| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Grab the intel_display from 'encoder' rather than 'state'
in the encoder hooks to avoid the massive footgun that is
intel_sanitize_encoder(), which passes NULL as the 'state'
argument to encoder .disable() and .post_disable().
TODO: figure out how to actually fix intel_sanitize_encoder()...
Fixes: 40eb34c3f491 ("drm/i915/crt: convert to struct intel_display")
Fixes: ab0b0eb5c85c ("drm/i915/tv: convert to struct intel_display")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241107161123.16269-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Bitwise OR for booleans is a bit of an abuse. We can trivially drop the
usage.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/f7ea5854c9a306f56f4142f8d37d567ee2f768a7.1730201504.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Drop the wa_16013835468_bit_get() function in favour of the register
macro. It doesn't have to be so complicated, and we don't have to use
the workaround name in everything that's related to it.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/22934fee1ea37c777c35e4b520d5f11b6cd953d0.1730201504.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Commit 1f12d63a14d7 ("drm/i915/dp: Write the source OUI for non-eDP
sinks as well") started writing source OUI for non-eDP sinks as well,
increasing the possibilities of hitting read/write failures either due
to the sink behaviour or hotplug or whatever.
Even before that, commit 3fb0501f0c07 ("drm/i915/display/dp: Reduce log
level for SOURCE OUI write failures") already reduced write failures to
info level when source OUI was just for eDP.
Further reduce the log level to just debug. Switch to struct
intel_display while at it.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/3372
Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241106162325.4065078-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Although Bspec doesn't explicitly mentions that, as of Xe3_LPD, using
DMC wakelock is the officially recommended way of accessing registers
that would be off during DC5/DC6 and the legacy method (where the DMC
intercepts MMIO to wake up the hardware) is to be avoided.
As such, update the driver to use the DMC wakelock by default starting
with Xe3_LPD. Since the feature is somewhat new to the driver, also
allow disabling it via a module parameter for debugging purposes.
For that, make the existing parameter allow values -1 (per-chip
default), 0 (disabled) and 1 (enabled), similarly to what is done for
other parameters.
v2:
- Describe -1 in the same area where 0 and 1 are described. (Luca)
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-16-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
Instead of checking for HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK() multiple times, let's use it
to sanitize the enable_dmc_wl parameter and use that variable when
necessary.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-15-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
A HAS_DMC_WAKELOCK() macro gives more semantic than openly checking the
display version. Define it and use it where appropriate.
v2:
- Make this patch contain only the non-functional refactor. Functional
changes related to including HAS_DMC() in the macro are done in
upcoming changes. (Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-14-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
Enabling and disabling the DMC wakelock should be done as part of
enabling and disabling of dynamic DC states, respectively. We should not
enable or disable DMC wakelock independently of DC states, otherwise we
would risk ending up with an inconsistent state where dynamic DC states
are enabled and the DMC wakelock is disabled, going against current
recommendations and making MMIO transactions potentially slower. In
future display IPs that could have a worse outcome if DMC trap
implementation is completely removed.
So, let's make things safer by tying stuff together, removing the
independent calls, and also put warnings in place to detect inconsistent
calls.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-13-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
It is possible that there are active wakelock references at the time we
are disabling the DMC wakelock mechanism. We need to deal with that in
two ways:
(A) Implement the missing step from Bspec:
The Bspec instructs us to clear any existing wakelock request bit
after disabling the mechanism. That gives a clue that it is okay to
disable while there are locks held and we do not need to wait for
them. However, since the spec is not explicit about it, we need
still to get confirmation with the hardware team. Let's thus
implement the spec and add a TODO note.
(B) Ensure a consistent driver state:
The enable/disable logic would be problematic if the following
sequence of events would happen:
1. Function A calls intel_dmc_wl_get();
2. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_disable();
3. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_enable();
4. Function A is done and calls intel_dmc_wl_put().
At (2), the refcount becomes zero and then (4) causes an invalid
decrement to the refcount. That would cause some issues:
- At the time between (3) and (4), function A would think that
the hardware lock is held but it could not be really held
until intel_dmc_wl_get() is called by something else.
- The call made to (4) could cause the refcount to become zero
and consequently the hardware lock to be released while there
could be innocent paths trusting they still have the lock.
To fix that, we need to keep the refcount correctly in sync with
intel_dmc_wl_{get,put}() calls and retake the hardware lock when
enabling the DMC wakelock with a non-zero refcount.
