summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-02-13drm/i915/hpd: drop dev_priv parameter from intel_hpd_pin_default()Jani Nikula
The function doesn't use the parameter for anything. Drop it. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4347a0f71a1a8c515617cf06471486d9bbb4a026.1739378095.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2025-02-13drm/i915/display: convert assert_port_valid() to struct intel_displayJani Nikula
Going forward, struct intel_display is the main display device data pointer. Convert the assert_port_valid() helper to struct intel_display, allowing further conversions elsewhere. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/e06ef0e2cc34d42918f3208362587a17ea34e28f.1739378095.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2025-02-13drm/i915/display: convert assert_transcoder*() to struct intel_displayJani Nikula
Going forward, struct intel_display is the main display device data pointer. Convert the assert_transcoder*() helpers to struct intel_display, allowing further conversions elsewhere. Do a few small opportunistic conversions right away. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/430c2f3c899bc98beeb6ba8608f841c9271d0971.1739378095.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2025-02-13drm/i915/ips: convert hsw_ips.c to struct intel_displayJani Nikula
Going forward, struct intel_display is the main display device data pointer. Convert as much as possible of hsw_ips.c to struct intel_display. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ebea40784fca6cfb4dbacec570bc9bef49393fc1.1739378095.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2025-02-13drm/i915/hdmi: convert g4x_hdmi.[ch] to struct intel_displayJani Nikula
Going forward, struct intel_display is the main display device data pointer. Convert as much as possible of g4x_hdmi.[ch] to struct intel_display. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4fbaaa4cdab8ec020e5b3fb2f615b3c244c9da2d.1739378095.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2025-02-13drm/i915/dp: convert g4x_dp.[ch] to struct intel displayJani Nikula
Going forward, struct intel_display is the main display device data pointer. Convert as much as possible of g4x_dp.[ch] to struct intel_display. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/89ce4f7e6aa31f3db6316537f54c5bc7df852322.1739378095.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dsb: Decode DSB error interruptsVille Syrjälä
Decode the DSB error interrupts into human readable form for easier debugging. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/vrr: Check that the push send bit is clear after delayed vblankVille Syrjälä
Since we don't do mailbox updates the push send bit should alwyas clear by the time the delay vblank fires and the flip completes. Check for that to make sure we haven't screwed up the sequencing/vblank evasion/etc. On the DSB path we should be able to guarantee this since we don't have to deal with any scheduler latencies and whatnot. I suppose unexpected DMA/memory latencies might be the only thing that might trip us up here. For the MMIO path we do always have a non-zero chance that vblank evasion fails (since we can't really guarantee anything about the scheduling behaviour). That could trip up this check, but that seems fine since we already print errors for other types of vblank evasion failures. Should the CPU vblank evasion actually fail, then the push send bit can still be set when the next commit happens. But both the DSB and MMIO paths should handle that situation gracefully. v2: Only check once instead of polling for two scanlines since we should now be guaranteed to be past the delayed vblank. Also check in the MMIO path for good measure v3: Skip the push send check when VRR is disabled. With joiner the secondary pipe's DSBs doen't have access to the transcoder registers, and so doing this check there triggers a reponse timeout error on the DSB. VRR is not currently allowed when using joiner, so this will prevent the bogus register access. Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250210160711.24010-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/vrr: Reorder the DSB "wait for safe window" vs. TRANS_PUSHVille Syrjälä
Currently we trigger the push send first, then follow it with a "wait for safe window". That approach no longer works on PTL+ because triggering the push send immediately ends the safe window. On prior hardware the safe window extended past the push being sent (presumably all the way to the pipe's delayed vblank). In order to deal with the new hardware behaviour we must reverse the order of these two operations: first wait for safe window, then trigger the push. The only slight danger with this approach is that if we mess up the vblank evasion around the vmax decision boundary the push might get postponed until after the next frame's vactive. But assuming we don't mess up the vblank evasion this approach is completely safe. As a slight bonus we can perform the push after we've done the LUT writes as well, meaning we no longer have to worry about extending the vblank delay to provide enough time for LUT programming. Instead we will now depend on the vblank evasion at vmax decision boundary to guarantee this. However vblank delay (or framestart delay) is still the only way to provide extra time for the LUT programming in the non-VRR use cases. Let's assume we don't need anything extra for now, but eventually we should come up with some proper estimates on how long the LUT programming can take and configure the vblank delay accordingly for the non-VRR use cases. Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dsb: Introduce intel_dsb_poll()Ville Syrjälä
