summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-11-13clocksource/drivers/mips-gic-timer: Always use cluster 0 counter as clocksourcePaul Burton
In a multi-cluster MIPS system, there are multiple GICs - one in each cluster - each of which has its independent counter. The counters in each GIC are not synchronized in any way, so they can drift relative to one another through the lifetime of the system. This is problematic for a clock source which ought to be global. Avoid problems by always accessing cluster 0's counter, using cross-cluster register access. This adds overhead so it is applied only on multi-cluster systems. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chao-ying Fu <cfu@wavecomp.com> Signed-off-by: Dragan Mladjenovic <dragan.mladjenovic@syrmia.com> Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Rikalo <arikalo@gmail.com> Tested-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com> Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019071037.145314-6-arikalo@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2024-11-13clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Don't fail probe if int not foundJudith Mendez
Some timers may not have an interrupt routed to the A53 GIC, but the timer PWM functionality can still be used by Linux Kernel. Therefore, do not fail probe if interrupt is not found and ti,timer-pwm exists. Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241011175203.1040568-1-jm@ti.com Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2024-11-13clocksource/drivers:sp804: Make user selectableMark Brown
The sp804 is currently only user selectable if COMPILE_TEST, this was done by commit dfc82faad725 ("clocksource/drivers/sp804: Add COMPILE_TEST to CONFIG_ARM_TIMER_SP804") in order to avoid it being spuriously offered on platforms that won't have the hardware since it's generally only seen on Arm based platforms. This config is overly restrictive, while platforms that rely on the SP804 do select it in their Kconfig there are others such as the Arm fast models which have a SP804 available but currently unused by Linux. Relax the dependency to allow it to be user selectable on arm and arm64 to avoid surprises and in case someone comes up with a use for extra timer hardware. Fixes: dfc82faad725 ("clocksource/drivers/sp804: Add COMPILE_TEST to CONFIG_ARM_TIMER_SP804") Reported-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241001-arm64-vexpress-sp804-v3-1-0a2d3f7883e4@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2024-11-13clocksource/drivers/dw_apb: Remove unused dw_apb_clockevent functionsDr. David Alan Gilbert
dw_apb_clockevent_pause(), dw_apb_clockevent_resume() and dw_apb_clockevent_stop() have been unused since 2021's commit 1b79fc4f2bfd ("x86/apb_timer: Remove driver for deprecated platform") Remove them. (Some of the other clockevent functions are still called by dw_apb_timer_of.c so I guess it is still in use?) Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241025203101.241709-1-linux@treblig.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
2024-11-07hrtimers: Delete hrtimer_init_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_init_on_stack() is now unused. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/510ce0d2944c4a382ea51e51d03dcfb73ba0f4f7.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07alarmtimer: Switch to use hrtimer_setup() and hrtimer_setup_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup() and hrtimer_setup_on_stack() take the callback function pointer as argument and initialize the timer completely. Replace the hrtimer_init*() variants and the open coded initialization of hrtimer::function with the new setup mechanism. Switch to use the new functions. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/2bae912336103405adcdab96b88d3ea0353b4228.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07io_uring: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_on_stack() takes the callback function pointer as argument and initializes the timer completely. Replace hrtimer_init_on_stack() and the open coded initialization of hrtimer::function with the new setup mechanism. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f0d4ac32ec4050710a656cee8385fa4427be33aa.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07sched/idle: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_on_stack() takes the callback function pointer as argument and initializes the timer completely. Replace hrtimer_init_on_stack() and the open coded initialization of hrtimer::function with the new setup mechanism. The conversion was done with Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/17f9421fed6061df4ad26a4cc91873d2c078cb0f.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07hrtimers: Delete hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() is now unused. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/52549846635c0b3a2abf82101f539efdabcd9778.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07wait: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() replaces hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() to keep the naming convention consistent. Convert the usage site over to it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/fc91182375df81120a88dbe0263267e24d1bf19e.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07timers: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() replaces hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() to keep the naming convention consistent. Convert the usage sites over to it. The conversion was done with Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/299c07f0f96af8ab3a7631b47b6ca22b06b20577.