| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Remove SH-5 documentation index entries following the removal
of SH-5 source code.
Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/mm/tlb-sh5.c
Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/mm/tlb-sh5.c
Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/include/asm/tlb_64.h
Error: Cannot open file ../arch/sh/include/asm/tlb_64.h
Fixes: 3b69e8b45711 ("Merge tag 'sh-for-5.8' of git://git.libc.org/linux-sh")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: ysato@users.sourceforge.jp
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux
Pull flexible-array member conversions from Gustavo A. R. Silva:
"Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members.
Notice that all of these patches have been baking in linux-next for
two development cycles now.
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no
longer be used[2].
C99 introduced “flexible array members”, which lacks a numeric size
for the array declaration entirely:
struct something {
size_t count;
struct foo items[];
};
This is the way the kernel expects dynamically sized trailing elements
to be declared. It allows the compiler to generate errors when the
flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which helps to
prevent some kind of undefined behavior[3] bugs from being
inadvertently introduced to the codebase.
It also allows the compiler to correctly analyze array sizes (via
sizeof(), CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, and CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS). For
instance, there is no mechanism that warns us that the following
application of the sizeof() operator to a zero-length array always
results in zero:
struct something {
size_t count;
struct foo items[0];
};
struct something *instance;
instance = kmalloc(struct_size(instance, items, count), GFP_KERNEL);
instance->count = count;
size = sizeof(instance->items) * instance->count;
memcpy(instance->items, source, size);
At the last line of code above, size turns out to be zero, when one
might have thought it represents the total size in bytes of the
dynamic memory recently allocated for the trailing array items. Here
are a couple examples of this issue[4][5].
Instead, flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the
sizeof() operator may not be applied[6], so any misuse of such
operators will be immediately noticed at build time.
The cleanest and least error-prone way to implement this is through
the use of a flexible array member:
struct something {
size_t count;
struct foo items[];
};
struct something *instance;
instance = kmalloc(struct_size(instance, items, count), GFP_KERNEL);
instance->count = count;
size = sizeof(instance->items[0]) * instance->count;
memcpy(instance->items, source, size);
instead"
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
[4] commit f2cd32a443da ("rndis_wlan: Remove logically dead code")
[5] commit ab91c2a89f86 ("tpm: eventlog: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member")
[6] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
* tag 'flex-array-conversions-5.8-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux: (41 commits)
w1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
tracing/probe: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
soc: ti: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
tifm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
dmaengine: tegra-apb: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
stm class: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
Squashfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
ASoC: SOF: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
ima: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
sctp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
phy: samsung: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
RxRPC: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
rapidio: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
media: pwc: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
firmware: pcdp: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
oprofile: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
block: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
tools/testing/nvdimm: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
libata: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
kprobes: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
...
|
|
The purgatory Makefile removes -fstack-protector options if they were
configured in, but does not currently add -fno-stack-protector.
If gcc was configured with the --enable-default-ssp configure option,
this results in the stack protector still being enabled for the
purgatory (absent distro-specific specs files that might disable it
again for freestanding compilations), if the main kernel is being
compiled with stack protection enabled (if it's disabled for the main
kernel, the top-level Makefile will add -fno-stack-protector).
This will break the build since commit
e4160b2e4b02 ("x86/purgatory: Fail the build if purgatory.ro has missing symbols")
and prior to that would have caused runtime failure when trying to use
kexec.
Explicitly add -fno-stack-protector to avoid this, as done in other
Makefiles that need to disable the stack protector.
Reported-by: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-queue
Jeff Kirsher says:
====================
Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2020-06-16
This series contains fixes to e1000 and e1000e.
Chen fixes an e1000e issue where systems could be waken via WoL, even
though the user has disabled the wakeup bit via sysfs.
Vaibhav Gupta updates the e1000 driver to clean up the legacy Power
Management hooks.
Arnd Bergmann cleans up the inconsistent use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
preprocessor tags, which also resolves the compiler warnings about the
possibility of unused structure.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The CONFIG_PM_SLEEP #ifdef checks in this file are inconsistent,
leading to a warning about sometimes unused function:
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c:137:13: error: unused function 'e1000e_check_me' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
Rather than adding more #ifdefs, just remove them completely
and mark the PM functions as __maybe_unused to let the compiler
work it out on it own.
