| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The gpio pinctrl nodes are redundant and as such useless most of the times.
Since they will also generate warnings in DTC, we can simply remove most of
them.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some boards override the MMC pin muxing settings in order to enable the
pull-ups and change the drive strength to a value higher than the default.
While this was needed in the earlier days, this is now the default setting
for those pins, and therefore we don't need those board-specific settings
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The simple-framebuffer nodes have a unit address, but no reg property which
generates a warning when compiling it with DTC.
Change the simple-framebuffer node names so that there is no warnings on
this anymore.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Most of our device trees have had leading zeros for padding as part of
the nodes unit-addresses.
Remove all these useless zeros that generate warnings
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The #address-cells and #size-cells are only relevant for nodes that have
childs with reg properties. Otherwise, DTC will emit a warning saying that
those properties are unnecessary.
Remove them when needed.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
DTC will emit a warning on our OPPs nodes for the common DTSI between the
A23 and A33 since those nodes use the frequency as unit addresses, but
don't have a matching reg property.
Fix this by moving the frequency to the node name instead.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our main node for all the in-SoC controllers used to have a unit name. The
unit-name, in addition to being actually false, would not match any reg
property, which generates a warning.
Remove it in order to remove those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Using skeleton.dtsi will create a memory node that will generate a warning
in DTC. However, that node will be created by the bootloader, so we can
just remove it entirely in order to remove that warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The #address-cells and #size-cells are only relevant for nodes that have
childs with reg properties. Otherwise, DTC will emit a warning saying that
those properties are unnecessary.
Remove them when needed.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some boards override the MMC pin muxing settings in order to enable the
pull-ups and change the drive strength to a value higher than the default.
While this was needed in the earlier days, this is now the default setting
for those pins, and therefore we don't need those board-specific settings
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The I2C and MMC controllers have only one muxing option in the SoC. In such a
case, we can just move the muxing into the DTSI, and remove it from
the DTS.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our HDMI output endpoint on the A10s DTSI has a warning under DTC: "graph
node has single child node 'endpoint', #address-cells/#size-cells are not
necessary". Fix this by removing those properties.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some GPIO pinctrl nodes cannot be easily removed, because they would also
change the pin configuration, for example to add a pull resistor or change
the current delivered by the pin.
Those nodes still have underscores and unit-addresses in their node names
in our DTs, so adjust their name to remove the warnings. Use that occasion
to also fix some poorly chosen node-names.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The SOM204-EVB doesn't use the CTS pin, and thus was defining its own
pinctrl node for the UART3 muxing. Since we split away the TX and RX pin,
we can use the global node now, and only have the RTS pin in our local
node.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some UART nodes on the A20 DTSI do not share the same pattern that we use
everywhere else, with the RTS and CTS pins split away from the TX and RX
pins. Make those pin groups consistent with the rest of our DT.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
All our pinctrl nodes were using a node name convention with a unit-address
to differentiate the different muxing options. However, since those nodes
didn't have a reg property, they were generating warnings in DTC.
In order to accomodate for this, convert the old nodes to the syntax we've
been using for the new SoCs, including removing the letter suffix of the
node labels to the bank of those pins to make things more readable.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some gpio-keys definitions in our DTs were having buttons defined with a
unit-address and that would generate a DTC warning.
Change the buttons node names to remove the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
One of the usage of the LRADC is to implement buttons. The bindings define
that we should have one subnode per button, with their associated voltage
as a property.
However, there was no reg property but we still used the voltage associated
to the button as the unit-address, which eventually generated warnings in
DTC.
Rename the node names to avoid those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Boards usually have an external pull-up on the card-detect signal, so
there's no need to add another one.
This also removes a DTC warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The gpio pinctrl nodes are redundant and as such useless most of the times.
Since they will also generate warnings in DTC, we can simply remove most of
them.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The simple-framebuffer nodes have a unit address, but no reg property which
generates a warning when compiling it with DTC.
Change the simple-framebuffer node names so that there is no warnings on
this anymore.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our oscillators clock names have a unit address, but no reg property, which
generates a warning in DTC. Change these names to remove those unit
addresses.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our main node for all the in-SoC controllers used to have a unit name. The
unit-name, in addition to being actually false, would not match any reg
property, which generates a warning.
Remove it in order to remove those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Using skeleton.dtsi will create a memory node that will generate a warning
in DTC. However, that node will be created by the bootloader, so we can
just remove it entirely in order to remove that warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The I2C and MMC controllers have only one muxing option in the SoC. In such a
case, we can just move the muxing into the DTSI, and remove it from
the DTS.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our I2C GPIO bus node name has a unit address, but no reg property, which
generates a warning in DTC. Change the name to remove that unit address.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some GPIO pinctrl nodes cannot be easily removed, because they would also
change the pin configuration, for example to add a pull resistor or change
the current delivered by the pin.