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07net: pktgen: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() replaces hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() to keep the naming convention consistent. Convert the usage site over to it. The conversion was done with Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c4b40b8fef250b6a325e1b8bd6057005fb3cb660.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07futex: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() replaces hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() to keep the naming convention consistent. Convert the usage site over to it. The conversion was done with Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d92116a17313dee283ebc959869bea80fbf94cdb.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07fs/aio: Switch to use hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack() replaces hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() to keep the naming convention consistent. Convert the usage site over to it. The conversion was done with Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5f10c259fa43ba2fe774de5b2cedc22f5e9cfd2d.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07hrtimers: Introduce hrtimer_update_function()Nam Cao
Some users of hrtimer need to change the callback function after the initial setup. They write to hrtimer::function directly. That's not safe under all circumstances as the write is lockless and a concurrent timer expiry might end up using the wrong function pointer. Introduce hrtimer_update_function(), which also performs runtime checks whether it is safe to modify the callback. This allows to make hrtimer::function private once all users are converted. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20a937b0ae09ad54b5b6d86eabead7c570f1b72e.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07hrtimers: Introduce hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack()Nam Cao
The hrtimer_init*() API is replaced by hrtimer_setup*() variants to initialize the timer including the callback function at once. hrtimer_init_sleeper_on_stack() does not need user to setup the callback function separately, so a new variant would not be strictly necessary. Nonetheless, to keep the naming convention consistent, introduce hrtimer_setup_sleeper_on_stack(). hrtimer_init_on_stack() will be removed once all users are converted. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/7b5e18e6dd0ace9eaa211201528cb9dc23752454.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07hrtimers: Introduce hrtimer_setup_on_stack()Nam Cao
To initialize hrtimer on stack, hrtimer_init_on_stack() needs to be called and also hrtimer::function must be set. This is error-prone and awkward to use. Introduce hrtimer_setup_on_stack() which does both of these things, so that users of hrtimer can be simplified. The new setup function also has a sanity check for the provided function pointer. If NULL, a warning is emitted and a dummy callback installed. hrtimer_init_on_stack() will be removed as soon as all of its users have been converted to the new function. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4b05e2ab3a82c517adf67fabc0f0cd8fe118b97c.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07hrtimers: Introduce hrtimer_setup() to replace hrtimer_init()Nam Cao
To initialize hrtimer, hrtimer_init() needs to be called and also hrtimer::function must be set. This is error-prone and awkward to use. Introduce hrtimer_setup() which does both of these things, so that users of hrtimer can be simplified. The new setup function also has a sanity check for the provided function pointer. If NULL, a warning is emitted and a dummy callback installed. hrtimer_init() will be removed as soon as all of its users have been converted to the new function. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5057c1ddbfd4b92033cd93d37fe38e6b069d5ba6.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07io_uring: Remove redundant hrtimer's callback function setupNam Cao
The IORING_OP_TIMEOUT command uses hrtimer underneath. The timer's callback function is setup in io_timeout(), and then the callback function is setup again when the timer is rearmed. Since the callback function is the same for both cases, the latter setup is redundant, therefore remove it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/07b28dfd5691478a2d250f379c8b90dd37f9bb9a.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07_RESEND_PATCH_v2_04_19_wifi_rt2x00_Remove_redundant_hrtimer_init_Nam Cao
rt2x00usb_probe() executes a hrtimer_init() for txstatus_timer. Afterwards, rt2x00lib_probe_dev() is called which also initializes this txstatus_timer with the same settings. Remove the redundant hrtimer_init() call in rt2x00usb_probe(). Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/66116057f788e18a6603d50a554417eee459e02c.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07KVM: x86/xen: Initialize hrtimer in kvm_xen_init_vcpu()Nam Cao
The hrtimer is initialized in the KVM_XEN_VCPU_SET_ATTR ioctl. That caused problem in the past, because the hrtimer can be initialized multiple times, which was fixed by commit af735db31285 ("KVM: x86/xen: Initialize Xen timer only once"). This commit avoids initializing the timer multiple times by checking the field 'function' of struct hrtimer to determine if it has already been initialized. This is not required and in the way to make the function field private. Move the hrtimer initialization into kvm_xen_init_vcpu() so that it will only be initialized once. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9c33c7224d97d08f4fa30d3cc8687981c1d3e953.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07drm/i915/request: Remove unnecessary modification of hrtimer:: FunctionNam Cao
