diff options
| author | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 2000-02-23 22:15:49 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> | 2000-02-23 22:15:49 +0000 |
| commit | b2b28911645ee10d8a9b843c2d7406abe16a250a (patch) | |
| tree | 69e1bb2f0d0819962e3cc171b1fc6424d1525823 /FAQ.in | |
| parent | c8bcc2eade4f02d43c1511f72eec99bea141866e (diff) | |
Update.
2000-02-23 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
* dlfcn/dlopen.c: Include <stddef.h> for NULL.
* dlfcn/dlsym.c: Likewise.
* dlfcn/dlvsym.c: Likewise.
* iconv/gconv.c: Likewise.
Diffstat (limited to 'FAQ.in')
| -rw-r--r-- | FAQ.in | 17 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 1 deletions
@@ -346,7 +346,6 @@ compatibility - forever! The binary compatibility you lose is not only against the previous version of the GNU libc (version 2.0) but also against all future versions. - ?? How can I compile on my fast ix86 machine a working libc for my slow i386? After installing libc, programs abort with "Illegal Instruction". @@ -363,6 +362,22 @@ And you need to tell gcc to only generate i386 code, just add `-mcpu=i386' {UD} This applies not only to the i386. Compiling on a i686 for any older model will also fail if the above methods are not used. +?? `make' complains about a missing dlfcn/libdl.so when building + malloc/libmemprof.so. How can I fix this? + +{AJ} Older make version (<= 3.78.90) have a bug which was hidden by a bug in +glibc (<= 2.1.2). You need to upgrade make to a newer or fixed version. A +patch is available via +<http://sourceware.cygnus.com//ml/libc-alpha/2000-02/msg00067.html>. + +After upgrading make, you should remove the file sysd-sorted in your build +directory. The problem is that the broken make creates a wrong order for +one list in that file. The list has to be recreated with the new make - +which happens if you remove the file. + +You might encounter this bug also in other situations where make scans +directories. I strongly advise to upgrade your make version. + ? Installation and configuration issues |