Those nodes still have underscores and unit-addresses in their node names
in our DTs, so adjust their name to remove the warnings. Use that occasion
to also fix some poorly chosen node-names.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
All our pinctrl nodes were using a node name convention with a unit-address
to differentiate the different muxing options. However, since those nodes
didn't have a reg property, they were generating warnings in DTC.
In order to accomodate for this, convert the old nodes to the syntax we've
been using for the new SoCs, including removing the letter suffix of the
node labels to the bank of those pins to make things more readable.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some boards override the MMC pin muxing settings in order to enable the
pull-ups and change the drive strength to a value higher than the default.
While this was needed in the earlier days, this is now the default setting
for those pins, and therefore we don't need those board-specific settings
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Boards usually have an external pull-up on the card-detect signal, so
there's no need to add another one.
This also removes a DTC warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The gpio pinctrl nodes are redundant and as such useless most of the times.
Since they will also generate warnings in DTC, we can simply remove most of
them.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
One of the usage of the LRADC is to implement buttons. The bindings define
that we should have one subnode per button, with their associated voltage
as a property.
However, there was no reg property but we still used the voltage associated
to the button as the unit-address, which eventually generated warnings in
DTC.
Rename the node names to avoid those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our main node for all the in-SoC controllers used to have a unit name. The
unit-name, in addition to being actually false, would not match any reg
property, which generates a warning.
Remove it in order to remove those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our oscillators clock names have a unit address, but no reg property, which
generates a warning in DTC. Change these names to remove those unit
addresses.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The simple-framebuffer nodes have a unit address, but no reg property which
generates a warning when compiling it with DTC.
Change the simple-framebuffer node names so that there is no warnings on
this anymore.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Using skeleton.dtsi will create a memory node that will generate a warning
in DTC. However, that node will be created by the bootloader, so we can
just remove it entirely in order to remove that warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The I2C's, MMC0 and MMC1 controllers have only one muxing option in the
SoC. In such a case, we can just move the muxing into the DTSI, and remove
it from the DTS.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The SRAM node in the A10s DTSI is empty, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
One of the usage of the LRADC is to implement buttons. The bindings define
that we should have one subnode per button, with their associated voltage
as a property.
However, there was no reg property but we still used the voltage associated
to the button as the unit-address, which eventually generated warnings in
DTC.
Rename the node names to avoid those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Some GPIO pinctrl nodes cannot be easily removed, because they would also
change the pin configuration, for example to add a pull resistor or change
the current delivered by the pin.
Those nodes still have underscores and unit-addresses in their node names
in our DTs, so adjust their name to remove the warnings. Use that occasion
to also fix some poorly chosen node-names.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
There's no phandle pointing to the CMA pool, so it's label is unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The CMA node has a unit address, but no reg property which generates a
warning in DTC. Change the node name to reflect its usage and drop the unit
address.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our HDMI output endpoint on the A10s DTSI has a warning under DTC: "graph
node has single child node 'endpoint', #address-cells/#size-cells are not
necessary". Fix this by removing those properties.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
All our pinctrl nodes were using a node name convention with a unit-address
to differentiate the different muxing options. However, since those nodes
didn't have a reg property, they were generating warnings in DTC.
In order to accomodate for this, convert the old nodes to the syntax we've
been using for the new SoCs, including removing the letter suffix of the
node labels to the bank of those pins to make things more readable.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Boards usually have an external pull-up on the card-detect signal, so
there's no need to add another one.
This also removes a DTC warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The gpio pinctrl nodes are redundant and as such useless most of the times.
Since they will also generate warnings in DTC, we can simply remove most of
them.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
One of the usage of the LRADC is to implement buttons. The bindings define
that we should have one subnode per button, with their associated voltage
as a property.
However, there was no reg property but we still used the voltage associated
to the button as the unit-address, which eventually generated warnings in
DTC.
Rename the node names to avoid those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
The interrupt-parent property is set in sun5i.dtsi, so there's no need to
repeat it.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Our main node for all the in-SoC controllers used to have a unit name. The
unit-name, in addition to being actually false, would not match any reg
property, which generates a warning.
Remove it in order to remove those warnings.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
|
Using skeleton.dtsi will create a memory node that will generate a warning
in DTC. However, that node will be created by the bootloader, so we can
just remove it entirely in order to remove that warning.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
|