Add a function for emitting a DSB poll instruction. We'll allow the caller to specify the poll parameters. v2: s/wait/wait_us/ (Ankit) Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dsb: Compute use_dsb earlierVille Syrjälä
Skip all the commit completion interrupt stuff on the chained DSB when we don't take the full DSB path (ie. when the plane/pipe programming is done via MMIO). The commit completion will be done via the CPU side vblank interrupt. Currently this is just a redundant interrupt, so not a big deal. But in the future we'll be moving the TRANS_PUSH write into the chained DSB as well, and that we definitely don't want to do when it's also being done by the CPU from intel_pipe_update_end(). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/vrr: Account for TRANS_PUSH delayVille Syrjälä
When we send a push during vblank the TRANS_PUSH write happens at some point during a scanline, and the hardware picks it up on the next scanline. Thus there is up to one extra scanline of delay between the TRANS_PUSH write and the delayed vblank triggering. Account for that during intel_dsb_wait_vblank_delay() so that we are guaranteed to be past the delayed vblank before we trigger the completion interrupt for the commit. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/vrr: Don't send push for legacy cursor updatesVille Syrjälä
We don't really want legacy cursor updates to trigger VRR pushes because these can happen willy nilly and we generally want more precise control over the pushes. The fastpath in intel_legacy_cursor_update() doesn't send pushes, but if we punt to the full commit path (with the flip completion short circuited) we are currently sending pushes. Skip those as well so that they don't interfere with the push handling from normal commits. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/dsb: Move the +1 usec adjustment into dsb_wait_usec()Ville Syrjälä
The "wait usec" DSB command doesn't quite seem to able to guarantee that it always waits at least the specified amount of usecs. Some of that could be just because it supposedly just does some kind of dumb timestamp comparison internally. But I also see cases where two hardware timestamps sampled on each side of the "wait usec" command come out one less than expected. So it looks like we always need at least a +1 to guarantee that we never wait less than specified. Always apply that adjustment in dsb_wait_usec(). Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207223159.14132-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/pch: Remove unused i915->pch_idJani Nikula
With the PCH checks based on PCH types instead of IDs, the i915->pch_id member has become unused. Remove it. Reviewed-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/fac1c59800128e8f398e83d718a3a5dc235d0526.1738923308.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/pch: Hide PCH device IDsJani Nikula
Only the PCH identification code needs the PCH device IDs, as all the PCH checks are now based on PCH type. Hide the PCH device IDs inside intel_pch.c. Remove the unused INTEL_PCH_ID() macro while at it. Reviewed-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/d1ceb9fc461cf21e1b885a55293f593eba1458ea.1738923308.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/pch: Make LPT LP a dedicated PCH typeJani Nikula
Add PCH type PCH_LPT_LP and rename PCH_LPT to PCH_LPT_H for consistency. Keep the existing HAS_PCH_LPT*() macros, but express them in terms of the PCH types instead of looking at the device IDs directly. This makes the PCH checks independent of the PCH device IDs. Reviewed-by: Nemesa Garg <nemesa.garg@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/777b63f50b10fba1d768af25870e81b33267bdc8.1738923308.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Replace all other leftover drm_i915_privateSuraj Kandpal
Replace all other left over drm_i915_private with intel_display in dpll_mgr.c. --v2 -Don't use inline to_intel_display() [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Accept intel_display as argument for shared_dpll_initSuraj Kandpal
Use intel_display as an argument for intel_shared_dpll_init() and replace drm_i915_private in function wherever possible. While at it prefer using display->platform.xx over IS_PLATFORM. Initialize dpio_phy and dpio_channel since with IS_GEMINILAKE() and IS_BROXTON() compiler knows it will return false for xe but since display->platform.xx is a runtime check which means the compiler sees a potential path where uninitialized variables could be accessed and raises a warning. --v2 -Amend commit message to explain why some variables were initialized [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for update_refclk hookSuraj Kandpal
