From 32a4605b38c30689a6a18f3f4c7d3133ac9d3277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 15:06:17 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Avoid using rq->engine after free during i915_fence_release In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after retiring the fence and releasing its refererences, we assume that rq->engine can only be a real engine (that stay intact until the device is shutdown after all fences have been flushed). However, due to a quirk of preempt-to-busy, we may retire a request that still belongs to a virtual engine and so eventually free it with rq->engine being invalid. To avoid dereferencing that invalid engine, we look at the execution_mask which if it indicates it may be executed on more than one engine, we know it originated on a virtual engine and may still be on one. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1906 Fixes: 43acd6516ca9 ("drm/i915: Keep a per-engine request pool") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200521140617.30015-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index 526c1e9acbd5..c282719ad3ac 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -121,8 +121,39 @@ static void i915_fence_release(struct dma_fence *fence) i915_sw_fence_fini(&rq->submit); i915_sw_fence_fini(&rq->semaphore); - /* Keep one request on each engine for reserved use under mempressure */ - if (!cmpxchg(&rq->engine->request_pool, NULL, rq)) + /* + * Keep one request on each engine for reserved use under mempressure + * + * We do not hold a reference to the engine here and so have to be + * very careful in what rq->engine we poke. The virtual engine is + * referenced via the rq->context and we released that ref during + * i915_request_retire(), ergo we must not dereference a virtual + * engine here. Not that we would want to, as the only consumer of + * the reserved engine->request_pool is the power management parking, + * which must-not-fail, and that is only run on the physical engines. + * + * Since the request must have been executed to be have completed, + * we know that it will have been processed by the HW and will + * not be unsubmitted again, so rq->engine and rq->execution_mask + * at this point is stable. rq->execution_mask will be a single + * bit if the last and _only_ engine it could execution on was a + * physical engine, if it's multiple bits then it started on and + * could still be on a virtual engine. Thus if the mask is not a + * power-of-two we assume that rq->engine may still be a virtual + * engine and so a dangling invalid pointer that we cannot dereference + * + * For example, consider the flow of a bonded request through a virtual + * engine. The request is created with a wide engine mask (all engines + * that we might execute on). On processing the bond, the request mask + * is reduced to one or more engines. If the request is subsequently + * bound to a single engine, it will then be constrained to only + * execute on that engine and never returned to the virtual engine + * after timeslicing away, see __unwind_incomplete_requests(). Thus we + * know that if the rq->execution_mask is a single bit, rq->engine + * can be a physical engine with the exact corresponding mask. + */ + if (is_power_of_2(rq->execution_mask) && + !cmpxchg(&rq->engine->request_pool, NULL, rq)) return; kmem_cache_free(global.slab_requests, rq); -- cgit v1.2.3 From fc0e127022162653195788680973eefe72806595 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 12:20:51 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Improve execute_cb struct packing Reduce the irq_work llist for attaching the callbacks to the signal for both smaller structs (two fewer pointers!) and simpler [debug] code: Function old new delta irq_execute_cb 35 34 -1 __igt_breadcrumbs_smoketest 1684 1682 -2 i915_request_retire 2003 1996 -7 __i915_request_create 1047 1040 -7 __notify_execute_cb 135 126 -9 __i915_request_ctor 188 178 -10 __await_execution.part.constprop 451 440 -11 igt_wait_request 924 714 -210 One minor artifact is that the order of cb exection is reversed. No current use cases are affected by that change. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526112051.10229-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index c282719ad3ac..877eaaccba81 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ #include "intel_pm.h" struct execute_cb { - struct list_head link; struct irq_work work; struct i915_sw_fence *fence; void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *signal); @@ -189,14 +188,14 @@ static void irq_execute_cb_hook(struct irq_work *wrk) static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq) { - struct execute_cb *cb; + struct execute_cb *cb, *cn; lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock); - if (list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)) + if (llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)) return; - list_for_each_entry(cb, &rq->execute_cb, link) + llist_for_each_entry_safe(cb, cn, rq->execute_cb.first, work.llnode) irq_work_queue(&cb->work); /* @@ -209,7 +208,7 @@ static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq) * preempt-to-idle cycle on the target engine, all the while the * master execute_cb may refire. */ - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb); + init_llist_head(&rq->execute_cb); } static inline void @@ -327,7 +326,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq) set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags); __notify_execute_cb(rq); } - GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); + GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); remove_from_client(rq); @@ -357,6 +356,12 @@ void i915_request_retire_upto(struct i915_request *rq) } while (i915_request_retire(tmp) && tmp != rq); } +static void __llist_add(struct llist_node *node, struct llist_head *head) +{ + node->next = head->first; + head->first = node; +} + static int __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_request *signal, @@ -395,7 +400,7 @@ __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, i915_sw_fence_complete(cb->fence); kmem_cache_free(global.slab_execute_cbs, cb); } else { - list_add_tail(&cb->link, &signal->execute_cb); + __llist_add(&cb->work.llnode, &signal->execute_cb); } spin_unlock_irq(&signal->lock); @@ -704,7 +709,7 @@ static void __i915_request_ctor(void *arg) rq->file_priv = NULL; rq->capture_list = NULL; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->execute_cb); + init_llist_head(&rq->execute_cb); } struct i915_request * @@ -794,7 +799,7 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp) rq->batch = NULL; GEM_BUG_ON(rq->file_priv); GEM_BUG_ON(rq->capture_list); - GEM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); + GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)); /* * Reserve space in the ring buffer for all the commands required to diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h index 8ec7ee4dbadc..5d4709a3dace 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ struct i915_request { ktime_t emitted; } duration; }; - struct list_head execute_cb; + struct llist_head execute_cb; struct i915_sw_fence semaphore; /* -- cgit v1.2.3 From ffb0c600c240103f6f34e07892a7e0a75502b243 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:07:52 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Reorder await_execution before await_request Reorder the code so that we can reuse the await_execution from a special case in await_request in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 264 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index 877eaaccba81..e64d82f7c830 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -1058,37 +1058,91 @@ await_fence: I915_FENCE_GFP); } +static bool intel_timeline_sync_has_start(struct intel_timeline *tl, + struct dma_fence *fence) +{ + return __intel_timeline_sync_is_later(tl, + fence->context, + fence->seqno - 1); +} + +static int intel_timeline_sync_set_start(struct intel_timeline *tl, + const struct dma_fence *fence) +{ + return __intel_timeline_sync_set(tl, fence->context, fence->seqno - 1); +} + static int -i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from) +__i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *to, + struct i915_request *from, + void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, + struct dma_fence *signal)) { - int ret; + int err; - GEM_BUG_ON(to == from); - GEM_BUG_ON(to->timeline == from->timeline); + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_barrier(from->context)); - if (i915_request_completed(from)) { - i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(&to->submit, from->fence.error); + /* Submit both requests at the same time */ + err = __await_execution(to, from, hook, I915_FENCE_GFP); + if (err) + return err; + + /* Squash repeated depenendices to the same timelines */ + if (intel_timeline_sync_has_start(i915_request_timeline(to), + &from->fence)) return 0; + + /* + * Wait until the start of this request. + * + * The execution cb fires when we submit the request to HW. But in + * many cases this may be long before the request itself is ready to + * run (consider that we submit 2 requests for the same context, where + * the request of interest is behind an indefinite spinner). So we hook + * up to both to reduce our queues and keep the execution lag minimised + * in the worst case, though we hope that the await_start is elided. + */ + err = i915_request_await_start(to, from); + if (err < 0) + return err; + + /* + * Ensure both start together [after all semaphores in signal] + * + * Now that we are queued to the HW at roughly the same time (thanks + * to the execute cb) and are ready to run at roughly the same time + * (thanks to the await start), our signaler may still be indefinitely + * delayed by waiting on a semaphore from a remote engine. If our + * signaler depends on a semaphore, so indirectly do we, and we do not + * want to start our payload until our signaler also starts theirs. + * So we wait. + * + * However, there is also a second condition for which we need to wait + * for the precise start of the signaler. Consider that the signaler + * was submitted in a chain of requests following another context + * (with just an ordinary intra-engine fence dependency between the + * two). In this case the signaler is queued to HW, but not for + * immediate execution, and so we must wait until it reaches the + * active slot. + */ + if (intel_engine_has_semaphores(to->engine) && + !i915_request_has_initial_breadcrumb(to)) { + err = __emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, from->fence.seqno - 1); + if (err < 0) + return err; } + /* Couple the dependency tree for PI on this exposed to->fence */ if (to->engine->schedule) { - ret = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, + err = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, &from->sched, - I915_DEPENDENCY_EXTERNAL); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; + I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK); + if (err < 0) + return err; } - if (to->engine == from->engine) - ret = i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&to->submit, - &from->submit, - I915_FENCE_GFP); - else - ret = emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, I915_FENCE_GFP); - if (ret < 0) - return ret; - - return 0; + return intel_timeline_sync_set_start(i915_request_timeline(to), + &from->fence); } static void mark_external(struct i915_request *rq) @@ -1141,23 +1195,20 @@ i915_request_await_external(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence) } int -i915_request_await_dma_fence(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence) +i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, + struct dma_fence *fence, + void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, + struct dma_fence *signal)) { struct dma_fence **child = &fence; unsigned int nchild = 1; int ret; - /* - * Note that if the fence-array was created in signal-on-any mode, - * we should *not* decompose it into its individual fences. However, - * we don't currently store which mode the fence-array is operating - * in. Fortunately, the only user of signal-on-any is private to - * amdgpu and we should not see any incoming fence-array from - * sync-file being in signal-on-any