From 7e86a8c4ac8d5dcf7dd58f5a4779d1a6ff0a827d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:41:21 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: implement and test custom testmod_seq iterator Implement a trivial iterator returning same specified integer value N times as part of bpf_testmod kernel module. Add selftests to validate everything works end to end. We also reuse these tests as "verification-only" tests to validate that kernel prints the state of custom kernel module-defined iterator correctly: fp-16=iter_testmod_seq(ref_id=1,state=drained,depth=0) "testmod_seq" part is an iterator type, and is coming from module's BTF data dynamically at runtime. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230308184121.1165081-9-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 46500636d8cd9..5e6e85c8d77de 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -65,6 +65,34 @@ bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i) *(int *)this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_testmod_ksym_percpu) = i; } +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it, s64 value, int cnt) +{ + if (cnt < 0) { + it->cnt = 0; + return -EINVAL; + } + + it->value = value; + it->cnt = cnt; + + return 0; +} + +__bpf_kfunc s64 *bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq* it) +{ + if (it->cnt <= 0) + return NULL; + + it->cnt--; + + return &it->value; +} + +__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy(struct bpf_iter_testmod_seq *it) +{ + it->cnt = 0; +} + struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 { int a; }; @@ -220,6 +248,17 @@ static struct bin_attribute bin_attr_bpf_testmod_file __ro_after_init = { .write = bpf_testmod_test_write, }; +BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_new, KF_ITER_NEW) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_testmod_seq_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) +BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids) + +static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set = { + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + .set = &bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_ids, +}; + BTF_SET8_START(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc) BTF_SET8_END(bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids) @@ -235,7 +274,8 @@ static int bpf_testmod_init(void) { int ret; - ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set); + ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC, &bpf_testmod_common_kfunc_set); + ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_testmod_kfunc_set); if (ret < 0) return ret; if (bpf_fentry_test1(0) < 0) -- cgit v1.2.3 From aa3d65de4b9004d799f97700751a86d3ebd7d5f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viktor Malik Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:41:00 +0100 Subject: bpf/selftests: Test fentry attachment to shadowed functions Adds a new test that tries to attach a program to fentry of two functions of the same name, one located in vmlinux and the other in bpf_testmod. To avoid conflicts with existing tests, a new function "bpf_fentry_shadow_test" was created both in vmlinux and in bpf_testmod. The previous commit fixed a bug which caused this test to fail. The verifier would always use the vmlinux function's address as the target trampoline address, hence trying to create two trampolines for a single address, which is forbidden. The test (similarly to other fentry/fexit tests) is not working on arm64 at the moment. Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fe2f364190b6f79b085066ed7c5989c5bc475fa.1678432753.git.vmalik@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- net/bpf/test_run.c | 5 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 6 + .../bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c') diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 6a8b33a103a40..71226f68270d9 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -560,6 +560,11 @@ long noinline bpf_kfunc_call_test4(signed char a, short b, int c, long d) return (long)a + (long)b + (long)c + d; } +int noinline bpf_fentry_shadow_test(int a) +{ + return a + 1; +} + struct prog_test_member1 { int a; }; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 index 99cc33c51eaac..0a6837f97c324 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ lookup_key # test_lookup_key__attach unexp lru_bug # lru_bug__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) modify_return # modify_return__attach failed unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) module_attach # skel_attach skeleton attach failed: -524 +module_fentry_shadow # bpf_link_create unexpected bpf_link_create: actual -524 < expected 0 mptcp/base # run_test mptcp unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) netcnt # packets unexpected packets: actual 10001 != expected 10000 rcu_read_lock # failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 5e6e85c8d77de..7999476b9446c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -268,6 +268,12 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_testmod_kfunc_set = { .set = &bpf_testmod_check_kfunc_ids, }; +noinline int bpf_fentry_shadow_test(int a) +{ + return a + 2; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_fentry_shadow_test); + extern int bpf_fentry_test1(int a); static int bpf_testmod_init(void) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..c7636e18b1ebd --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_fentry_shadow.c @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Red Hat */ +#include +#include +#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h" +#include "cgroup_helpers.h" + +static const char *module_name = "bpf_testmod"; +static const char *symbol_name = "bpf_fentry_shadow_test"; + +static int get_bpf_testmod_btf_fd(void) +{ + struct bpf_btf_info info; + char name[64]; + __u32 id = 0, len; + int err, fd; + + while (true) { + err = bpf_btf_get_next_id(id, &id); + if (err) { + log_err("failed to iterate BTF objects"); + return err; + } + + fd = bpf_btf_get_fd_by_id(id); + if (fd < 0) { + if (errno == ENOENT) + continue; /* expected race: BTF was unloaded */ + err = -errno; + log_err("failed to get FD for BTF object #%d", id); + return err; + } + + len = sizeof(info); + memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info)); + info.name = ptr_to_u64(name); + info.name_len = sizeof(name); + + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &len); + if (err) { + err = -errno; + log_err("failed to get info for BTF object #%d", id); + close(fd); + return err; + } + + if (strcmp(name, module_name) == 0) + return fd; + + close(fd); + } + return -ENOENT; +} + +void test_module_fentry_shadow(void) +{ + struct btf *vmlinux_btf = NULL, *mod_btf = NULL; + int err, i; + int btf_fd[2] = {}; + int prog_fd[2] = {}; + int link_fd[2] = {}; + __s32 btf_id[2] = {}; + + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, load_opts, + .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY, + ); + + const struct bpf_insn trace_program[] = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }; + + vmlinux_btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(vmlinux_btf, "load_vmlinux_btf")) + return; + + btf_fd[1] = get_bpf_testmod_btf_fd(); + if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_fd[1], 0, "get_bpf_testmod_btf_fd")) + goto out; + + mod_btf = btf_get_from_fd(btf_fd[1], vmlinux_btf); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(mod_btf, "btf_get_from_fd")) + goto out; + + btf_id[0] = btf__find_by_name_kind(vmlinux_btf, symbol_name, BTF_KIND_FUNC); + if (!ASSERT_GT(btf_id[0], 0, "btf_find_by_name")) + goto out; + + btf_id[1] = btf__find_by_name_kind(mod_btf, symbol_name, BTF_KIND_FUNC); + if (!ASSERT_GT(btf_id[1], 0, "btf_find_by_name")) + goto out; + + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + load_opts.attach_btf_id = btf_id[i]; + load_opts.attach_btf_obj_fd = btf_fd[i]; + prog_fd[i] = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, NULL, "GPL", + trace_program, + sizeof(trace_program) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn), + &load_opts); + if (!ASSERT_GE(prog_fd[i], 0, "bpf_prog_load")) + goto out; + + /* If the verifier incorrectly resolves addresses of the + * shadowed functions and uses the same address for both the + * vmlinux and the bpf_testmod functions, this will fail on + * attempting to create two trampolines for the same address, + * which is forbidden. + */ + link_fd[i] = bpf_link_create(prog_fd[i], 0, BPF_TRACE_FENTRY, NULL); + if (!ASSERT_GE(link_fd[i], 0, "bpf_link_create")) + goto out; + } + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd[0], NULL); + ASSERT_OK(err, "running test"); + +out: + btf__free(vmlinux_btf); + btf__free(mod_btf); + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { + if (btf_fd[i]) + close(btf_fd[i]); + if (prog_fd[i] > 0) + close(prog_fd[i]); + if (link_fd[i] > 0) + close(link_fd[i]); + } +} -- cgit v1.2.3 From 2995f9a8d427b9ff6f3cf4e85c0f9d4456ef324d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Song Liu Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:04:23 -0700 Subject: selftests/bpf: Keep the loop in bpf_testmod_loop_test Some compilers (for example clang-15) optimize bpf_testmod_loop_test and remove the loop: gcc version (gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test: 0x0000000000000570 <+0>: callq 0x575 0x0000000000000575 <+5>: xor %eax,%eax 0x0000000000000577 <+7>: test %edi,%edi 0x0000000000000579 <+9>: jle 0x587 0x000000000000057b <+11>: xor %edx,%edx 0x000000000000057d <+13>: add %edx,%eax 0x000000000000057f <+15>: add $0x1,%edx 0x0000000000000582 <+18>: cmp %edx,%edi 0x0000000000000584 <+20>: jne 0x57d 0x0000000000000586 <+22>: retq 0x0000000000000587 <+23>: retq clang-15 version (gdb) disassemble bpf_testmod_loop_test Dump of assembler code for function bpf_testmod_loop_test: 0x0000000000000450 <+0>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 0x0000000000000455 <+5>: test %edi,%edi 0x0000000000000457 <+7>: jle 0x46b 0x0000000000000459 <+9>: lea -0x1(%rdi),%eax 0x000000000000045c <+12>: lea -0x2(%rdi),%ecx 0x000000000000045f <+15>: imul %rax,%rcx 0x0000000000000463 <+19>: shr %rcx 0x0000000000000466 <+22>: lea -0x1(%rdi,%rcx,1),%eax 0x000000000000046a <+26>: retq 0x000000000000046b <+27>: xor %eax,%eax 0x000000000000046d <+29>: retq Note: The jne instruction is removed in clang-15 version. Force the compile to keep the loop by making sum volatile. Signed-off-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412210423.900851-4-song@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index 7999476b9446c..c5ad39bbe9af8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -130,7 +130,11 @@ bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_2(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_3 *arg) { noinline int bpf_testmod_loop_test(int n) { - int i, sum = 0; + /* Make sum volatile, so smart compilers, such as clang, will not + * optimize the code by removing the loop. + */ + volatile int sum = 0; + int i; /* the primary goal of this test is to test LBR. Create a lot of * branches in the function, so we can catch it easily. -- cgit v1.2.3 From 4099be372faf7b3616634dfe6994b81b1edf1906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:46:47 -0700 Subject: selftests/bpf: Fix compiler warnings in bpf_testmod for kfuncs Add -Wmissing-prototypes ignore in bpf_testmod.c, similarly to what we do in kernel code proper. Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304080951.l14IDv3n-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230412034647.3968143-1-andrii@kernel.org --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index c5ad39bbe9af8..fe847ebfb7312 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 { long b; }; +__diag_push(); +__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", + "Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF"); + noinline int bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 a, int b, int c) { bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a.a + a.b + b + c; @@ -175,6 +179,8 @@ noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c) return a + b + c; } +__diag_pop(); + int bpf_testmod_fentry_ok; noinline ssize_t -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5ff54dedf35bfee7a16eb9f8fb7ecadf7d5564cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Feng Zhou Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:27:35 +0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Add test to access integer type of variable array Add prog test for accessing integer type of variable array in tracing program. In addition, hook load_balance function to access sd->span[0], only to confirm whether the load is successful. Because there is no direct way to trigger load_balance call. Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420032735.27760-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/access_variable_array.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 2 ++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_access_variable_array.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/access_variable_array.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_access_variable_array.c (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c index fe847ebfb7312..52785ba671e6c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 { long b; }; +struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 { + int a; + int b[]; +}; + __diag_push(); __diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes", "Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF"); @@ -63,6 +68,12 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5(void) { return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result; } +noinline int +bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *a) { + bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a->b[0]; + return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result; +} + __bpf_kfunc void bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i) { @@ -195,6 +206,7 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, }; struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 struct_arg1 = {10}; struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 struct_arg2 = {2, 3}; + struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3; int i = 1; while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i)) @@ -206,6 +218,14 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj, (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct_arg1, 1, 2, 3, struct_arg2); (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5(); + struct_arg3 = kmalloc((sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3) + + sizeof(int)), GFP_KERNEL); + if (struct_arg3 != NULL) { + struct_arg3->b[0] = 1; + (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct_arg3); + kfree(struct_arg3); + } + /* This is always true. Use the check to make sure the compiler * doesn't remove bpf_testmod_loop_test. */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/access_variable_array.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/access_variable_array.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..08131782437c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/access_variable_array.c @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2022 Bytedance */ + +#include +#include "test_access_variable_array.skel.h" + +void test_access_variable_array(void) +{ + struct test_access_variable_array *skel; + + skel = test_access_variable_array__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_access_variable_array__open_and_load")) + return; + + test_access_variable_array__destroy(skel); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c index 48dc9472e160a..1c75a32186d68 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static void test_fentry(void) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t5_ret, 1, "t5 ret"); + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t6, 1, "t6 ret"); + tracing_struct__detach(skel); destroy_skel: tracing_struct__destroy(skel); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_access_variable_array.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_access_variable_array.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000..808c49b798890 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_access_variable_array.c @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2023 Bytedance */ + +#include "vmlinux.h" +#include +#include + +unsigned long span = 0; + +SEC("fentry/load_balance") +int BPF_PROG(fentry_fentry, int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, + struct sched_domain *sd) +{ + span = sd->span[0]; + + return 0; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c index e718f0ebee7dd..c435a3a8328ab 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c @@ -13,12 +13,18 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 { long b; }; +struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 { + int a; + int b[]; +}; + long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs; __u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3; long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret; long t3_a, t3_b, t3_c_a, t3_c_b, t3_ret; long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret; long t5_ret; +int t6; SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1") int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c) @@ -117,4 +123,11 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_10, int, ret) return 0; } +SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6") +int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a) +{ + t6 = a->b[0]; + return 0; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; -- cgit v1.2.3