Use intel_display instead of drm_i915_private for update_refclk hook. Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for asserting pllSuraj Kandpal
Use intel_display instead of drm_i915_private to assert pll enabled and disabled and the corresponding changes needed to make that happen. Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display possible in shared_dpll_mgr hooksSuraj Kandpal
We use intel_display for function hooks of shared_dpll_mgr and any function that gets called when we use for_each_shared_dpll. This also contains some opportunistic display->platform.xx changes all to reductate the use of drm_i915_private. --v2 -rebase --v3 -Don't use inline to_i915 [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw stateSuraj Kandpal
Let's use intel_display for dpll dump and compare hw state. This also helps elimanate drm_i915_private dependency from i915_shared_dplls_info in intel_display_debugfs.c --v2 -Fix commit message [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915/dpll: Change param to intel_display in for_each_shared_dpllSuraj Kandpal
Change the argument of for_each_shared_dpll to take intel_display which helps move as an ongoing effort to get rid off the dependency on drm_i915_private. Some opportunistic changes in intel_pch_refclk done too. --v2 -Prefer using &i915->display [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-12drm/i915: Use intel_display wherever possibleSuraj Kandpal
Use struct intel_display wherever possible in intel_display_debug_fs.c to reduce the use of drm_i915_private. While at it do the opportunistic display->platform.xx replacement. --v2 -Rebase --v3 -Don't use inline to_intel_display [Jani] -Don't use display debug fs as subject prefix [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250212074542.3569452-2-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-11drm/i915: Continue intel_display_power struct intel_display conversionVille Syrjälä
Convert the remaining intel_display_power.h interfaces to take struct intel_display instead of struct drm_i915_private. intel_display_power.c still has some internal uses due to i915->runtime_pm. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250211000135.6096-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-11drm/i915: Fix CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM=n buildVille Syrjälä
Looks like I missed one of myriad CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM=n special cases when converting the intel_display_power_{get,put}() code to use struct intel_display. Only noticed after the fact when building a EXPERT=n kernel :/ Fixes: 5dcfda5cfa42 ("drm/i915: Convert intel_display_power_{get,put}*() to intel_display") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250211000135.6096-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-10drm/i915: Pimp plane debugsVille Syrjälä
Include the standard "[PLANE:%d:s]" stuff in all plane debugs (or rather all I was able to find), to provide better information on which plane we're actually talking about. There are a few spots where we care about the CRTC as well, so include that where appropriate. Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Use DRM_RECT_FMT & co. for plane debugsVille Syrjälä
Switch the plane debugs to use DRM_RECT_FMT & co. instead of drm_rect_debug_print() so that the debugs go on the same line. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-12-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Convert skl_univeral_plane.c to struct intel_displayVille Syrjälä
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main thing for display code. Convert the skl+ universal plane code to use it. Note that we still have two straggles in the form on HAS_FLAT_CCS() and the pxp stuff. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Convert intel_cursor.c to struct intel_displayVille Syrjälä
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main thing for display code. Convert the cursor code to use it. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Finish intel_sprite.c struct intel_display conversionVille Syrjälä
intel_sprite.c was partially converted to struct intel_display. Finish the job now that we can deal with the platform checks as well. And while at it we also move the 'display' variable declaration to be the first thing in most functions, consistency. We can actually do that now since intel_display() accepts the intel_plane and intel_plane_state types. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Convert i9xx_plane.c to struct intel_displayVille Syrjälä
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main thing for display code. Convert the pre-skl primary plane code to use it. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Convert intel_display_power_{get,put}*() to intel_displayVille Syrjälä
Pass intel_display to the display power stuff. These are spread all over the place so tend to hinder clean conversions of whole files. TODO: The gt part/unpark power domain shenanigans need some kind of more abstract interface... v2: Deal with cmtg Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Convert intel_fb.c to struct intel_displayVille Syrjälä
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main thing for display code. Convert the fb code to use it. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Convert intel_crtc.c to struct intel_displayVille Syrjälä