One missing piece left to be handled here is the following scenario:
1. Function A calls intel_dmc_wl_get();
2. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_disable();
3. Some function calls intel_dmc_wl_enable();
4. Concurrently with (3), function A performs the MMIO in between
setting DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE and asserting the lock with
__intel_dmc_wl_take().
I'm mostly sure this would cause issues future display IPs if DMC
trap implementation was completely removed. We need to check with
the hardware team whether it would be safe to assert the hardware
lock before setting DMC_WAKELOCK_CFG_ENABLE to avoid this scenario.
If not, then we would have to deal with that via software
synchronization.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-12-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
Allow simpler syntax for defining entries for single registers in range
tables. That makes them easier to type as well as to read, allowing one
to quickly tell whether a range actually refers to a single register or
a "true range".
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-11-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
There are extra registers that require the DMC wakelock when specific
dynamic DC states are in place. Those are registers that are touched by
the DMC and require DC exit for proper access. Add the range tables for
them and use the correct one depending on the enabled DC state.
v2:
- Do not look into power domains guts (i.e.
display->power.domains.dc_state). (Jani)
- Come up with better names for variables containing register ranges.
(Luca)
- Keep a copy of dc_state in struct intel_dmc_wl.
- Update commit message for a clearer explanation for the need of
these new tables.
Bspec: 71583
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-10-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
In an upcoming change, we will add extra range tables for registers that
are touched by the DMC during DC states. The range table that we are
currently using is meant for registers that are powered off during DC
states. As such, let's rename the table to powered_off_ranges and also
add a comment regarding its purpose in the function that uses it.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-9-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
We will be using more than one range table in
intel_dmc_wl_check_range(). As such, move the logic to a new function
and name it intel_dmc_wl_reg_in_range().
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-8-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
We are currently using ARRAY_SIZE() to iterate address ranges in
intel_dmc_wl_check_range(). In upcoming changes, we will be using more
than a single table and will extract the range checking logic into a
dedicated function that takes a range table as argument. As we will not
able to use ARRAY_SIZE() then, let's make range tables contain a
sentinel item at the end and use that instead of having to pass the size
as parameter in this future function.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-7-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
Bspec says that disabling dynamic DC states require taking the DMC
wakelock to cause an DC exit before writing to DC_STATE_EN. Implement
that.
In fact, testing on PTL revealed we end up failing to exit DC5/6 without
this step.
Bspec: 71583
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-6-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
When the DMC wakelock refcount reaches zero, we know that there are no
users and that we can do the actual release operation on the hardware,
which is queued with a delayed work. The idea of the delayed work is to
avoid performing the release if a new lock user appears (i.e. refcount
gets incremented) in a very short period of time.
Based on the above, the release work should bail out if refcount is
non-zero (meaning new lock users appeared in the meantime), but our
current code actually does the opposite: it bails when refcount is zero.
That means that the wakelock is not released when it should be; and
that, when the work is not canceled in time, it ends up being releasing
when it should not.
Fix that by inverting the condition.
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-5-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
Some display MMIO transactions for offsets in the range that requires
the DMC wakelock happen in atomic context (this has been confirmed
during tests on PTL). That means that we need to use a non-sleeping
variant of MMIO waiting function.
Implement __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() and use it when
waiting for acknowledgment of acquire/release.
v2:
- No __intel_de_wait_for_register_atomic_nowl() wrapper to convert
i915 to display. (Jani)
- Add a quick explanation why DMC_WAKELOCK_CTL_TIMEOUT_US is defined
in microseconds. (Luca)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-4-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
In upcoming display changes, we will modify the DMC wakelock MMIO
waiting code to choose a non-sleeping variant implementation, because
the wakelock is also taking in atomic context.
While xe provides an explicit parameter (namely "atomic") to prevent
xe_mmio_wait32() from sleeping, i915 does not and implements that
behavior when slow_timeout_ms is zero.
So, for now, let's mimic what i915 does to allow for display to use
non-sleeping MMIO wait. In the future, we should come up with a better
and explicit interface for this behavior in i915, at least while display
code is not an independent entity with proper interfaces between xe and
i915.
v2:
- Make the tone in comment the comment added in
__intel_wait_for_register() more explanatory than a FIXME-like text.
(Luca)
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-3-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
The macro i915_mmio_reg_offset() is the proper interface to get a
register's offset. Use that instead of looking directly at reg.reg.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241108130218.24125-2-gustavo.sousa@intel.com
|
|
Having Panel Replay enabled together with VRR is causing following errors:
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Timed out waiting PSR idle state
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Fault errors on pipe A: 0x00000080
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Fault errors on pipe A: 0x00040080
xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Fault errors on pipe A: 0x00040080
Let's disable Panel Replay as well if VRR is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031081025.3215966-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
|
|
TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL asks us to disable hdcp line rekeying when not in
hdcp 2.2 and we are not using an hdmi transcoder and it need to be
enabled when we are using an HDMI transcoder to enable HDCP 1.4.
