summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2024-02-15x86/acpi: Dont invoke topology_register_apic() for XEN PVThomas Gleixner
The MADT table for XEN/PV dom0 is not really useful and registering the APICs is momentarily a pointless exercise because XENPV does not use an APIC at all. It overrides the x86_init.mpparse.parse_smp_config() callback, resets num_processors and counts how many of them are provided by the hypervisor. This is in the way of cleaning up the APIC registration. Prevent MADT registration for XEN/PV temporarily until the rework is completed and XEN/PV can use the MADT again. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.885489468@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Use new APIC registration functionThomas Gleixner
Aside of switching over to the new interface, record the number of registered CPUs locally, which allows to make num_processors and disabled_cpus confined to the topology code. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.830955273@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/of: Use new APIC registration functionsThomas Gleixner
No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.776009244@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/jailhouse: Use new APIC registration functionThomas Gleixner
No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.720970412@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/acpi: Use new APIC registration functionsThomas Gleixner
Use the new topology registration functions and make the early boot code path __init. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.664738831@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Provide separate APIC registration functionsThomas Gleixner
generic_processor_info() aside of being a complete misnomer is used for both early boot registration and ACPI CPU hotplug. While it's arguable that this can share some code, it results in code which is hard to understand and kept around post init for no real reason. Also the call sites do lots of manual fiddling in topology related variables instead of having proper interfaces for the purpose which handle the topology internals correctly. Provide topology_register_apic(), topology_hotplug_apic() and topology_hotunplug_apic() which have the extra magic of the call sites incorporated and for now are wrappers around generic_processor_info(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.605007456@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Move registration out of APIC codeThomas Gleixner
The APIC/CPU registration sits in the middle of the APIC code. In fact this is a topology evaluation function and has nothing to do with the inner workings of the local APIC. Move it out into a file which reflects what this is about. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213210251.543948812@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic: Use a proper define for invalid ACPI CPU IDThomas Gleixner
The ACPI ID for CPUs is preset with U32_MAX which is completely non obvious. Use a proper define for it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154640.177504138@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove yet another dubious callbackThomas Gleixner
Paranoia is not wrong, but having an APIC callback which is in most implementations a complete NOOP and in one actually looking whether the APICID of an upcoming CPU has been registered. The same APICID which was used to bring the CPU out of wait for startup. That's paranoia for the paranoia sake. Remove the voodoo. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154640.116510935@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove the pointless writeback of boot_cpu_physical_apicidThomas Gleixner
There is absolutely no point to write the APIC ID which was read from the local APIC earlier, back into the local APIC for the 64-bit UP case. Remove that along with the apic callback which is solely there for this pointless exercise. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154640.055288922@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Remove the physid_t bitmap wrapperThomas Gleixner
physid_t is a wrapper around bitmap. Just remove the onion layer and use bitmap functionality directly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.994904510@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mm/numa: Move early mptable evaluation into common codeThomas Gleixner
There is no reason to have the early mptable evaluation conditionally invoked only from the AMD numa topology code. Make it explicit and invoke it from setup_arch() right after the corresponding ACPI init call. Remove the pointless wrapper and invoke x86_init::mpparse::early_parse_smp_config() directly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.931761608@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Switch to new init callbacksThomas Gleixner
Now that all platforms have the new split SMP configuration callbacks set up, flip the switch and remove the old callback pointer and mop up the platform code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.870883080@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/hyperv/vtl: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner
Initialize the new callbacks in preparation for switching the core code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.808238769@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/xen/smp_pv: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner
Provide a wrapper around the existing function and fill the new callbacks in. No functional change as the new callbacks are not yet operational. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.745028043@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/jailhouse: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner
Provide a wrapper around the existing function and fill the new callbacks in. No functional change as the new callbacks are not yet operational. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.683073662@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/platform/intel-mid: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner
Initialize the split SMP configuration callbacks with NOOPs as MID is strictly ACPI only. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.620189339@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/platform/ce4100: Prepare for separate mpparse callbacksThomas Gleixner
Select x86_dtb_parse_smp_config() as SMP configuration parser in preparation of splitting up the get_smp_config() callback. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.558085053@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/dtb: Rename x86_dtb_init()Thomas Gleixner