struct intel_display will replace struct drm_i915_private as the main thing for display code. Convert intel_crtc.c code to use it. Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Decouple intel_fb_bo.h interfaces from driver specific typesVille Syrjälä
Make the intel_fb_bo.h interfaces operated purely in base drm_ types so that each driver (i915 and xe) doesn't have to know about each other, or the display stuff. v2: s/dev/drm/ (Jani) Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Decouple i915_gem_dumb_create() from the display a bitVille Syrjälä
Pass the device argument as drm_device to intel_plane_fb_max_stride() to decouple i915_gem_dumb_create() vs. the display code a bit. xe currently doesn't even call this, but it probably should... v2: s/dev/drm/ (Jani) Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
2025-02-10drm/i915: Pass intel_display to intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa()Ville Syrjälä
Now that intel_scanout_needs_vtd_wa() is no longer used from the gem code we can convert it to take struct intel_display. which will help with converting the low level plane code over as well. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206185533.32306-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-10drm/i915/hdcp: Make some functions staticJani Nikula
With the debugfs implementation moved next to the implementation, we no longer need to expose some of the functions. Make them static. Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250207105838.179805-1-jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-10drm/i915/hdcp: Convert platform checks to use display->platformJani Nikula
Prefer display->platform.<platform> over IS_<PLATFORM>(i915), and reducate struct drm_i915_private usages while at it. Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/58bad1e888a57a014acbaae67ccddd4f895091a7.1738924826.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-10drm/i915/hdcp: rename intel_connector to connectorJani Nikula
Follow the current convention of naming struct intel_connector pointers connector. Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/8f43542a8f0ce0ec5725b769c077d3cea723bde0.1738924826.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-10drm/i915/hdcp: Move HDCP debugfs to intel_hdcp.cJani Nikula
Continue with placing debugfs next to the implementation. intel_connector_info() still needs intel_hdcp_info(), so we'll need to expose that too. Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c118e992673f6b054aacaff0e1850fcea329e000.1738924826.git.jani.nikula@intel.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
2025-02-07drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix disabling the minimum HBlank timeImre Deak
Disable the minimum HBlank time only on LNL+, where this functionality and corresponding register exists. Bspec: 74379 Fixes: a5ebe00c2ace ("drm/i915/dp: Guarantee a minimum HBlank time") Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Cc: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206164624.3185280-1-imre.deak@intel.com
2025-02-07Revert "drm/i915/dp: Compute as_sdp based on if vrr possible"Mitul Golani
This reverts commit 08277aa5d5a44befd71717de35b956f55e1e8401. Compute AS SDP params only when VRR is enabled to maintain PSR exclusivity. Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206045001.2919360-3-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
2025-02-07drm/i915/display: Skip state checker for AS SDP infoframe enableMitul Golani
Avoid full modeset by skipping infoframe.enable check when toggling AS SDP while enabling VRR, preventing full modeset while pipe config changes. --v2: - Add check for exclude_infoframe. (Ankit) - Update commit message. (Ankit) --v3: - Optimise PIPE_CONF_CHECK for infoframes.enable. [Ankit] Signed-off-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206045001.2919360-2-mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com
2025-02-06drm/i915/backlight: Enable nits based luminanceSuraj Kandpal
Enable nits based luminance by writing the PANEL_LUMINANCE_CONTROL bit and set the correct register to change brightness. Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-9-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-06drm/i915/backlight: Setup nits based luminance via VESASuraj Kandpal
Modify backlight setup function for VESA interface to take into account the nits based luminance. --v2 -Prefer using luminance over nits [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-06drm/i915/backlight: Add function to change brightness in nits for VESASuraj Kandpal
Create a function that fills in the value for PANEL_TARGET_LUMINANCE_VALUE which helps in changing the luminance in nits using VESA interface. --v2 -Prefer using luminance over nits [Jani] Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
2025-02-06drm/i915/backlight: Modify function to get VESA brightness in NitsSuraj Kandpal
Modify vesa_get_brightness function to take into account luminance_control_support and based on that read the appropriate register and return the value. --v2 -Changes since we now use luminance instead of nits Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com