We use intel_de_rmw cycles to update TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL register so
we cannot depend on the value being 0 by default everytime which calls
for seprate handling of HDCP 1.4 case.
--v2
-Use the exising function and modify it based on a bool rather than
have a different function [Matt]
--v3
-No need for kzalloc [Jani]
--v4
-i915_reg_t should not be pointer [Jani]
-use rekey_bit to ensure when writing to reg everything is initialized
Bspec: 69964, 50493, 50054
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241107022807.869744-1-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
|
|
In some places we do
min_cdclk = max(min_cdclk, other_min_cdclk)
and in other places we have the arguments swapped as
min_cdclk = max(other_min_cdclk, min_cdclk)
Unify everyone to use the first order of arguments, because
it looks cleaner, especially within intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk()
which is doing a lot of these back-to-back.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Move intel_vdsc_min_cdclk() into intel_vdsc.c from intel_cdclk.c
so that details about DSC are better contained.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
min_cdclk==0 when intel_vdsc_min_cdclk() calls max_t() on it.
Drop the redundant max_t().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Declutter intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk() by moving the
crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable check into
intel_vdsc_min_cdclk().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
All the if statements in vlv_dsi_min_cdclk() check for
INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI. Make life simpler by checking that just
once at the start.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the DSI min cdclk calculation into a helper and hide
it inside vlv_dsi.c in order to keep most DSI related
details in one place.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
All the if statements in intel_audio_min_cdclk() check for
has_audio==true. Check that once ahead of time to make
things a bit simpler.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the audio min cdclk calculation into a helper and hide
it inside intel_audio.c in order to keep most audio related
details in one place.
The one audio related thing that remains in intel_cdclk.c
is commit 451eaa1a614c ("drm/i915: Bump GLK CDCLK frequency when
driving multiple pipes") but given that's implemented in terms
of the cdclk_state I think it should stay put.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Pull the whole BDW IPS min CDCLK stuff into the IPS code
so that all the details around IPS are contained in once
place.
Note that while
- min_cdclk = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_cdclk * 100, 95);
vs.
+ min_cdclk = max(DIV_ROUND_UP(crtc_state->pixel_rate * 100, 95), min_cdclk)
may look different, they are in fact the same because
min_cdclk==crtc_state->pixel_rate at this point in
intel_crtc_compute_min_cdclk() on BDW.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
We are duplicating the CDCLK guardband and "pixels per clock"
figures in two places. Pull those out into small helpers that
can be used by both places.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Make the code a bit more self documenting by adding
HAS_DOUBLE_WIDE().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241029215217.3697-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Introduce a proper VBT->enum mipi_dsi_pixel_format converter
instead of abusing pixel_format_from_register_bits() (whose
job is to parse the pixel format from some pre-ICL DSI
hardware register).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241106220904.29523-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
config
On ADLP+ during modeset disabling, disable the DP2 configuration for MST
master transcoders as required by the specification.
Bspec: 55424, 54128, 65448, 68849
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030192313.4030617-6-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
config
On ADLP+ during modeset enabling and disabling, enable and disable the DP2
configuration for MST slave transcoders as required by the specification.
Update the documentation of intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func() /
intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func() based on the above. While at it also
clarify the programming steps of these functions specific to transcoder
types.
v2:
- Enable/disable the DP2 config from
intel_ddi_config_transcoder_func()/intel_ddi_disable_transcoder_func().
(Jani)
- Handle all ADLP+ platforms in one patch, instead of doing that
separately wrt. PTL.
Bspec: 55424, 54128, 65448, 68849
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030192313.4030617-5-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
Add a way to disable the DP2 configuration, required by the next patch
during transcoder disabling.
While at it drop the redundant encoder parameter.
v2:
- Keep intel_ddi_config_transcoder_dp2() static. (Jani)
- Remove the encoder parameter.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030192313.4030617-4-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
function
On ADLP+ during modeset enabling configure the DDI function without
enabling it for MST slave transcoders before programming the data and
link M/N values. The DDI function gets enabled separately later in the
transcoder enabling sequence.
Align the code with the spec based on the above.
v2: Move this patch earlier in the series, addressing the DP2
config fixes for all ADLP+ platforms later.
Bspec: 55424, 54128, 65448, 68849
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030192313.4030617-3-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
On PTL during modeset enabling configure the DDI function without
enabling it for MST slave transcoders before programming the data and
link M/N values. The DDI function gets enabled separately later in the
transcoder enabling sequence.
This fixes a slave transcoder getting stuck during enabling, leading
to page flip timeout errors on the corresponding pipe.
