1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
|
/* strlen -- Compute length og NUL terminated string.
Highly optimized version for ix86, x>=5.
Copyright (C) 1995, 1996 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This file is part of the GNU C Library.
Contributed by Ulrich Drepper, <drepper@gnu.ai.mit.edu>.
The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as
published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the
License, or (at your option) any later version.
The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
Library General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public
License along with the GNU C Library; see the file COPYING.LIB. If
not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
#include <sysdep.h>
/* This version is especially optimized for the i586 (and following?)
processors. This is mainly done by using the two pipelines. The
version optimized for i486 is weak in this aspect because to get
as much parallelism we have to executs some *more* instructions.
The code below is structured to reflect the pairing of the instructions
as *I think* it is. I have no processor data book to verify this.
If you find something you think is incorrect let me know. */
/* The magic value which is used throughout in the whole code. */
#define magic 0xfefefeff
/*
INPUT PARAMETERS:
str (sp + 4)
*/
.text
ENTRY(strlen)
movl 4(%esp), %eax /* get string pointer */
movl %eax, %ecx /* duplicate it */
andl $3, %ecx /* mask alignment bits */
jz L11 /* aligned => start loop */
cmpb %ch, (%eax) /* is byte NUL? */
je L2 /* yes => return */
incl %eax /* increment pointer */
cmpl $3, %ecx /* was alignment = 3? */
je L11 /* yes => now it is aligned and start loop */
cmpb %ch, (%eax) /* is byte NUL? */
je L2 /* yes => return */
incl %eax /* increment pointer */
cmpl $2, %ecx /* was alignment = 2? */
je L11 /* yes => now it is aligned and start loop */
cmpb %ch, (%eax) /* is byte NUL? */
je L2 /* yes => return */
incl %eax /* increment pointer */
/* We exit the loop if adding MAGIC_BITS to LONGWORD fails to
change any of the hole bits of LONGWORD.
1) Is this safe? Will it catch all the zero bytes?
Suppose there is a byte with all zeros. Any carry bits
propagating from its left will fall into the hole at its
least significant bit and stop. Since there will be no
carry from its most significant bit, the LSB of the
byte to the left will be unchanged, and the zero will be
detected.
2) Is this worthwhile? Will it ignore everything except
zero bytes? Suppose every byte of LONGWORD has a bit set
somewhere. There will be a carry into bit 8. If bit 8
is set, this will carry into bit 16. If bit 8 is clear,
one of bits 9-15 must be set, so there will be a carry
into bit 16. Similarly, there will be a carry into bit
24. If one of bits 24-31 is set, there will be a carry
into bit 32 (=carry flag), so all of the hole bits will
be changed. */
L11: xorl %edx, %edx /* We need %edx == 0 for later */
L1:
movl (%eax), %ecx /* get word (= 4 bytes) in question */
addl $4, %eax /* adjust pointer for *next* word */
subl %ecx, %edx /* first step to negate word */
addl $magic, %ecx /* add magic word */
decl %edx /* complete negation of word */
jnc L3 /* previous addl caused overflow? */
xorl %ecx, %edx /* (word+magic)^word */
andl $~magic, %edx /* any of the carry flags set? */
jne L3 /* yes => determine byte */
movl (%eax), %ecx /* get word (= 4 bytes) in question */
addl $4, %eax /* adjust pointer for *next* word */
subl %ecx, %edx /* first step to negate word */
addl $magic, %ecx /* add magic word */
decl %edx /* complete negation of word */
jnc L3 /* previous addl caused overflow? */
xorl %ecx, %edx /* (word+magic)^word */
andl $~magic, %edx /* any of the carry flags set? */
jne L3 /* yes => determine byte */
movl (%eax), %ecx /* get word (= 4 bytes) in question */
addl $4, %eax /* adjust pointer for *next* word */
subl %ecx, %edx /* first step to negate word */
addl $magic, %ecx /* add magic word */
decl %edx /* complete negation of word */
jnc L3 /* previous addl caused overflow? */
xorl %ecx, %edx /* (word+magic)^word */
andl $~magic, %edx /* any of the carry flags set? */
jne L3 /* yes => determine byte */
movl (%eax), %ecx /* get word (= 4 bytes) in question */
addl $4, %eax /* adjust pointer for *next* word */
subl %ecx, %edx /* first step to negate word */
addl $magic, %ecx /* add magic word */
decl %edx /* complete negation of word */
jnc L3 /* previous addl caused overflow? */
xorl %ecx, %edx /* (word+magic)^word */
andl $~magic, %edx /* any of the carry flags set? */
je L1 /* no => start loop again */
L3: subl $4, %eax /* correct too early pointer increment */
subl $magic, %ecx
cmpb $0, %cl /* lowest byte NUL? */
jz L2 /* yes => return */
inc %eax /* increment pointer */
testb %ch, %ch /* second byte NUL? */
jz L2 /* yes => return */
shrl $16, %ecx /* make upper bytes accessible */
incl %eax /* increment pointer */
cmpb $0, %cl /* is third byte NUL? */
jz L2 /* yes => return */
incl %eax /* increment pointer */
L2: subl 4(%esp), %eax /* now compute the length as difference
between start and terminating NUL
character */
ret
|
