summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/FAQ.in
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>1999-12-27 20:26:55 +0000
committerUlrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>1999-12-27 20:26:55 +0000
commit8892c471bf1078c28adb239a4866a01356651843 (patch)
treefb1051f6460bce44170e84bc6c1361a388c62e41 /FAQ.in
parent01496d70ed327406aadd322c6cd83bf516920daf (diff)
Update.
1999-12-27 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com> * iconvdata/gb2312.c: Update mapping of GB 0x212c from latest Unicode tables.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ.in')
-rw-r--r--FAQ.in25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/FAQ.in b/FAQ.in
index 61b663ce08..babca37a11 100644
--- a/FAQ.in
+++ b/FAQ.in
@@ -1481,6 +1481,31 @@ implemented in some old PALcodes of AlphaStations. This may cause
catch these signals. Updating the firmware to a 1999 release has
fixed the problem on an AlphaStation 200 4/166.
+?? The conversion table for character set XX does not match with
+what I expect.
+
+{UD} I don't doubt for a minute that some of the conversion tables contain
+errors. We tried the best we can and relied on automatic generation of the
+data to prevent human-introduced errors but this still is no guarantee. If
+you think you found a problem please send a bug report describing it and
+give an authoritive reference. The latter is important since otherwise
+the current behaviour is as good as the proposed one.
+
+Before doing this look through the list of known problem first:
+
+- the GBK (simplified Chinese) encoding is based on Unicode tables. This
+ is good. These tables, however, differ slightly from the tables used
+ by the M$ people. The differences are these [+ Unicode, - M$]:
+
+ +0xA1AA 0x2015
+ +0xA844 0x2014
+ -0xA1AA 0x2014
+ -0xA844 0x2015
+
+ In addition the Unicode tables contain mappings for the GBK characters
+ 0xA8BC, 0xA8BF, 0xA989 to 0xA995, and 0xFE50 to 0xFEA0.
+
+
Answers were given by:
{UD} Ulrich Drepper, <drepper@cygnus.com>