When a request is created, the hrtimer is not initialized and only its 'function' field is set to NULL. The hrtimer is only initialized when the request is enqueued. The point of setting 'function' to NULL is that, it can be used to check whether hrtimer_try_to_cancel() should be called while retiring the request. This "trick" is unnecessary, because hrtimer_try_to_cancel() already does its own check whether the timer is armed. If the timer is not armed, hrtimer_try_to_cancel() returns 0. Fully initialize the timer when the request is created, which allows to make the hrtimer::function field private once all users of hrtimer_init() are converted to hrtimer_setup(), which requires a valid callback function to be set. Because hrtimer_try_to_cancel() returns 0 if the timer is not armed, the logic to check whether to call i915_request_put() remains equivalent. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/50f865045aa672a9730343ad131543da332b1d8d.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07hrtimers: Add missing hrtimer_init() trace pointsNam Cao
hrtimer_init*_on_stack() is not covered by tracing when CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_TIMERS=y. Rework the functions similar to hrtimer_init() and hrtimer_init_sleeper() so that the hrtimer_init() tracepoint is unconditionally available. The rework makes hrtimer_init_sleeper() unused. Delete it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/74528e8abf2bb96e8bee85ffacbf14e15cf89f0d.1730386209.git.namcao@linutronix.de
2024-11-07alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functionsThomas Gleixner
Now that the SIG_IGN problem is solved in the core code, the alarmtimer callbacks do not require a return value anymore. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.318837272@linutronix.de
2024-11-07alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now()Thomas Gleixner
Now that ignored posix timer signals are requeued and the timers are rearmed on signal delivery the workaround to keep such timers alive and self rearm them is not longer required. Remove the unused alarm timer parts. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.252443020@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftoversThomas Gleixner
Now that ignored posix timer signals are requeued and the timers are rearmed on signal delivery the workaround to keep such timers alive and self rearm them is not longer required. Remove the relevant hacks and the not longer required return values from the related functions. The alarm timer workarounds will be cleaned up in a separate step. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.187239060@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore listThomas Gleixner
Queue posixtimers which have their signal ignored on the ignored list: 1) When the timer fires and the signal has SIG_IGN set 2) When SIG_IGN is installed via sigaction() and a timer signal is already queued This only happens when the signal is for a valid timer, which delivered the signal in periodic mode. One-shot timer signals are correctly dropped. Due to the lock order constraints (sighand::siglock nests inside timer::lock) the signal code cannot access any of the timer fields which are relevant to make this decision, e.g. timer::it_status. This is addressed by establishing a protection scheme which requires to lock both locks on the timer side for modifying decision fields in the timer struct and therefore makes it possible for the signal delivery to evaluate with only sighand:siglock being held: 1) Move the NULLification of timer->it_signal into the sighand::siglock protected section of timer_delete() and check timer::it_signal in the code path which determines whether the signal is dropped or queued on the ignore list. This ensures that a deleted timer cannot be moved onto the ignore list, which would prevent it from being freed on exit() as it is not longer in the process' posix timer list. If the timer got moved to the ignored list before deletion then it is removed from the ignored list under sighand lock in timer_delete(). 2) Provide a new timer::it_sig_periodic flag, which gets set in the signal queue path with both timer and sighand locks held if the timer is actually in periodic mode at expiry time. The ignore list code checks this flag under sighand::siglock and drops the signal when it is not set. If it is set, then the signal is moved to the ignored list independent of the actual state of the timer. When the signal is un-ignored later then the signal is moved back to the signal queue. On signal delivery the posix timer side decides about dropping the signal if the timer was re-armed, dis-armed or deleted based on the signal sequence counter check. If the thread/process exits then not yet delivered signals are discarded which means the reference of the timer containing the sigqueue is dropped and frees the timer. This is way cheaper than requiring all code paths to lock sighand::siglock of the target thread/process on any modification of timer::it_status or going all the way and removing pending signals from the signal queues on every rearm, disarm or delete operation. So the protection scheme here is that on the timer side both timer::lock and sighand::siglock have to be held for modifying timer::it_signal timer::it_sig_periodic which means that on the signal side holding sighand::siglock is enough to evaluate these fields. In posixtimer_deliver_signal() holding timer::lock is sufficient to do the sequence validation against timer::it_signal_seq because a concurrent expiry is waiting on timer::lock to be released. This completes the SIG_IGN handling and such timers are not longer self rearmed which avoids pointless wakeups. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.120756416@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN)Thomas Gleixner