mode. - */ if (dma_fence_is_array(fence)) { struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence); + /* XXX Error for signal-on-any fence arrays */ + child = array->fences; nchild = array->num_fences; GEM_BUG_ON(!nchild); @@ -1170,138 +1221,78 @@ i915_request_await_dma_fence(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence) continue; } - /* - * Requests on the same timeline are explicitly ordered, along - * with their dependencies, by i915_request_add() which ensures - * that requests are submitted in-order through each ring. - */ if (fence->context == rq->fence.context) continue; - /* Squash repeated waits to the same timelines */ - if (fence->context && - intel_timeline_sync_is_later(i915_request_timeline(rq), - fence)) - continue; + /* + * We don't squash repeated fence dependencies here as we + * want to run our callback in all cases. + */ if (dma_fence_is_i915(fence)) - ret = i915_request_await_request(rq, to_request(fence)); + ret = __i915_request_await_execution(rq, + to_request(fence), + hook); else ret = i915_request_await_external(rq, fence); if (ret < 0) return ret; - - /* Record the latest fence used against each timeline */ - if (fence->context) - intel_timeline_sync_set(i915_request_timeline(rq), - fence); } while (--nchild); return 0; } -static bool intel_timeline_sync_has_start(struct intel_timeline *tl, - struct dma_fence *fence) -{ - return __intel_timeline_sync_is_later(tl, - fence->context, - fence->seqno - 1); -} - -static int intel_timeline_sync_set_start(struct intel_timeline *tl, - const struct dma_fence *fence) -{ - return __intel_timeline_sync_set(tl, fence->context, fence->seqno - 1); -} - static int -__i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *to, - struct i915_request *from, - void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, - struct dma_fence *signal)) +i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from) { - int err; - - GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_barrier(from->context)); + int ret; - /* Submit both requests at the same time */ - err = __await_execution(to, from, hook, I915_FENCE_GFP); - if (err) - return err; + GEM_BUG_ON(to == from); + GEM_BUG_ON(to->timeline == from->timeline); - /* Squash repeated depenendices to the same timelines */ - if (intel_timeline_sync_has_start(i915_request_timeline(to), - &from->fence)) + if (i915_request_completed(from)) { + i915_sw_fence_set_error_once(&to->submit, from->fence.error); return 0; - - /* - * Wait until the start of this request. - * - * The execution cb fires when we submit the request to HW. But in - * many cases this may be long before the request itself is ready to - * run (consider that we submit 2 requests for the same context, where - * the request of interest is behind an indefinite spinner). So we hook - * up to both to reduce our queues and keep the execution lag minimised - * in the worst case, though we hope that the await_start is elided. - */ - err = i915_request_await_start(to, from); - if (err < 0) - return err; - - /* - * Ensure both start together [after all semaphores in signal] - * - * Now that we are queued to the HW at roughly the same time (thanks - * to the execute cb) and are ready to run at roughly the same time - * (thanks to the await start), our signaler may still be indefinitely - * delayed by waiting on a semaphore from a remote engine. If our - * signaler depends on a semaphore, so indirectly do we, and we do not - * want to start our payload until our signaler also starts theirs. - * So we wait. - * - * However, there is also a second condition for which we need to wait - * for the precise start of the signaler. Consider that the signaler - * was submitted in a chain of requests following another context - * (with just an ordinary intra-engine fence dependency between the - * two). In this case the signaler is queued to HW, but not for - * immediate execution, and so we must wait until it reaches the - * active slot. - */ - if (intel_engine_has_semaphores(to->engine) && - !i915_request_has_initial_breadcrumb(to)) { - err = __emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, from->fence.seqno - 1); - if (err < 0) - return err; } - /* Couple the dependency tree for PI on this exposed to->fence */ if (to->engine->schedule) { - err = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, + ret = i915_sched_node_add_dependency(&to->sched, &from->sched, - I915_DEPENDENCY_WEAK); - if (err < 0) - return err; + I915_DEPENDENCY_EXTERNAL); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; } - return intel_timeline_sync_set_start(i915_request_timeline(to), - &from->fence); + if (to->engine == READ_ONCE(from->engine)) + ret = i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&to->submit, + &from->submit, + I915_FENCE_GFP); + else + ret = emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, I915_FENCE_GFP); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + return 0; } int -i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, - struct dma_fence *fence, - void (*hook)(struct i915_request *rq, - struct dma_fence *signal)) +i915_request_await_dma_fence(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence) { struct dma_fence **child = &fence; unsigned int nchild = 1; int ret; + /* + * Note that if the fence-array was created in signal-on-any mode, + * we should *not* decompose it into its individual fences. However, + * we don't currently store which mode the fence-array is operating + * in. Fortunately, the only user of signal-on-any is private to + * amdgpu and we should not see any incoming fence-array from + * sync-file being in signal-on-any mode. + */ if (dma_fence_is_array(fence)) { struct dma_fence_array *array = to_dma_fence_array(fence); - /* XXX Error for signal-on-any fence arrays */ - child = array->fences; nchild = array->num_fences; GEM_BUG_ON(!nchild); @@ -1314,22 +1305,31 @@ i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, continue; } + /* + * Requests on the same timeline are explicitly ordered, along + * with their dependencies, by i915_request_add() which ensures + * that requests are submitted in-order through each ring. + */ if (fence->context == rq->fence.context) continue; - /* - * We don't squash repeated fence dependencies here as we - * want to run our callback in all cases. - */ + /* Squash repeated waits to the same timelines */ + if (fence->context && + intel_timeline_sync_is_later(i915_request_timeline(rq), + fence)) + continue; if (dma_fence_is_i915(fence)) - ret = __i915_request_await_execution(rq, - to_request(fence), - hook); + ret = i915_request_await_request(rq, to_request(fence)); else ret = i915_request_await_external(rq, fence); if (ret < 0) return ret; + + /* Record the latest fence used against each timeline */ + if (fence->context) + intel_timeline_sync_set(i915_request_timeline(rq), + fence); } while (--nchild); return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 511b6d9aed417739b6aa49d0b6b4354ad21020f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:07:53 +0100 Subject: drm/i915/gt: Do not schedule normal requests immediately along virtual When we push a virtual request onto the HW, we update the rq->engine to point to the physical engine. A request that is then submitted by the user that waits upon the virtual engine, but along the physical engine in use, will then see that it is due to be submitted to the same engine and take a shortcut (and be queued without waiting for the completion fence). However, the virtual request may be preempted (either by higher priority users, or by timeslicing) and removed from the physical engine to be migrated over to one of its siblings. The dependent normal request however is oblivious to the removal of the virtual request and remains queued to execute on HW, believing that once it reaches the head of its queue all of its predecessors will have completed executing! v2: Beware restriction of signal->execution_mask prior to submission. Fixes: 6d06779e8672 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/sliced Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: # v5.3+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200526090753.11329-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index e64d82f7c830..0d810a62ff46 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -1242,6 +1242,25 @@ i915_request_await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, return 0; } +static int +await_request_submit(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from) +{ + /* + * If we are waiting on a virtual engine, then it may be + * constrained to execute on a single engine *prior* to submission. + * When it is submitted, it will be first submitted to the virtual + * engine and then passed to the physical engine. We cannot allow + * the waiter to be submitted immediately to the physical engine + * as it may then bypass the virtual request. + */ + if (to->engine == READ_ONCE(from->engine)) + return i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&to->submit, + &from->submit, + I915_FENCE_GFP); + else + return __i915_request_await_execution(to, from, NULL); +} + static int i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from) { @@ -1263,10 +1282,8 @@ i915_request_await_request(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from) return ret; } - if (to->engine == READ_ONCE(from->engine)) - ret = i915_sw_fence_await_sw_fence_gfp(&to->submit, - &from->submit, - I915_FENCE_GFP); + if (is_power_of_2(to->execution_mask | READ_ONCE(from->execution_mask))) + ret = await_request_submit(to, from); else ret = emit_semaphore_wait(to, from, I915_FENCE_GFP); if (ret < 0) -- cgit v1.2.3 From 98b7067a17ba745fb6dac9669e26bae1960d283c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 09:58:08 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Add a few asserts around handling of i915_request_is_active() Let's assert that we only call the execute callbacks on making the request active, and that we do not execute the request without calling the callbacks. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529085809.23691-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index 0d810a62ff46..e5aba6824e26 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ static void __notify_execute_cb(struct i915_request *rq) lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock); + GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq)); if (llist_empty(&rq->execute_cb)) return; @@ -518,15 +519,15 @@ xfer: /* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */ if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &request->fence.flags)) { list_move_tail(&request->sched.link, &engine->active.requests); clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &request->fence.flags); + __notify_execute_cb(request); } + GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&request->execute_cb)); if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &request->fence.flags) && !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &request->fence.flags) && !i915_request_enable_breadcrumb(request)) intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine); - __notify_execute_cb(request); - spin_unlock(&request->lock); return result; -- cgit v1.2.3 From b55230e5e800868961fc271b26d9ce53ae1f691e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 15:39:26 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Check for awaits on still currently executing requests With the advent of preempt-to-busy, a request may still be on the GPU as we unwind. And in the case of a unpreemptible [due to HW] request, that request will remain indefinitely on the GPU even though we have returned it back to our submission queue, and cleared the active bit. We only run the execution callbacks on transferring the request from our submission queue to the execution queue, but if this is a bonded request that the HW is waiting for, we will not submit it (as we wait for a fresh execution) even though it is still being executed. As we know that there are always preemption points between requests, we know that only the currently executing request may be still active even though we have cleared the flag. However, we do not precisely know which request is in ELSP[0] due to a delay in processing events, and furthermore we only store the last request in a context in our state tracker. Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/bonded-dual Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529143926.3245-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index e5aba6824e26..c5d7220de529 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -363,6 +363,53 @@ static void __llist_add(struct llist_node *node, struct llist_head *head) head->first = node; } +static struct i915_request * const * +__engine_active(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) +{ + return READ_ONCE(engine->execlists.active); +} + +static bool __request_in_flight(const struct i915_request *signal) +{ + struct i915_request * const *port, *rq; + bool inflight = false; + + if (!i915_request_is_ready(signal)) + return false; + + /* + * Even if we have unwound the request, it may still be on + * the GPU (preempt-to-busy). If that request is inside an + * unpreemptible critical section, it will not be removed. Some + * GPU functions may even be stuck waiting for the paired request + * (__await_execution) to be submitted and cannot be preempted + * until the bond is executing. + * + * As we know that there are always preemption points between + * requests, we know that only the currently executing request + * may be still active even though we have cleared the flag. + * However, we can't rely on our tracking of ELSP[0] to known + * which request is currently active and so maybe stuck, as + * the tracking maybe an event behind. Instead assume that + * if the context is still inflight, then it is still active + * even if the active flag has been cleared. + */ + if (!intel_context_inflight(signal->context)) + return false; + + rcu_read_lock(); + for (port = __engine_active(signal->engine); (rq = *port); port++) { + if (rq->context == signal->context) { + inflight = i915_seqno_passed(rq->fence.seqno, + signal->fence.seqno); + break; + } + } + rcu_read_unlock(); + + return inflight; +} + static int __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, struct i915_request *signal, @@ -393,7 +440,7 @@ __await_execution(struct i915_request *rq, } spin_lock_irq(&signal->lock); - if (i915_request_is_active(signal)) { + if (i915_request_is_active(signal) || __request_in_flight(signal)) { if (hook) { hook(rq, &signal->fence); i915_request_put(signal); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 5a833995364141a3306e234500800277aea52334 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 23:09:53 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Drop i915_request.i915 backpointer We infrequently use the direct i915 backpointer from the i915_request, so do we really need to waste the space in the struct for it? 8 bytes from the most frequently allocated struct vs an 3 bytes and pointer chasing in using rq->engine->i915? Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Akeem G Abodunrin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200602220953.21178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 6 ++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_cs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_mocs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c | 9 ++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_timeline.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 12 ++++++------ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h | 3 --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 10 +++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c | 14 +++++++------- 17 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 219a36995b96..02a5c0ce39ca 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -1910,8 +1910,8 @@ static int i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets(struct i915_request *rq) u32 *cs; int i; - if (!IS_GEN(rq->i915, 7) || rq->engine->id != RCS0) { - drm_dbg(&rq->i915->drm, "sol reset is gen7/rcs only\n"); + if (!IS_GEN(rq->engine->i915, 7) || rq->engine->id != RCS0) { + drm_dbg(&rq->engine->i915->drm, "sol reset is gen7/rcs only\n"); return -EINVAL; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c index 8d2e85081247..3fb0dc1fb910 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen2_engine_cs.c @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int gen4_emit_flush_rcs(struct i915_request *rq, u32 mode) cmd = MI_FLUSH; if (mode & EMIT_INVALIDATE) { cmd |= MI_EXE_FLUSH; - if (IS_G4X(rq->i915) || IS_GEN(rq->i915, 5)) + if (IS_G4X(rq->engine->i915) || IS_GEN(rq->engine->i915, 5)) cmd |= MI_INVALIDATE_ISP; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c index 487299cb91f2..27ae48049239 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context_sseu.c @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_rpcs_config(struct i915_request *rq, *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4 | MI_USE_GGTT; *cs++ = lower_32_bits(offset); *cs++ = upper_32_bits(offset); - *cs++ = intel_sseu_make_rpcs(rq->i915, &sseu); + *cs++ = intel_sseu_make_rpcs(rq->engine->i915, &sseu); intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c index c8c14981eb5d..e37490d459c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c @@ -661,7 +661,6 @@ static int measure_breadcrumb_dw(struct intel_context *ce) if (!frame) return -ENOMEM; - frame->rq.i915 = engine->i915; frame->rq.engine = engine; frame->rq.context = ce; rcu_assign_pointer(frame->rq.timeline, ce->timeline); @@ -1192,8 +1191,7 @@ bool intel_engine_can_store_dword(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) } } -static int print_sched_attr(struct drm_i915_private *i915, - const struct i915_sched_attr *attr, +static int print_sched_attr(const struct i915_sched_attr *attr, char *buf, int x, int len) { if (attr->priority == I915_PRIORITY_INVALID) @@ -1213,7 +1211,7 @@ static void print_request(struct drm_printer *m, char buf[80] = ""; int x = 0; - x = print_sched_attr(rq->i915, &rq->sched.attr, buf, x, sizeof(buf)); + x = print_sched_attr(&rq->sched.attr, buf, x, sizeof(buf)); drm_printf(m, "%s %llx:%llx%s%s %s @ %dms: %s\n", prefix, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c index 6fc0966b75ff..aac8da18694f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c @@ -3533,7 +3533,7 @@ static int emit_pdps(struct i915_request *rq) int err, i; u32 *cs; - GEM_BUG_ON(intel_vgpu_active(rq->i915)); + GEM_BUG_ON(intel_vgpu_active(rq->engine->i915)); /* * Beware ye of the dragons, this sequence is magic! @@ -4512,11 +4512,11 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request, * On GEN9: before VF_CACHE_INVALIDATE we need to emit a NULL * pipe control. */ - if (IS_GEN(request->i915, 9)) + if (IS_GEN(request->engine->i915, 9)) vf_flush_wa = true; /* WaForGAMHang:kbl */ - if (IS_KBL_REVID(request->i915, 0, KBL_REVID_B0)) + if (IS_KBL_REVID(request->engine->i915, 0, KBL_REVID_B0)) dc_flush_wa = true; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c index d9c1701061b9..68a08486fc87 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring_submission.c @@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ static inline int mi_set_context(struct i915_request *rq, struct intel_context *ce, u32 flags) { - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rq->i915; struct intel_engine_cs *engine = rq->engine; + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915; enum intel_engine_id id; const int num_engines = IS_HASWELL(i915) ? RUNTIME_INFO(i915)->num_engines - 1 : 0; @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ static inline int mi_set_context(struct i915_request *rq, static int remap_l3_slice(struct i915_request *rq, int slice) { - u32 *cs, *remap_info = rq->i915->l3_parity.remap_info[slice]; + u32 *cs, *remap_info = rq->engine->i915->l3_parity.remap_info[slice]; int i; if (!remap_info) @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int switch_context(struct i915_request *rq) void **residuals = NULL; int ret; - GEM_BUG_ON(HAS_EXECLISTS(rq->i915)); + GEM_BUG_ON(HAS_EXECLISTS(engine->i915)); if (engine->wa_ctx.vma && ce != engine->kernel_context) { if (engine->wa_ctx.vma->private != ce) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c index 0731bbcef06c..30cd798b9664 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c @@ -1757,7 +1757,7 @@ wa_list_srm(struct i915_request *rq, const struct i915_wa_list *wal, struct i915_vma *vma) { - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rq->i915; + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = rq->engine->i915; unsigned int i, count = 0; const struct i915_wa *wa; u32 srm, *cs; @@ -1846,7 +1846,7 @@ static int engine_wa_list_verify(struct intel_context *ce, err = 0; for (i = 0, wa = wal->list; i < wal->count; i++, wa++) { - if (mcr_range(rq->i915, i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa->reg))) + if (mcr_range(rq->engine->i915, i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa->reg))) continue; if (!wa_verify(wa, results[i], wal->name, from)) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_cs.c index f88e445a1cae..729c3c7b11e2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engine_cs.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static int write_timestamp(struct i915_request *rq, int slot) return PTR_ERR(cs); cmd = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM | MI_USE_GGTT; - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 8) cmd++; *cs++ = cmd; *cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(RING_TIMESTAMP(rq->engine->mmio_base)); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_mocs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_mocs.c index 8831ffee2061..7bae64018ad9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_mocs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_mocs.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static int read_mocs_table(struct i915_request *rq, { u32 addr; - if (HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(rq->i915)) + if (HAS_GLOBAL_MOCS_REGISTERS(rq->engine->i915)) addr = global_mocs_offset(); else addr = mocs_offset(rq->engine); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c index 2dc460624bbc..3c8434846fa1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_rc6.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ static const u32 *__live_rc6_ctx(struct intel_context *ce) } cmd = MI_STORE_REGISTER_MEM | MI_USE_GGTT; - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 8) cmd++; *cs++ = cmd; @@ -197,10 +197,10 @@ int live_rc6_ctx_wa(void *arg) int pass; for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) { + struct i915_gpu_error *error = >->i915->gpu_error; struct intel_context *ce; unsigned int resets = - i915_reset_engine_count(>->i915->gpu_error, - engine); + i915_reset_engine_count(error, engine); const u32 *res; /* Use a sacrifical context */ @@ -230,8 +230,7 @@ int live_rc6_ctx_wa(void *arg) engine->name, READ_ONCE(*res)); if (resets != - i915_reset_engine_count(>->i915->gpu_error, - engine)) { + i915_reset_engine_count(error, engine)) { pr_err("%s: GPU reset required\n", engine->name); add_taint_for_CI(TAINT_WARN); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_timeline.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_timeline.c index ef1c35073dc0..b2aad7ef046a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_timeline.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_timeline.c @@ -426,12 +426,12 @@ static int emit_ggtt_store_dw(struct i915_request *rq, u32 addr, u32 value) if (IS_ERR(cs)) return PTR_ERR(cs); - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) { + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 8) { *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4 | MI_USE_GGTT; *cs++ = addr; *cs++ = 0; *cs++ = value; - } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 4) { + } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 4) { *cs++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4 | MI_USE_GGTT; *cs++ = 0; *cs++ = addr; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c index 3a9bd8e4d8db..1e4dd4544dcf 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int copy_workload_to_ring_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) u32 *cs; int err; - if (IS_GEN(req->i915, 9) && is_inhibit_context(req->context)) + if (IS_GEN(req->engine->i915, 