Fixes: e086ba2fccda ("e1000e: disable s0ix entry and exit flows for ME systems")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
|
|
With legacy PM hooks, it was the responsibility of a driver to manage PCI
states and also the device's power state. The generic approach is to let PCI
core handle the work.
e1000_suspend() calls __e1000_shutdown() to perform intermediate tasks.
__e1000_shutdown() modifies the value of "wake" (device should be wakeup
enabled or not), responsible for controlling the flow of legacy PM.
Since, PCI core has no idea about the value of "wake", new code for generic
PM may produce unexpected results. Thus, use "device_set_wakeup_enable()"
to wakeup-enable the device accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Gupta <vaibhavgupta40@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
|
|
Currently the system will be woken up via WOL(Wake On LAN) even if the
device wakeup ability has been disabled via sysfs:
cat /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.6/power/wakeup
disabled
The system should not be woken up if the user has explicitly
disabled the wake up ability for this device.
This patch clears the WOL ability of this network device if the
user has disabled the wake up ability in sysfs.
Fixes: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver")
Reported-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
|
|
Without a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE the attributes are missing that create
an alias for auto-loading the module in userspace via hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Fix AFS's silly rename by the following means:
(1) Set the destination directory in afs_do_silly_rename() so as to avoid
misbehaviour and indicate that the directory data version will
increment by 1 so as to avoid warnings about unexpected changes in the
DV. Also indicate that the ctime should be updated to avoid xfstest
grumbling.
(2) Note when the server indicates that a directory changed more than we
expected (AFS_OPERATION_DIR_CONFLICT), indicating a conflict with a
third party change, checking on successful completion of unlink and
rename.
The problem is that the FS.RemoveFile RPC op doesn't report the status
of the unlinked file, though YFS.RemoveFile2 does. This can be
mitigated by the assumption that if the directory DV cranked by
exactly 1, we can be sure we removed one link from the file; further,
ordinarily in AFS, files cannot be hardlinked across directories, so
if we reduce nlink to 0, the file is deleted.
However, if the directory DV jumps by more than 1, we cannot know if a
third party intervened by adding or removing a link on the file we
just removed a link from.
The same also goes for any vnode that is at the destination of the
FS.Rename RPC op.
(3) Make afs_vnode_commit_status() apply the nlink drop inside the cb_lock
section along with the other attribute updates if ->op_unlinked is set
on the descriptor for the appropriate vnode.
(4) Issue a follow up status fetch to the unlinked file in the event of a
third party conflict that makes it impossible for us to know if we
actually deleted the file or not.
(5) Provide a flag, AFS_VNODE_SILLY_DELETED, to make afs_getattr() lie to
the user about the nlink of a silly deleted file so that it appears as
0, not 1.
Found with the generic/035 and generic/084 xfstests.
Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
The port's headroom buffers are used to store packets while they
traverse the device's pipeline and also to store packets that are egress
mirrored.
On Spectrum-3, ports with eight lanes use two headroom buffers between
which the configured headroom size is split.
In order to prevent packet loss, multiply the calculated headroom size
by two for 8x ports.
Fixes: da382875c616 ("mlxsw: spectrum: Extend to support Spectrum-3 ASIC")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Code to initialize the conf structure while gathering the configuration
of the device was missing.
Fixes: 571912c69f0e ("net: UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS, IP, NSH etc.")
Signed-off-by: Martin <martin.varghese@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The remove function does not destroy all
BM Pools when per cpu pool is active.
When reloading the mvpp2 as a module the BM Pools
are still active in hardware and due to the bug
have twice the size now old + new.
This eventually leads to a kernel crash.
v2:
* add Fixes tag
Fixes: 7d04b0b13b11 ("mvpp2: percpu buffers")
Signed-off-by: Sven Auhagen <sven.auhagen@voleatech.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Back in 2013, we made a change that broke fast retransmit
for non SACK flows.
Indeed, for these flows, a sender needs to receive three duplicate
ACK before starting fast retransmit. Sending ACK with different
receive window do not count.
Even if enabling SACK is strongly recommended these days,
there still are some cases where it has to be disabled.
Not increasing the window seems better than having to
rely on RTO.
