| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
AF_RXRPC has a keepalive message generator that generates a message for a
peer ~20s after the last transmission to that peer to keep firewall ports
open. The implementation is incorrect in the following ways:
(1) It mixes up ktime_t and time64_t types.
(2) It uses ktime_get_real(), the output of which may jump forward or
backward due to adjustments to the time of day.
(3) If the current time jumps forward too much or jumps backwards, the
generator function will crank the base of the time ring round one slot
at a time (ie. a 1s period) until it catches up, spewing out VERSION
packets as it goes.
Fix the problem by:
(1) Only using time64_t. There's no need for sub-second resolution.
(2) Use ktime_get_seconds() rather than ktime_get_real() so that time
isn't perceived to go backwards.
(3) Simplifying rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker() by splitting it into two
parts:
(a) The "worker" function that manages the buckets and the timer.
(b) The "dispatch" function that takes the pending peers and
potentially transmits a keepalive packet before putting them back
in the ring into the slot appropriate to the revised last-Tx time.
(4) Taking everything that's pending out of the ring and splicing it into
a temporary collector list for processing.
In the case that there's been a significant jump forward, the ring
gets entirely emptied and then the time base can be warped forward
before the peers are processed.
The warping can't happen if the ring isn't empty because the slot a
peer is in is keepalive-time dependent, relative to the base time.
(5) Limit the number of iterations of the bucket array when scanning it.
(6) Set the timer to skip any empty slots as there's no point waking up if
there's nothing to do yet.
This can be triggered by an incoming call from a server after a reboot with
AF_RXRPC and AFS built into the kernel causing a peer record to be set up
before userspace is started. The system clock is then adjusted by
userspace, thereby potentially causing the keepalive generator to have a
meltdown - which leads to a message like:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [kworker/0:1:23]
...
Workqueue: krxrpcd rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker
EIP: lock_acquire+0x69/0x80
...
Call Trace:
? rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x5e/0x350
? _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x29/0x60
? rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x5e/0x350
? rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x5e/0x350
? __lock_acquire+0x3d3/0x870
? process_one_work+0x110/0x340
? process_one_work+0x166/0x340
? process_one_work+0x110/0x340
? worker_thread+0x39/0x3c0
? kthread+0xdb/0x110
? cancel_delayed_work+0x90/0x90
? kthread_stop+0x70/0x70
? ret_from_fork+0x19/0x24
Fixes: ace45bec6d77 ("rxrpc: Fix firewall route keepalive")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Saeed Mahameed says:
====================
Mellanox, mlx5e fixes 2018-08-07
I know it is late into 4.18 release, and this is why I am submitting
only two mlx5e ethernet fixes.
The first one from Or, is needed for -stable and it fixes hairpin
for "same device" check.
The second fix is a non risk fix from Huy which cleans up and improves
error return value reporting for dcbnl_ieee_setapp.
For -stable v4.16
- net/mlx5e: Properly check if hairpin is possible between two functions
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Remove unused netdev_registered_init/remove in en.h
Return ENOSUPPORT if the check MLX5_DSCP_SUPPORTED fails.
Remove extra white space
Fixes: 2a5e7a1344f4 ("net/mlx5e: Add dcbnl dscp to priority support")
Signed-off-by: Huy Nguyen <huyn@mellanox.com>
Cc: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The current check relies on function BDF addresses and can get
us wrong e.g when two VFs are assigned into a VM and the PCI
v-address is set by the hypervisor.
Fixes: 5c65c564c962 ('net/mlx5e: Support offloading TC NIC hairpin flows')
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Add the missing unlock before return from function hwsim_add_one()
in the error handling case.
Fixes: f25da51fdc38 ("ieee802154: hwsim: add replacement for fakelb")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The return value from kzalloc() is not checked correctly. The
test is done against a wrong variable. This patch fix it.
Fixes: f25da51fdc38 ("ieee802154: hwsim: add replacement for fakelb")
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
This patch adds missing rcu_assign_pointer()/rcu_dereference() to used rcu
pointers. There was already a previous commit c5d99d2b35da ("ieee802154:
hwsim: fix rcu address annotation"), but there was more which was
pointed out on my side by using newest sparse version.