When a real handler (including SIG_DFL) is installed for a signal, which had previously SIG_IGN set, then the list of ignored posix timers has to be checked for timers which are affected by this change. Add a list walk function which checks for the matching signal number and if found requeues the timers signal, so the timer is rearmed on signal delivery. Rearming the timer right away is not possible because that requires to drop sighand lock. No functional change as the counter part which queues the timers on the ignored list is still missing. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064214.054091076@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exitThomas Gleixner
To handle posix timer signals on sigaction(SIG_IGN) properly, the timers will be queued on a separate ignored list. Add the necessary cleanup code for timer_delete() and exit_itimers(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.987530588@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers listThomas Gleixner
To prepare for handling posix timer signals on sigaction(SIG_IGN) properly, add a list to task::signal. This list will be used to queue posix timers so their signal can be requeued when SIG_IGN is lifted later. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.920101900@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimerThomas Gleixner
The posix timer signal handling uses siginfo::si_sys_private for handling the sequence counter check. That indirection is not longer required and the sequence count value at signal queueing time can be stored in struct k_itimer itself. This removes the requirement of treating siginfo::si_sys_private special as it's now always zero as the kernel does not touch it anymore. Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.852619866@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftoversThomas Gleixner
Remove the leftovers of sigqueue preallocation as it's not longer used. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.786506636@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimerThomas Gleixner
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time races of all sorts. Now that the prerequisites are in place, embed the sigqueue into struct k_itimer and fixup the relevant usage sites. Aside of preparing for proper SIG_IGN handling, this spares an extra allocation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.719695194@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Replace resched_timer logicThomas Gleixner
In preparation for handling ignored posix timer signals correctly and embedding the sigqueue struct into struct k_itimer, hand down a pointer to the sigqueue struct into posix_timer_deliver_signal() instead of just having a boolean flag. No functional change. Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.652658158@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Refactor send_sigqueue()Thomas Gleixner
To handle posix timers which have their signal ignored via SIG_IGN properly it is required to requeue a ignored signal for delivery when SIG_IGN is lifted so the timer gets rearmed. Split the required code out of send_sigqueue() so it can be reused in context of sigaction(). While at it rename send_sigqueue() to posixtimer_send_sigqueue() so its clear what this is about. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.586453412@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Store PID type in the timerThomas Gleixner
instead of re-evaluating the signal delivery mode everywhere. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.519086500@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init()Thomas Gleixner
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time races of all sorts. Provide a new function to initialize the embedded sigqueue to prepare for that. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.450427515@linutronix.de
2024-11-07signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc()Thomas Gleixner
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time races of all sorts. Reorganize __sigqueue_alloc() so the ucounts retrieval and the initialization can be used independently. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.371410037@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimerThomas Gleixner
To cure the SIG_IGN handling for posix interval timers, the preallocated sigqueue needs to be embedded into struct k_itimer to prevent life time races of all sorts. To make that work correctly it needs reference counting so that timer deletion does not free the timer prematuraly when there is a signal queued or delivered concurrently. Add a rcuref to the posix timer part. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.304756440@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleepThomas Gleixner
POSIX CPU timer nanosleep creates a k_itimer on stack and uses the sigq pointer to detect the nanosleep case in the expiry function. Prepare for embedding sigqueue into struct k_itimer by using a dedicated flag for nanosleep. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.238550394@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logicThomas Gleixner