The spec requires the same programming step for ADLP+ platforms, that
will be addressed separately (on those platforms the above transcoder
getting stuck issue was not observed).
Bspec: 68849
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030192313.4030617-2-imre.deak@intel.com
|
|
Implement xelpdp_is_only_pipe_per_dbuf_bank() in a slightly
more straightforward way.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031155646.15165-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
If the system boots with MBUS joining enabled but we disable
the relevant pipe during sanitation we later get into trouble
as the rest of the code doesn't expect MBUS joining to be
enabled unless the set of active pipes is in agreement.
We could relax some of the MBUS joining related checks during
normal atomic commits to let this slide, but that might also
let some real bugs through. So let's sanitize the MBUS joining
instead. And in order to keep things more or less in sync we'll
do the related credit, cdclk/mdclk ratio, etc. updates as well.
We'll stick to sturct drm_i915_private for now (instead of
struct intel_display) since the rest of the skl wm code does the
same, and we might need to bakport this.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031155646.15165-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
We'll be wanting to reprogram the MBUS_CTL register during an
upcoming MBUS sanitation stage. Extract the reprogramming
into a helper that doesn't depend on the full atomic state
so that it can be reused.
We'll stick to sturct drm_i915_private for now (instead of
struct intel_display) since the rest of the skl wm code does the
same, and we might need to bakport this.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031155646.15165-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
We'll be wanting to reprogram the PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL registers
during an upcoming MBUS sanitation stage. Extract the reprogramming
loop into a helper that doesn't depend on the full atomic state
so that it can be reused.
We'll stick to sturct drm_i915_private for now (instead of
struct intel_display) since the rest of the skl wm code does the
same, and we might need to bakport this.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031155646.15165-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
We'll be wanting to reprogram the PIPE_MBUS_DBOX_CTL registers
during an upcoming MBUS sanitation stage. To make that easier
extract a helper that computes the full register value for us.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031155646.15165-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
In order to add more MBUS sanitation into the code we'll want
to reuse a bunch of the code that performs the MBUS/related
hardware programming. Currently that code comes after the
main skl_wm_get_hw_state_and_sanitize() entrypoint. In order
to avoid annoying forward declarations relocate the
skl_wm_get_hw_state_and_sanitize() and related stuff nearer to
the end of the file.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241031155646.15165-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
|
Certain resolutions require 12 DSC slices support along with ultrajoiner.
For such cases, the third DSC Engine per Pipe is enabled. Each DSC
Engine processes 1 Slice, resulting in a total of 12 VDSC slices
(4 Pipes * 3 DSC Instances per Pipe).
Add support for 12 DSC slices and 3 DSC engines for such modes.
v2: Add missing check for 3 slices support only with 4 joined pipes.
(Suraj)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-8-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
|
|
According to the DSC spec, the slice width should be chosen such that
the picture width (hactive) is evenly divisible by the slice width.
If not, extra pixels (padding) must be added to the last slice to
ensure all slices have the same width.
Currently, we do not support handling these extra pixels.
Therefore, select a slice count that evenly divides the hactive
(slice_width = hactive / slice_count).
This check is already implemented for DSI, where the slice count is
selected from the BIOS.
For DP, currently with 1, 2, 4 slices per pipe it is unlikely to have
slice count not being able to divide hactive, but with 3 DSC engines
and 3 slices, we can have such cases. Adding this check prepares for
future scenarios where such configurations might be used.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-7-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
|
|
With BMG each pipe has 3 DSC engines, so add bits to read/write the PPS
registers for the 3rd DSC engine
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-6-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
|
|
Introduce the register bits to enable the 3rd DSC engine VDSC2.
Add support to read/write these bits.
v2: Only introduce bits that are used and update the subject and commit
message. (Suraj)
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-5-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
|
|
Drop use of LEFT/RIGHT VDSC engine and use VDSC0/VDSC1 instead.
While at it, use REG_BIT macro for the bits.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-4-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
|
|
At the moment dsc_split represents whether the dsc splitter is used
or not. With 3 DSC engines, the splitter can split into two streams
or three streams.
Instead of representing the splitter's state, it is more effective to
represent the number of DSC streams per pipe.
Replace the `dsc.dsc_split` member with `dsc.num_streams` to indicate the
number of DSC streams used per pipe. This change will implicitly
convey the splitter's operation mode.
v2: Avoid new enum for dsc split. (Suraj)
v3:
-Replace dsc_split with num_stream. (Suraj)
-Avoid extra parentheses. (Jani)
v4: Set num_streams to 1, if VDSC_JOINER not set while readout.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241030041036.1238006-3-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com
|
