diff options
| author | Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> | 2023-11-03 09:42:51 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2024-02-23 08:42:32 +0100 |
| commit | 9a865a11d6890d4a789db1eaafebdc8bd092b12c (patch) | |
| tree | 1dd765db8cf6e26c69733493236cc486a9ab3dd7 | |
| parent | 67f386f75637f25df714d57a48f6c94b83573631 (diff) | |
netfilter: nf_tables: fix pointer math issue in nft_byteorder_eval()
commit c301f0981fdd3fd1ffac6836b423c4d7a8e0eb63 upstream.
The problem is in nft_byteorder_eval() where we are iterating through a
loop and writing to dst[0], dst[1], dst[2] and so on... On each
iteration we are writing 8 bytes. But dst[] is an array of u32 so each
element only has space for 4 bytes. That means that every iteration
overwrites part of the previous element.
I spotted this bug while reviewing commit caf3ef7468f7 ("netfilter:
nf_tables: prevent OOB access in nft_byteorder_eval") which is a related
issue. I think that the reason we have not detected this bug in testing
is that most of time we only write one element.
Fixes: ce1e7989d989 ("netfilter: nft_byteorder: provide 64bit le/be conversion")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
[Ajay: Modified to apply on v5.10.y]
Signed-off-by: Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/netfilter/nft_meta.c | 2 |
3 files changed, 6 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h index 2237657514e1..2da11d8c0f45 100644 --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h @@ -142,9 +142,9 @@ static inline u16 nft_reg_load16(const u32 *sreg) return *(u16 *)sreg; } -static inline void nft_reg_store64(u32 *dreg, u64 val) +static inline void nft_reg_store64(u64 *dreg, u64 val) { - put_unaligned(val, (u64 *)dreg); + put_unaligned(val, dreg); } static inline u64 nft_reg_load64(const u32 *sreg) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c index 7b0b8fecb220..9d250bd60bb8 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_byteorder.c @@ -38,20 +38,21 @@ void nft_byteorder_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, switch (priv->size) { case 8: { + u64 *dst64 = (void *)dst; u64 src64; switch (priv->op) { case NFT_BYTEORDER_NTOH: for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) { src64 = nft_reg_load64(&src[i]); - nft_reg_store64(&dst[i], be64_to_cpu(src64)); + nft_reg_store64(&dst64[i], be64_to_cpu(src64)); } break; case NFT_BYTEORDER_HTON: for (i = 0; i < priv->len / 8; i++) { src64 = (__force __u64) cpu_to_be64(nft_reg_load64(&src[i])); - nft_reg_store64(&dst[i], src64); + nft_reg_store64(&dst64[i], src64); } break; } diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c b/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c index 44d9b38e5f90..cb5bb0e21b66 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_meta.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ nft_meta_get_eval_time(enum nft_meta_keys key, { switch (key) { case NFT_META_TIME_NS: - nft_reg_store64(dest, ktime_get_real_ns()); + nft_reg_store64((u64 *)dest, ktime_get_real_ns()); break; case NFT_META_TIME_DAY: nft_reg_store8(dest, nft_meta_weekday()); |