x86_dtb_init() is a misnomer and it really should be used as a SMP configuration parser which is selected by the platform via x86_init::mpparse:parse_smp_config(). Rename it to x86_dtb_parse_smp_config() in preparation for that. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.495992801@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Prepare for callback separationThomas Gleixner
In preparation of splitting the get_smp_config() callback, rename default_get_smp_config() to mpparse_get_smp_config() and provide an early and late wrapper. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.433811243@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Provide separate early/late callbacksThomas Gleixner
The early argument of x86_init::mpparse::get_smp_config() is more than confusing. Provide two callbacks, one for each purpose. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.370491894@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mpparse: Rename default_find_smp_config()Thomas Gleixner
MPTABLE is no longer the default SMP configuration mechanism. Rename it to mpparse_find_mptable() because that's what it does. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.306287711@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove check_apicid_used() and ioapic_phys_id_map()Thomas Gleixner
No more users. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.243307499@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/ioapic: Simplify setup_ioapic_ids_from_mpc_nocheck()Thomas Gleixner
No need to go through APIC callbacks. It's already established that this is an ancient APIC. So just copy the present mask and use the direct physid* functions all over the place. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.181901887@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/ioapic: Make io_apic_get_unique_id() simplerThomas Gleixner
No need to go through APIC callbacks. It's already established that this is an ancient APIC. So just copy the present mask and use the direct physid* functions all over the place. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.119261725@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic: Get rid of get_physical_broadcast()Thomas Gleixner
There is no point for this function. The only case where this is used is when there is no XAPIC available, which means the broadcast address is 0xF. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154639.057209154@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/ioapic: Replace some more set bit nonsenseThomas Gleixner
Yet another set_bit() operation wrapped in oring a mask. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.995080989@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/platform/ce4100: Dont override x86_init.mpparse.setup_ioapic_idsThomas Gleixner
There is no point to do that. The ATOMs have an XAPIC for which this function is a pointless exercise. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.931617775@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu/topology: Make the APIC mismatch warnings completeThomas Gleixner
Detect all possible combinations of mismatch right in the CPUID evaluation code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212154638.867699078@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic/uv: Remove the private leaf 0xb parserThomas Gleixner
The package shift has been already evaluated by the early CPU init. Put the mindless copy right next to the original leaf 0xb parser. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.637385562@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/xen/smp_pv: Remove cpudata fiddlingThomas Gleixner
The new topology CPUID parser installs already fake topology for XEN/PV, which ends up with cpuinfo::max_cores = 1. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.576579177@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/apic: Remove unused phys_pkg_id() callbackThomas Gleixner
Now that the core code does not use this monstrosity anymore, it's time to put it to rest. The only real purpose was to read the APIC ID on UV and VSMP systems for the actual evaluation. That's what the core code does now. For doing the actual shift operation there is truly no APIC callback required. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.516536121@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Remove x86_coreid_bitsThomas Gleixner
No more users. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.455839743@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Remove topology.cThomas Gleixner
No more users. Stick it into the ugly code museum. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.395230346@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Make topology_amd_node_id() use the actual node infoThomas Gleixner
Now that everything is converted switch it over and remove the intermediate operation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.334185785@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/mm/numa: Use core domain size on AMDThomas Gleixner
cpuinfo::topo::x86_coreid_bits is about to be phased out. Use the core domain size from the topology information. Add a comment why the early MPTABLE parsing is required and decrapify the loop which sets the APIC ID to node map. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.270320718@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Use common topology code for HYGONThomas Gleixner
Switch it over to use the consolidated topology evaluation and remove the temporary safe guards which are not longer needed. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.207750409@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Use common topology code for AMDThomas Gleixner
Switch it over to the new topology evaluation mechanism and remove the random bits and pieces which are sprinkled all over the place. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.145745053@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/smpboot: Teach it about topo.amd_node_idThomas Gleixner
When switching AMD over to the new topology parser then the match functions need to look for AMD systems with the extended topology feature at the new topo.amd_node_id member which is then holding the node id information. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.082979150@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Provide an AMD/HYGON specific topology parserThomas Gleixner
AMD/HYGON uses various methods for topology evaluation: - Leaf 0x80000008 and 0x8000001e based with an optional leaf 0xb, which is the preferred variant for modern CPUs. Leaf 0xb will be superseded by leaf 0x80000026 soon, which is just another variant of the Intel 0x1f leaf for whatever reasons. - Subleaf 0x80000008 and NODEID_MSR base - Legacy fallback That code is following the principle of random bits and pieces all over the place which results in multiple evaluations and impenetrable code flows in the same way as the Intel parsing did. Provide a sane implementation by clearly separating the three variants and bringing them in the proper preference order in one place. This provides the parsing for both AMD and HYGON because there is no point in having a separate HYGON parser which only differs by 3 lines of code. Any further divergence between AMD and HYGON can be handled in different functions, while still sharing the existing parsers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153625.020038641@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu/amd: Provide a separate accessor for Node IDThomas Gleixner