After the fix, following packetdrill test gives :
// Initialize connection
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,nop,wscale 7>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,wscale 8>
+0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 514
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// Quick ack
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264
+0 < . 2001:3001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// DUPACK : Normally we should not change the window
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264
+0 < . 3001:4001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// DUPACK : Normally we should not change the window
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264
+0 < . 4001:5001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// DUPACK : Normally we should not change the window
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 264
+0 < . 1001:2001(1000) ack 1 win 514
// Hole is repaired.
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 5001 win 272
Fixes: 4e4f1fc22681 ("tcp: properly increase rcv_ssthresh for ofo packets")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd
Pull MFD fix from Lee Jones:
"Fix NULL pointer dereference in mt6360 driver"
* tag 'mfd-fixes-5.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lee/mfd:
mfd: mt6360: Fix register driver NULL pointer by adding driver name
|
|
afs_vnode_commit_status() is only ever called if op->error is 0, so remove
the op->error checks from the function.
Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
afs_check_for_remote_deletion() checks to see if error ENOENT is returned
by the server in response to an operation and, if so, marks the primary
vnode as having been deleted as the FID is no longer valid.
However, it's being called from the operation success functions, where no
abort has happened - and if an inline abort is recorded, it's handled by
afs_vnode_commit_status().
Fix this by actually calling the operation aborted method if provided and
having that point to afs_check_for_remote_deletion().
Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
Remove afs_operation::abort_code as it's read but never set. Use
ac.abort_code instead.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
Fix yfs_fs_fetch_status() to honour the vnode selector in
op->fetch_status.which as does afs_fs_fetch_status() that allows
afs_do_lookup() to use this as an alternative to the InlineBulkStatus RPC
call if not implemented by the server.
This doesn't matter in the current code as YFS servers always implement
InlineBulkStatus, but a subsequent will call it on YFS servers too in some
circumstances.
Fixes: e49c7b2f6de7 ("afs: Build an abstraction around an "operation" concept")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
Remove yfs_fs_fetch_file_status() as it's no longer used.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
|
|
The driver name was accidentally removed when .probe() by was replaced
by .probe_new() during an early patch review.
[ 121.243012] EAX: c2a8bc64 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00000000
[ 121.243012] ESI: c2a8bc79 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e54bdea8 ESP: e54bdea0
[ 121.243012] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010286
[ 121.243012] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00000000 CR3: 02ec3000 CR4: 000006b0
[ 121.243012] Call Trace:
[ 121.243012] kset_find_obj+0x3d/0xc0
[ 121.243012] driver_find+0x16/0x40
[ 121.243012] driver_register+0x49/0x100
[ 121.243012] ? i2c_for_each_dev+0x39/0x50
[ 121.243012] ? __process_new_adapter+0x20/0x20
[ 121.243012] ? cht_wc_driver_init+0x11/0x11
[ 121.243012] i2c_register_driver+0x30/0x80
[ 121.243012] ? intel_lpss_pci_driver_init+0x16/0x16
[ 121.243012] mt6360_pmu_driver_init+0xf/0x11
[ 121.243012] do_one_initcall+0x33/0x1a0
[ 121.243012] ? parse_args+0x1eb/0x3d0
[ 121.243012] ? __might_sleep+0x31/0x90
[ 121.243012] ? kernel_init_freeable+0x10a/0x17f
[ 121.243012] kernel_init_freeable+0x12c/0x17f
[ 121.243012] ? rest_init+0x110/0x110
[ 121.243012] kernel_init+0xb/0x100
[ 121.243012] ? schedule_tail_wrapper+0x9/0xc
[ 121.243012] ret_from_fork+0x19/0x24
[ 121.243012] Modules linked in:
[ 121.243012] CR2: 0000000000000000
[ 121.243012] random: get_random_bytes called from init_oops_id+0x3a/0x40 with crng_init=0
[ 121.243012] ---[ end trace 38a803400f1a2bee ]---
[ 121.243012] EIP: strcmp+0x11/0x30
Fixes: 7edd363421dab ("mfd: Add support for PMIC MT6360")
Signed-off-by: Gene Chen <gene_chen@richtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@kernel.org>
[Lee: Taking the opportunity to fix the compatible string too 's/_/-/']
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
|
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
|