The firing flag of a posix CPU timer is tristate: 0: when the timer is not about to deliver a signal 1: when the timer has expired, but the signal has not been delivered yet -1: when the timer was queued for signal delivery and a rearm operation raced against it and supressed the signal delivery. This is a pointless exercise as this can be simply expressed with a boolean. Only if set, the signal is delivered. This makes delete and rearm consistent with the rest of the posix timers. Convert firing to bool and fixup the usage sites accordingly and add comments why the timer cannot be dequeued right away. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.172848618@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensibleThomas Gleixner
The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state, i.e. 0. Don't touch info::si_overrun in send_sigqueue() and only store the overrun value at signal delivery time, which is computed from the timer itself relative to the expiry time. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.106738193@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistentThomas Gleixner
Signals of timers which are reprogammed, disarmed or deleted can deliver signals related to the past. The POSIX spec is blury about this: - "The effect of disarming or resetting a timer with pending expiration notifications is unspecified." - "The disposition of pending signals for the deleted timer is unspecified." In both cases it is reasonable to expect that pending signals are discarded. Especially in the reprogramming case it does not make sense to account for previous overruns or to deliver a signal for a timer which has been disarmed. This makes the behaviour consistent and understandable. Remove the si_sys_private check from the signal delivery code and invoke posix_timer_deliver_signal() unconditionally for posix timer related signals. Change posix_timer_deliver_signal() so it controls the actual signal delivery via the return value. It now instructs the signal code to drop the signal when: 1) The timer does not longer exist in the hash table 2) The timer signal_seq value is not the same as the si_sys_private value which was set when the signal was queued. This is also a preparatory change to embed the sigqueue into the k_itimer structure, which in turn allows to remove the si_sys_private magic. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064213.040348644@linutronix.de
2024-11-07posix-cpu-timers: Correctly update timer status in posix_cpu_timer_del()Thomas Gleixner
If posix_cpu_timer_del() exits early due to task not found or sighand invalid, it fails to clear the state of the timer. That's harmless but inconsistent. These early exits are accounted as successful delete. Move the update of the timer state into the success return path, so all "successful" deletions are handled. Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241105064212.974053438@linutronix.de
2024-11-02timekeeping: Always check for negative motionThomas Gleixner
clocksource_delta() has two variants. One with a check for negative motion, which is only selected by x86. This is a historic leftover as this function was previously used in the time getter hot paths. Since 135225a363ae timekeeping_cycles_to_ns() has unconditional protection against this as a by-product of the protection against 64bit math overflow. clocksource_delta() is only used in the clocksource watchdog and in timekeeping_advance(). The extra conditional there is not hurting anyone. Remove the config option and unconditionally prevent negative motion of the readout. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031120328.599430157@linutronix.de
2024-11-02timekeeping: Remove CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPINGThomas Gleixner
Since 135225a363ae timekeeping_cycles_to_ns() handles large offsets which would lead to 64bit multiplication overflows correctly. It's also protected against negative motion of the clocksource unconditionally, which was exclusive to x86 before. timekeeping_advance() handles large offsets already correctly. That means the value of CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING which analyzed these cases is very close to zero. Remove all of it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241031120328.536010148@linutronix.de
2024-10-31timers: Add missing READ_ONCE() in __run_timer_base()Thomas Gleixner
__run_timer_base() checks base::next_expiry without holding base::lock. That can race with a remote CPU updating next_expiry under the lock. This is an intentional and harmless data race, but lacks a READ_ONCE(), so KCSAN complains about this. Add the missing READ_ONCE(). All other places are covered already. Fixes: 79f8b28e85f8 ("timers: Annotate possible non critical data race of next_expiry") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/87a5emyqk0.ffs@tglx Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202410301205.ef8e9743-lkp@intel.com
2024-10-31clocksource/drivers/timer-tegra: Remove clockevents shutdown call on offliningFrederic Weisbecker
The clockevents core already detached and unregistered it at this stage. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029125451.54574-11-frederic@kernel.org
2024-10-31clocksource/drivers/qcom: Remove clockevents shutdown call on offliningFrederic Weisbecker
The clockevents core already detached and unregistered it at this stage. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029125451.54574-10-frederic@kernel.org
2024-10-31clocksource/drivers/armada-370-xp: Remove clockevents shutdown call on offliningFrederic Weisbecker
The clockevents core already detached and unregistered it at this stage. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241029125451.54574-9-frederic@kernel.org