two threads may simultaneously try to pin the context and the second not notice that they needed to repin the context. <2> [198.669621] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_timeline.c:387! <4> [198.669703] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI <4> [198.669712] CPU: 0 PID: 1246 Comm: gem_exec_create Tainted: G U W 5.5.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_7755+ #1 <4> [198.669723] Hardware name: /NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0054.2017.1025.1822 10/25/2017 <4> [198.669776] RIP: 0010:timeline_advance+0x7b/0xe0 [i915] <4> [198.669785] Code: 00 48 c7 c2 10 f1 46 a0 48 c7 c7 70 1b 32 a0 e8 bb dd e7 e0 bf 01 00 00 00 e8 d1 af e7 e0 31 f6 bf 09 00 00 00 e8 35 ef d8 e0 <0f> 0b 48 c7 c1 48 fa 49 a0 ba 84 01 00 00 48 c7 c6 10 f1 46 a0 48 <4> [198.669803] RSP: 0018:ffffc900004c3a38 EFLAGS: 00010296 <4> [198.669810] RAX: ffff888270b35140 RBX: ffff88826f32ee00 RCX: 0000000000000006 <4> [198.669818] RDX: 00000000000017c5 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000009 <4> [198.669826] RBP: ffffc900004c3a64 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 <4> [198.669834] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88826f9b5980 <4> [198.669841] R13: 0000000000000cc0 R14: ffffc900004c3dc0 R15: ffff888253610068 <4> [198.669849] FS: 00007f63e663fe40(0000) GS:ffff888276c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [198.669857] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [198.669864] CR2: 00007f171f8e39a8 CR3: 000000026b1f6005 CR4: 00000000003606f0 <4> [198.669872] Call Trace: <4> [198.669924] intel_timeline_get_seqno+0x12/0x40 [i915] <4> [198.669977] __i915_request_create+0x76/0x5a0 [i915] <4> [198.670024] i915_request_create+0x86/0x1c0 [i915] <4> [198.670068] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0xbf2/0x2500 [i915] <4> [198.670082] ? __lock_acquire+0x460/0x15d0 <4> [198.670128] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11f/0x470 [i915] <4> [198.670171] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] <4> [198.670181] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0 <4> [198.670188] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390 <4> [198.670233] ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x300/0x300 [i915] Fixes: 841350223816 ("drm/i915/gt: Drop mutex serialisation between context pin/unpin") References: ac0e331a628b ("drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_release") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200127152829.2842149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/i915: Restore the kernel context after verifying the w/aChris Wilson
As a safety net, flush the engine verifications and restore the kernel context. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/971 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200126194618.2131078-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/i915/vlv_dsi_pll: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3a89bf4c8b312c233e6b219e9c73203608c3eaec.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/vlv_dsi: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/436e4267529dc11cc7850d0a4f0703caa81b8c80.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/vdsc: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/735389bfa1f9c4be8080f3187ea1dbde308d1ce2.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/sprite: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/722f73a4529808ef7dad51c03c0a3775d8c5b052.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/psr: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b7865c858374e9ab04cf2bc4ceb3d7d89c27db83.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/pipe_crc: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/0af05f6035046a515097da398de8722c0ca23e56.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915: Give aux channels a better nameVille Syrjälä
The aux ch is used for more than DDC, so let's give it a better name. For maximum ease let's include both the AUX ch identifier and the port identifier (for cases where the VBT has redefined the relationship of the two). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2020-01-27drm/i915: Include the AUX CH name in the debug messagesVille Syrjälä
To make it easier to figure out what caused a particular debug message let's print out aux->name. v2: Rebase for drm_err() & co. Add some punctuation to the messages (Matt) Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200123154542.12271-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2020-01-27drm/i915: Tighten atomicity of i915_active_acquire vs i915_active_releaseChris Wilson
As we use a mutex to serialise the first acquire (as it may be a lengthy operation), but only an atomic decrement for the release, we have to be careful in case a second thread races and completes both acquire/release as the first finishes its acquire. Thread A Thread B i915_active_acquire i915_active_acquire atomic_read() == 0 atomic_read() == 0 mutex_lock() mutex_lock() atomic_read() == 0 ref->active(); atomic_inc() mutex_unlock() atomic_read() == 1 i915_active_release atomic_dec_and_test() -> 0 ref->retire() atomic_inc() -> 1 mutex_unlock() So thread A has acquired the ref->active_count but since the ref was still active at the time, it did not initialise it. By switching the check inside the mutex to an atomic increment only if already active, we close the race. Fixes: c9ad602feabe ("drm/i915: Split i915_active.mutex into an irq-safe spinlock for the rbtree") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200126102346.1877661-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-01-27drm/i915/vga: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ad357e65ddb85e7341416f0d7890661a3ef99298.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/tv: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e6238e75f5a4155b1021736937b1fd7a0756a00.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/sdvo: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b21dbc3c0f349345619590893c8ab96828c39103.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/panel: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/efd117ff0a63ef6ec1a4514f2ee133ca33b3f0a0.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/overlay: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/03a907100bf86e877247df804104c50240e3b38c.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/lvds: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/75c2aa6ff0f0aa744de006c0bd6e33fb91b20994.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/lpe_audio: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d920b55fe225710169349db4819ca29af349e0b4.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/hdmi: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c89e66aaca33a1e26fa1372172be41da0ee1c62f.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/gmbus: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1fca6f7e201fb2c75fcfff213ebd982a988eb40d.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/fifo_underrun: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fca7d63b3aa669b5984be45b5968f47fb0b64b2b.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/fbc: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/bf67d57a7d760fb557325690f634799751d36f12.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2020-01-27drm/i915/dvo: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4898cb70cc12f54a3f5298c117ffc63b24b47d24.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-08-01 21:34:57 +0000