From e186536b6fa8ceb004dfa1ba45766edcc871a95b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Metcalf Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 13:27:09 -0500 Subject: test-fpucw-ieee: Don't use _FPU_IEEE if not defined Not all architectures define this value, and if they don't, just let the test run the same as test-fpucw, with __fpu_control set to _FPU_DEFAULT explicitly. --- ChangeLog | 5 +++++ math/test-fpucw-ieee.c | 7 +++++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 4042e3b017..b0ca6f7303 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-11-18 Chris Metcalf + + * math/test-fpucw-ieee.c [!defined _FPU_IEEE] (FPU_CONTROL): + Omit definition of FPU_CONTROL and use default if no _FPU_IEEE. + 2013-11-18 Paul Pluzhnikov * elf/Makefile (tst-auxv): New test. diff --git a/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c b/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c index ae5fc73f6e..7596486252 100644 --- a/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c +++ b/math/test-fpucw-ieee.c @@ -16,9 +16,12 @@ License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see . */ -#define FPU_CONTROL _FPU_IEEE +#ifdef _FPU_IEEE +/* Some architectures don't have _FPU_IEEE. */ +# define FPU_CONTROL _FPU_IEEE +#endif #include "test-fpucw.c" /* Preempt the library's definition of `__fpu_control'. */ -fpu_control_t __fpu_control = _FPU_IEEE; +fpu_control_t __fpu_control = FPU_CONTROL; -- cgit v1.2.3