9) && is_inhibit_context(req->context)) intel_vgpu_restore_inhibit_context(vgpu, req); /* @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static void update_guest_context(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) context_page_num = rq->engine->context_size; context_page_num = context_page_num >> PAGE_SHIFT; - if (IS_BROADWELL(rq->i915) && rq->engine->id == RCS0) + if (IS_BROADWELL(rq->engine->i915) && rq->engine->id == RCS0) context_page_num = 19; context_base = (void *) ctx->lrc_reg_state - diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index c5d7220de529..3bb7320249ae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ static struct i915_global_request { static const char *i915_fence_get_driver_name(struct dma_fence *fence) { - return dev_name(to_request(fence)->i915->drm.dev); + return dev_name(to_request(fence)->engine->i915->drm.dev); } static const char *i915_fence_get_timeline_name(struct dma_fence *fence) @@ -812,7 +812,6 @@ __i915_request_create(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp) } } - rq->i915 = ce->engine->i915; rq->context = ce; rq->engine = ce->engine; rq->ring = ce->ring; @@ -1011,12 +1010,12 @@ __emit_semaphore_wait(struct i915_request *to, struct i915_request *from, u32 seqno) { - const int has_token = INTEL_GEN(to->i915) >= 12; + const int has_token = INTEL_GEN(to->engine->i915) >= 12; u32 hwsp_offset; int len, err; u32 *cs; - GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(to->i915) < 8); + GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(to->engine->i915) < 8); GEM_BUG_ON(i915_request_has_initial_breadcrumb(to)); /* We need to pin the signaler's HWSP until we are finished reading. */ @@ -1211,7 +1210,7 @@ __i915_request_await_external(struct i915_request *rq, struct dma_fence *fence) { mark_external(rq); return i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence(&rq->submit, fence, - i915_fence_context_timeout(rq->i915, + i915_fence_context_timeout(rq->engine->i915, fence->context), I915_FENCE_GFP); } @@ -1782,7 +1781,8 @@ long i915_request_wait(struct i915_request *rq, * (bad for battery). */ if (flags & I915_WAIT_PRIORITY) { - if (!i915_request_started(rq) && INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 6) + if (!i915_request_started(rq) && + INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 6) intel_rps_boost(rq); } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h index 5d4709a3dace..118ab6650d1f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h @@ -162,9 +162,6 @@ struct i915_request { struct dma_fence fence; spinlock_t lock; - /** On Which ring this request was generated */ - struct drm_i915_private *i915; - /** * Context and ring buffer related to this request * Contexts are refcounted, so when this request is associated with a diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h index bc854ad60954..a4addcc64978 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h @@ -735,7 +735,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_queue, ), TP_fast_assign( - __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index; + __entry->dev = rq->engine->i915->drm.primary->index; __entry->class = rq->engine->uabi_class; __entry->instance = rq->engine->uabi_instance; __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context; @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(i915_request, ), TP_fast_assign( - __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index; + __entry->dev = rq->engine->i915->drm.primary->index; __entry->class = rq->engine->uabi_class; __entry->instance = rq->engine->uabi_instance; __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context; @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_in, ), TP_fast_assign( - __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index; + __entry->dev = rq->engine->i915->drm.primary->index; __entry->class = rq->engine->uabi_class; __entry->instance = rq->engine->uabi_instance; __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context; @@ -833,7 +833,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_out, ), TP_fast_assign( - __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index; + __entry->dev = rq->engine->i915->drm.primary->index; __entry->class = rq->engine->uabi_class; __entry->instance = rq->engine->uabi_instance; __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context; @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_request_wait_begin, * less desirable. */ TP_fast_assign( - __entry->dev = rq->i915->drm.primary->index; + __entry->dev = rq->engine->i915->drm.primary->index; __entry->class = rq->engine->uabi_class; __entry->instance = rq->engine->uabi_instance; __entry->ctx = rq->fence.context; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c index 8eb3108f1767..be54570c407c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_perf.c @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static int write_timestamp(struct i915_request *rq, int slot) return PTR_ERR(cs); len = 5; - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 8) len++; *cs++ = GFX_OP_PIPE_CONTROL(len); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c index e35ba5f9e73f..699bfe0328fb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/igt_spinner.c @@ -134,15 +134,15 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin, batch = spin->batch; - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) { + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 8) { *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4; *batch++ = lower_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq)); *batch++ = upper_32_bits(hws_address(hws, rq)); - } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 6) { + } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 6) { *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4; *batch++ = 0; *batch++ = hws_address(hws, rq); - } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 4) { + } else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 4) { *batch++ = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM_GEN4 | MI_USE_GGTT; *batch++ = 0; *batch++ = hws_address(hws, rq); @@ -154,11 +154,11 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin, *batch++ = arbitration_command; - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 8) + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 8) *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | BIT(8) | 1; - else if (IS_HASWELL(rq->i915)) + else if (IS_HASWELL(rq->engine->i915)) *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_PPGTT_HSW; - else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 6) + else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) >= 6) *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START; else *batch++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_START | MI_BATCH_GTT; @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ igt_spinner_create_request(struct igt_spinner *spin, } flags = 0; - if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) <= 5) + if (INTEL_GEN(rq->engine->i915) <= 5) flags |= I915_DISPATCH_SECURE; err = engine->emit_bb_start(rq, vma->node.start, PAGE_SIZE, flags); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 1d9221e9d395c8c80d99d002bea3c9b6dd192d6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:16:36 +0100 Subject: drm/i915: Skip signaling a signaled request Preempt-to-busy introduces various fascinating complications in that the requests may complete as we are unsubmitting them from HW. As they may then signal after unsubmission, we may find ourselves having to cleanup the signaling request from within the signaling callback. This causes us to recurse onto the same i915_request.lock. However, if the request is already signaled (as it will be before we enter the signal callbacks), we know we can skip the signaling of that request during submission, neatly evading the spinlock recursion. unsubmit(ve.rq0) # timeslice expiration or other preemption -> virtual_submit_request(ve.rq0) dma_fence_signal(ve.rq0) # request completed before preemption ack -> submit_notify(ve.rq1) -> virtual_submit_request(ve.rq1) # sees that we have completed ve.rq0 -> __i915_request_submit(ve.rq0) [ 264.210142] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#2, sample_multi_tr/2093 [ 264.210150] lock: 0xffff9efd6ac55080, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: sample_multi_tr/2093, .owner_cpu: 2 [ 264.210155] CPU: 2 PID: 2093 Comm: sample_multi_tr Tainted: G U [ 264.210158] Hardware name: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client Platform/CoffeeLake S UDIMM RVP, BIOS CNLSFWR1.R00.X212.B01.1909060036 09/06/2019 [ 264.210160] Call Trace: [ 264.210167] dump_stack+0x98/0xda [ 264.210174] spin_dump.cold+0x24/0x3c [ 264.210178] do_raw_spin_lock+0x9a/0xd0 [ 264.210184] _raw_spin_lock_nested+0x6a/0x70 [ 264.210314] __i915_request_submit+0x10a/0x3c0 [i915] [ 264.210415] virtual_submit_request+0x9b/0x380 [i915] [ 264.210516] submit_notify+0xaf/0x14c [i915] [ 264.210602] __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x8a/0x230 [i915] [ 264.210692] i915_sw_fence_complete+0x2d/0x40 [i915] [ 264.210762] __dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x19/0x30 [i915] [ 264.210767] dma_fence_signal_locked+0xb1/0x1c0 [ 264.210772] dma_fence_signal+0x29/0x50 [ 264.210871] i915_request_wait+0x5cb/0x830 [i915] [ 264.210876] ? dma_resv_get_fences_rcu+0x294/0x5d0 [ 264.210974] i915_gem_object_wait_fence+0x2f/0x40 [i915] [ 264.211084] i915_gem_object_wait+0xce/0x400 [i915] [ 264.211178] i915_gem_wait_ioctl+0xff/0x290 [i915] Fixes: 22b7a426bbe1 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy") References: 6d06779e8672 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Cc: "Nayana, Venkata Ramana" Cc: # v5.4+ Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200713141636.29326-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 7 ++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c index d907d538176e..91786310c114 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_breadcrumbs.c @@ -314,13 +314,18 @@ bool i915_request_enable_breadcrumb(struct i915_request *rq) { lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock); + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &rq->fence.flags)) + return true; + if (test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &rq->fence.flags)) { struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &rq->engine->breadcrumbs; struct intel_context *ce = rq->context; struct list_head *pos; spin_lock(&b->irq_lock); - GEM_BUG_ON(test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags)); + + if (test_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNAL, &rq->fence.flags)) + goto unlock; if (!__intel_breadcrumbs_arm_irq(b)) goto unlock; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c index 3bb7320249ae..0b2fe55e6194 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c @@ -560,22 +560,25 @@ bool __i915_request_submit(struct i915_request *request) engine->serial++; result = true; -xfer: /* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */ - spin_lock_nested(&request->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - +xfer: if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_ACTIVE, &request->fence.flags)) { list_move_tail(&request->sched.link, &engine->active.requests); clear_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_PQUEUE, &request->fence.flags); - __notify_execute_cb(request); } - GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&request->execute_cb)); - if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &request->fence.flags) && - !test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &request->fence.flags) && - !i915_request_enable_breadcrumb(request)) - intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine); + /* We may be recursing from the signal callback of another i915 fence */ + if (!i915_request_signaled(request)) { + spin_lock_nested(&request->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + + __notify_execute_cb(request); + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, + &request->fence.flags) && + !i915_request_enable_breadcrumb(request)) + intel_engine_signal_breadcrumbs(engine); - spin_unlock(&request->lock); + spin_unlock(&request->lock); + GEM_BUG_ON(!llist_empty(&request->execute_cb)); + } return result; } -- cgit v1.2.3