Cc: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Fixes: f25da51fdc38 ("ieee802154: hwsim: add replacement for fakelb")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aring@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
For years I thought all parisc machines executed loads and stores in
order. However, Jeff Law recently indicated on gcc-patches that this is
not correct. There are various degrees of out-of-order execution all the
way back to the PA7xxx processor series (hit-under-miss). The PA8xxx
series has full out-of-order execution for both integer operations, and
loads and stores.
This is described in the following article:
http://web.archive.org/web/20040214092531/http://www.cpus.hp.com/technical_references/advperf.shtml
For this reason, we need to define mb() and to insert a memory barrier
before the store unlocking spinlocks. This ensures that all memory
accesses are complete prior to unlocking. The ldcw instruction performs
the same function on entry.
Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
|
|
Enable the -mlong-calls compiler option by default, because otherwise in most
cases linking the vmlinux binary fails due to truncations of R_PARISC_PCREL22F
relocations. This fixes building the 64-bit defconfig.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
|
|
This patch fixes the problem below. The problem can be reproduced by the
following steps:
1) Connecting all HiNIC interfaces
2) On server side
# sudo ifconfig eth0 192.168.100.1 up #Using MLX CX4 card
# iperf -s
3) On client side
# sudo ifconfig eth0 192.168.100.2 up #Using our HiNIC card
# iperf -c 192.168.101.1 -P 10 -t 100000
after hours of testing, we will see errors:
hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
hinic 0000:05:00.0: No MGMT msg handler, mod = 0
The errors are caused by the following problem.
1) The hinic_get_wqe() checks the "wq->delta" to allocate new WQEs:
if (atomic_sub_return(num_wqebbs, &wq->delta) <= 0) {
atomic_add(num_wqebbs, &wq->delta);
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
}
If the WQE occupies multiple pages, the shadow WQE will be used. Then the
hinic_xmit_frame() fills the WQE.
2) While in parallel with 1), the free_tx_poll() checks the "wq->delta"
to free old WQEs:
if ((atomic_read(&wq->delta) + num_wqebbs) > wq->q_depth)
return ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
There is a probability that the shadow WQE which hinic_xmit_frame() is
using will be damaged by copy_wqe_to_shadow():
if (curr_pg != end_pg) {
void *shadow_addr = &wq->shadow_wqe[curr_pg * wq->max_wqe_size];
copy_wqe_to_shadow(wq, shadow_addr, num_wqebbs, *cons_idx);
return shadow_addr;
}
This can cause WQE data error and you will see the above error messages.
This patch fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Chen <zhaochen6@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
We need to reset metadata cache during new IOTLB initialization,
otherwise the stale pointers to previous IOTLB may be still accessed
which will lead a use after free.
Reported-by: syzbot+c51e6736a1bf614b3272@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: f88949138058 ("vhost: introduce O(1) vq metadata cache")
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The ret is modified after initalization, so just remove it and
return 0.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
We will not use the variable 'err' after initalization, So remove it and
return 0.
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Get rid of unused struct member 'last_link'
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Gustavo A. R. Silva says:
====================
net: ethernet: Mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
to add some annotations in order to mark switch cases where we are
expecting to fall through.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114813 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 141440 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384500 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357414 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1357415 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114811 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410181 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410184 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1384501 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1398869 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410182 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1410183 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comments with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114809 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114810 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114808 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114802 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114796 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114804 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114806 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114801 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114800 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114799 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 200521 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114797 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114794 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114795 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114792 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114793 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114791 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114790 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114789 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114788 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114787 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114784 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114785 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114786 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114782 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114781 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114780 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114777 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114778 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114779 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114910 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 143135 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114878 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114891 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114889 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
gre_multipath test was using egress vlan_id matching on flows, for the
purpose of collecting next-hops statistics, later to be compared
against configured weights.
As matching on vlan_id on egress direction is not supported on all HW
devices, change the match criteria to use destination IP.
Signed-off-by: Nir Dotan <nird@mellanox.com>
Acked-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Initial set of nat action unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Keara Leibovitz <kleib@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