AMD (ab)uses topology_die_id() to store the Node ID information and topology_max_dies_per_pkg to store the number of nodes per package. This collides with the proper processor die level enumeration which is coming on AMD with CPUID 8000_0026, unless there is a correlation between the two. There is zero documentation about that. So provide new storage and new accessors which for now still access die_id and topology_max_die_per_pkg(). Will be mopped up after AMD and HYGON are converted over. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.956116738@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Use common topology code for IntelThomas Gleixner
Intel CPUs use either topology leaf 0xb/0x1f evaluation or the legacy SMP/HT evaluation based on CPUID leaf 0x1/0x4. Move it over to the consolidated topology code and remove the random topology hacks which are sprinkled into the Intel and the common code. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.893644349@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Provide a sane leaf 0xb/0x1f parserThomas Gleixner
detect_extended_topology() along with it's early() variant is a classic example for duct tape engineering: - It evaluates an array of subleafs with a boatload of local variables for the relevant topology levels instead of using an array to save the enumerated information and propagate it to the right level - It has no boundary checks for subleafs - It prevents updating the die_id with a crude workaround instead of checking for leaf 0xb which does not provide die information. - It's broken vs. the number of dies evaluation as it uses: num_processors[DIE_LEVEL] / num_processors[CORE_LEVEL] which "works" only correctly if there is none of the intermediate topology levels (MODULE/TILE) enumerated. There is zero value in trying to "fix" that code as the only proper fix is to rewrite it from scratch. Implement a sane parser with proper code documentation, which will be used for the consolidated topology evaluation in the next step. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.830571770@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Move __max_die_per_package to common.cThomas Gleixner
In preparation of a complete replacement for the topology leaf 0xb/0x1f evaluation, move __max_die_per_package into the common code. Will be removed once everything is converted over. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.768188958@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Use common topology code for Centaur and ZhaoxinThomas Gleixner
Centaur and Zhaoxin CPUs use only the legacy SMP detection. Remove the invocations from their 32bit path and exclude them from the 64-bit call path. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.706794189@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Add legacy topology parserThomas Gleixner
The legacy topology detection via CPUID leaf 4, which provides the number of cores in the package and CPUID leaf 1 which provides the number of logical CPUs in case that FEATURE_HT is enabled and the CMP_LEGACY feature is not set, is shared for Intel, Centaur and Zhaoxin CPUs. Lift the code from common.c without the early detection hack and provide it as common fallback mechanism. Will be utilized in later changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.644448852@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Provide cpu_init/parse_topology()Thomas Gleixner
Topology evaluation is a complete disaster and impenetrable mess. It's scattered all over the place with some vendor implementations doing early evaluation and some not. The most horrific part is the permanent overwriting of smt_max_siblings and __max_die_per_package, instead of establishing them once on the boot CPU and validating the result on the APs. The goals are: - One topology evaluation entry point - Proper sharing of pointlessly duplicated code - Proper structuring of the evaluation logic and preferences. - Evaluating important system wide information only once on the boot CPU - Making the 0xb/0x1f leaf parsing less convoluted and actually fixing the short comings of leaf 0x1f evaluation. Start to consolidate the topology evaluation code by providing the entry points for the early boot CPU evaluation and for the final parsing on the boot CPU and the APs. Move the trivial pieces into that new code: - The initialization of cpuinfo_x86::topo - The evaluation of CPUID leaf 1, which presets topo::initial_apicid - topo_apicid is set to topo::initial_apicid when invoked from early boot. When invoked for the final evaluation on the boot CPU it reads the actual APIC ID, which makes apic_get_initial_apicid() obsolete once everything is converted over. Provide a temporary helper function topo_converted() which shields off the not yet converted CPU vendors from invoking code which would break them. This shielding covers all vendor CPUs which support SMP, but not the historical pure UP ones as they only need the topology info init and eventually the initial APIC initialization. Provide two new members in cpuinfo_x86::topo to store the maximum number of SMT siblings and the number of dies per package and add them to the debugfs readout. These two members will be used to populate this information on the boot CPU and to validate the APs against it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240212153624.581436579@linutronix.de
2024-02-15x86/cpu: Provide cpuid_read() et al.Thomas Gleixner
Provide a few helper functions to read CPUID leafs or individual registers into a data structure without requiring unions. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com> Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Tested-by: Wang Wendy <wendy.wang@intel.com> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878r3mg570.ffs@tglx
2024-02-11Linux 6.8-rc4v6.8-rc4Linus Torvalds
2024-02-11Merge tag 'timers_urgent_for_v6.8_rc4' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull timer fix from Borislav Petkov: - Make sure a warning is issued when a hrtimer gets queued after the timers have been migrated on the CPU down path and thus said timer will get ignored * tag 'timers_urgent_for_v6.8_rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: hrtimer: Report offline hrtimer enqueue
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2025-07-29 16:03:25 +0000